Market Research Logo

India Market Report for Surgical Robotics Systems 2017 - MedCore

India Market Report for Surgical Robotics Systems 2017 - MedCore

General Report Contents

  • Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
  • Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
Section on recent mergers & acquisitions

The da Vinci® system was used in India to perform the country’s first robotically-assisted procedure in 2002. The system is currently used to perform a wide variety of procedures including urologic, general laparoscopic, gynecologic laparoscopic, general non-cardiovascular thoracoscopic and thoracoscopically assisted cardiotomy surgical procedures in children and adults. Because medical robotic systems require a long and costly development phase, there are currently no competitive systems on the market, however, there are many prototypes.

Surgical robotics has tremendous potential to increase the effectiveness of existing procedures and to facilitate novel procedure types. The surgical robotics industry is, in many ways, still in its infancy, with more products in development than currently commercially available on the market. Most new surgical robotic systems are designed for highly specialized medical applications, which is a major draw-back for most facilities. The types of surgical robotic assisted systems covered in this section are: minimally invasive surgery robotic systems, orthopedic robotic systems, neurosurgery robotic systems, spinal robotic systems, and radiosurgery robotic systems.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INDIA ROBOTICS AND SURGICAL NAVIGATION MARKET OVERVIEW
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
MARKET TRENDS
MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
MARKETS INCLUDED
KEY REPORT UPDATES
PROCEDURES
VERSION HISTORY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
1.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
DISEASE OVERVIEW
2.1 MEDICAL CONDITIONS
2.1.1 Neurosurgery Conditions
2.1.1.1 Hydrocephalus
2.1.1.2 Communicating Hydrocephalus
2.1.1.3 Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
2.1.1.4 Non-Communicating Hydrocephalus
2.1.1.5 Brain Tumor
2.1.1.6 Intracranial Pressure
2.1.1.7 Intracranial Aneurysm
2.1.1.8 Intracranial Atherosclerosis Disease
2.1.2 Spinal Conditions
2.1.2.1 Herniated Disc
2.1.2.2 Spinal Stenosis
2.1.2.3 Spondylosis
2.1.2.4 Scoliosis
2.1.2.5 Lordosis
2.1.2.6 Kyphosis
2.1.3 ENT Conditions
2.1.3.1 Otitis Media
2.1.3.2 Cholesteatomas
2.1.3.3 Otosclerosis
2.1.3.4 Chronic Sinusitis
2.1.3.5 Tonsillitis
2.1.4 Orthopedic Conditions
2.1.4.1 Fractures
2.1.4.2 Osteoporosis
2.1.4.3 Arthritis
2.1.5 Gynecological Conditions
2.1.5.1 Gynecological Cancers
2.1.5.2 Uterine Fibroids
2.1.5.3 Endometriosis
2.1.5.4 Menorrhagia
2.1.5.5 Pelvic Prolapse
2.1.6 Urological Conditions
2.1.6.1 Prostate Cancer
2.1.6.2 Bladder Cancer
2.1.6.3 Kidney Cancer
2.1.6.4 Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH)
2.1.7 Digestive Tract Conditions
2.1.7.1 Achalasia
2.1.7.2 Stomach Cancer
2.1.7.3 Hernia
2.1.7.4 Gallbladder Attack
2.1.7.5 Gastroesophageal Reflex Disease
2.1.8 Colorectal Conditions
2.1.8.1 Colorectal Cancer
2.1.8.2 Inflammatory Bowel Disease
2.1.8.3 Diverticulitis
2.1.9 Cardiac Conditions
2.1.9.1 Mitral Valve Prolapse
2.1.9.2 Coronary Artery Disease
PRODUCT ASSESSMENT
3.1 RAS PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS
3.1.1 Robotic-Assisted Surgery Overview
3.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery
3.1.3 Orthopedic Surgery
3.1.4 Neurosurgery
3.1.5 Spine Surgery
3.1.6 Radiosurgery
3.2 ROBOTIC ASSISTED SURGERY REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS
3.2.1 Accuray Inc.
3.2.2 Blue Belt Technologies
3.2.3 Hansen Medical Inc.
3.2.4 Intuitive Surgical
3.2.5 MAKO Surgical/Stryker
3.2.6 OMNIlife Science
3.3 CLINICAL TRIALS
3.4 RAS CLINICAL TRIALS
3.4.1 Accuray Inc.
3.4.2 Intuitive Surgical
3.4.3 MAKO Surgical/Stryker
3.4.4 Mazor
3.4.5 Medrobotics
3.4.6 Medtech
INDIA SURGICAL ROBOTICS MARKET
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY ROBOTIC DEVICE MARKET
4.2.1 Introduction
4.2.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
4.2.3 Drivers and Limiters
4.2.3.1 Market Drivers
4.2.3.2 Market Limiters
4.2.4 Leading Competitors
4.2.5 Emerging Competitors
4.3 ROBOTIC ASSISTED ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY MARKET
4.3.1 Introduction
4.3.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
4.3.3 Drivers and Limiters
4.3.3.1 Market Drivers
4.3.3.2 Market Limiters
4.3.4 Emerging Competitors
APPENDIX I: ROBOTIC ASSISTED NEUROSURGERY, SPINE, AND RADIOSURGERY MARKETS
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
5.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
5.3.1 Market Drivers
5.3.2 Market Limiters
5.4 LEADING COMPETITORS
ABBREVIATIONS
APPENDIX II: COMPETITOR PRESS RELEASES
List of Charts
Chart 1 1: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Market by Segment, India, 2013 – 2023
Chart 1 2: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Market Overview, India, 2016 & 2023
Chart 4 1: Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, India, 2013 – 2023
Chart 4 2: Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, India, 2013 – 2023
List of Figures
Figure 1 1: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Competitor Market Share Ranking by Segment, India, 2016 (1 of 2)
Figure 1 2: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Competitor Market Share Ranking by Segment, India, 2016 (2 of 2)
Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, India, 2016
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Market by Segment, India (1 of 2)
Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Market by Segment, India (2 of 2)
Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Market, India, 2013 – 2016
Figure 1 7: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Markets Covered, India, 2016
Figure 1 8: Key Report Updates
Figure 1 9: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Procedures Covered, U.S., 2016 (2 of 2)
Figure 1 10: Version History
Figure 3 1: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy Products by Company
Figure 3 2: Robot-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Products by Company
Figure 3 3: Robot-Assisted Neurosurgery Products by Company
Figure 3 4: Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery Products by Company
Figure 3 5: Robot-Assisted Radiosurgery Products by Company
Figure 3 6: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 7: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 8: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 9: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 10: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 11: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc
Figure 3 12: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies
Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies
Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies
Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical
Figure 3 16: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical
Figure 3 17: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical
Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 23: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 25: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 26: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 44: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 47: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 49: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 53: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 55: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 56: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 57: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 58: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 59: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 60: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 61: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical
Figure 3 62: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 63: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 64: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 65: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 66: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 67: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker
Figure 3 68: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
Figure 3 69: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
Figure 3 70: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
Figure 3 71: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
Figure 3 72: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc
Figure 3 73: Endoscopic Evaluation of Late Rectal Injury Following CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Prostate Cancer
Figure 3 74: CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer
Figure 3 75: A Phase II Trial of CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Prostate Tumors
Figure 3 76: Study To Establish Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cyberknife in Patients
Figure 3 77: A Phase II Trial of CyberKnife Radiosurgery to Perioptic Tumors
Figure 3 78: An Effectiveness and Toxicity of CyberKnife Based Radiosurgery for Parkinson Disease
Figure 3 79: CyberKnife Stereotactic Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (SAPBI) (CK-SAPBI)
Figure 3 80: Safety and Efficacy Study of Five-fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Figure 3 81: A Study of Pre-Operative Cyberknife in Patients With Potentially Resectable Pancreas Cancer
Figure 3 82: Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Soft Tissue Sarcoma
Figure 3 83: A Phase II Study of Cyberknife Radiosurgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma
Figure 3 84: Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair
Figure 3 85: A Retrospective Multicenter Investigation of the Use of the da Vinci® Surgical System
Figure 3 86: Cosmesis, Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After da Vinci
Figure 3 87: Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection
Figure 3 88: Prospective Investigation of Robotic Single-port System
Figure 3 89: Clinical Outcomes of Knee Replacement
Figure 3 90: A Trial Evaluating TKR Compared to BKR Performed Using Stryker's Mako Robot
Figure 3 91: Robotic Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty
Figure 3 92: Outcomes of Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty
Figure 3 93: Clinical and Economic Comparison of Robot Assisted Versus Manual Knee Replacement
Figure 3 94: Prospective, Observational Registry of Renaissance-guided Spine Surgeries
Figure 3 95: Clinical Trial of Minimally Invasive Robotic Spine Surgery
Figure 3 96: Robotic vs. Freehand Corrective Surgery for Pediatric Scoliosis (PEDSCOLI)
Figure 3 97: ADDRESS - Adult Deformity Robotic vs. Freehand Surgery to Correct Spinal Deformity
Figure 3 98: MIS ReFRESH: Robotic vs. Freehand Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgeries
Figure 3 99: A Post-Market Clinical Trial for Access and Visualization
Figure 3 100: Robotic-assisted Pedicule Screw Placement (ARASS)
Figure 4 1: Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, India, 2013 – 2023 (US$)
Figure 4 2: Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, India, 2013 – 2023 (IN₹)
Figure 4 3: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, India, 2016
Figure 4 4: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Navigation System Market, India, 2016
Figure 4 5: Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, India, 2013 – 2023 (US$)
Figure 4 6: Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, India, 2013 – 2023 (IN₹)
Figure 4 7: Drivers and Limiters, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, India, 2016
Figure 4 8: Leading Competitors, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, India, 2016
Figure 5 1: Drivers and Limiters, Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, India, 2016
Figure 7 1: Robotic Assisted Surgery Press Release Summary
Figure 7 2: Surgical Navigation Press Release Summary

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook

Share this report