Nucleic Acid Amplification Life Science Dashboard™ Series 3
Percepta Associates, Inc.
September 1, 2011 204 Pages - SKU: PCT6639926
|
|
Nucleic acid amplification is one of the most commonly performed molecular biology techniques and is a necessary precursor to a range of methods from gene cloning and site-directed mutagenesis to the quantitative analysis of gene expression. The Nucleic Acid Amplification Dashboard was developed from responses to a 21-question survey by 492 scientists predominantly located in North America and Europe.
This Dashboard reveals key market indicators for the nucleic acid amplification market as a whole as well as for the following sub-segments:
- Difficult PCR (e.g. GC rich, complex, long targets)
- Digital PCR
- Emulsion PCR
- Fast PCR
- High Fidelity PCR
- High Resolution Melt (using real time PCR instrument)
- Standard endpoint PCR
- Standard endpoint RT-PCR
- qPCR (real time PCR with genomic DNA template)
- qRT-PCR (real time PCR with RNA or cDNA template)
Please note, the online download version is a global site license version of the report.
|
-
- Figures and Tables
- Executive Summary
-
- Key Findings and Implications
-
- Nucleic Acid Amplification Dashboard
-
- Nucleic Acid Amplification Market Opportunity Matrix
-
- Survey Methodology
-
- Survey Invitation Text
-
- Respondent Demographics
-
- Frequency of Performance of Life Science Techniques
-
- Frequency of Performance of Nucleic Acid Amplification
-
- Reaction Throughput and Market Growth Rates
-
- Respondents’ Stated Price Per Reaction
-
- Total Market Size, Market Segment Sizes and Total Market Growth Rate
-
- Market Shares by Segment (Share of Mentions)
-
- Customer Satisfaction And Interest In Switching Suppliers
-
- Product Features That Influence Purchasing Decisions
-
- Primary and Secondary Downstream Applications
- Desired Changes to Nucleic Acid Amplification Products
-
- Survey Questionnaire
- Appendix
- Figures and Tables
- List of Tables
- Figure 1: Respondents’ Place of Employment
- Figure 2: Respondent’s Location
- Figure 3: Respondents’ Job Title
- Figure 4: Respondents’ Areas of Expertise/Specialization
- Figure 5: Number of Employees in Respondents’ Laboratories
- Figure 6: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various Techniques at Least a Few Times per Year
- Figure 7: Percentage of Respondents Performing Nucleic Acid Amplification
- Figure 7A: Change in Percentage of Respondents Performing Nucleic Acid Amplification
- Figure 8: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques at Least a Few Times per Year
- Figure 9: Percentage of Respondents Using Various Thermostable Polymerases for Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
- Figure 10: Percentage of Respondents Performing Difficult PCR
- Figure 11: Percentage of Respondents Performing Digital PCR
- Figure 12: Percentage of Respondents Performing Emulsion PCR
- Figure 13: Percentage of Respondents Performing Fast PCR
- Figure 14: Percentage of Respondents Performing High Fidelity PCR
- Figure 14A: Change in Percentage of Respondents Performing High Fidelity PCR
- Figure 15: Percentage of Respondents Performing High Resolution Melt
- Figure 16: Percentage of Respondents Performing Standard Endpoint PCR
- Figure 17: Percentage of Respondents Performing Standard Endpoint RT-PCR
- Figure 18: Percentage of Respondents Performing qPCR
- Figure 19: Percentage of Respondents Performing qRT-PCR
- Figure 20: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Difficult PCR
- Figure 21: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Digital PCR
- Figure 22: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Emulsion PCR
- Figure 23: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Fast PCR
- Figure 24: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for High Fidelity PCR
- Figure 24A: Change in Mention for Respondents’ Primary Supplier for High Fidelity PCR
- Figure 25: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for High Resolution Melt
- Figure 26: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Standard Endpoint PCR
- Figure 27: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Standard Endpoint RT-PCR
- Figure 28: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for qPCR
- Figure 29: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for qRT-PCR
- Figure 30: Respondents’ Primary Supplier of Instruments for Standard PCR
- Figure 30A: Change in Respondents’ Primary Supplier of Instruments for Standard PCR
- Figure 31: Respondents’ Primary Supplier of Instruments for Real Time PCR
- Figure 31A: Change in Respondents’ Primary Supplier of Instruments for Real Time PCR
- Figure 32: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Difficult PCR
- Figure 33: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Digital PCR
- Figure 34: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Emulsion PCR
- Figure 35: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Fast PCR
- Figure 36: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from High Fidelity PCR
- Figure 37: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from High Resolution Melt
- Figure 38: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Standard Endpoint PCR
- Figure 39: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Standard Endpoint RT-PCR
- Figure 40: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from qPCR
- Figure 41: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from qRT-PCR
- Figure 42: Non current users of Nucleic Acid Amplification Products - Future Plans
- List of tables
- Table 1: Respondents’ Area of Expertise (Values for Figure 4)
- Table 2: Frequency of Performance of Various Life Science Techniques
- Table 3: Frequency of Co-Performance of Various Life Science Techniques
- Table 4: Percentage of Respondents Performing Nucleic Acid Amplification by Place of Employment and Location
- Table 5: Frequency of Performance of Various Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
- Table 6: Frequency of Co-Performance of Life Science Techniques with Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
- Table 7: Frequency of Co-Performance of Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques with Life Science Techniques
- Table 8: Mean, Median and Trim Mean Monthly Throughput for Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
- Table 8A: Change in Median Monthly Throughput for Nucleic Acid Amplification Methods - Comparison to the 2009 Dashboard
- Table 8B: Mean, Median and Trim Mean Monthly Throughput for Nucleic Acid Amplification Methods by Organization Type
- Table 9: Percentage of Respondents Performing Probe-based vs. DNA Binding-dye based Reactions for real time PCR
- Table 10: Percentage of Respondents Performing Various Numbers of Amplification Reactions Per Month by Product Category
- Table 11: Projected Growth in the Performance of Various Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
- Table 12: Mean, Median and Trim Mean Price Per Reaction for Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
- Table 13: Change in Mean, Median and Trim Mean Price Per Reaction for Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
- Table 14: Estimated 2012 Global Market Size for Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
- Table 15: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Difficult PCR by Market Segment
- Table 16: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Digital PCR by Market Segment
- Table 17: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Emulsion PCR by Market Segment
- Table 18: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Fast PCR by Market Segment
- Table 19: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for High Fidelity PCR by Market Segment
- Table 20: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for High Resolution Melt by Market Segment
- Table 21: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Standard Endpoint PCR by Market Segment
- Table 22: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Standard Endpoint RT-PCR by Market Segment
- Table 23: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for qPCR by Market Segment
- 119 Table 24: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for qRT-PCR by Market Segment
- 120 Table 25: Market Share Leaders for Nucleic Acid Amplification Products
- 125 Table 26: Respondents’ Primary Supplier of Standard PCR Thermocyclers by Market Segment
- 131 Table 27: Respondents’ Primary Supplier for Instruments for Real Time PCR by Market Segment
- 132 Table 28: Market Share Leaders for Standard and Real Time PCR Instruments
- 135 Table 29: Percentage of Respondents Satisfied with Various Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques and Reasons for Dissatisfaction
- 137 Table 30: Percentage of Respondents That Have Switched Suppliers in the Last Six Months
- 140 Table 31: Most Important Features of Nucleic Acid Amplification Products
- 141 Table 31A: Most Important Features of Nucleic Acid Amplification Products - Comparison to 2009 Nucleic Acid Amplification Dashboard
- 145 Table 32: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Difficult PCR (Values for Figure 32)
- 149 Table 33: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Digital PCR (Values for Figure 33)
- 152 Table 34: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Emulsion PCR (Values for Figure 34)
- 155 Table 35: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Fast PCR (Values for Figure 35)
- 160 Table 36: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from High Fidelity PCR (Values for Figure 36)
- 163 Table 37: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from High Resolution Melt (Values for Figure 37)
- 167 Table 38: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Standard Endpoint PCR (Values for Figure 38)
- 171 Table 39: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from Standard Endpoint RT-PCR (Values for Figure 39)
- 175 Table 40: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from qPCR (Values for Figure 40)
- 179 Table 41: Respondents’ Primary and Secondary Applications for End Products from qRT-PCR (Values for Figure 41)
- 181 Table 42: Respondents’ Primary Applications for End Products from Nucleic Acid Amplification
Share this report
Other tasks Related Markets Antisense & RNAi Technology Reports Free Alert Me service Receive bi-weekly email alerts on new market research Sign Up Today!
|