Marketing to College Students - US

Published by: Mintel International Group Ltd.

Published: Jul. 1, 2011 - 135 Pages


Table of Contents

Scope and Themes

What you need to know

Definition

Data sources

Consumer survey data

Advertising creative

Abbreviations and terms

Abbreviations

Terms

Executive Summary

Recessionary pressures and social trends drove student body growth

Women and minorities represent growing proportion of student body

Finances, employment prospects, and grades primary concerns of students

Living situations are about equally split between “college living” and “family living”

School, working, and hanging with friends most popular activities

Most students are avid users of social networking sites

Most eat at home but fast food a relatively popular lunch and dinner destination

Texting among most common forms of communication

Students more likely to own many electronic devices

Verizon is the preferred carrier overall, good network coverage is a must

Students more likely to have debit cards instead of credit cards

Insights and Opportunities

Appeal to the idealism and social nature of students

KFC gets social to promote the Double Down

QR tagging could capture the attention of students

Linking brands with culture and authenticity

Offer sustainable food and drink options on college campuses

Figure 1: Attitudes toward green advertising, by age, December 2010

Figure 2: Green or sustainable product purchase frequency, by age and household income, May-June 2010

Inspire Insights

Trend: Access All Areas

Smartphones

Online

Trend: A Simple Balance For Health

The Student Body

Key points

Growth of student body slows after spike in 2008

Figure 3: Actual and projected enrollment at degree-granting institutions, by age, 2006-16

Spending power spikes in 2009 as record numbers attend college

Women increasingly outnumber men in student body

Figure 4: Actual and projected enrollment at degree-granting institutions, by sex, 2006-16

Student body becoming more ethnically diverse

Figure 5: Actual and projected enrollment at degree-granting institutions, by race/ethnicity, 2006-16

Full- and part-time segments growing at a similar pace

Figure 6: Actual and projected enrollment at degree-granting institutions, by full- and part-time status, 2006-16

Marketing Challenges

On-campus bans of alcohol, tobacco, and credit card advertising limit reach

Online and for-profit colleges changing the nature of the student body

Market Drivers

Key points

Population growth will drive growth in student body

Figure 7: Population by age, 2006-16

Hispanic and Asian segments growing quickly

Figure 8: U.S. population of ages 18-24, by race/Hispanic origin, 2006-16

Spike in attendance driven by high unemployment

Figure 9: Unemployment, January 2007-June 2011

Economy drives some young adults to postpone marriage and childbirth

Figure 10: Percent of population 15+ who are married, 1960-2010

Figure 11: U.S. birth rate, 2003-11

Innovations and Innovators

On-campus brand ambassadors

MTVU

Target uses innovative techniques to attract college students

Red Bull positions as a part of college culture and student lifestyles

Marketing Strategies

Overview

For-profit schools focus efforts largely on minorities and working class

Figure 12: University of Phoenix TV ad, 2011

Taco Bell goes after college-aged men with steak value

Figure 13: Taco Bell Triple Steak Stack TV ad, 2011

Apple targets young adults with the emotional benefits of technology

Figure 14: Apple iPhone 4 TV ad, 2010

Target uses comedy and lifestyle relevance to reach students

Figure 15: Target “college life starts here” TV ad, 2010

Figure 16: Target “roommate’s parents” TV ad, 2010

Figure 17: Target “scare roommate” TV ad, 2010

Personal Concerns

Key points

Students’ concerns more inwardly focused compared with nonstudents

Figure 18: Items/situations personally concerned about, by student/Nonstudent status, April-May 2011

Older students more aware of broader issues

Figure 19: Items/situations personally concerned about, by student age, April-May 2011

Affluent students less concerned … about almost everything

Figure 20: Items/situations personally concerned about, by student household income, April-May 2011

Nontraditional students’ concerns generally reflect that of older students

Figure 21: Items/situations personally concerned about, by student type and living status, April-May 2011

School Year Living Situation

Key points

Off-campus apartments/houses most popular among students

Figure 22: School year living situation, by student age, April-May 2011

Affluent students more likely to live in dormitories

Figure 23: School year living situation, by student household income, April-May 2011

Nontraditional students are most likely to live with spouse/family

Figure 24: School year living situation, by student type, April-May 2011

Paying the Bills

Key points

Students are less likely to pay the bills in their household

Figure 25: Who pays household bills, by student/nonstudent status, October 2009-December 2010

Affluent students are the least likely to pay bills in their household

Figure 26: Who pays household bills, by student household income, October 2009-December 2010

Employed students more likely to pay the bills in their household

Figure 27: Who pays household bills, by student employment status, October 2009-December 2010

Typical Weekday Activities

Key points

Male and female students generally spend time similarly

Figure 28: Weekday time spent on various activities, by student gender, April-May 2011

Older working students spend more time at work

Figure 29: Weekday time spent on various activities, by student age, April-May 2011

Nontraditional students tend to spend more time working

Figure 30: Weekday time spent on various activities, by student type and living status, April-May 2011

Online Activities in the Last Seven Days

Key points

Students tend to be more active on social networking sites

Figure 31: Online activities in the last seven days, by student/nonstudent status, April-May 2011

Consider using social networking sites to target younger students

Figure 32: Online activities in the last seven days, by student age, April-May 2011

Online Search Engines Typically Used

Key points

Google the most popular search engine for students and nonstudents

Figure 33: Online search engines typically used, by student/nonstudent status, April-May 2011

Male college students somewhat more likely to use non-Google search

Figure 34: Online search engines typically used, by student gender, April-May 2011

Older students notably less likely than others to use Google

Figure 35: Online search engines typically used, by student age, April-May 2011

Nontraditional students use Google less than traditional students

Figure 36: Online search engines typically used, by student type, April-May 2011

Attitudes Toward Shopping Online

Key points

Students are more likely than nonstudents to search online for coupons

Figure 37: Attitudes toward shopping online, by student/nonstudent status, April-May 2011

Female students more likely to get coupons via email and through Groupon

Figure 38: Attitudes toward shopping online, by student gender, April-May 2011

Frequency of Eating Meals

Key points

Dinner is the most frequently eaten meal among college students

Figure 39: Frequency of eating meals on weekdays and weekends, by students, April-May 2011

Younger college students least likely to eat breakfast

Figure 40: Frequency of eating meals, by student age, April-May 2011

Affluent students more likely to eat breakfast

Figure 41: Frequency of eating meals, by student household income, April-May 2011

Nontraditional students are more likely to eat breakfast

Figure 42: Frequency of eating meals, by student type and living status, April-May 2011

Where Weekday Meals Typically Eaten

Key points

College students typically eat breakfast at home

Figure 43: Where weekday meals typically eaten by meal occasion, by students, April-May 2011

Affluent students less likely to eat meals at home

Figure 44: Where any weekday meals typically eaten, by student household income, April-May 2011

Family living students much more likely to eat meals at home

Figure 45: Where any weekday meals typically eaten, by student type and living status, April-May 2011

Frequency of Leisure Activities

Key points

Hanging out with friends is most popular college student activity

Figure 46: Frequency of leisure activities, by students, April-May 2011

Younger students more likely to hang out and play sports

Figure 47: Frequency of leisure activities, by student age, April-May 2011

Nontraditional students are more likely to eat out

Figure 48: Frequency of leisure activities, by student type and living status, April-May 2011

Frequency of Communication

Key point

Text messaging very popular form of communication among students

Figure 49: Frequency of non-face-to-face communication, by students, April-May 2011

Students less likely to use landlines and email to communicate

Figure 50: Frequency of non-face-to-face communication, by student/nonstudent status, April-May 2011

Electronics Product Ownership

Key points

Students more likely to own many electronic devices

Figure 51: Electronics product ownership, by student/nonstudent status, April-May 2011

Affluent students more likely to own smartphones

Figure 52: Electronics product ownership, by student household income, April-May 2011

Cell Phone Ownership, Provider and Subscription Type

Key points

Ownership

Students somewhat more likely than nonstudents to own a cell phone

Figure 53: Cell phone ownership, by student/nonstudent status, October 2009-December 2010

Service providers

Verizon most popular cell phone provider with students and nonstudents

Figure 54: Primary cell phone service provider, by student/nonstudent status, April-May 2011

AT&T more popular among upper-income students

Figure 55: Primary cell phone service provider, by student household income, April-May 2011

Subscription type

Students more likely to use unlimited cell phone plans

Figure 56: Cell phone service subscription type, by student/nonstudent status, April-May 2011

Younger students more likely to have unlimited plans

Figure 57: Cell phone service subscription type, by student age, April-May 2011

Nontraditional students more likely to use “pay as you go” and no contract

Figure 58: Cell phone service subscription type, by student type and living status, April-May 2011

Attitudes Toward Cell Phone Service Provider

Key points

Most important aspects of a service provider

Good network coverage is most important for students and nonstudents

Figure 59: Most important reasons for choosing cell phone carrier, by student/nonstudent status, April-May 2011

Attitudes toward switching providers

Students are more likely to switch carriers for desired phones

Figure 60: Attitudes toward switching cell phone carrier, by student/nonstudent status, April-May 2011

Male students more likely to be currently shopping for a new carrier

Figure 61: Attitudes toward switching cell phone carrier, by student gender, April-May 2011

Older students are more likely to be planning to switch carriers

Figure 62: Attitudes toward switching cell phone carrier, by student age, April-May 2011

Debit and Credit Card Ownership and Use

Key points

Students more likely to have debit cards than credit cards

Figure 63: Debit and credit card ownership, by student/nonstudent status, October 2009-December 2010

Female students more likely to have a debit card

Figure 64: Debit and credit card ownership, by student gender, October 2009-December 2010

Employed students more likely to have debit and credit cards

Figure 65: Debit and credit card ownership, by student employment status, October 2009-December 2010

Impact of Race and Hispanic Origin

Hispanics less likely to express concerns than non-Hispanics

Figure 66: Items/situations personally concerned about, by student race/Hispanic origin, April-May 2011

Black students more likely to live off campus alone or with roommates

Figure 67: School year living situation, by student race/Hispanic origin, April-May 2011

Non-Hispanics more likely to spend time on social networking sites

Figure 68: Online activities in the last seven days, by student race/Hispanic origin, April-May 2011

Hispanic students more likely to eat breakfast, less likely to indulge in late night snack

Figure 69: Frequency of eating meals, by student race/Hispanic origin, April-May 2011

Hispanic segment has a concentration of Skype users

Figure 70: Frequency of non-face-to-face communication, by student race/Hispanic origin, April-May 2011

Cluster Analysis

Reading and Worrying

Demographics

Characteristics

Opportunity

Musically Social

Demographics

Characteristics

Opportunity

Sleepless and Inactive

Demographics

Characteristics

Opportunity

Characteristic tables

Figure 71: College student lifestyle clusters, April-May 2011

Figure 72: Items/situations personally concerned about, by college student lifestyle clusters, April-May 2011

Figure 73: School year living situation, by college student lifestyle clusters, April-May 2011

Figure 74: Weekday time spent on various activities, by college student lifestyle clusters, April-May 2011

Figure 75: Online activities in the last seven days, by college student lifestyle clusters, April-May 2011

Demographic tables

Figure 76: College student lifestyle clusters, by gender, April-May 2011

Figure 77: College student lifestyle clusters, by age, April-May 2011

Figure 78: College student lifestyle clusters, by household income, April-May 2011

Figure 79: College student lifestyle clusters, by race, April-May 2011

Cluster methodology

Custom Consumer Groups

Traditional students spend more time on social networking sites

Figure 80: Online activities in the last seven days, by student type and living status, April-May 2011

Nontraditional students more likely to own basic electronics

Figure 81: Electronics product ownership, by student type and living status, April-May 2011

College living students more likely to use Verizon

Figure 82: Primary cell phone service provider, by student type and living status, April-May 2011

Most want to stay connected, remain loyal to provider

Figure 83: Attitudes toward cell phones, by student/nonstudent status, October 2009-December 2010

Appendix—Other Useful Consumer Tables

Figure 84: Items/situations personally concerned about, by student gender, April-May 2011

Figure 85: School year living situation, by student gender, April-May 2011

Figure 86: Online activities in the last seven days, by student gender, April-May 2011

Figure 87: Online activities in the last seven days, by student household income, April-May 2011

Figure 88: Frequency of eating meals, by student gender, April-May 2011

Figure 89: Where any weekday meals typically eaten, by student gender, April-May 2011

Figure 90: Where any weekday meals typically eaten, by student age, April-May 2011

Figure 91: Frequency of non-face-to-face communication, by student gender, April-May 2011

Figure 92: Frequency of non-face-to-face communication, by student age, April-May 2011

Figure 93: Frequency of non-face-to-face communication, by student household income, April-May 2011

Figure 94: Frequency of non-face-to-face communication, by student type and living status, April-May 2011

Figure 95: Primary cell phone service provider, by student gender, April-May 2011

Figure 96: Cell phone service subscription type, by student gender, April-May 2011

Appendix—Trade Associations

Abstract

Americans are attending college in record numbers, and it is increasingly seen as a requirement for young people, rather than an option. The increase in college attendance is impacting the lifestyles of young adults in a variety of ways. Many are postponing marriage and childbirth as they seek education and training that will help them achieve financial security. It is also clear that the nature of the student body is changing in that it has become much more diverse than it was in the past. Hispanics, blacks, and Asian-Americans are attending in large numbers, and there has also been a sharp rise in recent years in students aged 25+. In short, while the college segment is a potentially lucrative one for marketers, it is morphing and hence should be examined carefully by those developing messaging or new offerings for college students.

As such, Mintel has prepared this report to address the following questions:
  • How have college attendance levels changed in recent years and how are they likely to change between 2011 and 2016?
  • How is the demographic makeup of the student body changing and how is this impacting the way that marketers need to approach the student segment to optimize effectiveness?
  • How are students who attend state and private universities distinct from those who attend more nontraditional or for-profit schools, such as those in which classes are commonly taught online?
  • What are the primary concerns of college students and how do these concerns seem to impact decision making?
  • What is the typical living situation of today’s college student and what is their level of responsibility for paying household bills?
  • What types of leisure activities do students commonly engage in and how much time do they spend going to school, working and having fun?


Get full details about this report >>
 
Learn more about this product


Price and delivery options

Search Inside Report

US: 800.298.5699

Int'l: +1.240.747.3093


 

About MarketResearch.com
MarketResearch.com is an online aggregator selling over 400,000 market research reports, company profiles and country profiles from over 720 research firms. Our reports will provide you with the critical business and competitive intelligence you need for strategic planning and marketing research. Coverage includes the US, UK, Europe, Asia and global markets.