Report cover image

MedSuite: United States Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis - 2024-2030 - Includes: MIS Interbody Devices, MIS Pedicle Screws, Spinous Process Fixation, and 4 more

Publisher iData Research, Inc.
Published Mar 28, 2024
Length 450 Pages
SKU # IDR18720261

Description

Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis - United States - 2024-2030 - MedSuite - Includes: MIS Interbody Devices, MIS Pedicle Screws, Spinous Process Fixation, and 4 more


Product Description

The US MIS spinal implant market reached a value of $2.3 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 4.6% to exceed $3.1 billion during the forecast period.

The comprehensive report suite on the U.S. market for minimally invasive spinal (MIS) implants covers various segments, including MIS interbody devices, MIS pedicle screws, spinous process fixation, facet fixation, MIS sacroiliac joint fusion, spine endoscopes, and MIS instrumentation. Despite encountering multiple challenges, growth is anticipated across all market segments. This growth is attributed to steady patient demand driven by demographics and evolving regulations favoring MIS procedures. The reduced recovery time associated with MIS surgeries is also a significant factor influencing the preference for these procedures among patients, hospitals, and surgeons over traditional spine surgeries.

MARKET REPORT DATA TYPES INCLUDED

Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Value & Growth Trends
Forecasts Until 2030, and Historical Data to 2020
Market Drivers & Limiters for Each Segment
Competitive Analysis with Market Shares for Each Segment
Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
Procedure Volumes
Company Profiles, Product Portfolios and SWOT for Top Competitors

COVID-19 Impact Analysis



U.S. MIS SPINAL IMPLANTS MARKET INSIGHTS

The market for MIS interbody devices is increasingly favoring oblique (OLIF) and lateral (LLIF) lumbar interbody fusion techniques over the minimally invasive posterior (MIPLIF) and transforaminal (MITLIF) approaches. This trend is driven by the lower injury risk associated with the oblique and lateral methods, positioning them for greater growth. Nonetheless, all segments are anticipated to expand positively.

U.S. MIS SPINAL IMPLANTS MARKET SHARE INSIGHTS

In 2023, Globus Medical's merger with NuVasive propelled them to the forefront of the U.S. minimally invasive spine (MIS) market. This combined entity not only dominated the MIS interbody device sector but also held significant positions in MIS pedicle screws, spinous process fixation, and MIS instrumentation. However, NuVasive did not enter the MIS sacroiliac joint fusion and spine endoscope segments.

Medtronic secured the runner-up position in the 2023 U.S. MIS market, showcasing impressive performance across several segments, notably MIS interbody devices, MIS pedicle screws, spinous process fixation, facet fixation, and MIS instrumentation. Unlike its leading competitor, Medtronic also did not venture into the spine endoscope market.

Other key players like DePuy Synthes, Stryker, SI-BONE, Richard Wolf, Joimax, ZimVie, and various smaller entities rounded out the competition. The U.S. MIS market is marked by the presence of numerous smaller companies, with most holding market shares of no more than 2%.

MARKET SEGMENTATION SUMMARY

While this report suite contains all applicable market data, each of the markets are also available as stand alone MedCore reports. This allows you to get access to only the specific market segment research that you need. You can view all these included reports and segmentation here:

MIS Interbody Device Market – MedCore – Segmented by:

Device Type: MIPLIF, LITLIF, LLIF, OLIF.

MIS Pedicle Screw Market – Segmented by:

Device Type: Percutaneous Cannulated, Retractor Cannulated, and Retractor Non-Cannulated.
Spinous Process Fixation Market
Facet Fixation Market
MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market
Spinal Endoscope Market – Segmented by:
Device Type: Endoscope, and Spine Endoscope Instrumentation
MIS Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market

Research Scope Summary
Regions: United States
Base Year: 2023
Forecast: 2024-2030
Historical Data: 2020-2022

Quantitative Coverage: Market Size, Procedure Volume, Market Shares, Market Forecasts, Market Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Average Selling Prices.

Qualitative Coverage: COVID-19 Impact, Market Growth Trends, Market Limiters, Competitive Analysis & SWOT for Top Competitors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Company Profiles, Product Portfolios

Data Sources: Primary Interviews with Industry Leaders, Government Physician Data, Regulatory Data, Hospital Private Data, Import & Export Data, iData Research Internal Database.

Table of Contents

450 Pages
executive summary
U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview
Competitive Analysis
Market Trends
Market Developments
Procedures Included
Procedure Codes Investigated
Markets Included
Key Report Updates
Version History
research methodology
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
impact of covid-19 on THE U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Analysis By Market Segment
2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario
2.2.2 Base Case Scenario
2.2.3 Best Case Scenario
Disease overview
3.1 Introduction
3.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
3.1.1.1 Disc Herniation
3.1.1.2 Stenosis
3.1.1.3 Spondylolisthesis
3.1.1.4 Arthritis
3.1.2 Spinal Deformities
3.1.2.1 Scoliosis
3.1.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis
3.1.3 Trauma and Tumor
3.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures
3.1.4.1 Osteoporosis
3.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures
3.2 Patient Demographics
3.2.1 Degenerative Disc Disease
3.2.2 Spinal Deformities
3.2.3 Vertebral Compression Fractures
Product Assessment
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Product Portfolios
4.2.1 MIS Interbody Device
4.2.1.1 Approaches
4.2.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive PLIF
4.2.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive TLIF
4.2.1.1.3 LLIF
4.2.1.1.4 OLIF
4.2.2 MIS Pedicle Screw
4.2.3 Spinous Process Fixation
4.2.4 Facet Fixation
4.2.5 SI Joint Fusion
4.2.6 Spine Endoscope
4.2.7 Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation
4.3 Regulatory Issues and Recalls
4.3.1 MIS Interbody Device
4.3.2 MIS Pedicle Screw
4.3.3 Spinous Process Fixation
4.4 Clinical Trials
4.4.1 MIS Interbody Devices
4.4.2 MIS Pedicle Screw
4.4.3 Spinous Process Fixation
4.4.4 Facet Fixation
4.4.5 SI Joint Fusion
4.4.6 Spine Endoscopes
U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview
5.1 Introduction
5.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion
5.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
5.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
5.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
5.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
5.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws
5.1.2.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
5.1.2.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems
5.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation
5.1.4 Facet Fixation
5.1.5 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
5.1.6 MIS Spine Endoscopes
5.2 Market Overview & Trend Analysis
5.3 Drivers and Limiters
5.3.1 Market Drivers
5.3.2 Market Limiters
5.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
5.5 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.6 Company Profiles
5.6.1 DePuy Synthes
5.6.2 Globus Medical/NuVasive
5.6.3 Joimax
5.6.4 Medtronic
5.6.5 SI-BONE
5.6.6 Stryker
5.6.7 VGI Medical
5.6.8 ZimVie
5.7 SWOT Analysis
5.7.1 DePuy Synthes
5.7.2 Globus Medical/NuVasive
5.7.3 Joimax
5.7.4 Medtronic
5.7.5 SI-BONE
5.7.6 Stryker
5.7.7 VGI Medical
5.7.8 ZimVie
Procedure Numbers
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Procedures
6.2.1 Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures
6.2.2 MIS Interbody Device Procedures
6.2.2.1 MIPLIF Procedures
6.2.2.1.1 MIPLIF Procedures by Care Setting
6.2.2.2 MITLIF Procedures
6.2.2.2.1 MITLIF Procedures by Care Setting
6.2.2.3 LLIF Procedures
6.2.2.3.1 LLIF Procedures by Care Setting
6.2.2.4 OLIF Procedures
6.2.2.4.1 OLIF Procedures by Care Setting
6.2.3 MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures
6.2.3.1 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
6.2.3.2 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
6.2.3.3 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
6.2.4 Spinous Process Fixation Procedures
6.2.5 Facet Fixation Procedures
6.2.6 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures
6.2.7 Spine Endoscope Procedures
MIS Interbody Device Market
7.1 Introduction
7.1.1 Approach Types
7.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.7 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion
7.2 Market Overview
7.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
7.3.1 MIS Interbody Device Market
7.3.2 MIPLIF Market
7.3.3 MITLIF Market
7.3.4 LLIF Market
7.3.5 OLIF Market
7.4 Drivers and Limiters
7.4.1 Market Drivers
7.4.2 Market Limiters
7.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
MIS Pedicle Screw Market
8.1 Introduction
8.1.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
8.1.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems
8.2 Market Overview
8.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
8.3.1 MIS Pedicle Screw Market
8.3.2 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
8.3.3 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
8.3.4 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
8.4 Drivers and Limiters
8.4.1 Market Drivers
8.4.2 Market Limiters
8.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
spinous process fixation Market
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
9.3 Drivers and Limiters
9.3.1 Market Drivers
9.3.2 Market Limiters
9.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Facet Fixation Market
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
10.3 Drivers and Limiters
10.3.1 Market Drivers
10.3.2 Market Limiters
10.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
11.3 Drivers and Limiters
11.3.1 Market Drivers
11.3.2 Market Limiters
11.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Spine Endoscope Market
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Market Overview
12.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
12.3.1 Endoscope Market
12.3.2 Spine Endoscope Instrumentation Market
12.4 Drivers and Limiters
12.4.1 Market Drivers
12.4.2 Market Limiters
12.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Minimally invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
13.3 Drivers and Limiters
13.3.1 Market Drivers
13.3.2 Market Limiters
13.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Abbreviations
Chart 1-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2023
Chart 1-2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview, U.S., 2023 & 2030
Chart 2-1: Multi-Scenario Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Forecast, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Chart 5-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 5-2: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 6-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Chart 7-1: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Chart 7-2: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 8-1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Chart 8-2: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 9-1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 9-2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 10-1: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 10-2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 11-1: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 11-2: Leading Competitors, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2020
Chart 12-1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Chart 12-2: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, U.S., 2023
Chart 13-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 1-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2023
Figure 1-2: Companies Researched in This Report
Figure 1-3: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2)
Figure 1-4: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2)
Figure 1-5: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2020 – 2024
Figure 1-6: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Procedures Covered
Figure 1-7: Procedure Codes Investigated
Figure 1-8: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Markets Covered
Figure 1-9: Key Report Updates
Figure 1-10: Version History
Figure 2-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 2-2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 2-3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 4-1: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (1 of 5)
Figure 4-2: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (2 of 5)
Figure 4-3: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (3 of 5)
Figure 4-4: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (4 of 5)
Figure 4-5: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (5 of 5)
Figure 4-6: MIS Pedicle Screw by Company (1 of 2)
Figure 4-7: MIS Pedicle Screw by Company (2 of 2)
Figure 4-8: Spinous Process Fixation Devices by Company
Figure 4-9: Facet Fixation Devices by Company
Figure 4-10: SI Joint Fusion Devices by Company
Figure 4-11: Spine Endoscopes by Company
Figure 4-12: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation by Company
Figure 4-13: Class 2 Device Recall Catalyft LS Expandable Interbody System Anterior Standalone Cage
Figure 4-14: Class 2 Device Recall XCORE 2 Ti Core, Static
Figure 4-15: Class 2 Device Recall ALTERA Spacer
Figure 4-16: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Spine
Figure 4-17: Class 2 Device Recall Concorde Lift Expandable Interbody Device
Figure 4-18: Class 2 Device Recall LineSider Spinal System
Figure 4-19: Class 2 Device Recall Polaris 5.5 Spinal System and Polaris 5.5/Cypher Spinal System
Figure 4-20: Class 2 Device Recall Vital MIS Spinal Fixation system
Figure 4-21: Class 2 Device Recall Pass Tulip pedicle screw
Figure 4-22: Class 2 Device Recall Vital MIS Spinal Fixation system
Figure 4-23: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet Vitality Spinal Fixation System
Figure 4-24: MIS-D Versus MIS-TLIF for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Figure 4-25: Bio2 Vitrium® Cervical Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
Figure 4-26: Retro-prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Stand-alone Cervical Interbody Cage C-CURVE (Peek and Titanium) Manufactured by MEDICREA® (C-CURVE)
Figure 4-27: Prospective Study of Fusion Rates Using Spira-C Device for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery (ACDF)
Figure 4-28: LLIF Plus Posterior Decompression for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Figure 4-29: SPIRA™-A 3D and HCT/p DBM vs. Medtronic Divergent™-L/Perimeter™ and Recombinant BMP-2
Figure 4-30: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Figure 4-31: Pedicle Screw Fixation in Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine (PSFOLS)
Figure 4-32: XLIF Decade Plate System Study
Figure 4-33: Effectiveness and Safety of the Facet Fixation (FFX®) Implant in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Figure 4-34: Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Using the zLOCK Facet Stabilization System
Figure 4-35: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the FACET FIXation Implant
Figure 4-36: Percutaneous Screw Fixation vs. Open Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures (PrecScrew)
Figure 4-37: iFuse TORQ for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Figure 4-38: Post-Market Feasibility Study of the Tenon Medical CATAMARAN™ SI Joint Fusion System
Figure 4-39: Clinical Outcome and Fusion Results Using the SiJoin® Transfixing Sacroiliac Fusion Device
Figure 4-40: Tenon Medical CATAMARAN™ SI Joint Fusion System CT Scan Study
Figure 4-41: Evolusion Study Using the Zyga SImmetry Sacroiliac Joint Fusion System
Figure 4-42: Treatment of Sacroiliac Dysfunction With SI-LOK® Sacroiliac Joint Fixation SI-SI-LOK
Figure 4-43: The Effect of Mediclore as an Anti-adhesion Agent and Safety in Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery: a Preliminary Study
Figure 4-44: Fluorescence Imaging with Indocyanine Green (ICG) in Endoscopic Spinal Surgery
Figure 5-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 5-2: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2023
Figure 5-3: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes
Figure 5-4: SWOT Analysis, Globus Medical/NuVasive
Figure 5-5: SWOT Analysis, Joimax
Figure 5-6: SWOT Analysis, Medtronic
Figure 5-7: SWOT Analysis, SI-BONE
Figure 5-8: SWOT Analysis, Stryker
Figure 5-9: SWOT Analysis, VGI Medical
Figure 5-10: SWOT Analysis, ZimVie
Figure 6-1: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2023
Figure 6-2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-3: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-4: Total Levels Treated, MIS Interbody Device, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-5: Total MIS Interbody Device Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-6: MIPLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-7: MITLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-8: LLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-9: OLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-10: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-11: Total Levels Treated, MIS Pedicle Screw, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-12: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-13: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-14: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-15: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-16: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-17: Facet Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-18: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 6-19: Spine Endoscope Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 7-1: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 7-2: MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 7-3: MIPLIF Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 7-4: MITLIF Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 7-5: LLIF Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 7-6: OLIF Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 7-7: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2023
Figure 8-1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 8-2: MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 8-3: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 8-4: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 8-5: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030
Figure 8-6: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023
Figure 9-1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 9-2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2023
Figure 10-1: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 10-2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2023
Figure 11-1: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 11-2: Leading Competitors, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2023
Figure 12-1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M)
Figure 12-2: Endoscope Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 12-3: Spine Endoscope Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 12-4: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, U.S., 2023
Figure 13-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030
Figure 13-2: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2023

Pricing

Currency Rates
How Do Licenses Work?

How Do Licenses Work?

The primary function of a report license is to define how many people within a company are authorized to use the purchased report. This is separate to how a report might be delivered. Unless specifically identified otherwise, the purchase option is Single User. Below is a helpful description of that license, along with a sampling of others most commonly offered.

  • This license allows only one user to have access to and to use/read the report. It is not one user at a time or one user group; it is an individual who will be reading and utilizing the report.

  • This license allows for the entire purchasing company to read and use the report. This is the license level that would allow for a report to be placed on an internal company shared drive for access by all employees of that direct company. This license does not extend to parent or sister company use.

  • This license is designed to allow an entire department within a company full access to a report. The departmental license is a great option for companies that have more than one location and the department is spread out all over the country/world

  • This license is for companies that have one location where they want the report to be accessible by all employees within that physical location.

  • This is the most flexible of the licensing options. Some publishers will allow you to get a license for a preset number of people (typically 5). These licenses are ideal for small work groups.

License options are at the discretion of each publisher. As such, not all licenses indicated above are available for every product. If you are uncertain of the best license for your needs or would like a license that is not proactively available, please contact us and we will be happy to assist.

Head shot

Questions or Comments?

Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
Chat Now
Contact Us