US Market Report for Meniscal Repair 2017 - MedCore
General Report Contents
- Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
- Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
- Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
- Section on recent mergers & acquisitions
Meniscal tears can happen from a sudden forceful impact or twisting of the knee, which frequently occurs in athletic injuries and can be repaired, depending on the location of the tear. Tears in the red zone of the meniscus, which is vascularized, are good candidates for repair because they bleed and healing is more likely to occur. Tears in the white zone of the meniscus are not as likely to heal since they do not receive any blood flow and often require a meniscectomy, which is complete or partial removal of the meniscus. There are also degenerative tears that can happen gradually over time, which are most common in older patients. In these cases, the worn out meniscus is difficult to repair and is often removed.
The two major surgical methods for meniscal repair are all-inside repair and inside-out (or outside-in) repair. All-inside repair is a newer technique and involves use of hybrid devices that have both suture and implant components. The inside-out repair surgical technique uses only sutures and accordingly is also referred to as suture-repair. More incisions are required in suture repair, which may lead to additional tears and thus all-inside repair is quickly growing in popularity. An additional surgical technique is implant-repair that uses screws or darts to fixate between the tear to help it close. This method is quickly being surpassed by all-inside and inside-out repairs.
The meniscus is a crescent-shaped pad of fibrocartilage located between the femur and the tibia. It acts as a shock absorber and prevents friction between the two bones. It also helps stabilize the knee along with the ligaments and protects the articular cartilage of the knee, aiding in the prevention of degenerative arthritis.
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- U.S. ORTHOPEDIC SOFT TISSUE REPAIR MARKET OVERVIEW
- COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
- MARKET TRENDS
- MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
- PROCEDURE NUMBERS
- PROCEDURE CODES INVESTIGATED
- MARKETS INCLUDED
- KEY REPORT UPDATES
- VERSION HISTORY
- RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
- 1.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
- Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
- Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
- Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
- Step 4: Performing Primary Research
- Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
- Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
- Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
- Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
- Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
- DISEASE OVERVIEW
- 2.1.1 Soft Tissue Injury
- 2.1.1.1 Sprains
- 2.1.1.2 Strains
- 2.1.1.3 Contusions
- 2.1.1.4 Tendinitis
- 2.1.1.5 Bursitis
- 2.1.2 Rotator Cuff Tears
- 2.1.3 Bicep Tendon Tear
- 2.1.4 ACL/PCL Injury
- 2.1.5 Meniscus Tears
- 2.1.6 Hip Injury
- PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS
- 3.1.1 Meniscal Repair
- 3.2 FDA RECALLS
- 3.2.1 Arthrex
- 3.2.2 DePuy Mitek
- 3.2.3 Smith & Nephew
- 3.2.4 Tornier
- MENISCAL REPAIR MARKET
- 4.1 INTRODUCTION
- 4.2 MARKET OVERVIEW
- 4.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
- 4.3.1 Suture Meniscal Repair Market
- 4.3.2 Implant Meniscal Repair Market
- 4.3.3 Hybrid Meniscal Repair Market
- 4.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
- 4.4.1 Market Drivers
- 4.4.2 Market Limiters
- 4.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
- ABBREVIATIONS
- APPENDIX: COMPANY PRESS RELEASES
- List of Charts
- Chart 1 1: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market by Segment, U.S., 2013 – 2023
- Chart 1 2: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market Overview, U.S., 2016 & 2023
- Chart 4 1: Meniscal Repair Market by Segment, U.S., 2013 – 2023
- Chart 4 2: Meniscal Repair Market Breakdown, U.S., 2016
- Chart 4 3: Meniscal Repair Market Breakdown, U.S., 2023
- Chart 4 4: Suture Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2013 – 2023
- Chart 4 5: Implant Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2013 – 2023
- Chart 4 6: Hybrid Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2013 – 2023
- Chart 4 7: Leading Competitors, Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2016
- List of Figures
- Figure 1 1: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2016 (1 of 2)
- Figure 1 2: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2016 (2 of 2)
- Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, U.S., 2016
- Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2)
- Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting the Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2)
- Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market, U.S., 2014 – 2016
- Figure 1 7: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Markets Covered, U.S., 2016
- Figure 1 8: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2016
- Figure 1 9: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Markets Covered, U.S., 2016 (1 of 2)
- Figure 1 10: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Markets Covered, U.S., 2016 (2 of 2)
- Figure 1 11: Key Report Updates
- Figure 1 12: Version History
- Figure 3 1: Meniscal Repair Devices by Company
- Figure 3 2: Class 2 Device Recall Arthrex
- Figure 3 3: Class 2 Device Recall Depuy Mitek
- Figure 3 4: Class 2 Device Recall Depuy Mitek
- Figure 3 5: Class 2 Device Recall Smith & Nephew
- Figure 3 6: Class 2 Device Recall Smith & Nephew
- Figure 3 7: Class 2 Device Recall Tornier
- Figure 4 1: Meniscal Repair Market by Segment, U.S., 2013 – 2023 (US$M)
- Figure 4 2: Suture Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2013 – 2023
- Figure 4 3: Implant Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2013 – 2023
- Figure 4 4: Hybrid Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2013 – 2023
- Figure 4 5: Drivers and Limiters, Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2016
- Figure 4 6: Leading Competitors, Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2016
- Figure 6 1: Press Release Summary