2026 Global: Air-Based Remote Weapon Stations Market-Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Air-Based Remote Weapon Stations Market-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for air-based remote weapon stations market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the air-based remote weapon stations market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Kongsberg Gruppen, Elbit Systems, BAE Systems, General Dynamics, Leonardo S.p.A., Rheinmetall AG, Saab AB, RTX (Raytheon Technologies), Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, and FN Herstal are among the ten major companies supplying air-based remote weapon stations (RWS), each contributing distinct strengths to airborne and counter‑UAS capabilities. Kongsberg’s PROTECTOR family is a market-leading, highly fielded RWS suite noted for modularity and wide adoption across many nations. Elbit Systems leverages advanced electro‑optics, real‑time fire control and integration with unmanned aerial systems to deliver lightweight, precision RWS solutions tailored to air and UAS platforms. BAE Systems provides integrated RWS for a range of aircraft and platforms, combining mature stabilization, targeting and systems‑of‑systems integration backed by extensive defense program experience. General Dynamics develops scalable, ruggedized RWS configurations optimized for aerial platforms and ISR integrations, emphasizing networked operation and survivability in contested environments. Leonardo focuses on lightweight, stabilized airborne and naval RWS variants with strong sensor fusion and target‑tracking performance suitable for helicopters, UAVs and maritime aircraft. Rheinmetall has positioned itself with high‑end, modular RWS optimized for anti‑drone and airborne threats, offering automated recoil management, 360° sensor suites and cyber‑secure integration for modern air platforms. Saab AB contributes precision electro‑optical targeting and compact, low‑weight RWS designs that suit both manned and unmanned aircraft roles while prioritizing sensor performance and integration with national C2 networks. RTX (Raytheon Technologies) brings advanced sensors, counter‑UAS and directed‑energy work that augment RWS capability sets—its systems and Phalanx family exemplify automatic tracking and rapid engagement technologies applicable to air‑defense roles. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems supplies compact, high‑performance RWS and counter‑UAS modules that integrate missile‑warning, EO/IR sensors and automated engagement logic for airborne and rotary platforms. FN Herstal, with deep firearms integration expertise, produces air‑suitable RWS mounts and multi‑caliber solutions emphasizing remote reloading, stabilization and weapon modularity for helicopter and UAV installations.
These vendors differentiate through combinations of sensor fusion (EO/IR, laser rangefinders, radar), stabilization and fire‑control algorithms, software‑defined interfaces for aircraft integration, and growing inclusion of AI/autonomy for target detection and tracking. Market drivers include rising counter‑UAS demand, integration of RWS onto both manned aircraft and UAS, and defense modernization programs that favor lightweight, low‑recoil airborne mounts. Competitive dynamics show established prime contractors (Kongsberg, RTX, BAE, General Dynamics) holding broad installation footprints while specialist firms (Elbit, Rafael, FN Herstal, Saab, Leonardo, Rheinmetall) push innovation in optics, modularity and anti‑drone performance. Export controls, platform certification complexity, and the need for cyber‑resilient command links remain key procurement constraints influencing supplier selection and system architecture across air‑based RWS programs.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for air-based remote weapon stations market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the air-based remote weapon stations market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Kongsberg Gruppen, Elbit Systems, BAE Systems, General Dynamics, Leonardo S.p.A., Rheinmetall AG, Saab AB, RTX (Raytheon Technologies), Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, and FN Herstal are among the ten major companies supplying air-based remote weapon stations (RWS), each contributing distinct strengths to airborne and counter‑UAS capabilities. Kongsberg’s PROTECTOR family is a market-leading, highly fielded RWS suite noted for modularity and wide adoption across many nations. Elbit Systems leverages advanced electro‑optics, real‑time fire control and integration with unmanned aerial systems to deliver lightweight, precision RWS solutions tailored to air and UAS platforms. BAE Systems provides integrated RWS for a range of aircraft and platforms, combining mature stabilization, targeting and systems‑of‑systems integration backed by extensive defense program experience. General Dynamics develops scalable, ruggedized RWS configurations optimized for aerial platforms and ISR integrations, emphasizing networked operation and survivability in contested environments. Leonardo focuses on lightweight, stabilized airborne and naval RWS variants with strong sensor fusion and target‑tracking performance suitable for helicopters, UAVs and maritime aircraft. Rheinmetall has positioned itself with high‑end, modular RWS optimized for anti‑drone and airborne threats, offering automated recoil management, 360° sensor suites and cyber‑secure integration for modern air platforms. Saab AB contributes precision electro‑optical targeting and compact, low‑weight RWS designs that suit both manned and unmanned aircraft roles while prioritizing sensor performance and integration with national C2 networks. RTX (Raytheon Technologies) brings advanced sensors, counter‑UAS and directed‑energy work that augment RWS capability sets—its systems and Phalanx family exemplify automatic tracking and rapid engagement technologies applicable to air‑defense roles. Rafael Advanced Defense Systems supplies compact, high‑performance RWS and counter‑UAS modules that integrate missile‑warning, EO/IR sensors and automated engagement logic for airborne and rotary platforms. FN Herstal, with deep firearms integration expertise, produces air‑suitable RWS mounts and multi‑caliber solutions emphasizing remote reloading, stabilization and weapon modularity for helicopter and UAV installations.
These vendors differentiate through combinations of sensor fusion (EO/IR, laser rangefinders, radar), stabilization and fire‑control algorithms, software‑defined interfaces for aircraft integration, and growing inclusion of AI/autonomy for target detection and tracking. Market drivers include rising counter‑UAS demand, integration of RWS onto both manned aircraft and UAS, and defense modernization programs that favor lightweight, low‑recoil airborne mounts. Competitive dynamics show established prime contractors (Kongsberg, RTX, BAE, General Dynamics) holding broad installation footprints while specialist firms (Elbit, Rafael, FN Herstal, Saab, Leonardo, Rheinmetall) push innovation in optics, modularity and anti‑drone performance. Export controls, platform certification complexity, and the need for cyber‑resilient command links remain key procurement constraints influencing supplier selection and system architecture across air‑based RWS programs.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.