2026 Global: Blockchain-Based Service Network Market -Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Blockchain-Based Service Network Market -Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for blockchain-based service network market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the blockchain-based service network market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Alchemy, Infura (Consensys), QuickNode, Ankr, Blockdaemon, Chainlink Labs, IBM Blockchain, Microsoft Azure, Amazon Managed Blockchain (AWS), and Google Cloud occupy the leading positions in the Blockchain-based Service Network market due to their complementary strengths in node infrastructure, developer tooling, oracle services, and enterprise-grade blockchain platforms. Alchemy is a developer-focused infrastructure provider offering high-reliability node access, broad multi-chain support, advanced APIs, and observability tools that accelerate dApp performance and developer productivity. Infura, part of Consensys, delivers globally distributed Ethereum and multi-protocol node access with low-latency endpoints and robust WebSocket support, making it a backbone for many Web3 projects and exchanges. QuickNode provides fast, scalable RPC endpoints, specialized tooling for backfills and streams, and performance-oriented features for builders needing high-throughput access to chains like Ethereum and Solana. Ankr supplies a hybrid infrastructure model that includes RPC, staking services, and distributed node hosting to reduce costs for projects while enabling flexible deployment across multiple cloud and on-premise environments. Blockdaemon focuses on institutional-grade node operations and staking infrastructure, offering dedicated nodes, validator management, and white-glove services suited to exchanges, custodians, and enterprise blockchain deployments. Chainlink Labs operates the dominant decentralized oracle network that securely connects smart contracts to off-chain data and services, providing verifiable randomness (VRF), cross-chain interoperability layers, and high-assurance price feeds critical to DeFi, gaming, and enterprise automation. IBM Blockchain delivers permissioned blockchain solutions and managed enterprise platforms—leveraging Hyperledger Fabric, strong governance tooling, and integrations with hybrid cloud stacks—targeted at supply chain, finance, and regulated industries seeking privacy and compliance. Microsoft Azure offers a comprehensive Blockchain-as-a-Service suite, including managed ledger services, confidential computing primitives, and developer toolchains that simplify enterprise adoption while integrating with Azure Active Directory and analytics ecosystems. Amazon Managed Blockchain from AWS provides scalable frameworks for building and operating Hyperledger Fabric and Ethereum networks with tight integration into the AWS ecosystem, supporting high-throughput enterprise use cases and familiar cloud operations. Google Cloud advances blockchain infrastructure through data analytics integrations, managed node partnerships, and collaboration with key ecosystem players to enable on-chain data streaming into BigQuery and to support secure, scalable deployments for exchanges and builders.
Collectively these ten companies form the market’s core by addressing both permissioned and public blockchain needs, from raw RPC and node provisioning to oracles, validation, and enterprise BaaS offerings. The node providers (Alchemy, Infura, QuickNode, Ankr, Blockdaemon) prioritize uptime, latency, and multi-chain compatibility for dApps and wallets, while cloud and enterprise vendors (IBM, Microsoft, Amazon, Google) provide governance, compliance, and hybrid-cloud integration essential for regulated industries and large-scale corporate projects. Chainlink Labs fills the data and oracle layer, ensuring secure external data flows and cross-chain connectivity used by DeFi protocols, insurance, and supply chain systems. Market differentiation is driven by developer experience, protocol coverage, SLA-backed reliability, custody and staking services, and the ability to integrate off-chain analytics and confidential computing—factors that determine which provider enterprises and builders select for production blockchain-based service networks.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for blockchain-based service network market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the blockchain-based service network market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Alchemy, Infura (Consensys), QuickNode, Ankr, Blockdaemon, Chainlink Labs, IBM Blockchain, Microsoft Azure, Amazon Managed Blockchain (AWS), and Google Cloud occupy the leading positions in the Blockchain-based Service Network market due to their complementary strengths in node infrastructure, developer tooling, oracle services, and enterprise-grade blockchain platforms. Alchemy is a developer-focused infrastructure provider offering high-reliability node access, broad multi-chain support, advanced APIs, and observability tools that accelerate dApp performance and developer productivity. Infura, part of Consensys, delivers globally distributed Ethereum and multi-protocol node access with low-latency endpoints and robust WebSocket support, making it a backbone for many Web3 projects and exchanges. QuickNode provides fast, scalable RPC endpoints, specialized tooling for backfills and streams, and performance-oriented features for builders needing high-throughput access to chains like Ethereum and Solana. Ankr supplies a hybrid infrastructure model that includes RPC, staking services, and distributed node hosting to reduce costs for projects while enabling flexible deployment across multiple cloud and on-premise environments. Blockdaemon focuses on institutional-grade node operations and staking infrastructure, offering dedicated nodes, validator management, and white-glove services suited to exchanges, custodians, and enterprise blockchain deployments. Chainlink Labs operates the dominant decentralized oracle network that securely connects smart contracts to off-chain data and services, providing verifiable randomness (VRF), cross-chain interoperability layers, and high-assurance price feeds critical to DeFi, gaming, and enterprise automation. IBM Blockchain delivers permissioned blockchain solutions and managed enterprise platforms—leveraging Hyperledger Fabric, strong governance tooling, and integrations with hybrid cloud stacks—targeted at supply chain, finance, and regulated industries seeking privacy and compliance. Microsoft Azure offers a comprehensive Blockchain-as-a-Service suite, including managed ledger services, confidential computing primitives, and developer toolchains that simplify enterprise adoption while integrating with Azure Active Directory and analytics ecosystems. Amazon Managed Blockchain from AWS provides scalable frameworks for building and operating Hyperledger Fabric and Ethereum networks with tight integration into the AWS ecosystem, supporting high-throughput enterprise use cases and familiar cloud operations. Google Cloud advances blockchain infrastructure through data analytics integrations, managed node partnerships, and collaboration with key ecosystem players to enable on-chain data streaming into BigQuery and to support secure, scalable deployments for exchanges and builders.
Collectively these ten companies form the market’s core by addressing both permissioned and public blockchain needs, from raw RPC and node provisioning to oracles, validation, and enterprise BaaS offerings. The node providers (Alchemy, Infura, QuickNode, Ankr, Blockdaemon) prioritize uptime, latency, and multi-chain compatibility for dApps and wallets, while cloud and enterprise vendors (IBM, Microsoft, Amazon, Google) provide governance, compliance, and hybrid-cloud integration essential for regulated industries and large-scale corporate projects. Chainlink Labs fills the data and oracle layer, ensuring secure external data flows and cross-chain connectivity used by DeFi protocols, insurance, and supply chain systems. Market differentiation is driven by developer experience, protocol coverage, SLA-backed reliability, custody and staking services, and the ability to integrate off-chain analytics and confidential computing—factors that determine which provider enterprises and builders select for production blockchain-based service networks.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.