Report cover image

Wound and Tissue Management Market Size, Share, and Trends Analysis - United States - 2024-2030 - MedSuite - Includes: Wound Closure Market, Traditional Wound Dressing Market, and 11 more

Publisher iData Research, Inc.
Published Aug 23, 2024
Length 505 Pages
SKU # IDR19173485

Description

Wound and Tissue Management Market Size, Share, and Trends Analysis - United States - 2024-2030 - MedSuite - Includes: Wound Closure Market, Traditional Wound Dressing Market, and 11 more


In 2023, the U.S. wound and tissue management market was valued at $12.2 billion, with expectations for it to grow at a 3.9% CAGR, reaching $15.9 billion by the end of the forecast period. The full report on this market encompasses a wide range of segments, including wound closure, traditional and advanced wound dressings (such as moist, antimicrobial, interactive, and non-adherent contact layers), surgical hemostats, tissue sealants, anti-adhesion products, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), static compression therapy, and dynamic compression therapy.

DATA COVERED IN THE REPORT:

Unit Sales, Pricing Trends, and Market Growth
Projections to 2030 and Historical Insights from 2020
Key Drivers and Restraints by Segment
Competitive Landscape with Market Share Breakdown
Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
Procedure Volumes
Competitor Profiles, Product Portfolios, and SWOT Analysis for Leading Companies
Impact of COVID-19

U.S. WOUND AND TISSUE MANAGEMENT MARKET TRENDS:

While most wound and tissue management segments are experiencing growth, the market faces challenges due to the availability of alternative wound care options. Traditional wound dressings are increasingly being replaced by advanced products, although even within the advanced segment, some dressings are outperformed by newer methods tailored to specific wound types

U.S. WOUND AND TISSUE MANAGEMENT MARKET LEADERS:

Three major companies dominate the U.S. wound and tissue management market: Ethicon, 3M, and Medtronic.
Ethicon holds the top position, primarily due to its leading role in wound closure, representing over 25% of the total market. Additionally, Ethicon has a strong presence in surgical hemostats, anti-adhesion, and tissue sealants, with steady growth expected in these sectors.
3M ranks second, driven by its dominant 75%+ market share in NPWT and significant stake in advanced wound dressings. Both segments are anticipated to grow at a 4-5% CAGR, reinforcing 3M’s strong foothold.
Medtronic secures third place, thanks to its significant share in wound closure products like sutures, staplers, and ligating clips, which account for over a quarter of that market segment. Despite limited activity in other areas, Medtronic’s position in wound closure ensures its market strength.

MARKET SEGMENTATION OVERVIEW:

Wound Closure Market: Includes sutures, staplers, ligating clips, skin closure strips, mesh, and cyanoacrylate-based tissue adhesives.
Traditional Wound Dressings: Comprises gauze, tapes, bandages (excluding compression types), and cotton-based products.
Advanced Wound Dressings: Covers moist, antimicrobial, interactive dressings, and non-adherent contact layers.
Moist Dressings: Encompasses foam, transparent films, hydrocolloid, alginate, gelling fiber, and hydrogel dressings.
Antimicrobial Dressings: Includes both silver-based and non-silver antimicrobial options.
Interactive Dressings: Biomaterials such as collagen-based products and skin substitutes.
Non-Adherent Contact Layers: Used in hospital and alternate care settings.
Surgical Hemostats: Includes thrombin-based, oxidized cellulose, gelatin, collagen, polysaccharide, and combination hemostats.
Tissue Sealants: Includes fibrin, protein, and synthetic-based tissue sealants.
Anti-Adhesion: Used for gynecological, abdominal, and other surgeries to prevent adhesion.
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT): Includes single-use pumps, conventional NPWT rentals, dressings, and canisters.
Static Compression Therapy: Consists of compression stockings, AES, compression bandages, and Unna boots.
Dynamic Compression Therapy: Comprises dynamic DVT prevention sleeves, mobile DVT prevention, and pneumatic compression devices.

RESEARCH SCOPE SUMMARY:

Regions: United States
Base Year: 2023
Forecast Period: 2024-2030
Historical Data: 2020-2022
Quantitative Coverage: Market Size, Shares, Forecasts, Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Prices
Qualitative Coverage: COVID-19 Impact, Market Trends, Limiters, Competitive
Landscape, SWOT, Mergers & Acquisitions, FDA Recalls, Disruptive Technologies,
Disease Insights
Data Sources: Interviews with industry experts, government and regulatory data, hospital statistics, import/export records, and internal iData Research databases.

Table of Contents

505 Pages
executive summary
U.S. Wound and Tissue Management Market Overview
Competitive Analysis
Market Trends
Market Developments
Markets Included
Key Report Updates
Version History
research methodology
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
impact of covid-19 on THE U.S. Wound and tissue management Market
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Analysis By Market Segment
2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario
2.2.2 Base Case Scenario
2.2.3 Best Case Scenario
Disease Overview
3.1 Disease Treatment and Diagnostic
3.1.1 Vascular Malformations
3.1.2 Deep Ven Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
3.1.3 Lower Extremity Ulcers
3.1.4 Lymphedema
3.1.5 Surgery
3.1.6 Traumas and Burns
3.2 Patient Demographics
3.2.1 Vascular Malformations
3.2.2 Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
3.2.3 Lower Extremity Ulcers
3.2.4 Lymphedema
3.2.5 Traumas and Burns
Product Assessment
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Product Portfolios
4.2.1 Wound Closure Devices
4.2.1.1 Sutures
4.2.1.2 Staplers
4.2.1.3 Ligating Clip Appliers
4.2.1.4 Wound Closure Strips
4.2.1.5 Tissue Adhesives
4.2.2 Traditional Wound Dressings
4.2.3 Advanced Wound Dressings
4.2.4 Moist Dressings
4.2.4.1.1 Foam Dressings
4.2.4.1.2 Transparent Film Dressings
4.2.4.1.3 Hydrocolloid Dressings
4.2.4.1.4 Alginate Dressings
4.2.4.1.5 Gelling Fiber Dressings
4.2.4.1.6 Hydrogel Dressings
4.2.5 Antimicrobial Dressings
4.2.5.1.1 Silver Dressing
4.2.5.1.2 Non-Silver Dressing
4.2.5.1.3 Charcoal Dressing
4.2.6 Interactive Dressing
4.2.6.1.1 Bioactive Dressings
4.2.6.1.2 Skin Substitute
4.2.7 Non-Adherent Contact Layer
4.2.8 Surgical Hemostats
4.2.8.1 Thrombin-Based Hemostats
4.2.8.2 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Hemostats
4.2.8.3 Gelatin-Based Hemostat
4.2.8.4 Collagen-Based Hemostat
4.2.8.5 Combination Hemostat
4.2.8.6 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostat
4.2.8.7 First-Responder Hemostat
4.2.9 Tissue Sealants
4.2.9.1 Fibrin-Based Tissue Sealants
4.2.9.2 Protein-Based Tissue Sealants
4.2.9.3 Synthetic Tissue Sealants
4.2.10 Anti-Adhesion
4.2.11 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
4.2.12 Static Compression Therapy
4.2.12.1 Compression Stockings
4.2.12.2 Anti-Embolism Stockings
4.2.12.3 Compression Bandages
4.2.12.4 Unna Boots
4.2.13 Dynamic Compression Therapy
4.2.13.1 Dynamic DVT Prevention
4.2.13.2 Mobile DVT Prevention
4.2.13.3 Pneumatic Compression
4.3 Regulatory Issues and Recalls
4.3.1 Wound Closure Market FDA Recalls
4.3.2 Moist Dressing Market FDA Recalls
4.3.3 Antimicrobial Dressing Market FDA Recalls
4.3.4 Interactive Dressing Market FDA Recalls
4.3.5 Surgical Hemostat Market FDA Recalls
4.3.6 Tissue Sealant Market FDA Recalls
4.3.7 Anti-Adhesion Market FDA Recalls
4.3.8 Negative Pressure Market FDA Recalls
4.3.9 Static Compression Therapy Market FDA Recalls
4.4 Clinical Trials
4.4.1 Wound Closure Devices Clinical Trials
4.4.2 Advanced Wound Dressings Clinical Trials
4.4.3 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Clinical Trials
4.4.4 Surgical Hemostat Clinical Trials
4.4.5 Tissue Sealant Clinical Trials
4.4.6 Static Compression Clinical Trials
4.4.7 Dynamic Compression Clinical Trials
U.S. Wound and Tissue Management Market Overview
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Market Overview & Trend Analysis
5.3 Drivers and Limiters
5.3.1 Market Drivers
5.3.2 Market Limiters
5.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
5.5 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.6 Company Profiles
5.6.1 3M
5.6.2 Baxter
5.6.3 Cardinal Health
5.6.4 Essity
5.6.5 Ethicon
5.6.6 Integra Lifesciences
5.6.7 Intuitive Surgical
5.6.8 Medline
5.6.9 Medtronic
5.6.10 MiMedx
5.6.11 Organogenesis
5.6.12 Smith & Nephew
5.6.13 Tactile Medical
5.7 SWOT Analysis
5.7.1 3M
5.7.2 Baxter
5.7.3 Cardinal Health
5.7.4 Essity
5.7.5 Ethicon
5.7.6 Integra Lifesciences
5.7.7 Intuitive Surgical
5.7.8 Medline
5.7.9 Medtronic
5.7.10 MiMedx
5.7.11 Organogenesis
5.7.12 Smith & Nephew
5.7.13 Tactile Medical
Wound Closure Market
6.1 Introduction
6.1.1 Sutures
6.1.2 Staplers
6.1.3 Ligating Clip Appliers
6.1.4 Skin Closure Strips
6.1.5 Mesh and Cyanoacrylate-Based Skin Closure System
6.1.6 Zip Surgical Skin Closure
6.1.7 Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesives
6.2 Market Overview
6.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
6.3.1 Suture Market
6.3.1.1 Suture Market by Device Type
6.3.1.1.1 Absorbable Suture Market
6.3.1.1.2 Non-Absorbable Suture Market
6.3.1.1.3 Knotless Tissue Closure Market
6.3.1.2 Suture Market by Infection Control Type
6.3.1.2.1 Antibacterial Suture Market
6.3.1.2.2 Standard Suture Market
6.3.1.3 Suture Market by Care Setting
6.3.1.3.1 Hospital Suture Market
6.3.1.3.2 Alternate Care Suture Market
6.3.2 Stapler Market
6.3.2.1 Stapler Market by Device Type
6.3.2.1.1 Open Surgery Stapler Market
6.3.2.1.2 Laparoscopic Stapler Market
6.3.2.1.3 Skin Stapler Market
6.3.2.2 Stapler Market by Care Setting
6.3.2.2.1 Hospital Stapler Market
6.3.2.2.2 Alternate Care Stapler Market
6.3.3 Ligation Clip Applier Market
6.3.3.1 Ligating Clip Applier Market by Device Type
6.3.3.1.1 Open Surgery Ligation Market
6.3.3.1.2 Laparoscopic Ligation Market
6.3.3.2 Ligation Market by Care Setting
6.3.3.2.1 Hospital Ligation Market
6.3.3.2.2 Alternate Care Ligation Market
6.3.4 Skin Closure Strip Market
6.3.4.1 Hospital Skin Closure Strip Market
6.3.4.2 Alternate Care Skin Closure Strip Market
6.3.5 Mesh and Cyanoacrylate-Based Skin Closure System Market
6.3.6 Zip Surgical Skin Closure Market
6.3.7 Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
6.3.7.1 Hospital Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
6.3.7.2 Alternate Care Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market
6.4 Drivers and Limiters
6.4.1 Market Drivers
6.4.2 Market Limiters
6.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Traditional Wound Dressing Market
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Market Overview
7.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
7.3.1 Traditional Wound Dressing Market
7.3.2 Gauze Market
7.3.2.1 Hospital Gauze Market
7.3.2.2 Alternate Care Gauze Market
7.3.3 Tape Market
7.3.3.1 Hospital Tape Market
7.3.3.2 Alternate Care Tape Market
7.3.4 Bandage Market
7.3.4.1 Hospital Bandage Market
7.3.4.2 Alternate Care Bandage Market
7.3.5 Cotton Market
7.3.5.1 Hospital Cotton Market
7.3.5.2 Alternate Care Cotton Market
7.4 Drivers and Limiters
7.4.1 Market Drivers
7.4.2 Market Limiters
7.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Advanced wound dressing Market
8.1 Introduction
8.1.1 Moist Advanced Dressings
8.1.2 Antimicrobial Advanced Dressings
8.1.3 Interactive Advanced Dressings
8.1.4 Non-Adherent Contact Layers
8.2 Market Overview
8.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
8.3.1 Advanced Wound Dressing Market
8.3.2 Moist Dressing Market
8.3.3 Antimicrobial Dressing Market
8.3.4 Interactive Advanced Dressing Market
8.3.5 Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
8.4 Drivers and Limiters
8.4.1 Market Drivers
8.4.2 Market Limiters
8.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Moist dressing Market
9.1 Introduction
9.1.1 Foam Dressings
9.1.2 Transparent Film Dressings
9.1.3 Hydrocolloid Dressings
9.1.4 Alginate Dressings
9.1.5 Gelling Fiber Dressings
9.1.6 Hydrogel Dressings
9.2 Market Overview
9.2.1 Moist Dressing Market by Segment
9.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
9.3.1 Moist Dressing Market
9.3.2 Foam Dressing Market
9.3.3 Transparent Film Dressing Market
9.3.4 Hydrocolloid Dressing Market
9.3.5 Alginate Dressing Market
9.3.6 Gelling Fiber Dressing Market
9.3.7 Hydrogel Dressing Market
9.3.8 Moist Dressing Market by Care Setting
9.3.8.1 Hospital Moist Dressing Market
9.3.8.2 Alternate Care Moist Dressing Market
9.4 Drivers and Limiters
9.4.1 Market Drivers
9.4.2 Market Limiters
9.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Antimicrobial dressing Market
10.1 Introduction
10.1.1 Silver Dressings
10.1.2 Non-Silver Dressings
10.2 Market Overview
10.2.1 Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Segment
10.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
10.3.1 Antimicrobial Dressing Market
10.3.2 Silver Dressing Market
10.3.3 Non-Silver Dressing Market
10.3.4 Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Care Setting
10.3.4.1 Hospital Antimicrobial Dressing Market
10.3.4.2 Alternate Care Antimicrobial Dressing Market
10.4 Drivers and Limiters
10.4.1 Market Drivers
10.4.2 Market Limiters
10.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Interactive dressing Market
11.1 Introduction
11.1.1 Biomaterials
11.1.2 Skin Substitutes
11.2 Market Overview
11.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
11.3.1 Interactive Dressing Market
11.3.2 Collagen Dressing Market
11.3.3 Skin Substitute Market
11.3.3.1 Particulate Skin Substitute Market
11.3.3.2 Sheet Skin Substitute Market
11.3.3.3 Other Skin Substitute Market
11.3.3.4 Skin Substitute Market by Care Setting
11.3.3.4.1 Hospital Skin Substitute Market
11.3.3.4.2 Alternate Care Skin Substitute Market
11.4 Drivers and Limiters
11.4.1 Market Drivers
11.4.2 Market Limiters
11.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Non-Adherent Contact layer Market
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Market Overview
12.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
12.3.1 Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
12.3.2 Hospital Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
12.3.3 Alternate Care Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market
12.4 Drivers and Limiters
12.4.1 Market Drivers
12.4.2 Market Limiters
12.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Surgical Hemostat Market
13.1 Introduction
13.1.1 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostats
13.1.2 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose-Based Hemostats
13.1.3 Thrombin-Based Hemostats
13.1.4 Gelatin-Based Hemostats
13.1.5 Collagen-Based Hemostats
13.1.6 Combination Hemostats
13.1.7 First Responder Hemostats
13.2 Market Overview
13.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
13.3.1 Surgical Hemostat Market
13.3.2 Thrombin-Based Hemostat Market
13.3.3 Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Hemostat Market
13.3.4 Gelatin-Based Hemostat Market
13.3.5 Collagen-Based Hemostat Market
13.3.6 Combination Hemostat Market
13.3.7 Polysaccharide-Based Hemostat Market
13.3.8 First Responder Hemostat Market
13.4 Drivers and Limiters
13.4.1 Market Drivers
13.4.2 Market Limiters
13.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Tissue sealant Market
14.1 Introduction
14.1.1 Fibrin Sealants
14.1.2 Protein-Based Sealants
14.1.3 Synthetic Tissue Sealants
14.2 Market Overview
14.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
14.3.1 Tissue Sealant Market
14.3.2 Fibrin-Based Tissue Sealant Market
14.3.3 Protein-Based Tissue Sealant Market
14.3.4 Synthetic Tissue Sealant Market
14.4 Drivers and Limiters
14.4.1 Market Drivers
14.4.2 Market Limiters
14.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Anti-Adhesion Market
15.1 Introduction
15.2 Market Overview
15.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
15.3.1 Anti-Adhesion Market
15.3.2 Gynecological Procedure Market
15.3.3 Abdominal Procedure Market
15.3.4 Other Procedures Market
15.4 Drivers and Limiters
15.4.1 Market Drivers
15.4.2 Market Limiters
15.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market
16.1 Introduction
16.2 Market Overview
16.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
16.3.1 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market
16.3.2 Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
16.3.2.1 Hospital Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
16.3.2.2 Alternate Care Single-Use NPWT Pump Market
16.3.3 Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
16.3.3.1 Hospital Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
16.3.3.2 Alternate Care Conventional NPWT Pump Rental Market
16.3.4 NPWT Dressing Market
16.3.4.1 Hospital NPWT Dressing Market
16.3.4.2 Alternate Care NPWT Dressing Market
16.3.5 NPWT Canister Market
16.3.5.1 Hospital NPWT Canister Market
16.3.5.2 Alternate Care NPWT Canister Market
16.4 Drivers and Limiters
16.4.1 Market Drivers
16.4.2 Market Limiters
16.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Static Compression therapy Market
17.1 Introduction
17.1.1 Graduated Compression Stockings
17.1.2 Anti-Embolism Stockings
17.1.3 Compression Bandages
17.1.4 Unna Boot
17.2 Market Overview
17.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
17.3.1 Static Compression Therapy Market
17.3.2 Graduated Compression Stocking Market
17.3.2.1 OTC Graduated Compression Stocking Market
17.3.2.2 Medical-Grade Graduated Compression Stocking Market
17.3.3 Anti-Embolism Stocking Market
17.3.4 Compression Bandage Market
17.3.4.1 Compression Kit Market
17.3.4.2 Adhesive Bandage Market
17.3.4.3 Cohesive Bandage Market
17.3.5 Unna Boot Market
17.4 Drivers and Limiters
17.4.1 Market Drivers
17.4.2 Market Limiters
17.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Dynamic Compression Therapy Market
18.1 Introduction
18.1.1 Dynamic Deep Vein Thrombosis Prevention
18.1.2 Mobile Deep Vein Thrombosis Compression
18.1.3 Pneumatic Compression
18.2 Market Overview
18.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
18.3.1 Dynamic DVT Prevention Device Market
18.3.2 Mobile DVT Prevention Device Market
18.3.3 Pneumatic Compression Device Market
18.3.3.1 Sequential Compression Device Market
18.3.3.1.1 Sequential Compression Pump Market
18.3.3.1.2 Sequential Compression Sleeve Market
18.3.3.1.3 Sequential Compression Sleeve Market Unit Analysis
18.3.3.2 Calibrated Sequential Compression Device Market
18.3.3.2.1 Calibrated Sequential Compression Pump Market
18.3.3.2.2 Calibrated Sequential Compression Sleeve Market
18.4 Drivers and Limiters
18.4.1 Market Drivers
18.4.2 Market Limiters
18.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Abbreviations
List of Charts
Chart 1-1: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Chart 1-2: Wound and Tissue Management Market Overview, U.S., 2023 & 2030
Chart 2-1: Multi-Scenario Wound and Tissue Management Market Forecast, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Chart 5-1: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 5-2: Leading Competitors, Wound and Tissue Management Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 6-1: Wound Closure Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 6-2: Leading Competitors, Wound Closure Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 7-1: Traditional Wound Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 7-2: Leading Competitors, Traditional Wound Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 8-1: Advanced Wound Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 8-2: Leading Competitors, Advanced Wound Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 9-1: Moist Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 9-2: Leading Competitors, Moist Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 10-1: Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 10-2: Leading Competitors, Antimicrobial Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 11-1: Interactive Dressing Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 11-2: Leading Competitors, Interactive Dressing Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 12-1: Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 12-2: Leading Competitors, Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 13-1: Surgical Hemostat Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 13-2: Leading Competitors, Surgical Hemostat Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 14-1: Tissue Sealant Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 14-2: Leading Competitors, Tissue Sealant Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 15-1: Anti-Adhesion Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 15-2: Leading Competitors, Anti-Adhesion Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 16-1: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 16-2: Leading Competitors, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 17-1: Static Compression Therapy Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 17-2: Leading Competitors, Static Compression Therapy Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 18-1: Dynamic Compression Therapy Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 18-2: Leading Competitors, Dynamic Compression Therapy Market, U.S., 2023
List of Figures
Figure 1-1: Wound and Tissue Management Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2023 (1 of 2)
Figure 1-2: Wound and Tissue Management Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2023 (2 of 2)
Figure 1-3: Companies Researched in This Report (1 of 2)
Figure 1-4: Companies Researched in This Report (2 of 2)
Figure 1-5: Factors Impacting the Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2)
Figure 1-6: Factors Impacting the Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2)
Figure 1-7: Recent Events in the Wound and Tissue Management Market, U.S., 2020 – 2024 (1 of 2)
Figure 1-8: Recent Events in the Wound and Tissue Management Market, U.S., 2020 – 2024 (2 of 2)
Figure 1-9: Wound and Tissue Management Markets Covered (1 of 5)
Figure 1-10: Wound and Tissue Management Markets Covered (2 of 5)
Figure 1-11: Wound and Tissue Management Markets Covered (3 of 5)
Figure 1-12: Wound and Tissue Management Markets Covered (4 of 5)
Figure 1-13: Wound and Tissue Management Markets Covered (5 of 5)
Figure 1-14: Key Report Updates
Figure 1-15: Version History
Figure 2-1: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) (1 of 2)
Figure 2-2: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) (2 of 2)
Figure 2-3: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) (1 of 2)
Figure 2-4: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) (2 of 2)
Figure 2-5: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) (1 of 2)
Figure 2-6: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) (2 of 2)
Figure 4-1 Wound Closure Device Products by Company (1 of 2)
Figure 4-2 Wound Closure Device Market by Company (2 of 2)
Figure 4-3 Traditional Wound Dressing Market by Company (1 of 2)
Figure 4-4 Traditional Wound Dressings by Company (2 of 2)
Figure 4-5 Advanced Wound Dressing Market by Company (1 of 3)
Figure 4-6 Advanced Wound Dressing Market by Company (2 of 3)
Figure 4-7 Advanced Wound Dressing Market by Company (3 of 3)
Figure 4-8 Moist Dressing Market by Company (1 of 2)
Figure 4-9 Moist Dressing Market by Company (2 of 2)
Figure 4-10 Antimicrobial Dressing Market by Company
Figure 4-11 Interactive Dressing Market by Company
Figure 4-12 Non-Adherent Contact Layer Market by Company
Figure 4-13 Surgical Hemostat Market by Company
Figure 4-14 Tissue Sealant Products by Company
Figure 4-15: Anti-Adhesion Market by Company
Figure 4-16: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Products by Company
Figure 4-17: Static Compression Theraply by Company (1 of 3)
Figure 4-18: Static Compression Theraply by Company (2 of 3)
Figure 4-19: Static Compression Theraply by Company (3 of 3)
Figure 4-20: Dynamic Compression Therapy by Company (1 of 2)
Figure 4-21: Dynamic Compression Therapy by Company (2 of 2)
Figure 4-22: Class 2 Device Recall Sofsilk Braided Silk sutures
Figure 4-23: Class 2 Device Recall ECHELON Endopath Stapler
Figure 4-24: Class 2 Device Recall Sofsilk Braided Silk sutures
Figure 4-25: Class 2 Device Recall TriStaple 2.0 Black Intelligent Reload
Figure 4-26: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic
Figure 4-27: Class 3 Device Recall Liquiband
Figure 4-28: Class 2 Device Recall Class 2 Device Recall Ethicon ECHELON FLEX Powered Plus Stapler
Figure 4-29: Class 2 Device Recall Ethicon Dermabond Advanced Topical Skin Adhesive-topical skin adhesive
Figure 4-30: Class 2 Class 2 Class 2 Device Recall VICRYL MONOFILAMENT VIOLET
Figure 4-31: Class 2 Device Recall Velosorb Fast Braided Absorbable Suture
Figure 4-32: Class 2 Device Recall Endo GIA Auto Suture Universal Articulating Loading
Figure 4-33: Class 2 Device Recall: MERSILK and PERMAHAND, Braided Silk and Virgin Silk Non-Absorbable Suture
Figure 4-34: Class 2 Device Recall MERSILK and PERMAHAND, Braided Silk and Virgin Silk NonAbsorbable Suture
Figure 4-35: Class 2 Device Recall
Figure 4-36: Class 2 Device Recall Coated VICRYL (Polyglactin 910) Suture
Figure 4-37: Class 2 Device Recall CarboFlex
Figure 4-38: Class 2 Device Recall ConvaTec AQUACEL
Figure 4-39: Class 2 Device Recall DuoDERM
Figure 4-40: Class 2 Device Recall DuoDERM
Figure 4-41: Class 2 Device Recall ConvaTec AQUACEL
Figure 4-42: Class 2 Device Recall Gentrix Surgical Matrix Thick
Figure 4-43: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Ostene
Figure 4-44: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Floseal
Figure 4-45: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Coseal
Figure 4-46: Class 2 Device Recall Ethicon
Figure 4-47: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Coseal
Figure 4-48: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Preveleak
Figure 4-49: Class 2 Device Recall Baxter Seprafilm Adhesion Barrier
Figure 4-50: Class 2 Device Recall Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Powered Suction Pump
Figure 4-51: Class 3 Device Recall UNNA BOOT
Figure 4-52: Class 2 Device Recall JOBST Compri2 & JOBST Compri2 Lite
Figure 4-53: Vicryl Rapide Versus Nonabsorbable Suture in Repair of Simple Traumatic Extremity and Trunk Lacerations in Adult Patients
Figure 4-54: Barbed Suture: A Look at Its Use for Hysterotomy Closure During Cesarean Section
Figure 4-55: Subcuticular Absorbable Staples Versus Conventional Skin Closure in Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Control Trial
Figure 4-56: Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs. Conventional Dressings for Prevention of Wound Complications After Revision THA
Figure 4-57: PMS Study of Silver I Alginate Non-Woven Dressing (Hydro-Alginate)
Figure 4-58: Novel Antimicrobial Dressing in Peripheral Intravenous Catheters (PIVCs)
Figure 4-59: An Adaptive, Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of PermeaDerm® (PD) as Compared to Mepilex Ag® Used as Standard of Care in the Treatment of Adult and Pediatric Partial Thickness Burns.
Figure 4-60: Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Surgical Removal of Deep-Seated High-Malignant Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities and Trunk Wall.
Figure 4-61: Effect of Negative Wound Pressure on P.S
Figure 4-62: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Post-Operative Incision Management
Figure 4-63The Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Wound Healing in Major Amputations
Figure 4-64: PICO Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Obese Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Delivery.
Figure 4-65: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Diabetic Wounds
Figure 4-66: A Pilot Study to Compare the Efficacy of NPWT PRO Versus KCI Ulta® NPWT and to Compare NPWT PRO Versus NPWT PRO With Simultaneous Irrigation on Wound Healing
Figure 4-67: GATT-Patch Versus SURGICEL® Original in Minimally Invasive Liver and Gallbladder Surgery
Figure 4-68: ACCEL Absorbable Hemostat
Figure 4-69: The EVARREST® Pediatric Mild or Moderate Liver and Soft Tissue Bleeding Study
Figure 4-70: Assessment of Long-term Effects of Tachosil
Figure 4-71: Observational Pilot Study With TachoSil as a Ventricular Sealant
Figure 4-72: The ROle of Compression StocKings in Heart Failure Patients
Figure 4-73: Use of Compression Bandages in the Prevention of Post-mastectomy Lymphoceles
Figure 4-74: Adjustable Compression Wrap Versus Compression Bandage Reduce to Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema
Figure 4-75: Effectiveness of Compression Stocking on Overnight Fluid Shift in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Patients
Figure 4-76: Evaluation of the Effect of Custom Compression Garments on Standing Static Balance in Ehlers Danlos Syndrome
Figure 4-77: Effects of Dynamic Compression Garments in Children With CP
Figure 4-78: Design Validation Hemodynamic Study of New Kendall SCD SmartFlow Compression System
Figure 4-79: The Use of a Dynamic Compression Intramedullary Nail for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis
Figure 5-1: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) (1 of 2)
Figure 5-2: Wound and Tissue Management Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) (2 of 2)
Figure 5-3: Leading Competitors, Wound and Tissue Management Market, U.S., 2023 (1 of 2)
Figure 5-4: Leading Competitors, Wound and Tissue Management Market, U.S., 2023 (2 of 2)
Figure 5-5: SWOT Analysis, Baxter
Figure 5-6: SWOT Analysis Cardinal Health (1 of 2)
Figure 5-7: SWOT Analysis, Essity
Figure 5-8: SWOT Analysis, Ethicon
Figure 5-9: SWOT Analysis, Integra LifeSciences
Figure 5-10: SWOT Analysis, Intuitive Surgical
Figure 5-11: SWOT Analysis, Medline
Figure 5-12: SWOT Analysis, Medtronic
Figure 5-13: SWOT Analysis, MiMedx
Figure 5-14: SWOT Analysis, Organogenesis
Figure 5-15: SWOT Analysis, Smith & Nephew
Figure 5-16: SWOT Analysis, Tactile Medical
Figure 6-1: Wound Closure Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) (1 of 2)
Figure 6-2: Wound Closure Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) (2 of 2)
Figure 6-3: Total Suture Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-4: Suture Market by Device Type, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 6-5: Absorbable Suture Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-6: Non-Absorbable Suture Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-7: Knotless Tissue Closure Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-8: Suture Market by Infection Control Type, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 6-9: Antibacterial Suture Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-10: Standard Suture Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-11: Suture Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 6-12: Hospital Suture Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-13: Alternate Care Suture Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-14: Stapler Market by Device Type, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 6-15: Open Surgery Stapler by Segment Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-16: Open Surgery Firing Gun Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-17: Open Surgery Cartridge Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-18: Laparoscopic Stapler by Segment Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-19: Laparoscopic Firing Gun Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-20: Laparoscopic Cartridge Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-21: Skin Stapler Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-22: Stapler Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 6-23: Hospital Stapler Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-24: Alternate Care Stapler Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-25: Ligating Clip Applier Market by Device Type, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 6-26: Open Surgery Ligation by Segment Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-27: Open Surgery Multi-Fire Clip Applier Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-28: Open Surgery Single-Fire Clip Applier Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-29: Laparoscopic Ligation by Segment Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-30: Laparoscopic Multi-Fire Clip Applier Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-31: Laparoscopic Single-Fire Clip Applier Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-32: Ligation Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 6-33: Hospital Ligation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-34: Alternate Care Ligation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-35: Skin Closure Strip Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 6-36: Total Skin Closure Strip Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-37: Hospital Skin Closure Strip Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-38: Alternate Care Skin Closure Strip Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-39: Total Mesh and Cyanoacrylate-Based Skin Closure System Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-40: Total Zip Surgical Skin Closure Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-41: Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 6-42: Total Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-43: Hospital Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-44: Alternate Care Cyanoacrylate-Based Tissue Adhesive Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 6-45: Leading Competitors, Wound Closure Market, U.S., 2023

Pricing

Currency Rates
How Do Licenses Work?

How Do Licenses Work?

The primary function of a report license is to define how many people within a company are authorized to use the purchased report. This is separate to how a report might be delivered. Unless specifically identified otherwise, the purchase option is Single User. Below is a helpful description of that license, along with a sampling of others most commonly offered.

  • This license allows only one user to have access to and to use/read the report. It is not one user at a time or one user group; it is an individual who will be reading and utilizing the report.

  • This license allows for the entire purchasing company to read and use the report. This is the license level that would allow for a report to be placed on an internal company shared drive for access by all employees of that direct company. This license does not extend to parent or sister company use.

  • This license is designed to allow an entire department within a company full access to a report. The departmental license is a great option for companies that have more than one location and the department is spread out all over the country/world

  • This license is for companies that have one location where they want the report to be accessible by all employees within that physical location.

  • This is the most flexible of the licensing options. Some publishers will allow you to get a license for a preset number of people (typically 5). These licenses are ideal for small work groups.

License options are at the discretion of each publisher. As such, not all licenses indicated above are available for every product. If you are uncertain of the best license for your needs or would like a license that is not proactively available, please contact us and we will be happy to assist.

Head shot

Questions or Comments?

Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
Chat Now
Contact Us