Market Research Logo

Europe Market Report for Conventional Hip Screws 2017 - MedCore

Europe Market Report for Conventional Hip Screws 2017 - MedCore

General Report Contents

  • Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
  • Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
  • Section on recent mergers & acquisitions
Conventional hip screws, also known as conventional hip screws, are used for the fixation of pertrochanteric, intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. They have been used for over 40 years. A complete system includes the screw barrel that penetrates the femur and the plate that it connects to, which stabilizes the fracture. This section covers hip screws other than intramedullary hip screws and femoral IM nails.

The advantage of using conventional hip screws is the simplicity of the procedure, owing to the number of side plate options that can be used in a given surgery. Conventional hip screws allow for earlier patient mobilization and rehabilitation over other forms of fracture fixation. However, the incision made for conventional hip screws tends to be larger than that made for competing intramedullary hip screw technology. Conventional hip screws produce optimal results when used with stable intertrochanteric fractures. Intramedullary devices tend to perform better in unstable fractures.Hip fracture is a common injury that is more frequent with age and has an immediate impact on the quality of life. The approximate one-year mortality rate after a hip fracture is between 20% and 30%. A 2007 study in the American Journal of Therapy showed that fractures repaired within 48 hours of the traumatic incident had better outcomes than those repaired later.


EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EUROPEAN ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA DEVICE MARKET OVERVIEW
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS
MARKET TRENDS
MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
MARKETS INCLUDED
PROCEDURE NUMBERS
KEY REPORT UPDATES
VERSION HISTORY
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE
1.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
DISEASE OVERVIEW
2.1 BASIC ANATOMY
2.2 DISEASE TREATMENTS AND DIAGNOSTICS
2.3 PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS
2.3.1 General Statistics
PRODUCT ASSESSMENT
3.1 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS
3.1.1 Conventional Hip Screws
3.2 REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS
3.2.1 Acumed
3.2.1.1 Plates and Screws
3.2.2 DePuy
3.2.2.1 External Fixation
3.2.2.2 Intramedullary Nails
3.2.2.3 Plates and Screws
3.2.3 Integra LifeScience
3.2.3.1 Bone Pin
3.2.3.2 External Fixation
3.2.3.3 Plates and Screws
3.2.4 Smith and Nephew
3.2.4.1 Plates and Screws
3.2.5 Stryker
3.2.5.1 Bone Pins
3.2.5.2 External Fixation
3.2.5.3 Intramedullary Nails
3.2.5.4 Plates and Screws
3.2.6 Wright Medical
3.2.6.1 Plates and Screws
3.2.7 Zimmer Biomet
3.2.7.1 External Fixation
3.2.7.2 Intramedullary Nails
3.2.7.3 Plates and screws
3.2.7.4 Other related products
3.2.8 Other companies
3.2.8.1 Bone Pin
3.2.8.2 Intramedullary Nails
3.2.8.3 Plates and Screws
3.2.8.4 Staple Fixation
3.3 CLINICAL TRIALS
3.3.1 Acumed
3.3.1.1 Plates and Screws
3.3.2 Arthrex
3.3.2.1 Plates and Screws
3.3.3 DePuy Synthes
3.3.3.1 Plates and Screws
3.3.3.2 Intramedullary Nail
3.3.4 Integra LifeScience
3.3.4.1 Plates and Screws
3.3.4.2 Staples Fixation
3.3.5 Smith and Nephew
3.3.5.1 Bioabsorbable Plates and Screws
3.3.5.2 Conventional Hip Screw / Nail
3.3.6 Stryker
3.3.6.1 External Fixation
3.3.6.2 Intramedullary Nails
3.3.7 Zimmer Biomet
3.3.7.1 Bone Growth Stimulator
3.3.7.2 Intramedullary Nail
3.3.7.3 Plates and Screws
3.3.8 Other companies
3.3.8.1 Bioabsorbable Plates and Screws
3.3.8.2 Bone Growth Stimulation
3.3.8.3 Bone Pin
3.3.8.4 Cannulated Screws
3.3.8.5 Intramedullary Nail
3.3.8.6 Plates and Screws
COUNTRY PROFILES
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.1.1.1 Population
4.1.1.2 Median Age
4.1.1.3 GDP Per Capita
4.1.1.4 Price Index
4.2 GERMANY
4.3 FRANCE
4.4 UNITED KINGDOM
4.5 ITALY
4.6 SPAIN
4.7 BENELUX
4.8 SCANDINAVIA
4.9 AUSTRIA
4.10 SWITZERLAND
4.11 PORTUGAL
CONVENTIONAL HIP SCREW MARKET
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.1.1 Product Description
5.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
5.2.1 Total Conventional Hip Screw Market
5.2.2 Conventional Hip Screw Market by Material
5.2.2.1 Stainless Steel Conventional hip screw Market
5.2.2.2 Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market
5.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS
5.3.1 Market Drivers
5.3.2 Market Limiters
5.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS
ABBREVIATIONS
APPENDIX: COMPANY PRESS RELEASES
List of Charts
Chart 1 1: Orthopedic Trauma Device Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 – 2023
Chart 1 2: Orthopedic Trauma Device Market Overview, Europe, 2016 & 2023
Chart 4 1: Country Profile, Germany, 2016
Chart 4 2: Country Profile, France, 2016
Chart 4 3: Country Profile, United Kingdom, 2016
Chart 4 4: Country Profile, Italy, 2016
Chart 4 5: Country Profile, Spain, 2016
Chart 4 6: Country Profile, Benelux, 2016
Chart 4 7: Country Profile, Scandinavia, 2016
Chart 4 8: Country Profile, Austria, 2016
Chart 4 9: Country Profile, Switzerland, 2016
Chart 4 10: Country Profile, Portugal, 2016
Chart 5 1: Total Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023
Chart 5 2: Conventional Hip Screw Market by Material, Europe, 2013 – 2023
Chart 5 3: Conventional Hip Screw Market Breakdown, Europe, 2016
Chart 5 4: Conventional Hip Screw Market Breakdown, Europe, 2023
Chart 5 5: Stainless Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023
Chart 5 6: Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023
Chart 5 7: Leading Competitors, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2016
List of Figures
Figure 1 1: Orthopedic Trauma Device Market Share Ranking by Segment, Europe, 2016 (1 of 2)
Figure 1 2: Orthopedic Trauma Device Market Share Ranking by Segment, Europe, 2016 (2 of 2)
Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, Europe, 2016
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Orthopedic Trauma Device Market by Segment, Europe (1 of 2)
Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting the Orthopedic Trauma Device Market by Segment, Europe (2 of 2)
Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Orthopedic Trauma Device Market, Europe, 2016 – 2017
Figure 1 7: Orthopedic Trauma Device Markets Covered, Europe, 2016 (1 of 2)
Figure 1 8: Orthopedic Trauma Device Markets Covered, Europe, 2016 (2 of 2)
Figure 1 9: Orthopedic Trauma Device Markets Covered, U.S., 2016
Figure 1 10: Key Report Updates
Figure 1 11: Version History
Figure 3 1: Conventional Hip Screws Market Products by Company
Figure 3 2: Class 2 Device Recall Acumed Tension Band Pin
Figure 3 3: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes Trauma ExFix System (Small, Medium, Distraction Osteogenesis (DO) and Large)
Figure 3 4: Class 2 Device Recall Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced System
Figure 3 5: Class 2 Device Recall Specialist 2 Intermedullary (SP2 IM) Rod
Figure 3 6: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Natural Nail CM Long
Figure 3 7: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes 2.4mm Titanium Locking Screws SelfTapping with Stardrive Recess 12mm
Figure 3 8: Class 2 Device Recall 5.0 mm Periprosthetic Locking Screw Selftapping 12 mm Sterile see related information
Figure 3 9: Class 2 Device Recall 4.0 mm Cortex Screw, Cannulated Screw, Cancellous Screw
Figure 3 10: Class 2 Device Recall Orthopedic Devices
Figure 3 11: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes Titanium Small Reconstruction Plate
Figure 3 12: Class 2 Device Recall 2.7 mm Locking Screw SLFTPNG with T8 Stardrive Recess 12mm
Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Orthopedic Devices
Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Dynamic Locking Screw System (DLS) 3.7mm & Dynamic Locking Screw (DLS) 5.0mm
Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes 5.0mm Variable Locking Screw
Figure 3 16: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes 2.7mm LCP Ulna Osteotomy System
Figure 3 17: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes TomoFix Plates
Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes 2.4 mm LCDCP Plate 6 Holes/51mm
Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes 4.5 mm LCP Curved Condylar Plate
Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes 4.5MM TI VALCP CRVD Condylar Plate/6H/159MM/RTSTER
Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes Midfoot Fusion Bolt
Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Synthes 3.5 MM LCP(R) Distal Humerus System
Figure 3 23: Class 2 Device Recall Kwire, Smooth Doublepointed 0.8 x 90mm
Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall Integra External Fixation System
Figure 3 25: Class 2 Device Recall Integra External Fixation System Rocker Bottom Model 12225400
Figure 3 26: Class 3 Device Recall Integra LifeSciences Corp.
Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall Integra
Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall SURFIX Fixed Angle Locking Screw
Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Periloc Volar Distal Radius Right 3h STD Head Locking Plate
Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall PeriLoc(R) VLP 3.5 mm x 6 mm selftapping cortex screw
Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall DRAD, 1.8mm X 16mm, locking peg; 2.4mmx 20mm, S.T. cortex screw
Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall Titanium Locking Screw
Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall Smith & Nephew Periloc Volar Distal Radius Plate Standard 3 Hole
Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall T2 K Wire
Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall Guide and KWires for T2 and Gamma Systems
Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall SBi RingFix Olive Wires
Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker T2 Supracondylar Nail System
Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall GAM Guide/Metaizeau Intramedullary Pin
Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker
Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall CrossCHECK Locking Screw
Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall CROSSCHECK(R) plating system
Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Claw(R) II straight plate Ortholoc(tm)
Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Large Combination Clamp component of Synthes External Fixation System
Figure 3 44: Unclassified Correction or Removal Fem and Tibial IM Nail
Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall VersaFx / VersaFx II Femoral Fixation System
Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer M/DN Intramedullary Fixation System, Metaphyseal/Diaphyseal Nail System
Figure 3 47: Class 2 Device Recall Freelock Femoral Hip Fixation System
Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Plates and Screws
Figure 3 49: Class 2 Device Recall Biomet Inc., Biomet Sports Medicine, and Biomet
Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall DVR ePAK
Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer
Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer
Figure 3 53: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Universal Locking System
Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Biomet A.L.P.S. 4.0mm Cancellous Locking Screws
Figure 3 55: Class 2 Device Recall A.L.P.S
Figure 3 56: Class 2 Device Recall low profile Nonlock screw
Figure 3 57: Class 2 Device Recall Trauma Tubes and Plates
Figure 3 58: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Periarticular Locking Plate System
Figure 3 59: Class 2 Device Recall Distal Radius Fracture Repair System
Figure 3 60: Class 2 Device Recall various polyethylene implants
Figure 3 61: Class 2 Device Recall MicroAire KWires
Figure 3 62: Class 2 Device Recall Kwires and Guide Wres
Figure 3 63: Class 2 Device Recall KirschnerWire (KWire), MicroAire Surgical Instruments, LLC
Figure 3 64: OrthoPediatrics PediNail Intramedullary Nailing System
Figure 3 65: Class 2 Device Recall 3.5mm Bowed Locking Compression Femur Plates
Figure 3 66: Class 2 Device Recall DRP SCREW, In2Bones
Figure 3 67: Class 2 Device Recall Tiger Cannulated Screw System, Trilliant Surgical Ltd.
Figure 3 68: Class 2 Device Recall Tiger Large Cannulated Headless Screw System, Trilliant Surgical Ltd.
Figure 3 69: Class 2 Device Recall TriMed SemiTubular Plate, Trimed Inc.
Figure 3 70: Class 2 Device Recall FPS 35mm x 3.5 mm nonlocking screw
Figure 3 71: Class 2 Device Recall UltOS 3.5mm locking screw (12mm to 50mm)
Figure 3 72: Class 2 Device Recall 7, 9, and 11Hole VL Gridlock Fibula Plating System, Trilliant Surgical Ltd.
Figure 3 73: Class 2 Device Recall Gridlock Screw Driver Bit, Trilliant Surgical Ltd.
Figure 3 74: Class 2 Device Recall Orthopediatrics PediLoc Tibial Plate System, OrthoPediatrics Corp
Figure 3 75: Class 2 Device Recall MotoCLIP(TM) Super Elastic Fusion System, Crossroads Extremity Systems Llc
Figure 3 76: A Study Comparing Computerized Tomographic Progression of Bone Bridging After Subtalar Fusion Using Fully and Partially Threaded Screws
Figure 3 77: Clinical Trial Evaluating Acutrak Headless Compression Screw Fixation of Medial Malleolus Fractures
Figure 3 78: TMT Fusion Plate vs. Two Crossed Screws (TMT)
Figure 3 79: Plate Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures: A Protocol for a Study of Two Plate Options
Figure 3 80: A Study Comparing Computerized Tomographic Progression of Bone Bridging After Subtalar Fusion Using Fully and Partially Threaded Screws
Figure 3 81: Volar Locked Plating vs Bridging External Fixation in Distal Radius Fracture
Figure 3 82: Observational Patient Registry of the Dynamic Locking Screws (DLS)
Figure 3 83: Plate Fixation Versus Intramedullary Nailing of 3 and 4 Part Proximal Humerus Fractures
Figure 3 84: Operative Treatment of 2-fragment-fractures (AO 11-A3) of the Proximal Humerus in the Elderly: Cement Augmented Locking Plate Philos vs. Proximal Humerus Nail MultiLoc
Figure 3 85: Short Term Follow-up of Patent Implanted With the B-BOP Lock Plate
Figure 3 86: Follow-up of Patient Implanted With the Staple ASTUS®
Figure 3 87: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction- Bioabsorbable Screw
Figure 3 88: Trigen InterTAN vs Sliding Hip Screw RCT
Figure 3 89: Volar Locked Plating vs Bridging External Fixation in Distal Radius Fracture
Figure 3 90: Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture Fixation Trial
Figure 3 91: Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study
Figure 3 92: Intramedullary Nail Versus Sliding Hip Screw Inter-Trochanteric Evaluation (INSITE)
Figure 3 93: A Clinical Registry to Collect Patient Outcome Date for the BIOMET® Stimulator Systems
Figure 3 94: Short Versus Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of Pertrochanteric Hip Fractures: A Randomized Prospective Study
Figure 3 95: Zimmer® MotionLoc® in Distal Tibia Fractures
Figure 3 96: G7 Acetabular System vs. Exceed ABT Acetabular System in THA (G7)
Figure 3 97: A New Type of Bioabsorbable Screw in the Hallux Valgus Surgery
Figure 3 98: A Comparison of Stainless Steel and Bioabsorbable Screw Fixation of Lisfranc Foot Injuries (Lisfranc)
Figure 3 99: The Efficacy and Safety of Magnesium Alloy Screw as a Novel Bioabsorbable Material in Patients Due to Hand Fractures
Figure 3 100: Ankle Syndesmosis Fixation by Antibiotic Releasing Bioabsorbable Screw
Figure 3 101: CMF Bone Stimulation as Adjunct to Surgical Treatment of Ankle Fractures
Figure 3 102: Single Versus Double Kirschner Wires for Intramedullary Fixation of Metacarpal V Fractures (1-2-KiWI)
Figure 3 103: Cemented K-wire Fixation vs Plating for Finger Fractures (CKFPFF)
Figure 3 104: Pediatric Hip Plate Versus Cannulated Screw in Pediatric Femoral Neck Fracture (PFNF)
Figure 3 105: Ellipse Intramedullary High Tibial Osteotomy Nail Study
Figure 3 106: Stabilization of Fresh Unilateral Unstable Pertrochanteric Hip Fracture (PET)
Figure 3 107: Plate Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures: A Protocol for a Study of Two Plate Options
Figure 3 108: Volar Plate vs. Conventus DRS Fixation
Figure 3 109: Buried Intramedullary K-wire Fixation Compared With Plate and Screw Fixation in Unstable Extra-Articular Metacarpal Fractures
Figure 3 110: Sternal Closure With SternaLock 360: First in Man Study (SL360)
Figure 3 111: Lateral Mini Approach vs Anterior Approach for Plating of Proximal Humerus Fracture (HURA)
Figure 3 112: Fibular Fixation in Ankle Fractures: Plate Verses Nail.
Figure 3 113: A Prospective Randomized Pilot Study to Compare Open Versus Percutaneous Syndesmosis Repair of Unstable Ankle Fractures
Figure 3 114: Comparing Stability and Cost-Effectiveness of 3 Bicortical Screws Vs Adjustable Plate and 2 Bicortical Screws in Fixation of BSSRO
Figure 3 115: A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of an Implant in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Great Toe
Figure 5 1: Total Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023
Figure 5 2: Units Sold by Country, Total Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023
Figure 5 3: Average Selling Price by Country, Total Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€)
Figure 5 4: Average Selling Price by Country, Total Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$)
Figure 5 5: Market Value by Country, Total Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M)
Figure 5 6: Market Value by Country, Total Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M)
Figure 5 7: Conventional Hip Screw Market by Material, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M)
Figure 5 8: Conventional Hip Screw Market by Material, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M)
Figure 5 9: Stainless Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023
Figure 5 10: Units Sold by Country, Stainless Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023
Figure 5 11: Average Selling Price by Country, Stainless Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€)
Figure 5 12: Average Selling Price by Country, Stainless Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$)
Figure 5 13: Market Value by Country, Stainless Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M)
Figure 5 14: Market Value by Country, Stainless Steel Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M)
Figure 5 15: Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023
Figure 5 16: Units Sold by Country, Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023
Figure 5 17: Average Selling Price by Country, Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€)
Figure 5 18: Average Selling Price by Country, Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$)
Figure 5 19: Market Value by Country, Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M)
Figure 5 20: Market Value by Country, Titanium Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M)
Figure 5 21: Drivers and Limiters, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2016
Figure 5 22: Leading Competitors, Conventional Hip Screw Market, Europe, 2016
Figure 7 1: Press Release Summary

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook

Share this report