Orthopaedic Imaging Equipment Market: X-Ray System and CT-Scanner Product Type Segments to Compete for the Most Attractive Segment Title Throughout the Forecast Period: Global Industry Analysis and Opportunity Assessment, 2016-2026

1.Executive Summary

2.Market Introduction

2.1. Market Definition

2.2. Market Taxonomy

2.3. Market Overview

3.Global Global Orthopedic Imaging Equipment MarketAnalysis Scenario

3.1. Pricing Analysis

3.1.1. Pricing Assumptions

3.1.2. Price Projections Per Region

3.2. Market Size (US$ Mn) and Forecast

3.2.1. Market Size and Y-o-Y Growth

3.2.2. Absolute $ Opportunity

3.3. Market Overview

3.3.1. Value Chain

3.3.2. Profitability Margins

3.3.3. List of Active Participants

3.3.3.1. Component Suppliers

3.3.3.2. Integrators

3.3.3.3. Manufacturers

3.3.3.4. Distributors / Retailers

4.Market Dynamics

4.1. Macro-economic Factors

4.2. Drivers

4.2.1. Supply Side

4.2.2. Demand Side

4.3. Restraints

4.4. Opportunity

4.5. Forecast Factors – Relevance and Impact

4.6 Regulatory Scenario and Devices/Product Approval Processes

5. Global Global Orthopedic Imaging Equipment MarketAnalysis and Forecasts, By Product Type

5.1. Introduction

5.2. Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Product Type Type

5.3. Y-o-Y Growth Projections By Product Type Type

5.4. Market Value Forecast By Product Type, 2016–2026

5.4.1. X-Ray Systems

5.4.2. CT-Scanner

5.4.3. MRI Systems

5.4.4. EOS Imaging Systems

5.4.5. Ultrasound

5.4.6. Nuclear Imaging Systems

5.5. Market Attractiveness By Product Type

6. Global Global Orthopedic Imaging Equipment MarketAnalysis and Forecasts, By Indications

6.1. Introduction

6.2. Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Indications

6.3. Y-o-Y Growth Projections By Indications

6.4. Market Value Forecast By Indications, 2016–2026

6.4.1. Acute injuries

6.4.1.1. Sports injuries

6.4.1.2. Trauma cases

6.4.2. Chronic Disorders

6.4.2.1. Osteoarthritis

6.4.2.2. Osteoporosis

6.4.2.3. Prolapsed Disc

6.4.2.4. Degenerative joint diseases

6.4.3. Others

6.5. Market Attractiveness By Indications

7. Global Global Orthopedic Imaging Equipment MarketAnalysis and Forecasts, By End Users

7.1. Introduction

7.2. Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By End Users

7.3. Y-o-Y Growth Projections By End Users

7.4. Market Value Forecast By End Users, 2016–2026

7.4.1. Hospitals

7.4.2. Radiology Centers

7.4.3. Emergency Care Facility

7.4.4. Ambulatory Surgical Center

7.5. Market Attractiveness By End Users

8. Global Global Orthopedic Imaging Equipment MarketAnalysis and Forecasts, By Region

8.1. Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Region

8.2. Y-o-Y Growth Projections By Region

8.3. Market Value Forecast By Region

8.3.1. North America

8.3.2. Latin America

8.3.3. Western Europe

8.3.4. Eastern Europe

8.3.5. APEJ

8.3.6. Japan

8.3.7. MEA

8.4. Market Attractiveness By Region

9. North America Global Orthopedic Imaging Equipment MarketAnalysis and Forecast

9.1. Introduction

9.1.1. Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Country

9.1.2. Y-o-Y Growth Projections By Country

9.1.3. Key Regulations

9.2. Market Value Forecast By Product Type, 2016–2026

9.2.1. X-Ray Systems

9.2.2. CT-Scanner

9.2.3. MRI Systems

9.2.4. EOS Imaging Systems

9.2.5. Ultrasound

9.2.6. Nuclear Imaging Systems

9.3. Market Value Forecast By Indications, 2016–2026

9.3.1. Acute injuries

9.3.1.1. Sports injuries

9.3.1.2. Trauma cases

9.3.2. Chronic Disorders

9.3.2.1. Osteoarthritis

9.3.2.2. Osteoporosis

9.3.2.3. Prolapsed Disc

9.3.2.4. Degenerative joint diseases

9.3.3. Others

9.4. Market Value Forecast By End Users, 2016–2026

9.4.1. Hospitals

9.4.2. Radiology Centers

9.4.3. Emergency Care Facility

9.4.4. Ambulatory Surgical Center

9.5. Market Value Forecast By Country, 2016–2026

9.5.1. US

9.5.2. Canada

9.6. Market Attractiveness Analysis

9.6.1. By Product Type

9.6.2. By Indications

9.6.3. By End Users

9.6.4. By Country

10. Latin America Global Orthopedic Imaging Equipment MarketAnalysis and Forecast

10.1.Introduction

10.1.1. Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Country

10.1.2. Y-o-Y Growth Projections By Country

10.1.3. Key Regulations

10.2.Market Value Forecast By Product Type, 2016–2026

10.2.1. X-Ray Systems

10.2.2. CT-Scanner

10.2.3. MRI Systems

10.2.4. EOS Imaging Systems

10.2.5. Ultrasound

10.2.6. Nuclear Imaging Systems

10.3.Market Value Forecast By Indications, 2016–2026

10.3.1. Acute injuries

10.3.1.1. Sports injuries

10.3.1.2. Trauma cases

10.3.2. Chronic Disorders

10.3.2.1. Osteoarthritis

10.3.2.2. Osteoporosis

10.3.2.3. Prolapsed Disc

10.3.2.4. Degenerative joint diseases

10.3.3. Others

10.4.Market Value Forecast By End Users, 2016–2026

10.4.1. Hospitals

10.4.2. Radiology Centers

10.4.3. Emergency Care Facility

10.4.4. Ambulatory Surgical Center

10.5.Market Value Forecast By Country, 2016–2026

10.5.1. Argentina

10.5.2. Brazil

10.5.3. Mexico

10.5.4. Rest of Latin America

10.6.Market Attractiveness Analysis

10.6.1. By Product Type

10.6.2. By Indications

10.6.3. By End Users

10.6.4. By Country

11. Western Europe Global Orthopedic Imaging Equipment MarketAnalysis and Forecast

11.1.Introduction

11.1.1. Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Country

11.1.2. Y-o-Y Growth Projections By Country

11.1.3. Key Regulations

11.2.Market Value Forecast By Product Type, 2016–2026

11.2.1. X-Ray Systems

11.2.2. CT-Scanner

11.2.3. MRI Systems

11.2.4. EOS Imaging Systems

11.2.5. Ultrasound

11.2.6. Nuclear Imaging Systems

11.3.Market Value Forecast By Indications, 2016–2026

11.3.1. Acute injuries

11.3.1.1. Sports injuries

11.3.1.2. Trauma cases

11.3.2. Chronic Disorders

11.3.2.1. Osteoarthritis

11.3.2.2. Osteoporosis

11.3.2.3. Prolapsed Disc

11.3.2.4. Degenerative joint diseases

11.3.3. Others

11.4.Market Value Forecast By End Users, 2016–2026

11.4.1. Hospitals

11.4.2. Radiology Centers

11.4.3. Emergency Care Facility

11.4.4. Ambulatory Surgical Center

11.5.Market Value Forecast By Country, 2016–2026

11.5.1. UK

11.5.2. France

11.5.3. Germany

11.5.4. Italy

11.5.5. Spain

11.5.6. Nordic

11.5.7. Rest of Western Europe

11.6.Market Attractiveness Analysis

11.6.1. By Product Type

11.6.2. By Indications

11.6.3. By End Users

11.6.4. By Country

12. Eastern Europe Global Orthopedic Imaging Equipment MarketAnalysis and Forecast

12.1.Introduction

12.1.1. Basis Point Share (BPS) Analysis By Country

12.1.2. Y-o-Y Growth Projections By Country

12.1.3. Key Regulations

12.2.Market Value Forecast By Product Type, 2016–2026

12.2.1. X-Ray Systems

12.2.2. CT-Scanner

12.2.3. MRI Systems

12.2.4. EOS Imaging Systems

12.2.5. Ultrasound

12.2.6. Nuclear Imaging Systems

12.3.Market Value Forecast By Indications, 2016–2026

12.3.1. Acute injuries

12.3.1.1. Sports injuries

12.3.1.2. Trauma cases

Orthopaedic Imaging Equipment Market: X-Ray System and CT-Scanner Product Type Segments to Compete for the Most Attractive Segment Title Throughout the Forecast Period: Global Industry Analysis and Opportunity Assessment, 2016-2026

Rise in incidences of orthopaedic diseases and bone injuries is fuelling the global orthopaedic imaging equipment market growth

The global orthopaedic imaging equipment market is anticipated to be valued at nearly US$ 12,500 Mn in terms of revenue by 2026, registering a CAGR of 4.9% over the assessment period. The global orthopaedic imaging equipment market is expected to represent nearly US$ 5,000 Mn in terms of incremental opportunity between 2016 and 2026.

Global Orthopaedic Imaging Equipment Market Analysis, By Product Type, 2016–2026

X-Ray System segment is anticipated to be the largest segment among orthopaedic imaging equipment market product type segments, which accounted for nearly US$ 2,500 Mn in 2016 and is estimated to be valued at nearly US$ 3,500 Mn by 2026, registering a CAGR of 4.3% over the forecast period. This segment is projected to create absolute $ opportunity of nearly US$ 100 Mn in 2017 over 2016

CT-Scanner segment is estimated to register a 5.2% CAGR over the forecast period and be valued at nearly US$ 3,000 Mn by 2026 end. The segment is estimated to gain 48 BPS by 2026. Revenue from the CT-Scanner segment in the global orthopaedic imaging equipment market is expected to grow 1.7x by 2026 end as compared to that in 2016

EOS Imaging Systems segment revenue in the global orthopaedic imaging equipment market is expected to grow 5.1x by 2026 end as compared to that in 2016

MRI System segment is expected to create absolute $ opportunity of nearly US$ 70 Mn in 2017 over 2016. Revenue from this segment in the global orthopaedic imaging equipment market is expected to grow 1.4x by 2026 end as compared to that in 2016

Ultrasound segment is anticipated to record absolute $ opportunity of nearly US$ 100 Mn in 2017 over 2016. Revenue from this segment in the global orthopaedic imaging equipment market is expected to grow 1.9x by 2026 end as compared to that in 2016

Nuclear Imaging System segment is expected to create absolute $ opportunity of nearly US$ 30 Mn in 2017 over 2016. Revenue from this segment in the global orthopaedic imaging equipment market is expected to grow 1.6x by 2026 end as compared to that in 2016.

Global Orthopaedic Imaging Equipment Market Attractiveness Analysis, by Product Type, 2016–2026

The X-ray System segment is expected to remain the most attractive segment in the global orthopaedic imaging equipment market with an attractiveness index of 1.7. The CT-Scanner segment is anticipated to be the second-most attractive segment in the global orthopaedic imaging equipment market with an attractiveness index of 1.3 over the forecast period.

“Fusion and multimodality of diagnostic equipment to be the latest trend in the global orthopaedic imaging equipment market

Fusion and multimodality of diagnostic equipment is one of the important trends likely to govern the global orthopaedic imaging equipment in the coming decade. For specialties such as spinal radiosurgery, the merger of MRI and CT imaging techniques creates an opportunity to run the full range of imaging scans simultaneously from the same place and time. The fusion also allows to merge the information from corresponding imaging modalities for additional or customised set of information. Additionally, fusion imaging and multimodality offers a comfort level to patients as it does not need repositioning and requires less time. In addition, companies are now focussing on the development of imaging modalities to overcome the existing limitation of CT scans for orthopaedic imaging. For example, CT scans have a limitation of multiple rotation, due to which they cannot capture weight-bearing images. However, manufacturers such as Carestream have come up with an innovative solution to this. The company has developed “OnSight 3D Extremity System” that offers high quality point of care imaging for sports and orthopaedic practices.” --- Analyst – Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices, Future Market Insights