Beverage Packaging Market by Beverage Type (Alcoholic Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks, Dairy Products), Material Type (Glass, Metal, Paper & Paperboard), Packaging Format, Operation Type, Distribution Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Beverage Packaging Market was valued at USD 156.25 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 166.64 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.51%, reaching USD 258.81 billion by 2032.
Setting the scene for beverage packaging transformation where sustainability, supply resilience, and consumer-driven design converge to redefine industry priorities
The beverage packaging landscape is undergoing a period of accelerated evolution as manufacturers, brand owners, and retail partners confront converging pressures from sustainability expectations, cost volatility, and shifting consumer behaviors. This introduction frames the contemporary context: materials innovation, regulatory shifts, and omnichannel distribution are not isolated forces but interconnected drivers that shape priorities for design, procurement, and manufacturing investments.
Sustainability has moved from a niche differentiator to a baseline expectation, prompting firms to evaluate life-cycle impacts, recyclability, and circularity in tandem with functional requirements such as barrier properties and shelf stability. Meanwhile, supply chain risk awareness now informs raw material sourcing and contingency planning, as disruptions expose vulnerabilities across global manufacturing networks. Simultaneously, consumers demand packaging that communicates brand values and convenience, influencing choices around single-serve formats, resealability, and on-the-go usability.
This section sets the stage for the deeper analysis that follows by outlining how technological improvements in materials and automation, together with evolving distribution channels, are raising the bar for competitiveness. It establishes the imperative for stakeholders to integrate environmental considerations with operational resilience and consumer-centric design, thereby aligning packaging strategy with broader corporate objectives.
How circularity, digital manufacturing, and collaborative supply strategies are fundamentally reshaping beverage packaging economics and innovation trajectories
Today's beverage packaging environment reflects transformative shifts that are both structural and emergent, creating new strategic imperatives for industry participants. The transition toward circular systems is accelerating product redesign, with materials selection increasingly evaluated through the lens of end-of-life management and regulatory compliance. Manufacturers are investing in recyclable and reusable solutions while also exploring compostable and bio-based alternatives that reduce reliance on fossil-derived feedstocks.
Concurrently, digitization and automation are reshaping production economics. Advances in smart manufacturing and inspection systems enhance throughput and quality consistency, which in turn enable more complex packaging designs to be produced reliably at scale. E-commerce growth has driven demand for packaging optimized for transit durability and minimal dimensional weight, prompting reassessments of secondary and tertiary packaging practices to balance protection and sustainability.
On the market front, collaboration models among brands, material suppliers, and recovery systems are becoming more common, reflecting the recognition that individual solutions alone will not achieve systemic change. As a result, strategic alliances and shared infrastructure investments are emerging as important mechanisms to accelerate innovation and cost-effective implementation of next-generation packaging.
Assessing how recent tariff dynamics and trade policy shifts are catalyzing supply chain regionalization, supplier diversification, and strategic capital decisions
Tariff policy can materially alter the competitive landscape for beverage packaging by influencing relative input costs, capital allocation, and sourcing strategies. Recent and prospective tariff actions have prompted manufacturers and brands to reassess supplier footprints and logistics routing to mitigate exposure to cost shocks. Companies are increasingly mapping tariff-sensitive inputs and finished goods to identify substitution opportunities and build redundancies within their supplier base.
In response to heightened trade friction, many organizations have pursued nearshoring and regionalization strategies that prioritize continuity and lead time reduction over marginal cost advantages. These strategic shifts often involve investments in local tooling, qualification of alternative materials that are more readily available domestically, and the establishment of contingency inventory to smooth production. While such moves can increase fixed costs, they enhance supply chain resilience and reduce vulnerability to sudden tariff escalations.
Furthermore, tariff-driven dynamics are influencing longer-term decisions around capital expenditure and vertical integration. Some firms are exploring in-house extrusion or coating capabilities to capture more control over critical inputs, while others are negotiating long-term contracts that stabilize pricing and delivery. Overall, trade policy is a persistent strategic variable that companies now incorporate into scenario planning and procurement frameworks.
A multidimensional segmentation framework revealing how beverage type, material selection, packaging format, distribution pathways, and operation models dictate strategic choices
Insightful segmentation reveals where growth, risk, and innovation intersect across product categories, material choices, packaging formats, distribution channels, and production models. Based on beverage type, the market encapsulates Alcoholic Beverages with subsegments including Beer, Spirits, and Wine, Carbonated Soft Drinks divided into Cola and Energy Drinks, Dairy Products comprising Flavored Milk, Milk, and Yogurt Drinks, as well as Juice and Water. Each beverage category imposes distinct requirements for barrier performance, shelf life, and consumer interaction, which in turn drive material and format selection.
Based on material type, packaging decisions span Glass, Metal, Paper & Paperboard, and Plastic, with Metal further categorized into Aluminum and Steel. Material properties such as recyclability, weight, and barrier characteristics shape both environmental profiles and logistics costs. Based on packaging format, the landscape covers Bottles, Cans, Cartons, Pouches, and Tetra Pak, where Bottles are differentiated into Glass Bottles, Metal Bottles, and Plastic Bottles, Cans split into Aluminum Cans and Steel Cans, Cartons classified as Aseptic and Non Aseptic, and Pouches subdivided into Sachets and Stand Up Pouches. The interaction between format and beverage type determines fill technology requirements and distribution suitability.
Based on distribution channel, the market is examined across Convenience Stores, Online Retail, and Supermarkets/Hypermarkets, each channel presenting unique packaging performance and merchandising needs. Finally, based on operation type, production systems are delineated into Automated, Manual, and Semi Automated, which influence capital intensity, labor dynamics, and the ability to scale personalized or limited-run packaging. Together, these segmentation lenses enable targeted strategies that align product propositions with operational capability and channel expectations.
How differentiated regional drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific determine packaging priorities, policy responses, and scaling strategies
Regional dynamics exert a defining influence on packaging strategy and competitive positioning, with distinct drivers present across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, regulatory focus on recycling access and an emphasis on convenience formats shape demand for lightweight materials and refillable systems. North-South supply chains and regional logistics networks further determine material sourcing strategies and the pace at which innovations scale into mainstream channels.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory environment and consumer sustainability expectations are particularly influential, prompting ambitious recycling targets and extended producer responsibility schemes that affect material economics and product design. Brands operating in this region often face stringent compliance requirements and active NGO engagement, driving collaboration with waste management and recovery partners. Market heterogeneity within the region necessitates flexible packaging strategies that can be adapted to local infrastructure and consumer preferences.
Across Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, expanding retail ecosystems, and strong growth in e-commerce create opportunities for novel formats and lightweight materials that optimize cost and convenience. Manufacturing capacity expansion in this region supports both domestic demand and export flows, but also raises questions about regional standards, quality assurance, and circularity infrastructure. Understanding these geographical nuances is essential for designing rollout plans and investment priorities that match local market conditions.
Why cross-functional leadership, material innovation partnerships, and automation investments are shaping the competitive hierarchy among packaging solution providers
Leading companies set the tone for innovation, standard-setting, and strategic investment across the beverage packaging ecosystem. Market leaders and specialist suppliers alike are advancing initiatives in material substitution, lightweighting, and closed-loop systems, while large brand owners drive demand-side commitments that ripple through supply chains. Technology providers that offer automation, inspection, and digital traceability solutions enable faster innovation adoption and tighter quality control, creating competitive advantages in speed-to-market and cost efficiency.
Partnerships between material producers and converters are accelerating development cycles for alternative substrates, including high-recycled-content materials and bio-based polymers. At the same time, primary packaging manufacturers that invest in modular, flexible production lines can respond more rapidly to SKU proliferation and limited-run promotional packaging. Service providers specializing in end-of-life collection, sorting, and recycling are increasingly essential collaborators, as they help translate corporate sustainability commitments into viable recovery pathways.
Collectively, these company-level dynamics underscore the importance of cross-functional capabilities that bridge R&D, procurement, and commercial teams. Firms that integrate sustainability targets with process capability and channel insights are better positioned to capture value from changing consumer preferences while managing operational risk.
Actionable priorities for executives to synchronize sustainability goals, supplier resilience, automation investment, and channel-driven packaging innovation
Industry leaders should adopt a set of actionable priorities that balance short-term resilience with long-term transformation. Begin by aligning packaging strategy with clear sustainability objectives that are measurable and time-bound; this alignment should cascade into procurement policies, supplier scorecards, and product design parameters. Concurrently, invest in supplier diversification and near-term buffer strategies to reduce exposure to input price and tariff volatility while preserving optionality for materials and formats.
Prioritizing automation and modular production systems will enhance flexibility and improve lead time responsiveness, enabling companies to meet increasing SKU complexity and personalization demands. Complement these investments with digital tracking and quality assurance tools to reduce waste, improve yield, and enable real-time decision-making across production and distribution. Engage proactively with recovery and recycling partners to ensure post-consumer pathways exist for chosen materials, thereby mitigating regulatory risk and reinforcing brand credibility.
Finally, adopt a customer-centric approach to packaging innovation by testing format and material changes in targeted channels before broad rollout. This phased implementation reduces commercial risk and generates actionable feedback that informs scale-up decisions. By combining operational rigor with deliberate innovation, leaders can drive both environmental performance and commercial differentiation.
Methodological approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature, supply chain indicators, and scenario analysis to inform packaging strategy decisions
This research synthesizes primary and secondary sources to produce an evidence-based analysis of packaging trends, material dynamics, and operational strategies. Primary inputs include interviews with packaging engineers, procurement leaders, converters, brand managers, and retail category specialists, providing qualitative depth on technology adoption, material trade-offs, and channel requirements. Secondary inputs encompass policy documents, industry association guidance, and technical literature on material science and recycling systems to ensure contextual accuracy and regulatory alignment.
Quantitative assessments draw on production and trade data, equipment installation reports, and supply chain indicators to identify directional shifts in sourcing and capacity. The analysis also employs scenario planning to illustrate how tariff changes, regulatory developments, and technology adoption trajectories may influence strategic choices. Throughout, methodological rigor has been maintained by triangulating insights across stakeholder perspectives and validating assumptions with domain experts.
Limitations of the approach include the evolving nature of regulatory frameworks and variable availability of post-consumer recovery data across regions. To address these gaps, the study highlights sensitivity considerations and recommends ongoing monitoring of policy updates and pilot program outcomes to refine strategic actions over time.
Concluding perspective on treating packaging as a strategic capability that integrates sustainability, resilience, and consumer-centric innovation for competitive advantage
The concluding perspective emphasizes that beverage packaging is no longer a purely functional cost center but a strategic axis where sustainability, consumer experience, and supply resilience intersect. Companies that treat packaging as an integrated capability-linking material selection, production technology, distribution optimization, and recovery systems-will secure competitive advantage. Success requires deliberate investment in flexible production, partnerships for circularity, and targeted pilot programs that validate material and format choices in market-representative conditions.
Moreover, leaders must embed policy and tariff scenario planning into their procurement and capital planning cycles, recognizing that trade shifts can rapidly alter cost and sourcing landscapes. By pairing near-term resilience measures with longer-term transformation initiatives, organizations can manage risk while advancing toward sustainable packaging objectives. The path forward is iterative: continual testing, measurement, and adaptation will be essential as consumer preferences, technology capabilities, and regulatory requirements evolve.
Overall, the industry stands at an inflection point where coordinated action across value chain participants can unlock both environmental benefits and commercial growth, provided firms move with strategic clarity and operational discipline.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Setting the scene for beverage packaging transformation where sustainability, supply resilience, and consumer-driven design converge to redefine industry priorities
The beverage packaging landscape is undergoing a period of accelerated evolution as manufacturers, brand owners, and retail partners confront converging pressures from sustainability expectations, cost volatility, and shifting consumer behaviors. This introduction frames the contemporary context: materials innovation, regulatory shifts, and omnichannel distribution are not isolated forces but interconnected drivers that shape priorities for design, procurement, and manufacturing investments.
Sustainability has moved from a niche differentiator to a baseline expectation, prompting firms to evaluate life-cycle impacts, recyclability, and circularity in tandem with functional requirements such as barrier properties and shelf stability. Meanwhile, supply chain risk awareness now informs raw material sourcing and contingency planning, as disruptions expose vulnerabilities across global manufacturing networks. Simultaneously, consumers demand packaging that communicates brand values and convenience, influencing choices around single-serve formats, resealability, and on-the-go usability.
This section sets the stage for the deeper analysis that follows by outlining how technological improvements in materials and automation, together with evolving distribution channels, are raising the bar for competitiveness. It establishes the imperative for stakeholders to integrate environmental considerations with operational resilience and consumer-centric design, thereby aligning packaging strategy with broader corporate objectives.
How circularity, digital manufacturing, and collaborative supply strategies are fundamentally reshaping beverage packaging economics and innovation trajectories
Today's beverage packaging environment reflects transformative shifts that are both structural and emergent, creating new strategic imperatives for industry participants. The transition toward circular systems is accelerating product redesign, with materials selection increasingly evaluated through the lens of end-of-life management and regulatory compliance. Manufacturers are investing in recyclable and reusable solutions while also exploring compostable and bio-based alternatives that reduce reliance on fossil-derived feedstocks.
Concurrently, digitization and automation are reshaping production economics. Advances in smart manufacturing and inspection systems enhance throughput and quality consistency, which in turn enable more complex packaging designs to be produced reliably at scale. E-commerce growth has driven demand for packaging optimized for transit durability and minimal dimensional weight, prompting reassessments of secondary and tertiary packaging practices to balance protection and sustainability.
On the market front, collaboration models among brands, material suppliers, and recovery systems are becoming more common, reflecting the recognition that individual solutions alone will not achieve systemic change. As a result, strategic alliances and shared infrastructure investments are emerging as important mechanisms to accelerate innovation and cost-effective implementation of next-generation packaging.
Assessing how recent tariff dynamics and trade policy shifts are catalyzing supply chain regionalization, supplier diversification, and strategic capital decisions
Tariff policy can materially alter the competitive landscape for beverage packaging by influencing relative input costs, capital allocation, and sourcing strategies. Recent and prospective tariff actions have prompted manufacturers and brands to reassess supplier footprints and logistics routing to mitigate exposure to cost shocks. Companies are increasingly mapping tariff-sensitive inputs and finished goods to identify substitution opportunities and build redundancies within their supplier base.
In response to heightened trade friction, many organizations have pursued nearshoring and regionalization strategies that prioritize continuity and lead time reduction over marginal cost advantages. These strategic shifts often involve investments in local tooling, qualification of alternative materials that are more readily available domestically, and the establishment of contingency inventory to smooth production. While such moves can increase fixed costs, they enhance supply chain resilience and reduce vulnerability to sudden tariff escalations.
Furthermore, tariff-driven dynamics are influencing longer-term decisions around capital expenditure and vertical integration. Some firms are exploring in-house extrusion or coating capabilities to capture more control over critical inputs, while others are negotiating long-term contracts that stabilize pricing and delivery. Overall, trade policy is a persistent strategic variable that companies now incorporate into scenario planning and procurement frameworks.
A multidimensional segmentation framework revealing how beverage type, material selection, packaging format, distribution pathways, and operation models dictate strategic choices
Insightful segmentation reveals where growth, risk, and innovation intersect across product categories, material choices, packaging formats, distribution channels, and production models. Based on beverage type, the market encapsulates Alcoholic Beverages with subsegments including Beer, Spirits, and Wine, Carbonated Soft Drinks divided into Cola and Energy Drinks, Dairy Products comprising Flavored Milk, Milk, and Yogurt Drinks, as well as Juice and Water. Each beverage category imposes distinct requirements for barrier performance, shelf life, and consumer interaction, which in turn drive material and format selection.
Based on material type, packaging decisions span Glass, Metal, Paper & Paperboard, and Plastic, with Metal further categorized into Aluminum and Steel. Material properties such as recyclability, weight, and barrier characteristics shape both environmental profiles and logistics costs. Based on packaging format, the landscape covers Bottles, Cans, Cartons, Pouches, and Tetra Pak, where Bottles are differentiated into Glass Bottles, Metal Bottles, and Plastic Bottles, Cans split into Aluminum Cans and Steel Cans, Cartons classified as Aseptic and Non Aseptic, and Pouches subdivided into Sachets and Stand Up Pouches. The interaction between format and beverage type determines fill technology requirements and distribution suitability.
Based on distribution channel, the market is examined across Convenience Stores, Online Retail, and Supermarkets/Hypermarkets, each channel presenting unique packaging performance and merchandising needs. Finally, based on operation type, production systems are delineated into Automated, Manual, and Semi Automated, which influence capital intensity, labor dynamics, and the ability to scale personalized or limited-run packaging. Together, these segmentation lenses enable targeted strategies that align product propositions with operational capability and channel expectations.
How differentiated regional drivers across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific determine packaging priorities, policy responses, and scaling strategies
Regional dynamics exert a defining influence on packaging strategy and competitive positioning, with distinct drivers present across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, regulatory focus on recycling access and an emphasis on convenience formats shape demand for lightweight materials and refillable systems. North-South supply chains and regional logistics networks further determine material sourcing strategies and the pace at which innovations scale into mainstream channels.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory environment and consumer sustainability expectations are particularly influential, prompting ambitious recycling targets and extended producer responsibility schemes that affect material economics and product design. Brands operating in this region often face stringent compliance requirements and active NGO engagement, driving collaboration with waste management and recovery partners. Market heterogeneity within the region necessitates flexible packaging strategies that can be adapted to local infrastructure and consumer preferences.
Across Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, expanding retail ecosystems, and strong growth in e-commerce create opportunities for novel formats and lightweight materials that optimize cost and convenience. Manufacturing capacity expansion in this region supports both domestic demand and export flows, but also raises questions about regional standards, quality assurance, and circularity infrastructure. Understanding these geographical nuances is essential for designing rollout plans and investment priorities that match local market conditions.
Why cross-functional leadership, material innovation partnerships, and automation investments are shaping the competitive hierarchy among packaging solution providers
Leading companies set the tone for innovation, standard-setting, and strategic investment across the beverage packaging ecosystem. Market leaders and specialist suppliers alike are advancing initiatives in material substitution, lightweighting, and closed-loop systems, while large brand owners drive demand-side commitments that ripple through supply chains. Technology providers that offer automation, inspection, and digital traceability solutions enable faster innovation adoption and tighter quality control, creating competitive advantages in speed-to-market and cost efficiency.
Partnerships between material producers and converters are accelerating development cycles for alternative substrates, including high-recycled-content materials and bio-based polymers. At the same time, primary packaging manufacturers that invest in modular, flexible production lines can respond more rapidly to SKU proliferation and limited-run promotional packaging. Service providers specializing in end-of-life collection, sorting, and recycling are increasingly essential collaborators, as they help translate corporate sustainability commitments into viable recovery pathways.
Collectively, these company-level dynamics underscore the importance of cross-functional capabilities that bridge R&D, procurement, and commercial teams. Firms that integrate sustainability targets with process capability and channel insights are better positioned to capture value from changing consumer preferences while managing operational risk.
Actionable priorities for executives to synchronize sustainability goals, supplier resilience, automation investment, and channel-driven packaging innovation
Industry leaders should adopt a set of actionable priorities that balance short-term resilience with long-term transformation. Begin by aligning packaging strategy with clear sustainability objectives that are measurable and time-bound; this alignment should cascade into procurement policies, supplier scorecards, and product design parameters. Concurrently, invest in supplier diversification and near-term buffer strategies to reduce exposure to input price and tariff volatility while preserving optionality for materials and formats.
Prioritizing automation and modular production systems will enhance flexibility and improve lead time responsiveness, enabling companies to meet increasing SKU complexity and personalization demands. Complement these investments with digital tracking and quality assurance tools to reduce waste, improve yield, and enable real-time decision-making across production and distribution. Engage proactively with recovery and recycling partners to ensure post-consumer pathways exist for chosen materials, thereby mitigating regulatory risk and reinforcing brand credibility.
Finally, adopt a customer-centric approach to packaging innovation by testing format and material changes in targeted channels before broad rollout. This phased implementation reduces commercial risk and generates actionable feedback that informs scale-up decisions. By combining operational rigor with deliberate innovation, leaders can drive both environmental performance and commercial differentiation.
Methodological approach combining stakeholder interviews, technical literature, supply chain indicators, and scenario analysis to inform packaging strategy decisions
This research synthesizes primary and secondary sources to produce an evidence-based analysis of packaging trends, material dynamics, and operational strategies. Primary inputs include interviews with packaging engineers, procurement leaders, converters, brand managers, and retail category specialists, providing qualitative depth on technology adoption, material trade-offs, and channel requirements. Secondary inputs encompass policy documents, industry association guidance, and technical literature on material science and recycling systems to ensure contextual accuracy and regulatory alignment.
Quantitative assessments draw on production and trade data, equipment installation reports, and supply chain indicators to identify directional shifts in sourcing and capacity. The analysis also employs scenario planning to illustrate how tariff changes, regulatory developments, and technology adoption trajectories may influence strategic choices. Throughout, methodological rigor has been maintained by triangulating insights across stakeholder perspectives and validating assumptions with domain experts.
Limitations of the approach include the evolving nature of regulatory frameworks and variable availability of post-consumer recovery data across regions. To address these gaps, the study highlights sensitivity considerations and recommends ongoing monitoring of policy updates and pilot program outcomes to refine strategic actions over time.
Concluding perspective on treating packaging as a strategic capability that integrates sustainability, resilience, and consumer-centric innovation for competitive advantage
The concluding perspective emphasizes that beverage packaging is no longer a purely functional cost center but a strategic axis where sustainability, consumer experience, and supply resilience intersect. Companies that treat packaging as an integrated capability-linking material selection, production technology, distribution optimization, and recovery systems-will secure competitive advantage. Success requires deliberate investment in flexible production, partnerships for circularity, and targeted pilot programs that validate material and format choices in market-representative conditions.
Moreover, leaders must embed policy and tariff scenario planning into their procurement and capital planning cycles, recognizing that trade shifts can rapidly alter cost and sourcing landscapes. By pairing near-term resilience measures with longer-term transformation initiatives, organizations can manage risk while advancing toward sustainable packaging objectives. The path forward is iterative: continual testing, measurement, and adaptation will be essential as consumer preferences, technology capabilities, and regulatory requirements evolve.
Overall, the industry stands at an inflection point where coordinated action across value chain participants can unlock both environmental benefits and commercial growth, provided firms move with strategic clarity and operational discipline.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
185 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Widespread implementation of recyclable and compostable packaging materials in single-use beverage containers driven by consumer environmental concerns
- 5.2. Integration of smart packaging technologies including NFC tags and QR codes to enhance consumer engagement and traceability in beverages
- 5.3. Rising demand for lightweight glass and aluminum bottles to reduce transportation costs and carbon footprint in beverage distribution
- 5.4. Expansion of tamper-evident resealable closures to ensure product safety and maintain freshness in on-the-go beverage segments
- 5.5. Growing use of recycled ocean-bound plastics in beverage packaging to support circular economy initiatives and brand sustainability goals
- 5.6. Emerging trend of refillable beverage systems featuring reusable containers and deposit-return schemes to minimize single-use waste
- 5.7. Adoption of minimalist and label-free packaging designs to simplify recycling processes and reduce material usage in beverage products
- 5.8. Implementation of predictive shelf-life labels with time-temperature indicators to optimize inventory management and reduce spoilage
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Beverage Packaging Market, by Beverage Type
- 8.1. Alcoholic Beverages
- 8.1.1. Beer
- 8.1.2. Spirits
- 8.1.3. Wine
- 8.2. Carbonated Soft Drinks
- 8.2.1. Cola
- 8.2.2. Energy Drinks
- 8.3. Dairy Products
- 8.3.1. Flavored Milk
- 8.3.2. Milk
- 8.3.3. Yogurt Drinks
- 8.4. Juice
- 8.5. Water
- 9. Beverage Packaging Market, by Material Type
- 9.1. Glass
- 9.2. Metal
- 9.2.1. Aluminum
- 9.2.2. Steel
- 9.3. Paper & Paperboard
- 9.4. Plastic
- 10. Beverage Packaging Market, by Packaging Format
- 10.1. Bottles
- 10.1.1. Glass Bottles
- 10.1.2. Metal Bottles
- 10.1.3. Plastic Bottles
- 10.2. Cans
- 10.2.1. Aluminum Cans
- 10.2.2. Steel Cans
- 10.3. Cartons
- 10.3.1. Aseptic
- 10.3.2. Non Aseptic
- 10.4. Pouches
- 10.4.1. Sachets
- 10.4.2. Stand Up Pouches
- 10.5. Tetra Pak
- 11. Beverage Packaging Market, by Operation Type
- 11.1. Automated
- 11.2. Manual
- 11.3. Semi Automated
- 12. Beverage Packaging Market, by Distribution Channel
- 12.1. Online
- 12.2. Offline
- 13. Beverage Packaging Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Beverage Packaging Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Beverage Packaging Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Ball Corporation
- 16.3.2. Crown Holdings, Inc.
- 16.3.3. Ardagh Group S.A.
- 16.3.4. O-I Glass, Inc.
- 16.3.5. Amcor plc
- 16.3.6. Berry Global Group, Inc.
- 16.3.7. Silgan Holdings Inc.
- 16.3.8. Tetra Pak International S.A.
- 16.3.9. DS Smith Plc
- 16.3.10. WestRock Company
- 16.3.11. International Paper Company
- 16.3.12. Smurfit Kappa Group plc
- 16.3.13. Reynolds Group Holdings Ltd.
- 16.3.14. Can-Pack S.A.
- 16.3.15. CCL Industries Inc.
- 16.3.16. SIG Combibloc Group AG
- 16.3.17. Greif, Inc.
- 16.3.18. Albea S.A.
- 16.3.19. Huhtamäki Oyj
- 16.3.20. UACJ Corporation
- 16.3.21. Impress Group B.V.
- 16.3.22. Kian Joo Group
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
