
Assessment of CO2 Emissions Life Cycle in the Fuel Cell Electric Truck Sector, United States, 2024–2040
Description
Assessment of CO2 Emissions Life Cycle in the Fuel Cell Electric Truck Sector, United States, 2024–2040
Adoption of Clean Hydrogen Production Sources Will Drive Transformational Growth in Sustainable Transportation Due to Reductions in CO2 Emissions by 43% Per FCET
In this study, Frost & Sullivan offers a comprehensive exploration of the carbon dioxide (CO2) trail of a fuel cell electric truck (FCET) by investigating the carbon emission implications of FCETs, particularly with focus on hydrogen as a prospective fuel for the trucking industry in the United States. Our analysis begins with the rationale for considering hydrogen, highlighting its potential to mitigate life cycle emissions as compared to conventional fuels.
We delve into various hydrogen production methods, ranging from grey hydrogen to renewable sources, each carrying distinct carbon footprints. Emphasis falls on the CO2 emissions associated with manufacturing fuel cell vehicles, pinpointing significant contributions from components including fuel cell stacks and hydrogen storage tanks. Furthermore, we project total CO2 emissions throughout the operation of a truck, drawing comparative insights with its battery electric and diesel truck counterparts.
Ultimately, this study underscores the urgency of transitioning to cleaner hydrogen production methods and optimizing vehicle manufacturing to achieve substantial CO2 emission reductions in the trucking sector.
The study period is 2023 to 2030.
Table of Contents
- Why is it Increasingly Difficult to Grow?
- The Strategic Imperative 8™
- The Impact of the Top Three Strategic Imperatives on the CO2 Emissions of Fuel Cell Electric Truck (FCET) Industry
- Hydrogen is the Fuel of the Future
- Life Cycle CO2 Flow of a Fuel Cell Electric Truck
- Different Methods of Producing Hydrogen
- Research Scope
- Powertrain Technology Segmentation
- Growth Drivers
- Growth Restraints
- Analysis of Major Hydrogen Production Methods
- Key Factors Impacting Adoption of H2 Production Methods
- Factor 1: Lower CO2 Emissions & Readiness Levels
- Factor 2: Clean Hydrogen Programs and Targets
- Factor 3: States' H2 Production Potential & Plan
- Adoption Forecast of H2 Production in California
- Adoption Forecast of H2 Production in the Southwest
- Adoption Forecast of H2 Production in Texas
- CO2 Emission Trail from H2 Production
- Major Components of a Fuel Cell Electric Truck
- Fuel Cell Stack
- Hydrogen Storage Tanks
- Battery
- CO2 Emission Trail: Manufacture of an FCET
- LDT Use Case Characteristics and Forecast Assumptions
- LDT Cycle A & H—H2 Consumption and CO2 Emissions
- LDT Cycle A to H—kgCO2 Per Mile
- MDT Use Case Characteristics and Forecast Assumptions
- MDT Cycle A & H—H2 Consumption and CO2 Emissions
- MDT Cycle A to H — kgCO2 per Mile
- HDT Use Case Characteristics and Forecast Assumptions
- HDT—Cycle A
- HDT—Cycle H
- HDT Cycle A to H—kgCO2 Per Mile
- LDT: ICE, BEV, and FCEV Comparison (Cycle A & H)
- MDT: ICE, BEV, and FCEV Comparison (Cycle A & H)
- HDT: ICE, BEV, and FCEV Comparison (Cycle A & H)
- Top 3 Takeaways
- Growth Opportunity 1: CO2 Emissions Tracking
- Growth Opportunity 2: Geographic-specific Vertical Integration for Battery and Fuel Cell Manufacture
- Growth Opportunity 3: Hydrogen Infrastructure Expansion
- Best Practices Recognition
- Frost Radar
- Benefits and Impacts of Growth Opportunities
- Next Steps
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.