Urology Market Analysis, Size, Trends - Brazil - 2020-2026 - MedSuite (Includes 6 Reports)
BPH is prevalent among men over the age of 50 years. Prevalence increases with age, reachingfigures of 85% to 90% for men above the age of 80. Brazil is aging at record highs. By 2050, Brazilwill have around 66 million people above the age 60 living in its territory, or three times more than the 24 million today
The full report suite on the Brazilian market for urological devices includes urinary incontinence devices, pelvic organ prolapse repair (POP) devices, stone management devices, benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) treatment devices and erectile dysfunction devices.
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- BRAZIL UROLOGICAL DEVICE MARKET OVERVIEW
- COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
- MARKET TRENDS
- MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
- PROCEDURE NUMBERS
- MARKETS INCLUDED
- VERSION HISTORY
- RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
- Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
- Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
- Step 4: Performing Primary Research
- Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
- Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
- Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
- Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
- Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
- DISEASE OVERVIEW
- 2.1 BASIC ANATOMY
- 2.1.1 Urinary System
- 2.1.1.1 Male Urinary System
- 2.1.1.2 Female Urinary System
- 2.2 DISEASE TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSTICS
- 2.2.1 Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
- 2.2.2 Urinary Incontinence
- 2.2.3 Urinary Tract Infections
- 2.2.4 Kidney Stones
- 2.2.5 Bladder Prolapse
- 2.2.6 Overactive Bladder
- 2.2.7 Prostatitis
- 2.2.8 Erectile Dysfunction
- 2.2.9 Cancer
- 2.2.9.1 Prostate Cancer
- 2.2.9.2 Bladder Cancer
- 2.2.10 Indications for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
- PRODUCT ASSESSMENT
- 3.1 INTRODUCTION
- 3.2 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS
- 3.2.1 Urinary Incontinence
- 3.2.1.1 Urinary Catheters
- 3.2.1.1.1 Intermittent Catheters
- 3.2.1.1.2 Foley Catheters
- 3.2.1.1.3 Male External Catheters
- 3.2.1.2 Urethral Bulking Agents
- 3.2.1.3 Incontinence Management Devices
- 3.2.1.3.1 Female Incontinence Slings
- 3.2.1.3.2 Male Implantable Devices
- 3.2.1.4 Urine Bags
- 3.2.1.4.1 Leg Bags
- 3.2.1.4.2 Night Bags
- 3.2.2 Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
- 3.2.2.1 Autologous Tissue as an Alternative to Vaginal Mesh
- 3.2.2.2 Product Matrix for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
- 3.2.3 Stone Management
- 3.2.3.1 ESWL Equipment
- 3.2.3.2 ISWL Equipment
- 3.2.3.3 Holmium Lasers
- 3.2.3.4 Stone Fragment Retrieval Devices
- 3.2.3.5 Ureteral Stents
- 3.2.4 BPH Treatment
- 3.2.4.1 TURP
- 3.2.4.2 TUMT
- 3.2.4.3 TUNA
- 3.2.4.4 Prostatic Stents
- 3.2.4.5 Laser BPH
- 3.2.4.5.1 Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate (PVP)
- 3.2.4.5.2 Laser Vaporization of the Prostate
- 3.2.4.5.3 Laser Ablation of the Prostate
- 3.2.4.5.4 Laser Resection of the Prostate
- 3.2.4.5.5 Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
- 3.2.5 Erectile Dysfunction
- 3.2.5.1 Penile Implants
- 3.2.5.1.1 Inflatable
- 3.2.5.1.2 Malleable
- 3.2.5.2 Vacuum
- 3.3 REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS
- 3.3.1 Boston Scientific
- 3.3.1.1 Stone Management
- 3.3.1.2 Nephrostomy
- 3.3.2 C. R. Bard (Becton Dickinson)
- 3.3.2.1 Urinary Incontinence
- 3.3.2.2 Stone Management
- 3.3.2.3 Urological Endoscopes
- 3.3.2.4 Prostate Cancer Treatment
- 3.3.2.5 Nephrostomy
- 3.3.3 Coloplast
- 3.3.3.1 Urinary Catheter
- 3.3.3.2 Erectile Dysfunction
- 3.3.4 Cook Medical
- 3.3.4.1 Stone Management
- 3.3.4.2 Nephrostomy
- 3.3.5 Elekta
- 3.3.5.1 Prostate Cancer Treatment
- 3.3.6 Karl Storz
- 3.3.6.1 Urological Endoscopes
- 3.3.7 Olympus
- 3.3.7.1 Urological Endoscopes
- 3.4 CLINICAL TRIALS
- 3.4.1 Boston Scientific
- 3.4.1.1 Urinary Incontinence
- 3.4.1.2 BPH Treatment
- 3.4.1.3 Urological endoscopes
- 3.4.1.4 Nephrostomy
- 3.4.1.5 Erectile Dysfunction
- 3.4.2 C. R. Bard (Becton Dickinson)
- 3.4.2.1 Urinary Incontinence
- 3.4.2.2 Prostate Cancer Treatment
- 3.4.3 Coloplast
- 3.4.3.1 Urinary Incontinence
- 3.4.4 Cook Medical
- 3.4.4.1 Nephrostomy
- 3.4.5 Elekta
- 3.4.5.1 Prostate Cancer Treatment
- 3.4.6 Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson)
- 3.4.6.1 Urinary Incontinence
- 3.4.7 Karl Storz
- 3.4.7.1 Stone Management
- 3.4.7.2 Urological Endoscopes
- 3.4.8 Laborie
- 3.4.8.1 Urodynamics
- 3.4.9 Medline
- 3.4.9.1 Urinary Incontinence
- 3.4.10 Olympus
- 3.4.10.1 Stone Management
- 3.4.10.2 BPH Treatment
- 3.4.10.3 Urological Endoscopes
- BRAZIL UROLOGICAL DEVICE MARKET OVERVIEW
- 4.1 INTRODUCTION
- 4.2 CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE
- 4.3 MARKET OVERVIEW
- 4.4 TREND ANALYSIS BY SEGMENT
- 4.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
- 4.5.1 Market Drivers
- 4.5.2 Market Limiters
- 4.6 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
- 4.7 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
- 4.8 COMPANY PROFILES
- 4.8.1 Boston Scientific
- 4.8.2 C. R. Bard (Becton Dickinson)
- 4.8.3 Coloplast
- 4.8.4 Cook Medical
- 4.8.5 Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson)
- 4.8.6 Karl Storz
- 4.8.7 Laborie
- 4.8.8 Olympus
- 4.9 SWOT ANALYSIS
- 4.9.1 Boston Scientific
- 4.9.2 C. R. Bard (Becton Dickinson)
- 4.9.3 Coloplast
- 4.9.4 Cook Medical
- 4.9.5 Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson)
- 4.9.6 Karl Storz
- 4.9.7 Laborie
- 4.9.8 Olympus
- PROCEDURE NUMBERS
- 5.1 PROCEDURE OVERVIEW
- 5.2 URINARY INCONTINENCE PROCEDURES
- 5.2.1 Male Incontinence Management Procedures
- 5.2.2 Female Incontinence Management Procedures
- 5.3 PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE REPAIR PROCEDURES
- 5.4 STONE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES
- 5.4.1 ESWL Procedures
- 5.4.2 Transurethral Procedures
- 5.4.3 Ureteral Stent Placement Procedures
- 5.4.4 PCNL Procedures
- 5.5 BPH PROCEDURES
- 5.6 ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES
- URINARY INCONTINENCE MANAGEMENT DEVICE MARKET
- 6.1 INTRODUCTION
- 6.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
- 6.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
- 6.3.1 Total Urinary Catheter Market
- 6.3.1.1 Intermittent Catheter Market
- 6.3.1.2 Foley Catheter Market
- 6.3.1.3 Male External Catheter Market
- 6.3.2 Total Urethral Bulking Agent Market
- 6.3.2.1 Male Urethral Bulking Agent Market
- 6.3.2.2 Female Urethral Bulking Agent Market
- 6.3.3 Total Incontinence Management Device Market
- 6.3.3.1 Total Male Implantable Incontinence Device Market
- 6.3.3.1.1 Male Incontinence Sling Market
- 6.3.3.1.2 Male Artificial Urinary Sphincter Market
- 6.3.3.2 Total Female Incontinence Sling Market
- 6.3.3.2.1 Transvaginal Tape Female Incontinence Sling Market
- 6.3.3.2.2 Transobturator Female Incontinence Sling Market
- 6.3.3.2.3 Single-Incision Female Incontinence Sling Market
- 6.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
- 6.4.1 Market Drivers
- 6.4.2 Market Limiters
- 6.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
- PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE REPAIR DEVICE MARKET
- 7.1 INTRODUCTION
- 7.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
- 7.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
- 7.3.1 Total Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Device Market
- 7.3.2 Transvaginal Mesh Market
- 7.3.3 Sacrocolpopexy Mesh Market
- 7.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
- 7.4.1 Market Drivers
- 7.4.2 Market Limiters
- 7.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
- STONE MANAGEMENT DEVICE MARKET
- 8.1 INTRODUCTION
- 8.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
- 8.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
- 8.3.1 ESWL Equipment Market
- 8.3.2 ISWL Equipment Market
- 8.3.3 Total Holmium Laser Market
- 8.3.3.1 Holmium Laser Equipment Market
- 8.3.3.2 Holmium Laser Fiber Market
- 8.3.4 Total Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market
- 8.3.4.1 Nitinol Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market
- 8.3.4.2 Stainless Steel Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market
- 8.3.5 Ureteral Stent Market
- 8.3.6 Ureteral Guidewire Market
- 8.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
- 8.4.1 Market Drivers
- 8.4.2 Market Limiters
- 8.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
- BPH TREATMENT DEVICE MARKET
- 9.1 INTRODUCTION
- 9.1.1 Treatments
- 9.1.1.1 TURP
- 9.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Treatments
- 9.1.1.3 Laser BPH Treatments
- 9.1.2 Comparison of TURP and Laser BPH Procedures
- 9.1.3 Emerging Technologies
- 9.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
- 9.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
- 9.3.1 Total TURP Market
- 9.3.1.1 Monopolar Electrode Market
- 9.3.1.2 Bipolar Electrode Market
- 9.3.2 Total Laser BPH Market
- 9.3.2.1 Laser BPH Equipment Market
- 9.3.2.2 Laser BPH Fiber Market
- 9.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
- 9.4.1 Market Limiters
- 9.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
- ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION DEVICE MARKET
- 10.1 INTRODUCTION
- 10.1.1 Low Testosterone Pharmaceutical Delivery
- 10.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
- 10.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
- 10.3.1 Inflatable Erectile Dysfunction Device Market
- 10.3.2 Malleable Erectile Dysfunction Device Market
- 10.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
- 10.4.1 Market Drivers
- 10.4.2 Market Limiters
- 10.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
- ABBREVIATIONS
- List of Charts
- Chart 1 1: Urological Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 3
- Chart 1 2: Urological Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2019 & 2026 3
- Chart 4 1: Urological Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 131
- Chart 4 2: Urological Device Market Breakdown, Brazil, 2019 132
- Chart 4 3: Urological Device Market Breakdown, Brazil, 2026 133
- Chart 4 4: Growth Rates by Segment, Urological Device Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 137
- Chart 4 5: Leading Competitors, Urological Device Market, Brazil, 2019 147
- Chart 5 1: Urological Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 176
- Chart 5 2: Urological Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2019 177
- Chart 5 3: Urological Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2026 178
- Chart 5 4: Urinary Incontinence Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 180
- Chart 5 5: Male Incontinence Management Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2015 – 2025 183
- Chart 5 6: Female Incontinence Management Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 186
- Chart 5 7: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 188
- Chart 5 8: Stone Management Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 190
- Chart 5 9: ESWL Procedures, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 192
- Chart 5 10: Transurethral Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 194
- Chart 5 11: Ureteral Stent Placement Procedures, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 196
- Chart 5 12: PCNL Procedures, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 198
- Chart 5 13: BPH Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 200
- Chart 5 14: Erectile Dysfunction Management Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 203
- Chart 6 1: Urinary Incontinence Management Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 208
- Chart 6 2: Urinary Incontinence Management Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2019 209
- Chart 6 3: Urinary Incontinence Management Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2026 210
- Chart 6 4: Urinary Catheter Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 213
- Chart 6 5: Intermittent Catheter Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 215
- Chart 6 6: Foley Catheter Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 217
- Chart 6 7: Male External Catheter Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 219
- Chart 6 8: Urethral Bulking Agent Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 223
- Chart 6 9: Male Urethral Bulking Agent Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 225
- Chart 6 10: Female Urethral Bulking Agent Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 227
- Chart 6 11: Incontinence Management Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 230
- Chart 6 12: Male Implantable Incontinence Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2016 – 2026 233
- Chart 6 13: Total Male Implantable Incontinence Device Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 235
- Chart 6 14: Male Incontinence Sling Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 237
- Chart 6 15: Male Artificial Urinary Sphincter Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 239
- Chart 6 16: Female Incontinence Sling Market by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 242
- Chart 6 17: Total Female Incontinence Sling Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 244
- Chart 6 18: Transvaginal Tape Female Incontinence Sling Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 246
- Chart 6 19: Transobturator Female Incontinence Sling Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 248
- Chart 6 20: Single-Incision Female Incontinence Sling Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 250
- Chart 6 21: Leading Competitors, Urinary Incontinence Management Device Market, Brazil, 2019 259
- Chart 7 1: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2013 – 2023 264
- Chart 7 2: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Device Market Breakdown, Brazil, 2019 265
- Chart 7 3: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Device Market Breakdown, Brazil, 2026 266
- Chart 7 4: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Device Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 269
- Chart 7 5: Transvaginal Mesh Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 272
- Chart 7 6: Sacrocolpopexy Mesh Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 274
- Chart 7 7: Leading Competitors, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Market, Brazil, 2019 280
- Chart 8 1: Stone Management Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 286
- Chart 8 2: Stone Management Device Market Breakdown, Brazil, 2019 287
- Chart 8 3: Stone Management Device Market Breakdown, Brazil, 2026 288
- Chart 8 4: ESWL Equipment Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 291
- Chart 8 5: ISWL Equipment Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 294
- Chart 8 6: Holmium Laser Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 297
- Chart 8 7: Holmium Laser Equipment Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 299
- Chart 8 8: Holmium Laser Fiber Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 302
- Chart 8 9: Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 306
- Chart 8 10: Total Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 308
- Chart 8 11: Nitinol Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 310
- Chart 8 12: Stainless Steel Stone Fragment Retrieval Device Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 312
- Chart 8 13: Ureteral Stent Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 315
- Chart 8 14: Ureteral Guidewire Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 318
- Chart 8 15: Leading Competitors, Stone Management Device Market, Brazil, 2019 328
- Chart 9 1: BPH Treatment Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 336
- Chart 9 2: BPH Treatment Device Market Breakdown, Brazil, 2019 337
- Chart 9 3: BPH Treatment Device Market Breakdown, Brazil, 2026 338
- Chart 9 4: TURP Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 341
- Chart 9 5: Monopolar Electrode Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 343
- Chart 9 6: Bipolar Electrode Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 345
- Chart 9 7: Laser BPH Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 348
- Chart 9 8: Laser BPH Equipment Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 350
- Chart 9 9: Laser BPH Fiber Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 352
- Chart 9 10: Leading Competitors, BPH Treatment Market, Brazil, 2019 361
- Chart 10 1: Erectile Dysfunction Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 367
- Chart 10 2: Erectile Dysfunction Device Market Breakdown, Brazil, 2019 368
- Chart 10 3: Erectile Dysfunction Device Market Breakdown, Brazil, 2026 369
- Chart 10 4: Inflatable Erectile Dysfunction Device Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 372
- Chart 10 5: Malleable Erectile Dysfunction Device Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 374
- Chart 10 6: Leading Competitors, Erectile Dysfunction Device Market, Brazil, 2019 381
- List of Figures
- Figure 1 1: Urological Device Market Share Ranking by Segment, Brazil, 2019 4
- Figure 1 2: Companies Researched in this Report, Brazil 5
- Figure 1 3: Factors Impacting the Urological Device Market by Segment, Brazil 6
- Figure 1 4: Recent Events in the Urological Device Market, 2018 – 2019 7
- Figure 1 5: Urological Procedures Covered, Brazil 8
- Figure 1 6: Urological Device Markets Covered, Brazil (1 of 2) 9
- Figure 1 7: Urological Device Markets Covered, Brazil (2 of 2) 10
- Figure 1 8: Version History 10
- Figure 3 1: Urinary Incontinence Treatments by Company (1 of 3) 54
- Figure 3 2: Urinary Incontinence Treatments by Company (2 of 3) 55
- Figure 3 3: Urinary Incontinence Treatments by Company (3 of 3) 56
- Figure 3 4: Stone Management Devices by Company (1 of 3) 63
- Figure 3 5: Stone Management Devices by Company (2 of 3) 64
- Figure 3 6: Stone Management Devices by Company (3 of 3) 65
- Figure 3 7: BPH Treatments by Company 74
- Figure 3 8: Erectile Dysfunction Devices by Company 77
- Figure 3 9: Class 2 Device Recall Auriga Laser System 78
- Figure 3 10: Class 2 Device Recall Fiber Strippers and Cleavers 79
- Figure 3 11: Class 2 Device Recall StarMedTec LightTrail Reusable Fibers 80
- Figure 3 12: Class 2 Device Recall Malecot Catheter Set 80
- Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Encore(TM) 26 Inflation Device 80
- Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Bardex Lubricath 3Way 75cc Continuous Irrigation Foley Catheter 81
- Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Intermittent Catheters 81
- Figure 3 16: Class 2 Device Recall leg bag 81
- Figure 3 17: Class 2 Device Recall SURESTEP 82
- Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall PureWick External Catheter 82
- Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall SURESTEP Tray, BARDEX I.C. COMPLETE CARE, Urine Meter, Temperature STATLOCK Stabilization Device 82
- Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall BARD Irrigation Syringe, Rx Only, Sterile 83
- Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Magic3 83
- Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Optionvm Urinary Catheter. Male use only. Latex Free. Sterile, Rx only. 83
- Figure 3 23: Class 3 Device Recall SureStep Tray, with AddaFoley 84
- Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall BARDEX 84
- Figure 3 25: Class 3 Device Recall BARD Toomey Irrigation Syringe 70cc 84
- Figure 3 26: Class 3 Device Recall Antibacterial Hydro Personal Catheter 84
- Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall Magic3 Intermittent Catheter with Sure Grip Hydrophilic Coated Silicone Coude tip 85
- Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall Magic3 Hydrophiliccoated Female Intermittent Catheter 85
- Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Bard 100 LatexFree Urinary Drainage Bag with AntiReflux Chamber and Bard EXLok Sampling 85
- Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall Bard Dimension Stone Basket 86
- Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall CMax 86
- Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall Bard BrachySource Seed Implants 86
- Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall I125 CE Marked QuickLink Cartridges 87
- Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall Bard 87
- Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall XForce Nephrostomy Balloon Dilation Catheter Kit with Inflation Device 88
- Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall SelfCath Pediatric Catheter 89
- Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall Coloplast Conveen Urine Collection Leg Bag 89
- Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall Genesis Malleable Penile Prosthesis 89
- Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall StoneBreaker 90
- Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall OptiLite MultiUse Holmium Laser Fibers 90
- Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall Cook MultiUse Holmium Laser Fibers 91
- Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Cook Bush 91
- Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Aprima Access Nonvascular Introducer Set 91
- Figure 3 44: Class 2 Device Recall Ascend AQ 92
- Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall Oncentra Brachy 4.5 93
- Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Oncentra External Beam Treatment Planning Software 93
- Figure 3 47: Class 2 Device Recall Oncentra External Beam Treatment Planning Software 93
- Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall Oncentra Brachy treatment planning system 93
- Figure 3 49: Class 2 Device Recall STORZ High Flow Insufflation Tubing (with filter) 94
- Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall Image1 SPIES XLINK Camera Control Unit (CCU) 94
- Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Ureteroreno Videoscope & Fiberscope 95
- Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall A20975A: Working insert, with ramp, one way; A20976A: Bridge, one way; A20977A; Bridge, two way 95
- Figure 3 53: Class 2 Device Recall Olympus High Frequency Resection Electrodes 95
- Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Ureteroreno videoscope URFV2 and URFV2R 96
- Figure 3 55: Class 2 Device Recall HF Cable WA00014A 96
- Figure 3 56: Post Market Study Of Single Incision Sling Versus Transobturator Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence (Solyx) 97
- Figure 3 57: Mid-Urethral Sling Tensioning Trial (MUST) 97
- Figure 3 58: Prospective Registry for Patients Undergoing Surgery for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence 98
- Figure 3 59: Stop or Ongoing Oral Anticoagulation in Patients Undergoing Pvp (SOAP) (SOAP) 98
- Figure 3 60: LithoVue Single Use Disposable Ureteroscope 99
- Figure 3 61: Comparing Treatment of Urolithiasis Between Disposable and Reusable Ureteroscope 99
- Figure 3 62: Indwelling Stent Discoloration Project 100
- Figure 3 63: Reduction of Stent Associated Morbidity by Minimizing Stent Material. 100
- Figure 3 64: PROPPER Prospective Registry of Outcomes With Penile Prosthesis (PROPPER) 101
- Figure 3 65: Patient Satisfaction During Outpatient Versus Inpatient Foley Catheter Induction of Labor 102
- Figure 3 66: Foley Catheter vs a Self-contained Valved Urinary Catheter 102
- Figure 3 67: Bladder Morphology Using 2 Different Catheter Designs 103
- Figure 3 68: Outpatient Labor Induction With the Transcervical Foley Balloon 103
- Figure 3 69: Medical and Economic Evaluation for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer (GETUGP05) 104
- Figure 3 70: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Transperineal Targeted Biopsy Compared to Standard Transrectal Biopsy 104
- Figure 3 71: Product Evaluation of a Newly Developed Intermittent Catheter. 105
- Figure 3 72: Clinical Study Investigating Safety and Performance of a New Urinary Intermittent Catheter in Healthy Volunteers 105
- Figure 3 73: Clinical Study Investigating Safety and Performance of a New Urinary Intermittent Catheters in Healthy Volunteers 105
- Figure 3 74: Virtue® European Study 106
- Figure 3 75: Exploratory Study Investigating Urodynamic Parameters During Catheterisation 106
- Figure 3 76: Altis® 522 Trial - Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence 106
- Figure 3 77: The European Study of Altis Single Incision Sling System for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence (EASY) 107
- Figure 3 78: Do Hydrophilic Catheters Decrease Pain and Discomfort of a Patient During Urodynamic Study (HYDRUDS) 107
- Figure 3 79: Efficacy Study of Antimicrobial Catheters to Avoid Urinary Infections in Spinal Cord Injured Patients (ESCALE) 107
- Figure 3 80: Ureteral Stent Study 108
- Figure 3 81: Impact Ureteral Sheath Design During Ureteroscopy 108
- Figure 3 82: Optimization of Ureterolysis During Hysterectomy 109
- Figure 3 83: Suctioning Flexible Ureteroscopy With Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure 109
- Figure 3 84: Evaluation Of Transperineal Ultrasound For Image Guidance In The Treatment Of Prostate Cancer in Men Following Prostatectomy 110
- Figure 3 85: Use of Non-invasive 4D Ultrasound Clarity System in Prostate IMRT/RapidArc Therapy 110
- Figure 3 86: Single Fraction Real-time High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in Patients With Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer (SINFRA_PROST) 111
- Figure 3 87: Dose Escalation to Dominant Intraprostatic Lesions (DIL) With MRI-TRUS Fusion High Dose Rate (HDR) Prostate Brachytherapy (BRAPROST) 111
- Figure 3 88: Combined Treatment for Mixed Incontinence (ESTEEM) 112
- Figure 3 89: TVT-ABBREVO Versus SERASIS for the Treatment of Female Urinary Stress Incontinence: 1 Year Outcomes of a Comparative Study With 2 Trans-obturator Sub Mid Urethral Slings 112
- Figure 3 90: Trans-obturator Mid-urethral Sling and the Single-incision Sling in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence 113
- Figure 3 91: Low-energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Treatment for Patients After Radical Prostatectomy 114
- Figure 3 92: Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Vacuum Erectile Device as a Treatment for Peyronies Disease 114
- Figure 3 93: Safety and Effect of Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) on the Renal Allograft in Transplant Recipients. 115
- Figure 3 94: Low Energy Shockwave Therapy (LE-SWT): A Novel Treatment for Chronic Kidney Disease 115
- Figure 3 95: Narrow Versus Wide Focal Zones for Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi 115
- Figure 3 96: Are the Stone Density and Location Useful Parameters for Small Kidney Stones? 116
- Figure 3 97: Durability of Flexible Ureteroscopes and Causes of Infection During Flexible Ureterorenoscopy 116
- Figure 3 98: Comparison of Different Energy Sources During TUR-P 116
- Figure 3 99: Effects of Flexible Ureteroscopy on Renal Blood Flow 117
- Figure 3 100: A Study of Blue Light Flexible Cystoscopy With Cysview in the Detection of Bladder Cancer in the Surveillance Setting 117
- Figure 3 101: Blue Light Cystoscopy With Cysview® Registry (BLCCR) 117
- Figure 3 102: Safety Study of Bipolar Versus Monopolar Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors 118
- Figure 3 103: Multi-Center Comparison of Dual Lumen Versus Single Lumen Ureteroscopes 118
- Figure 3 104: T-DOC® 5 Fr Pediatric Clinical Investigation 119
- Figure 3 105: Air vs Water Catheters (AvW (Bonn)) 119
- Figure 3 106: A Human Factor Study To Asses The Usability And Feasibility Of The Peritron+ During Intended Use 120
- Figure 3 107: Portable Pves Study 120
- Figure 3 108: Ambulatory Pessary Trial 120
- Figure 3 109: Study to Compare CAUTI Rates Following ERASE CAUTI Tray Non-Silver vs Silver Coated Foley Catheters 121
- Figure 3 110: Study to Compare CAUTI Rates Following ERASE CAUTI Tray Silver vs Silver Coated Foley Catheters 121
- Figure 3 111: Trial Comparing Three Different Devices for Kidney Stone Removal During Percutaneous Surgery 122
- Figure 3 112: Quality of Life in Kidney Stone Patients Undergoing Surgery 122
- Figure 3 113: Prostate Vaporization Techniques in Canadian Hospital 123
- Figure 3 114: Treatment of Symptomatic BPH Patients Undergoing Anticoagulant Therapy Using the PlasmaButton Vaporization Electrode 123
- Figure 3 115: Assessment of Infection Control, Practice Efficiency, and Health Economics of Sheathed Versus Standard Cystoscopy 124
- Figure 3 116: Results of Safety Guidewire Use in Ureteroscopic Stone Surgery 124
- Figure 3 117: Transurethral En Bloc Versus Standard Resection of Bladder Tumour 124
- Figure 3 118: PlasmaKinetic (PK) Button Vaporization Electrode for Treatment of Bladder Tumors (PK Button) 125
- Figure 4 1: Currency Exchange Rate, 2019 127
- Figure 4 2: Urological Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 129
- Figure 4 3: Urological Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (R$M) 130
- Figure 4 4: Urological Device Market Growth by Segment, 2016 – 2026 136
- Figure 4 5: Drivers and Limiters, Urological Device Market, Brazil, 2019 140
- Figure 4 6: Leading Competitors, Urological Device Market, Brazil, 2019 146
- Figure 4 7: SWOT Analysis, Boston Scientific (1 of 2) 162
- Figure 4 8: SWOT Analysis, Boston Scientific (2 of 2) 163
- Figure 4 9: SWOT Analysis, C. R. Bard (Becton Dickinson) (1 of 2) 164
- Figure 4 10: SWOT Analysis, C. R. Bard (Becton Dickinson) (2 of 2) 165
- Figure 4 11: SWOT Analysis, Coloplast 166
- Figure 4 12: SWOT Analysis, Cook Medical (1 of 2) 167
- Figure 4 13: SWOT Analysis, Cook Medical (2 of 2) 168
- Figure 4 14: SWOT Analysis, Ethicon (Johnson & Johnson) 169
- Figure 4 15: SWOT Analysis, Karl Storz 170
- Figure 4 16: SWOT Analysis, Laborie 171
- Figure 4 17: SWOT Analysis, Olympus (1 of 2) 172
- Figure 4 18: SWOT Analysis, Olympus (2 of 2) 173
- Figure 5 1: Urological Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 175
- Figure 5 2: Urinary Incontinence Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 179
- Figure 5 3: Male Incontinence Management Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 182
- Figure 5 4: Female Incontinence Management Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 185
- Figure 5 5: Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 187
- Figure 5 6: Stone Management Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 189
- Figure 5 7: ESWL Procedures, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 191
- Figure 5 8: Transurethral Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 193
- Figure 5 9: Ureteral Stent Placement Procedures, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 195
- Figure 5 10: PCNL Procedures, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 197
- Figure 5 11: BPH Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 199
- Figure 5 12: Erectile Dysfunction Management Procedures by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 202
- Figure 6 1: Urinary Incontinence Device Management Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 206
- Figure 6 2: Urinary Incontinence Device Management Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (R$M) 207
- Figure 6 3: Urinary Catheter Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 212
- Figure 6 4: Urinary Catheter Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (R$M) 212
- Figure 6 5: Intermittent Catheter Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 214
- Figure 6 6: Foley Catheter Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 216
- Figure 6 7: Male External Catheter Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 218
- Figure 6 8: Urethral Bulking Agent Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 220
- Figure 6 9: Urethral Bulking Agent Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (R$M) 221
- Figure 6 10: Total Urethral Bulking Agent Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 222
- Figure 6 11: Male Urethral Bulking Agent Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 224
- Figure 6 12: Female Urethral Bulking Agent Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 226
- Figure 6 13: Incontinence Management Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 229
- Figure 6 14: Incontinence Management Device Market by Segment, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (R$M) 229
- Figure 6 15: Male Implantable Incontinence Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 232
- Figure 6 16: Male Implantable Incontinence Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2016 – 2026 (R$M) 232
- Figure 6 17: Total Male Implantable Incontinence Device Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 234
- Figure 6 18: Male Incontinence Sling Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 236
- Figure 6 19: Male Artificial Urinary Sphincter Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 238
- Figure 6 20: Female Incontinence Sling Market by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (US$M) 241
- Figure 6 21: Female Incontinence Sling Market by Type, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 (R$M) 241
- Figure 6 22: Total Female Incontinence Sling Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 243
- Figure 6 23: Transvaginal Tape Female Incontinence Sling Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 245
- Figure 6 24: Transobturator Female Incontinence Sling Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 247
- Figure 6 25: Single-Incision Female Incontinence Sling Market, Brazil, 2016 – 2026 249
- Figure 6 26: