2026 Global: Aircraft Survivability Equipment Market-Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Aircraft Survivability Equipment Market-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for aircraft survivability equipment market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the aircraft survivability equipment market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
BAE Systems (UK), Northrop Grumman Corporation (US), Elbit Systems Ltd. (Israel), Raytheon Company (US, now RTX Corporation), Thales Group (France), ASELSAN A.S. (Turkey), Chemring Group (UK), Saab AB (Sweden), RUAG Holding AG (Switzerland), and Lockheed Martin Corporation (US) stand as the ten major companies dominating the Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE) market. These firms lead due to their expertise in electronic warfare systems, countermeasures, sensors, and ballistic protection, serving combat aircraft, helicopters, UAVs, and special mission platforms amid rising geopolitical tensions and military modernizations. BAE Systems excels in integrated defensive aids like missile approach warning systems (MAWS) and radar warning receivers (RWR), emphasizing multi-sensor fusion for rapid threat response on fixed-wing and rotary platforms. Northrop Grumman specializes in electronic countermeasures, directed infrared jamming, and networked survivability suites, prioritizing lightweight modular designs with high sensor sensitivity and avionics interoperability. Elbit Systems delivers countermeasure dispensing systems and electronic attack solutions, noted for detection range, low response latency, and compliance with global military standards.
RTX Corporation (formerly Raytheon) and Thales Group provide advanced survivability suites optimized for diverse threats, including radar jamming modules and data fusion software that enhance situational awareness in high-threat environments. ASELSAN A.S. focuses on electronic support and non-combat systems tailored for emerging markets, while Chemring Group advances expendable countermeasures like flares and chaff for NATO-aligned forces. Saab AB and RUAG Holding AG contribute directional infrared countermeasures (DIRCM) and ballistic armor, with Saab emphasizing UAV integration and RUAG prioritizing platform-specific mounting and environmental resilience. Lockheed Martin integrates ASE into broader aerospace programs, incorporating AI-driven threat detection and cyber-resilient software for next-generation fighters. These companies compete on system reliability, weight reduction, and lifecycle support, driving market growth projected at 6-7.5% CAGR to over $22 billion by 2033.
Innovation defines their strategies, with investments in AI, machine learning, and directed energy weapons to counter evolving missile threats and electronic warfare challenges. North America leads adoption via U.S. defense spending, followed by Europe (UK, France, Germany) for NATO needs and Asia-Pacific (China, India) for rapid modernization. Firms like Survitec Group complement electronic systems with egress aids such as seat liferafts, expanding into crew survival amid retrofit demands. Overall, these leaders shape ASE through technical datasheets detailing power efficiency, jamming effectiveness, and interoperability, ensuring aircraft endurance in contested airspace.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for aircraft survivability equipment market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the aircraft survivability equipment market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
BAE Systems (UK), Northrop Grumman Corporation (US), Elbit Systems Ltd. (Israel), Raytheon Company (US, now RTX Corporation), Thales Group (France), ASELSAN A.S. (Turkey), Chemring Group (UK), Saab AB (Sweden), RUAG Holding AG (Switzerland), and Lockheed Martin Corporation (US) stand as the ten major companies dominating the Aircraft Survivability Equipment (ASE) market. These firms lead due to their expertise in electronic warfare systems, countermeasures, sensors, and ballistic protection, serving combat aircraft, helicopters, UAVs, and special mission platforms amid rising geopolitical tensions and military modernizations. BAE Systems excels in integrated defensive aids like missile approach warning systems (MAWS) and radar warning receivers (RWR), emphasizing multi-sensor fusion for rapid threat response on fixed-wing and rotary platforms. Northrop Grumman specializes in electronic countermeasures, directed infrared jamming, and networked survivability suites, prioritizing lightweight modular designs with high sensor sensitivity and avionics interoperability. Elbit Systems delivers countermeasure dispensing systems and electronic attack solutions, noted for detection range, low response latency, and compliance with global military standards.
RTX Corporation (formerly Raytheon) and Thales Group provide advanced survivability suites optimized for diverse threats, including radar jamming modules and data fusion software that enhance situational awareness in high-threat environments. ASELSAN A.S. focuses on electronic support and non-combat systems tailored for emerging markets, while Chemring Group advances expendable countermeasures like flares and chaff for NATO-aligned forces. Saab AB and RUAG Holding AG contribute directional infrared countermeasures (DIRCM) and ballistic armor, with Saab emphasizing UAV integration and RUAG prioritizing platform-specific mounting and environmental resilience. Lockheed Martin integrates ASE into broader aerospace programs, incorporating AI-driven threat detection and cyber-resilient software for next-generation fighters. These companies compete on system reliability, weight reduction, and lifecycle support, driving market growth projected at 6-7.5% CAGR to over $22 billion by 2033.
Innovation defines their strategies, with investments in AI, machine learning, and directed energy weapons to counter evolving missile threats and electronic warfare challenges. North America leads adoption via U.S. defense spending, followed by Europe (UK, France, Germany) for NATO needs and Asia-Pacific (China, India) for rapid modernization. Firms like Survitec Group complement electronic systems with egress aids such as seat liferafts, expanding into crew survival amid retrofit demands. Overall, these leaders shape ASE through technical datasheets detailing power efficiency, jamming effectiveness, and interoperability, ensuring aircraft endurance in contested airspace.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.