India Market Report for Surgical Robotics Systems 2017 - MedCore
General Report Contents
- Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
- Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
- Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
Section on recent mergers & acquisitions
The da Vinci® system was used in India to perform the country’s first robotically-assisted procedure in 2002. The system is currently used to perform a wide variety of procedures including urologic, general laparoscopic, gynecologic laparoscopic, general non-cardiovascular thoracoscopic and thoracoscopically assisted cardiotomy surgical procedures in children and adults. Because medical robotic systems require a long and costly development phase, there are currently no competitive systems on the market, however, there are many prototypes.
Surgical robotics has tremendous potential to increase the effectiveness of existing procedures and to facilitate novel procedure types. The surgical robotics industry is, in many ways, still in its infancy, with more products in development than currently commercially available on the market. Most new surgical robotic systems are designed for highly specialized medical applications, which is a major draw-back for most facilities. The types of surgical robotic assisted systems covered in this section are: minimally invasive surgery robotic systems, orthopedic robotic systems, neurosurgery robotic systems, spinal robotic systems, and radiosurgery robotic systems.
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- INDIA ROBOTICS AND SURGICAL NAVIGATION MARKET OVERVIEW
- COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
- MARKET TRENDS
- MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
- MARKETS INCLUDED
- KEY REPORT UPDATES
- PROCEDURES
- VERSION HISTORY
- RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
- 1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
- 1.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
- Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
- Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
- Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
- Step 4: Performing Primary Research
- Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
- Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
- Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
- Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
- Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
- DISEASE OVERVIEW
- 2.1 MEDICAL CONDITIONS
- 2.1.1 Neurosurgery Conditions
- 2.1.1.1 Hydrocephalus
- 2.1.1.2 Communicating Hydrocephalus
- 2.1.1.3 Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
- 2.1.1.4 Non-Communicating Hydrocephalus
- 2.1.1.5 Brain Tumor
- 2.1.1.6 Intracranial Pressure
- 2.1.1.7 Intracranial Aneurysm
- 2.1.1.8 Intracranial Atherosclerosis Disease
- 2.1.2 Spinal Conditions
- 2.1.2.1 Herniated Disc
- 2.1.2.2 Spinal Stenosis
- 2.1.2.3 Spondylosis
- 2.1.2.4 Scoliosis
- 2.1.2.5 Lordosis
- 2.1.2.6 Kyphosis
- 2.1.3 ENT Conditions
- 2.1.3.1 Otitis Media
- 2.1.3.2 Cholesteatomas
- 2.1.3.3 Otosclerosis
- 2.1.3.4 Chronic Sinusitis
- 2.1.3.5 Tonsillitis
- 2.1.4 Orthopedic Conditions
- 2.1.4.1 Fractures
- 2.1.4.2 Osteoporosis
- 2.1.4.3 Arthritis
- 2.1.5 Gynecological Conditions
- 2.1.5.1 Gynecological Cancers
- 2.1.5.2 Uterine Fibroids
- 2.1.5.3 Endometriosis
- 2.1.5.4 Menorrhagia
- 2.1.5.5 Pelvic Prolapse
- 2.1.6 Urological Conditions
- 2.1.6.1 Prostate Cancer
- 2.1.6.2 Bladder Cancer
- 2.1.6.3 Kidney Cancer
- 2.1.6.4 Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH)
- 2.1.7 Digestive Tract Conditions
- 2.1.7.1 Achalasia
- 2.1.7.2 Stomach Cancer
- 2.1.7.3 Hernia
- 2.1.7.4 Gallbladder Attack
- 2.1.7.5 Gastroesophageal Reflex Disease
- 2.1.8 Colorectal Conditions
- 2.1.8.1 Colorectal Cancer
- 2.1.8.2 Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- 2.1.8.3 Diverticulitis
- 2.1.9 Cardiac Conditions
- 2.1.9.1 Mitral Valve Prolapse
- 2.1.9.2 Coronary Artery Disease
- PRODUCT ASSESSMENT
- 3.1 RAS PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS
- 3.1.1 Robotic-Assisted Surgery Overview
- 3.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery
- 3.1.3 Orthopedic Surgery
- 3.1.4 Neurosurgery
- 3.1.5 Spine Surgery
- 3.1.6 Radiosurgery
- 3.2 ROBOTIC ASSISTED SURGERY REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS
- 3.2.1 Accuray Inc.
- 3.2.2 Blue Belt Technologies
- 3.2.3 Hansen Medical Inc.
- 3.2.4 Intuitive Surgical
- 3.2.5 MAKO Surgical/Stryker
- 3.2.6 OMNIlife Science
- 3.3 CLINICAL TRIALS
- 3.4 RAS CLINICAL TRIALS
- 3.4.1 Accuray Inc.
- 3.4.2 Intuitive Surgical
- 3.4.3 MAKO Surgical/Stryker
- 3.4.4 Mazor
- 3.4.5 Medrobotics
- 3.4.6 Medtech
- INDIA SURGICAL ROBOTICS MARKET
- 4.1 INTRODUCTION
- 4.2 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY ROBOTIC DEVICE MARKET
- 4.2.1 Introduction
- 4.2.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
- 4.2.3 Drivers and Limiters
- 4.2.3.1 Market Drivers
- 4.2.3.2 Market Limiters
- 4.2.4 Leading Competitors
- 4.2.5 Emerging Competitors
- 4.3 ROBOTIC ASSISTED ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY MARKET
- 4.3.1 Introduction
- 4.3.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
- 4.3.3 Drivers and Limiters
- 4.3.3.1 Market Drivers
- 4.3.3.2 Market Limiters
- 4.3.4 Emerging Competitors
- APPENDIX I: ROBOTIC ASSISTED NEUROSURGERY, SPINE, AND RADIOSURGERY MARKETS
- 5.1 INTRODUCTION
- 5.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
- 5.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
- 5.3.1 Market Drivers
- 5.3.2 Market Limiters
- 5.4 LEADING COMPETITORS
- ABBREVIATIONS
- APPENDIX II: COMPETITOR PRESS RELEASES
- List of Charts
- Chart 1 1: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Market by Segment, India, 2013 – 2023
- Chart 1 2: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Market Overview, India, 2016 & 2023
- Chart 4 1: Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, India, 2013 – 2023
- Chart 4 2: Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, India, 2013 – 2023
- List of Figures
- Figure 1 1: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Competitor Market Share Ranking by Segment, India, 2016 (1 of 2)
- Figure 1 2: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Competitor Market Share Ranking by Segment, India, 2016 (2 of 2)
- Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, India, 2016
- Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Market by Segment, India (1 of 2)
- Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Market by Segment, India (2 of 2)
- Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Market, India, 2013 – 2016
- Figure 1 7: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Markets Covered, India, 2016
- Figure 1 8: Key Report Updates
- Figure 1 9: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Procedures Covered, U.S., 2016 (2 of 2)
- Figure 1 10: Version History
- Figure 3 1: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy Products by Company
- Figure 3 2: Robot-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Products by Company
- Figure 3 3: Robot-Assisted Neurosurgery Products by Company
- Figure 3 4: Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery Products by Company
- Figure 3 5: Robot-Assisted Radiosurgery Products by Company
- Figure 3 6: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
- Figure 3 7: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
- Figure 3 8: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
- Figure 3 9: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
- Figure 3 10: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
- Figure 3 11: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
- Figure 3 12: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies
- Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies
- Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies
- Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical
- Figure 3 16: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical
- Figure 3 17: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical
- Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 23: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 25: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 26: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 44: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 47: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 49: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 53: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 55: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 56: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 57: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 58: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 59: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 60: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 61: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
- Figure 3 62: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
- Figure 3 63: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
- Figure 3 64: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
- Figure 3 65: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
- Figure 3 66: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
- Figure 3 67: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
- Figure 3 68: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
- Figure 3 69: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
- Figure 3 70: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
- Figure 3 71: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
- Figure 3 72: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
- Figure 3 73: Endoscopic Evaluation of Late Rectal Injury Following CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Prostate Cancer
- Figure 3 74: CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
- Figure 3 75: A Phase II Trial of CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Prostate Tumors
- Figure 3 76: Study To Establish Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cyberknife in Patients
- Figure 3 77: A Phase II Trial of CyberKnife Radiosurgery to Perioptic Tumors
- Figure 3 78: An Effectiveness and Toxicity of CyberKnife Based Radiosurgery for Parkinson Disease
- Figure 3 79: CyberKnife Stereotactic Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (SAPBI) (CK-SAPBI)
- Figure 3 80: Safety and Efficacy Study of Five-fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
- Figure 3 81: A Study of Pre-Operative Cyberknife in Patients With Potentially Resectable Pancreas Cancer
- Figure 3 82: Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- Figure 3 83: A Phase II Study of Cyberknife Radiosurgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Figure 3 84: Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair
- Figure 3 85: A Retrospective Multicenter Investigation of the Use of the da Vinci® Surgical System
- Figure 3 86: Cosmesis, Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After da Vinci
- Figure 3 87: Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection
- Figure 3 88: Prospective Investigation of Robotic Single-port System
- Figure 3 89: Clinical Outcomes of Knee Replacement
- Figure 3 90: A Trial Evaluating TKR Compared to BKR Performed Using Stryker's Mako Robot
- Figure 3 91: Robotic Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Figure 3 92: Outcomes of Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty
- Figure 3 93: Clinical and Economic Comparison of Robot Assisted Versus Manual Knee Replacement
- Figure 3 94: Prospective, Observational Registry of Renaissance-guided Spine Surgeries
- Figure 3 95: Clinical Trial of Minimally Invasive Robotic Spine Surgery
- Figure 3 96: Robotic vs. Freehand Corrective Surgery for Pediatric Scoliosis (PEDSCOLI)
- Figure 3 97: ADDRESS - Adult Deformity Robotic vs. Freehand Surgery to Correct Spinal Deformity
- Figure 3 98: MIS ReFRESH: Robotic vs. Freehand Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgeries
- Figure 3 99: A Post-Market Clinical Trial for Access and Visualization
- Figure 3 100: Robotic-assisted Pedicule Screw Placement (ARASS)
- Figure 4 1: Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, India, 2013 – 2023 (US$)
- Figure 4 2: Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, India, 2013 – 2023 (IN₹)
- Figure 4 3: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, India, 2016
- Figure 4 4: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Navigation System Market, India, 2016
- Figure 4 5: Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, India, 2013 – 2023 (US$)
- Figure 4 6: Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, India, 2013 – 2023 (IN₹)
- Figure 4 7: Drivers and Limiters, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, India, 2016
- Figure 4 8: Leading Competitors, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, India, 2016
- Figure 5 1: Drivers and Limiters, Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, India, 2016
- Figure 7 1: Robotic Assisted Surgery Press Release Summary
- Figure 7 2: Surgical Navigation Press Release Summary