Report cover image

2026 Global: Carbon Management System Market-Competitive Review (2032) report

Publisher PerryHope Partners
Published Dec 15, 2025
Length 32 Pages
SKU # PHP20694014

Description

The 2026 Global: Carbon Management System Market-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.

Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).

The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for carbon management system market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the carbon management system market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.

The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?

The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:

SAP SE, Microsoft Corporation, Salesforce, IBM, Schneider Electric, Watershed, Persefoni, Sphera, Gravity, and Greenly are widely cited among the ten major companies shaping the Carbon Management System market today. SAP integrates carbon accounting into enterprise resource planning and sustainability control towers to enable automated emissions tracking across global operations. Microsoft combines cloud infrastructure and Sustainability Manager tools for real-time monitoring and supply-chain emissions management while expanding carbon removal and low‑carbon datacenter initiatives. Salesforce’s Net Zero Cloud leverages CRM integration and workflow automation to streamline footprint assessment, reporting and stakeholder engagement across enterprise ecosystems. IBM offers the Environmental Intelligence Suite (including Envizi) that fuses carbon accounting with climate risk analytics and AI to support audit-grade disclosures and operational resilience. Schneider Electric pairs energy management hardware and software with carbon analytics to help energy‑intensive organizations optimize operations and compliance through IoT and adaptive controls.

Watershed, Persefoni, Sphera and Gravity represent specialist and fast‑growing vendors focused on enterprise-grade carbon accounting, Scope 3 complexity, and AI-driven automation. Watershed’s platform emphasizes precise Scope 1–3 measurement, scenario planning and emissions reduction pathways for large, complex supply chains. Persefoni positions itself as a Climate Management and Accounting Platform (CMAP) offering audit-ready carbon data suitable for financial institutions and regulated disclosures. Sphera brings lifecycle-based emissions modeling, risk management and industry-specific compliance capabilities that appeal to regulated sectors requiring deep technical fidelity. Gravity has recently been recognized for market‑leading functionality in AI data collection, automated bill ingestion, abatement opportunity identification and integrated energy project execution—features that support faster, audit‑ready Scope 1–3 reporting for energy‑intensive enterprises.

Greenly, Sweep, Emitwise and other emerging platforms complement established vendors by targeting SMB accessibility, collaborative supplier engagement and machine‑learning supply‑chain hotspots that fill important market niches alongside the top ten. Greenly focuses on user‑friendly, SMB‑oriented interfaces and analytics for Scopes 1–3, enabling smaller organizations to adopt structured carbon management. Sweep prioritizes networked collaboration across employees, suppliers and investors to drive collective decarbonization efforts. Emitwise applies ML to automate supply‑chain emissions hotspot identification for manufacturing and consumer‑goods companies facing embedded emissions challenges. Collectively, the ten major companies combine ERP and cloud incumbents’ scale with specialist platforms’ accuracy and AI capabilities to meet growing regulatory, investor and operational demands for auditable, actionable carbon data across Scopes 1, 2 and 3.

Table of Contents

32 Pages
1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
2.1 Market Definition
2.2 Market Segments
2.3 Market Strengths
2.4 Market Weaknesses
2.5 Market Threats
2.6 Market Opportunities
2.7 Major Players
3.0 Competitive Analysis
3.1 Market Player 1
3.2 Market Player 2
3.3 Market Player 3
3.4 Market Player 4
3.5 Market Player 5
3.6 Market Player 6
3.7 Market Player 7
3.8 Market Player 8
3.9 Market Player 9
3.10 Market Player 10
4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
5.0 Appendix

Search Inside Report

How Do Licenses Work?
Request A Sample
Head shot

Questions or Comments?

Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.