2026 Global: Contract Lifecycle Management Software Market-Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Contract Lifecycle Management Software Market-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for contract lifecycle management software market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the contract lifecycle management software market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Icertis is a leading enterprise-grade CLM provider known for its cloud-native Icertis Contract Intelligence platform that emphasizes compliance, scalability, and AI-driven risk insights for complex global contracts, with deep ERP and CRM integrations suited to regulated industries and large enterprises. Icertis’ strengths include dynamic contract authoring, obligation management, and analytics that surface clause-level risks and obligations to legal and procurement teams.
Agiloft offers a highly customizable CLM suite centered on flexible workflow automation and extensive configuration without code, making it a strong fit for organizations with unique contracting processes or complex approval chains. Agiloft’s platform supports advanced clause libraries, redlining, and integration with enterprise systems, and it has recently expanded generative AI capabilities to accelerate authoring and review.
DocuSign Agreement Cloud (DocuSign CLM) extends DocuSign’s eSignature leadership into full lifecycle management, focusing on rapid execution, collaborative drafting, and seamless signature-to-fulfillment workflows. DocuSign CLM is prized for easy adoption, strong security and audit trails, and integrations across major business apps to reduce cycle times for sales and legal teams.
Conga (including Conga CLM) provides an end-to-end solution optimized for quote-to-cash and revenue operations, integrating tightly with Salesforce and other CRM systems to automate contract generation, approvals, and renewals. Conga emphasizes template-driven authoring, automated compliance checks, and analytics that align contracting with commercial processes.
Ironclad positions itself as a modern, developer-friendly CLM focused on legal operations and rapid workflow automation; its visual workflow builder, clause library, and collaboration tools aim to accelerate contract creation and approval in high-growth companies. Ironclad is frequently chosen by remote and distributed teams for role-based access and auditability.
LinkSquares (now LinkSquares) specializes in AI-powered contract analysis and post-signature intelligence, offering fast repository ingestion, automated clause extraction, and reporting that helps legal and finance teams remediate obligations and discover contract-driven risks. Customers cite rapid ROI from AI summarization and obligation tracking.
Sirion (SirionLabs) focuses on supplier- and services-heavy contracts, pairing CLM with performance management and financial modeling to track SLAs, obligations and earnbacks across long-term vendor relationships. Sirion’s analytics and metadata extraction capabilities are designed for complex, outcome-based contracts.
Evisort delivers AI-native contract intelligence combined with CLM features for centralizing contracts, extracting metadata without manual tagging, and surfacing risk and renewal opportunities; it highlights fast time-to-value for legal teams seeking automated review and reporting. Evisort’s founders’ academic background underpins its machine-learning emphasis.
CobbleStone Software targets mid-to-large organizations with feature-rich CLM and contract intelligence, offering predictive analytics, compliance controls, and configurable workflows for procurement and legal operations. CobbleStone is noted for robust reporting and obligation management.
Concord emphasizes user-friendly, collaborative contract creation and negotiation with unlimited document storage and integrated e-signature, making it attractive for small-to-medium teams that need rapid turnaround and transparent collaboration across stakeholders. Concord’s simplicity and pricing appeal to organizations prioritizing ease of use and fast deployment.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for contract lifecycle management software market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the contract lifecycle management software market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Icertis is a leading enterprise-grade CLM provider known for its cloud-native Icertis Contract Intelligence platform that emphasizes compliance, scalability, and AI-driven risk insights for complex global contracts, with deep ERP and CRM integrations suited to regulated industries and large enterprises. Icertis’ strengths include dynamic contract authoring, obligation management, and analytics that surface clause-level risks and obligations to legal and procurement teams.
Agiloft offers a highly customizable CLM suite centered on flexible workflow automation and extensive configuration without code, making it a strong fit for organizations with unique contracting processes or complex approval chains. Agiloft’s platform supports advanced clause libraries, redlining, and integration with enterprise systems, and it has recently expanded generative AI capabilities to accelerate authoring and review.
DocuSign Agreement Cloud (DocuSign CLM) extends DocuSign’s eSignature leadership into full lifecycle management, focusing on rapid execution, collaborative drafting, and seamless signature-to-fulfillment workflows. DocuSign CLM is prized for easy adoption, strong security and audit trails, and integrations across major business apps to reduce cycle times for sales and legal teams.
Conga (including Conga CLM) provides an end-to-end solution optimized for quote-to-cash and revenue operations, integrating tightly with Salesforce and other CRM systems to automate contract generation, approvals, and renewals. Conga emphasizes template-driven authoring, automated compliance checks, and analytics that align contracting with commercial processes.
Ironclad positions itself as a modern, developer-friendly CLM focused on legal operations and rapid workflow automation; its visual workflow builder, clause library, and collaboration tools aim to accelerate contract creation and approval in high-growth companies. Ironclad is frequently chosen by remote and distributed teams for role-based access and auditability.
LinkSquares (now LinkSquares) specializes in AI-powered contract analysis and post-signature intelligence, offering fast repository ingestion, automated clause extraction, and reporting that helps legal and finance teams remediate obligations and discover contract-driven risks. Customers cite rapid ROI from AI summarization and obligation tracking.
Sirion (SirionLabs) focuses on supplier- and services-heavy contracts, pairing CLM with performance management and financial modeling to track SLAs, obligations and earnbacks across long-term vendor relationships. Sirion’s analytics and metadata extraction capabilities are designed for complex, outcome-based contracts.
Evisort delivers AI-native contract intelligence combined with CLM features for centralizing contracts, extracting metadata without manual tagging, and surfacing risk and renewal opportunities; it highlights fast time-to-value for legal teams seeking automated review and reporting. Evisort’s founders’ academic background underpins its machine-learning emphasis.
CobbleStone Software targets mid-to-large organizations with feature-rich CLM and contract intelligence, offering predictive analytics, compliance controls, and configurable workflows for procurement and legal operations. CobbleStone is noted for robust reporting and obligation management.
Concord emphasizes user-friendly, collaborative contract creation and negotiation with unlimited document storage and integrated e-signature, making it attractive for small-to-medium teams that need rapid turnaround and transparent collaboration across stakeholders. Concord’s simplicity and pricing appeal to organizations prioritizing ease of use and fast deployment.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.