Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market- Growth, Share, Opportunities & Competitive Analysis, 2024 – 2032

Market Overview
The Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market is anticipated to grow significantly, expanding from USD 1,201.39 million in 2024 to an estimated USD 6,293.97 million by 2032. This reflects a strong compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 23% over the forecast period.

Market expansion is driven by advancements in cell-based therapies, the rising emphasis on personalized medicine, and the increasing incorporation of automation within biomanufacturing processes. The surge in clinical trials and the global prevalence of chronic diseases are amplifying the demand for scalable, efficient manufacturing solutions. Additionally, the adoption of closed systems enhances safety and mitigates contamination risks, which is critical when producing sensitive cell-based therapeutics. These systems are increasingly vital to ensure quality, compliance, and consistency in cell therapy manufacturing.

Market Drivers
Technological Advancements in Cell Therapy Manufacturing
Innovation in manufacturing technologies plays a pivotal role in accelerating the adoption of automated and closed cell therapy processing systems. Automation enhances operational efficiency, scalability, and product safety—key factors in meeting the growing global demand for cell-based treatments. For example, in 2021, Thermo Fisher Scientific unveiled an automated platform aimed at scaling the production of cell and gene therapies, backed by a USD 300 million R&D investment. Furthermore, the U.S. Department of Energy allocated over USD 300 million toward advanced cell manufacturing initiatives, emphasizing automation as a strategic priority. These investments underscore the increasing focus on building robust, automated solutions to support the commercial viability of next-generation cell therapies.

Market Challenges
High Costs and Complex Manufacturing Demands
A major barrier to market growth lies in the substantial costs and complexity associated with developing and scaling automated cell therapy systems. These technologies require advanced infrastructure, skilled labor, and high-grade materials, all contributing to elevated capital and operational expenses. For emerging companies or startups, the financial commitment needed to implement such systems can be prohibitive. Moreover, manufacturing cell therapies involves intricate procedures that demand continuous R&D investment and strict compliance with evolving regulatory frameworks. Companies like Lonza face ongoing challenges balancing cost-efficiency with technological innovation. The need for investment in software, hardware, and process standardization further amplifies financial pressure. Although public and private funding initiatives aim to address these concerns, affordability and scalability remain key challenges, particularly for smaller market entrants seeking to remain competitive while maintaining quality and regulatory compliance.

Market Segmentation

By Product Type:

Automated Cell Therapy Processing Systems

Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems

By Technology:

Automation Technology

Gene-Editing Technology

Stem-Cell Processing Technology

By End-User:

Hospitals

Research Institutions

Biotechnology Companies

Pharmaceutical Companies

By Region:

North America

United States

Canada

Mexico

Europe

Germany

France

United Kingdom

Italy

Spain

Rest of Europe

Asia Pacific

China

Japan

India

South Korea

Southeast Asia

Rest of Asia Pacific

Latin America

Brazil

Argentina

Rest of Latin America

Middle East & Africa

GCC Countries

South Africa

Rest of the Middle East and Africa

Key Player Analysis

Miltenyi Biotec

Lonza

Fresenius Kabi AG

Danaher Corporation

BioSpherix, LLC

Terumo Corporation

Sartorius AG

ThermoGenesis Holdings, Inc.

CELLARS

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.


CHAPTER NO. 1 : INTRODUCTION
1.1.1. Report Description
Purpose of the Report
USP & Key Offerings
1.1.2. Key Benefits for Stakeholders
1.1.3. Target Audience
1.1.4. Report Scope
CHAPTER NO. 2 : EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.1. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market Snapshot
2.1.1. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market, 2018 - 2032 (USD Million)
CHAPTER NO. 3 : Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market – INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
3.1. Introduction
3.2. Market Drivers
3.3. Market Restraints
3.4. Market Opportunities
3.5. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
CHAPTER NO. 4 : ANALYSIS COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
4.1. Company Market Share Analysis – 2023
4.2. Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market Company Revenue Market Share, 2023
4.3. Company Assessment Metrics, 2023
4.4. Start-ups /SMEs Assessment Metrics, 2023
4.5. Strategic Developments
4.6. Key Players Product Matrix
CHAPTER NO. 5 : PESTEL & ADJACENT MARKET ANALYSIS
CHAPTER NO. 6 : Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market – BY Based on Product Type: ANALYSIS
CHAPTER NO. 7 : Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market – BY Based on Technology: ANALYSIS
CHAPTER NO. 8 : Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market – BY Based on End-User: ANALYSIS
CHAPTER NO. 9 : Automated and Closed Cell Therapy Processing Systems Market – BY Based on Region: ANALYSIS
CHAPTER NO. 10 : COMPANY PROFILES
9.1. Miltenyi Biotec
9.1.1. Company Overview
9.1.2. Product Portfolio
9.1.3. Swot Analysis
9.1.4. Business Strategy
9.1.5. Financial Overview
9.2. Lonza
9.3. Fresenius Kabi AG
9.4. Danaher Corporation
9.5. BioSpherix, LLC
9.6. Terumo Corporation
9.7. Sartorius AG
9.8. ThermoGenesis Holdings, Inc.
9.9. CELLARS
9.10. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Download our eBook: How to Succeed Using Market Research

Learn how to effectively navigate the market research process to help guide your organization on the journey to success.

Download eBook
Cookie Settings