Market Research Logo

US Market Report for Ophthalmic Data Management Systems 2017 - MedCore

US Market Report for Ophthalmic Data Management Systems 2017 - MedCore

General Report Contents

  • Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
  • Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
  • Section on recent mergers & acquisitions
Ophthalmic data management systems are being increasingly prioritized by optometrists looking to streamline their patient flow and diagnostic capabilities. The cost of an ophthalmic data management system varies widely depending on the characteristics of the practice and the number of devices that need to be integrated with the system. The overall cost is broken up into several components including the software, server software, hardware and professional services including maintenance and implementation fees. Typically a billing scenario will include a base rate for installation, plus an additional charge for each device that is integrated with the system. Across competitors, there is not currently much variance in pricing. The systems from Carl Zeiss Meditec and Topcon are priced similarly. However, with ongoing innovation in this product category there is potential for a spreading in prices as some of these systems become more established.

Optometrists and ophthalmologists work in an environment where multiple pieces of equipment are routinely used for the diagnosis and treatment of a single patient. For example, to test for the presence of glaucoma, a patient may be assessed with optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus imagery, perimetry, and some form of tonometer for measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP). Ophthalmic data management systems are diagnostic information and patient profile solutions that allow the practitioner to store, access, and review information in an efficient and clinically meaningful way. The systems allow practitioners to display and compare reports from a single diagnostic tool over an extended period of the patient’s history. For example, fundus imagery of a diabetic retinopathy patient can be compared from the beginning of the onset of the pathology throughout the period of treatment. Alternatively, reports from multiple devices can be reviewed at once to facilitate a highly informed diagnosis. All of these functions can be performed from the practitioners office or using a wireless device.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
U.S. DIAGNOSTIC OPHTHALMIC DEVICE MARKET OVERVIEW
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
MARKET TRENDS
MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
MARKETS INCLUDED
KEY REPORT UPDATES
VERSION HISTORY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
1.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
DISEASE OVERVIEW
2.1.1 Glaucoma
2.1.2 Diabetic Retinopathy
2.1.3 Refractive Error
2.1.4 Age-Related Macular Degeneration
2.1.5 Astigmatism
2.1.6 Cataract
PRODUCT ASSESSMENT
3.1 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS
3.1.1 Ophthalmic Data Management Systems
3.2 FDA RECALLS
3.2.1 Alcon
3.2.2 Abbott Medical Optics (AMO)
3.2.3 Topcon
3.2.4 Nidek
3.3 CLINICAL TRIALS
3.3.1 Alcon
3.3.2 Carl Zeiss Meditec
3.3.3 Topcon
OPHTHALMIC DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS MARKET
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
4.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
4.3.1 Market Drivers
4.3.2 Market Limiters
4.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
ABBREVIATIONS
APPENDIX: COMPANY PRESS RELEASES
List of Charts
Chart 1 1: Diagnostic Ophthalmic Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2013 – 2023
Chart 1 2: Diagnostic Ophthalmic Device Market Overview, U.S., 2013 & 2023
Chart 4 1: Ophthalmic Data Management Systems Market, U.S., 2013 – 2023
Chart 4 2: Leading Competitors, Ophthalmic Data Management Systems Market, U.S., 2016
List of Figures
Figure 1 1: Diagnostic Ophthalmic Device Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2016 (1 of 2)
Figure 1 2: Diagnostic Ophthalmic Device Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2016 (2 of 2)
Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, U.S., 2016
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Diagnostic Ophthalmic Device Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2)
Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting the Diagnostic Ophthalmic Device Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2)
Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Diagnsotic Ophthalmic Device Market, U.S., 2013 – 2016 (1 of 2)
Figure 1 7: Recent Events in the Diagnsotic Ophthalmic Device Market, U.S., 2013 – 2016 (2 of 2)
Figure 1 8: Diagnostic Ophthalmic Device Markets Covered, U.S., 2016 (1 of 2)
Figure 1 9: Diagnostic Ophthalmic Device Markets Covered, U.S., 2016 (2 of 2)
Figure 1 10: Key Report Updates
Figure 1 11: Version History
Figure 3 1: Ophthalmic Data Management Systems by Company
Figure 3 2: Class 2 Device Recall Alcon
Figure 3 3: Class 2 Device Recall Alcon
Figure 3 4: Class 2 Device Recall Alcon
Figure 3 5: Class 2 Device Recall Alcon
Figure 3 6: Class 2 Device Recall Alcon
Figure 3 7: Class 2 Device Recall Alcon
Figure 3 8: Class 2 Device Recall Alcon
Figure 3 9: Class 2 Device Recall Alcon
Figure 3 10: Class 2 Device Recall Abbott Medical Optics
Figure 3 11: Class 2 Device Recall Abbott Medical Optics
Figure 3 12: Class 2 Device Recall Abbott Medical Optics
Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Abbott Medical Optics
Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Abbott Medical Optics
Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Abbott Medical Optics
Figure 3 16: Class 2 Device Recall Abbott Medical Optics
Figure 3 17: Class 2 Device Recall Abbott Medical Optics
Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall Abbott Medical Optics
Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall Abbott Medical Optics
Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall Topcon
Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Nidek
Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Nidek
Figure 3 23: Clinical Investigation of Corneal Incision Size After Intraocular Lens (IOL) Implantation
Figure 3 24: Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment With SYSTANE® BALANCE
Figure 3 25: Clinical Evaluation of DAILIES TOTAL 1® Performance in a Japanese Population
Figure 3 26: CLEAR CARE® PLUS for Presbyopic Contact Lens Wearers
Figure 3 27: Clinical Assessment of DAILIES TOTAL1® (DT1) Multifocal
Figure 3 28: Tolerability and Toxicity of Topically Applied Nepafenac 0.3% vs Ketorolac 0.5%
Figure 3 29: Pseudophakic Astigmatic Reduction With Verion-LenSx Arcuate Incisions
Figure 3 30: Glaucoma HFA / OCT Specificity Study
Figure 3 31: OCT Image Quality Performance Evaluation
Figure 3 32: Evaluation of the Signal to Noise Ratio at Various Retinal Layers
Figure 3 33: Slit Lamp Model SL-D-301 and DC-4 Digital Camera Attachment
Figure 4 1: Ophthalmic Data Management Systems Market, U.S., 2013 – 2023
Figure 4 2: Drivers and Limiters, Ophthalmic Data Management Systems Market, U.S., 2016
Figure 4 3: Leading Competitors, Ophthalmic Data Management Systems Market, U.S., 2016
Figure 6 1: Press Release Summary

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook

Share this report