2026 Global: Cloud-Based Quantum Computing Market-Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Cloud-Based Quantum Computing Market-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for cloud-based quantum computing market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the cloud-based quantum computing market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Quantinuum, IBM, Google Quantum AI, IonQ, D‑Wave, Rigetti, Microsoft (Azure Quantum), Amazon Web Services (Braket), Xanadu and PsiQuantum are widely cited as the ten major companies shaping the cloud‑based quantum computing market, each offering distinct hardware, software and cloud access models that together define today’s commercial landscape. Quantinuum combines high‑fidelity trapped‑ion hardware with a full software stack and cloud access focused on enterprise chemistry and cryptography workloads. IBM delivers broad public cloud access via the IBM Quantum platform and Qiskit, pursues superconducting qubit scale‑up and error‑correction roadmaps, and markets systems and developer tooling aimed at enterprise adoption. Google Quantum AI concentrates on superconducting qubits and algorithm research with cloud interfaces for researchers and partnerships that emphasize machine learning and fundamental demonstrations of quantum advantage. IonQ offers trapped‑ion processors accessible through multiple cloud partners, touting high gate fidelity and all‑to‑all connectivity that suit simulation and optimisation applications while scaling roadmaps aim at dramatic qubit growth. D‑Wave provides quantum annealing hardware via its Leap cloud service tailored to combinatorial optimisation and hybrid quantum‑classical solvers, with Advantage‑class processors delivered as cloud services for enterprise optimisation problems.
Rigetti, Microsoft Azure Quantum and AWS Braket form the crucial bridge between diverse hardware vendors and cloud users by offering developer platforms, orchestration and hybrid workflows that let customers experiment across architectures. Rigetti’s Quantum Cloud Services ties its superconducting processors to classical compute for integrated workloads and developer APIs. Microsoft’s Azure Quantum aggregates multiple hardware providers, supplies the Q language and resource estimation tools, and targets enterprise cloud integration alongside long‑term hardware research into topological qubits. Amazon Braket provides single‑entry cloud access to multiple device types (annealers, trapped‑ion, superconducting and photonic) plus simulators and hybrid execution orchestration that lower the barrier to multi‑vendor experimentation. Xanadu is notable for photonic quantum processors and a cloud offering that appeals to users seeking room‑temperature, scalable photonic approaches and software libraries for continuous‑variable quantum computing. PsiQuantum pursues a full‑stack photonic fault‑tolerant route with heavy industrial partnerships and a business model oriented toward delivering large‑scale, manufacturable photonic quantum processors to the cloud ecosystem.
Collectively these ten companies drive the market by combining varied qubit technologies, cloud platforms, and software ecosystems that address near‑term NISQ workloads and longer‑term fault‑tolerant goals while enabling hybrid quantum‑classical production use cases. Enterprise customers pick vendors based on target workloads—quantum chemistry and cryptography favor trapped‑ion and high‑fidelity platforms such as Quantinuum and IonQ, optimisation tasks often leverage D‑Wave’s annealers or hybrid services on Braket and Azure, and broad experimental access and developer communities gravitate to IBM and Google’s cloud interfaces and open tooling. The multi‑vendor cloud model (AWS Braket, Azure Quantum, IBM Quantum) plus vendor‑specific managed services lets organizations test algorithms today and transition to scaled hardware as error rates, qubit counts and software orchestration mature.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for cloud-based quantum computing market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the cloud-based quantum computing market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Quantinuum, IBM, Google Quantum AI, IonQ, D‑Wave, Rigetti, Microsoft (Azure Quantum), Amazon Web Services (Braket), Xanadu and PsiQuantum are widely cited as the ten major companies shaping the cloud‑based quantum computing market, each offering distinct hardware, software and cloud access models that together define today’s commercial landscape. Quantinuum combines high‑fidelity trapped‑ion hardware with a full software stack and cloud access focused on enterprise chemistry and cryptography workloads. IBM delivers broad public cloud access via the IBM Quantum platform and Qiskit, pursues superconducting qubit scale‑up and error‑correction roadmaps, and markets systems and developer tooling aimed at enterprise adoption. Google Quantum AI concentrates on superconducting qubits and algorithm research with cloud interfaces for researchers and partnerships that emphasize machine learning and fundamental demonstrations of quantum advantage. IonQ offers trapped‑ion processors accessible through multiple cloud partners, touting high gate fidelity and all‑to‑all connectivity that suit simulation and optimisation applications while scaling roadmaps aim at dramatic qubit growth. D‑Wave provides quantum annealing hardware via its Leap cloud service tailored to combinatorial optimisation and hybrid quantum‑classical solvers, with Advantage‑class processors delivered as cloud services for enterprise optimisation problems.
Rigetti, Microsoft Azure Quantum and AWS Braket form the crucial bridge between diverse hardware vendors and cloud users by offering developer platforms, orchestration and hybrid workflows that let customers experiment across architectures. Rigetti’s Quantum Cloud Services ties its superconducting processors to classical compute for integrated workloads and developer APIs. Microsoft’s Azure Quantum aggregates multiple hardware providers, supplies the Q language and resource estimation tools, and targets enterprise cloud integration alongside long‑term hardware research into topological qubits. Amazon Braket provides single‑entry cloud access to multiple device types (annealers, trapped‑ion, superconducting and photonic) plus simulators and hybrid execution orchestration that lower the barrier to multi‑vendor experimentation. Xanadu is notable for photonic quantum processors and a cloud offering that appeals to users seeking room‑temperature, scalable photonic approaches and software libraries for continuous‑variable quantum computing. PsiQuantum pursues a full‑stack photonic fault‑tolerant route with heavy industrial partnerships and a business model oriented toward delivering large‑scale, manufacturable photonic quantum processors to the cloud ecosystem.
Collectively these ten companies drive the market by combining varied qubit technologies, cloud platforms, and software ecosystems that address near‑term NISQ workloads and longer‑term fault‑tolerant goals while enabling hybrid quantum‑classical production use cases. Enterprise customers pick vendors based on target workloads—quantum chemistry and cryptography favor trapped‑ion and high‑fidelity platforms such as Quantinuum and IonQ, optimisation tasks often leverage D‑Wave’s annealers or hybrid services on Braket and Azure, and broad experimental access and developer communities gravitate to IBM and Google’s cloud interfaces and open tooling. The multi‑vendor cloud model (AWS Braket, Azure Quantum, IBM Quantum) plus vendor‑specific managed services lets organizations test algorithms today and transition to scaled hardware as error rates, qubit counts and software orchestration mature.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.