Bone Pins Market Size, Share, & Trends Analysis - Global - 2025-2031
Description
Global Bone Pin Market Report, 2025 Edition
Executive Summary
The global bone pin market was valued at $155 million in 2024. The market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.1 percent, reaching $192 million by 2031.
This report covers bone pins used to stabilize bone fragments and to fixate fractures during surgery. It quantifies unit sales, average selling prices (ASPs), market values, growth rates, and company shares, and it analyzes procedure trends, market drivers and limiters, recent mergers and acquisitions, and technology shifts. Historical data extend to 2021, with forecasts through 2031.
Market Overview
Bone pins are a foundational tool in orthopedic trauma. Their simplicity, broad size range, and compatibility with standard instrumentation make them a mainstay for provisional fixation and for many definitive fixation use cases. Surgeons rely on Kirschner wires (K-wires) and Steinmann pins for temporary fragment control, traction, skeletal stabilization, and final fixation in smaller bones.
Although bone pins are commodity items with low ASPs, the market grows as procedure volumes expand and as surgeons use pins in combination with other fixation hardware. A key dynamic is the strong link between bone pins and plate-and-screw workflows. Pins help reduce and hold fragments before definitive plating, and they support alignment while imaging confirms reduction. As plate and screw usage rises, bone pin units follow.
Definitive fixation with pins is also increasing in phalanges, metacarpals, metatarsals, the proximal humerus, and the wrist, where minimally invasive approaches and shorter procedures are preferred. In these indications, threaded and smooth pins provide stability with limited dissection and limited implant bulk. Their low profile reduces soft-tissue conflict, and removal is straightforward if clinically indicated.
Across regions, adoption patterns reflect training, cost, and inventory access. Mature markets use pins across emergency, outpatient, and elective hand and foot cases. In many emerging markets, pins are a cost-effective solution for a wide range of fractures due to ease of storage, long shelf life, and straightforward sterilization. As a result, unit growth tends to be steady even when hospital budgets are tight.
Global Bone Pin Market Segmentation Summary
Bone Pins Market
Quantitative coverage: Market size, company shares, forecasts, growth rates, units sold, and ASPs.
Qualitative coverage: Market growth trends, limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles, product portfolios, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews.
Data sources: Primary interviews with industry leaders, government physician and regulatory data, hospital and private purchasing inputs, import and export records, and iData Research’s internal database.
Market Drivers
Demographic Factors
Demographic change underpins steady procedural demand. Aging populations experience higher rates of fragility fractures due to osteoporosis, and obesity and diabetes further increase fracture risk and slow healing. About 1 in 10 adults over 25 live with diabetes. Lower bone mass and reduced bone quality, combined with delayed bone formation, translate into more fractures and more fixation events.
In the elderly, low-energy trauma to the hip, wrist, and ankle is common. Many of these cases require rapid stabilization and reduction. Bone pins provide an immediate, reliable option for temporary fixation and assist in definitive fixation for smaller bones. As the share of seniors rises across the world, the volume of fracture procedures is expected to grow, supporting baseline unit growth for pins.
Growth of the Plate and Screw Market
Bone pins are closely integrated with plate-and-screw workflows. Surgeons use pins to reduce fragments, hold alignment, and guide plating. As plate and screw usage expands across upper and lower extremity indications, demand for pins rises in tandem.
This relationship is structural. Even when plate technology advances, the need to temporarily stabilize fragments does not change. In multi-fragment fractures or osteoporotic bone, multiple pins can be used to maintain reduction during imaging and while drill guides and plates are positioned. Because pins are low cost, hospitals stock ample quantities, and surgeons do not hesitate to use extra pins if it helps achieve anatomic reduction. The net effect is stable unit growth aligned with plate-and-screw procedure trends.
Increased Definitive Fixation Application
Beyond provisional use, pins are seeing greater application in definitive fixation, especially in hand and foot surgery. In phalangeal and metacarpal fractures, percutaneous pinning provides fragment control with limited soft-tissue disruption. In metatarsal injuries and select wrist cases, pins offer adequate stability while minimizing operative time and implant bulk.
This shift is driven by minimally invasive techniques, shorter surgeries, and fast rehabilitation goals. When outcomes are comparable and reoperation rates are acceptable, surgeons favor methods that reduce incision size and cost. As training programs reinforce these techniques, definitive pin fixation is expected to add to total unit demand.
Market Limiters
Cost Sensitivity
Hospitals and ambulatory centers pursue cost containment strategies, particularly for commodity items. In bone pins, this translates into off-the-shelf purchases, fewer rep-supported orders, and increased reliance on bulk contracts. Procurement teams compare pins on unit price, sterility assurance level, and lead time, with low tolerance for premium features that do not change outcomes. Aggressive pricing is essential to win tenders, and this emphasis on cost limits market value growth.
Commoditization
Bone pins are simple to manufacture and have a long history of use. As a result, they are treated as commodity products with low ASPs. Label differences exist across brands, but performance is largely comparable when quality standards are met. Growth in generic versions caps pricing power and reduces the payoff for incremental product tweaks, which keeps value growth below procedure growth.
ASP Decreases
Broader industry pricing trends affect bone pins as well. Group purchasing organizations (GPOs), government tenders, and value-based procurement models push ASPs down in North America, Western Europe, China, and increasingly in other regions. China’s policy shift at the end of 2021 accelerated ASP declines across many orthopedic categories. In a low-ASP segment like bone pins, even small price reductions can weigh on total market value despite steady unit growth.
Market Coverage and Data Scope
Time frame: Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2023.
Care settings: Hospitals, orthopedic trauma centers, ambulatory surgical centers, and specialty hand and foot clinics.
Methodology: Revenues modeled as units × ASP, validated against procedure volumes, purchasing records, and import/export data. Unit mix reflects diameter, length, thread, and tip preferences by region and care setting.
Competitive Analysis
DePuy Synthes held the leading share of the global bone pin market in 2024. The company’s dominance across trauma categories enables high penetration in hospitals and ambulatory centers. Its broad catalog, consistent availability, and integrated trays keep DePuy Synthes top of mind for surgeons and supply chain teams. Leadership is expected to continue through the forecast period.
Stryker ranked second in global share. Stryker markets a full line of K-wires and Steinmann pins that are often ordered alongside plates, screws, and intramedullary devices. This attachment to larger orders strengthens Stryker’s position and supports incremental share gains as the company grows in other trauma segments.
Zimmer Biomet held the third position with Steinmann pins available in standard diameters from 2.0 mm to 4.8 mm, including regular and threaded versions with trocar or diamond points. While Zimmer Biomet remains a key multinational supplier, the company faces renewed competition from regional manufacturers with aggressive pricing in tenders. This dynamic could result in modest share erosion in selected markets over the next few years.
Smaller regional firms participate in government tenders and private channels, typically competing on price, delivery times, and basic quality compliance. These companies do not shift global share structure on their own, but they increase price pressure in local markets and reinforce the category’s commoditized nature.
Technology and Practice Trends
Smooth and threaded options: Smooth K-wires remain standard for provisional fixation. Threaded variants are used when the goal is to reduce migration and improve hold in definitive applications.
Tip geometry choice: Trocar and diamond points support different insertion preferences and bone qualities. Surgeons match tip design to cortical density and access path to reduce skiving and improve first-pass accuracy.
Sterile, single-use packaging: Pre-sterilized pins reduce reprocessing burden and help ASCs standardize inventory. Bulk sterile packs remain preferred for high-throughput centers.
Radiographic visibility: Clear under-fluoro visibility is essential for precise pin placement in small bones and periarticular regions. Vendors maintain consistent radiopacity and surface finish to support imaging.
Retention and migration control: Stop-pin caps, external clamps, and bend-over techniques help reduce pin migration and soft-tissue irritation in definitive cases.
Workflow integration: Trays and caddies that pair pins, pin drivers, and wire guides streamline setup and reduce turnover time in trauma rooms.
Geography
This edition provides global coverage across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.
Why This Report
Quantify demand for bone pins by region and care setting through 2031, with unit and ASP splits aligned to procurement patterns.
Benchmark competitors and understand how portfolio breadth, logistics, and attachment to larger trauma orders shape share stability.
Track procedure links between bone pins and plate-and-screw cases to plan inventory, trays, and rep coverage.
Assess pricing pressure from GPOs, tenders, and value-based procurement, and model its impact on realized ASPs.
Identify growth pockets in definitive fixation across hand and foot indications where pins can replace larger implants.
Plan channel strategy for ASCs and outpatient trauma centers where sterile, single-use packaging and fast turnover matter most.
The Global Bone Pin Market Report from iData Research delivers device-level sizing, pricing benchmarks, and company share analysis that commercial teams can use to set price corridors, align tender responses, and forecast attachment rates with plates and screws.
About iData Research
iData Research is a premium market intelligence firm headquartered in Canada with offices across North America and Europe.
Over the last 20 years, the company has specialized in device-level sizing, procedure models, pricing trends, and competitive share across MedTech.
Since 2005, iData has supported global OEMs, mid-market innovators, and investors with triangulated data based on units and ASPs, with country-level forecasts and analyst access across Europe, North America, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, and APAC.
Reports are available with flexible licensing to fit commercial, strategy, and investment workflows
Executive Summary
The global bone pin market was valued at $155 million in 2024. The market is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.1 percent, reaching $192 million by 2031.
This report covers bone pins used to stabilize bone fragments and to fixate fractures during surgery. It quantifies unit sales, average selling prices (ASPs), market values, growth rates, and company shares, and it analyzes procedure trends, market drivers and limiters, recent mergers and acquisitions, and technology shifts. Historical data extend to 2021, with forecasts through 2031.
Market Overview
Bone pins are a foundational tool in orthopedic trauma. Their simplicity, broad size range, and compatibility with standard instrumentation make them a mainstay for provisional fixation and for many definitive fixation use cases. Surgeons rely on Kirschner wires (K-wires) and Steinmann pins for temporary fragment control, traction, skeletal stabilization, and final fixation in smaller bones.
Although bone pins are commodity items with low ASPs, the market grows as procedure volumes expand and as surgeons use pins in combination with other fixation hardware. A key dynamic is the strong link between bone pins and plate-and-screw workflows. Pins help reduce and hold fragments before definitive plating, and they support alignment while imaging confirms reduction. As plate and screw usage rises, bone pin units follow.
Definitive fixation with pins is also increasing in phalanges, metacarpals, metatarsals, the proximal humerus, and the wrist, where minimally invasive approaches and shorter procedures are preferred. In these indications, threaded and smooth pins provide stability with limited dissection and limited implant bulk. Their low profile reduces soft-tissue conflict, and removal is straightforward if clinically indicated.
Across regions, adoption patterns reflect training, cost, and inventory access. Mature markets use pins across emergency, outpatient, and elective hand and foot cases. In many emerging markets, pins are a cost-effective solution for a wide range of fractures due to ease of storage, long shelf life, and straightforward sterilization. As a result, unit growth tends to be steady even when hospital budgets are tight.
Global Bone Pin Market Segmentation Summary
Bone Pins Market
Quantitative coverage: Market size, company shares, forecasts, growth rates, units sold, and ASPs.
Qualitative coverage: Market growth trends, limiters, competitive analysis and SWOT for top competitors, mergers and acquisitions, company profiles, product portfolios, disruptive technologies, and disease overviews.
Data sources: Primary interviews with industry leaders, government physician and regulatory data, hospital and private purchasing inputs, import and export records, and iData Research’s internal database.
Market Drivers
Demographic Factors
Demographic change underpins steady procedural demand. Aging populations experience higher rates of fragility fractures due to osteoporosis, and obesity and diabetes further increase fracture risk and slow healing. About 1 in 10 adults over 25 live with diabetes. Lower bone mass and reduced bone quality, combined with delayed bone formation, translate into more fractures and more fixation events.
In the elderly, low-energy trauma to the hip, wrist, and ankle is common. Many of these cases require rapid stabilization and reduction. Bone pins provide an immediate, reliable option for temporary fixation and assist in definitive fixation for smaller bones. As the share of seniors rises across the world, the volume of fracture procedures is expected to grow, supporting baseline unit growth for pins.
Growth of the Plate and Screw Market
Bone pins are closely integrated with plate-and-screw workflows. Surgeons use pins to reduce fragments, hold alignment, and guide plating. As plate and screw usage expands across upper and lower extremity indications, demand for pins rises in tandem.
This relationship is structural. Even when plate technology advances, the need to temporarily stabilize fragments does not change. In multi-fragment fractures or osteoporotic bone, multiple pins can be used to maintain reduction during imaging and while drill guides and plates are positioned. Because pins are low cost, hospitals stock ample quantities, and surgeons do not hesitate to use extra pins if it helps achieve anatomic reduction. The net effect is stable unit growth aligned with plate-and-screw procedure trends.
Increased Definitive Fixation Application
Beyond provisional use, pins are seeing greater application in definitive fixation, especially in hand and foot surgery. In phalangeal and metacarpal fractures, percutaneous pinning provides fragment control with limited soft-tissue disruption. In metatarsal injuries and select wrist cases, pins offer adequate stability while minimizing operative time and implant bulk.
This shift is driven by minimally invasive techniques, shorter surgeries, and fast rehabilitation goals. When outcomes are comparable and reoperation rates are acceptable, surgeons favor methods that reduce incision size and cost. As training programs reinforce these techniques, definitive pin fixation is expected to add to total unit demand.
Market Limiters
Cost Sensitivity
Hospitals and ambulatory centers pursue cost containment strategies, particularly for commodity items. In bone pins, this translates into off-the-shelf purchases, fewer rep-supported orders, and increased reliance on bulk contracts. Procurement teams compare pins on unit price, sterility assurance level, and lead time, with low tolerance for premium features that do not change outcomes. Aggressive pricing is essential to win tenders, and this emphasis on cost limits market value growth.
Commoditization
Bone pins are simple to manufacture and have a long history of use. As a result, they are treated as commodity products with low ASPs. Label differences exist across brands, but performance is largely comparable when quality standards are met. Growth in generic versions caps pricing power and reduces the payoff for incremental product tweaks, which keeps value growth below procedure growth.
ASP Decreases
Broader industry pricing trends affect bone pins as well. Group purchasing organizations (GPOs), government tenders, and value-based procurement models push ASPs down in North America, Western Europe, China, and increasingly in other regions. China’s policy shift at the end of 2021 accelerated ASP declines across many orthopedic categories. In a low-ASP segment like bone pins, even small price reductions can weigh on total market value despite steady unit growth.
Market Coverage and Data Scope
Time frame: Base year 2024, forecasts 2025 to 2031, historical data 2021 to 2023.
Care settings: Hospitals, orthopedic trauma centers, ambulatory surgical centers, and specialty hand and foot clinics.
Methodology: Revenues modeled as units × ASP, validated against procedure volumes, purchasing records, and import/export data. Unit mix reflects diameter, length, thread, and tip preferences by region and care setting.
Competitive Analysis
DePuy Synthes held the leading share of the global bone pin market in 2024. The company’s dominance across trauma categories enables high penetration in hospitals and ambulatory centers. Its broad catalog, consistent availability, and integrated trays keep DePuy Synthes top of mind for surgeons and supply chain teams. Leadership is expected to continue through the forecast period.
Stryker ranked second in global share. Stryker markets a full line of K-wires and Steinmann pins that are often ordered alongside plates, screws, and intramedullary devices. This attachment to larger orders strengthens Stryker’s position and supports incremental share gains as the company grows in other trauma segments.
Zimmer Biomet held the third position with Steinmann pins available in standard diameters from 2.0 mm to 4.8 mm, including regular and threaded versions with trocar or diamond points. While Zimmer Biomet remains a key multinational supplier, the company faces renewed competition from regional manufacturers with aggressive pricing in tenders. This dynamic could result in modest share erosion in selected markets over the next few years.
Smaller regional firms participate in government tenders and private channels, typically competing on price, delivery times, and basic quality compliance. These companies do not shift global share structure on their own, but they increase price pressure in local markets and reinforce the category’s commoditized nature.
Technology and Practice Trends
Smooth and threaded options: Smooth K-wires remain standard for provisional fixation. Threaded variants are used when the goal is to reduce migration and improve hold in definitive applications.
Tip geometry choice: Trocar and diamond points support different insertion preferences and bone qualities. Surgeons match tip design to cortical density and access path to reduce skiving and improve first-pass accuracy.
Sterile, single-use packaging: Pre-sterilized pins reduce reprocessing burden and help ASCs standardize inventory. Bulk sterile packs remain preferred for high-throughput centers.
Radiographic visibility: Clear under-fluoro visibility is essential for precise pin placement in small bones and periarticular regions. Vendors maintain consistent radiopacity and surface finish to support imaging.
Retention and migration control: Stop-pin caps, external clamps, and bend-over techniques help reduce pin migration and soft-tissue irritation in definitive cases.
Workflow integration: Trays and caddies that pair pins, pin drivers, and wire guides streamline setup and reduce turnover time in trauma rooms.
Geography
This edition provides global coverage across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa.
Why This Report
Quantify demand for bone pins by region and care setting through 2031, with unit and ASP splits aligned to procurement patterns.
Benchmark competitors and understand how portfolio breadth, logistics, and attachment to larger trauma orders shape share stability.
Track procedure links between bone pins and plate-and-screw cases to plan inventory, trays, and rep coverage.
Assess pricing pressure from GPOs, tenders, and value-based procurement, and model its impact on realized ASPs.
Identify growth pockets in definitive fixation across hand and foot indications where pins can replace larger implants.
Plan channel strategy for ASCs and outpatient trauma centers where sterile, single-use packaging and fast turnover matter most.
The Global Bone Pin Market Report from iData Research delivers device-level sizing, pricing benchmarks, and company share analysis that commercial teams can use to set price corridors, align tender responses, and forecast attachment rates with plates and screws.
About iData Research
iData Research is a premium market intelligence firm headquartered in Canada with offices across North America and Europe.
Over the last 20 years, the company has specialized in device-level sizing, procedure models, pricing trends, and competitive share across MedTech.
Since 2005, iData has supported global OEMs, mid-market innovators, and investors with triangulated data based on units and ASPs, with country-level forecasts and analyst access across Europe, North America, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, and APAC.
Reports are available with flexible licensing to fit commercial, strategy, and investment workflows
Table of Contents
34 Pages
- Research Methodology
- Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
- Step 2: Prepare Data Systems And Perform Secondary Research
- Step 3: Preparation For Interviews & Questionnaire Design
- Step 4: Performing Primary Research
- Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
- Step 6: Market Forecast And Analysis
- Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
- Step 8: Final Review And Market Release
- Step 9: Customer Feedback And Market Monitoring
- Impact Of Global Tariffs
- Bone Pin Market
- 11.1 Executive Summary
- 11.1.1 Global Bone Pin Market Overview
- 11.1.2 Competitive Analysis
- 11.1.3 Regions Included
- 11.2 Introduction
- 11.3 Market Analysis And Forecast
- 11.4 Drivers And Limiters
- 11.4.1 Market Drivers
- 11.4.2 Market Limiters
- 11.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
- Abbreviations
- Chart 11-1: Bone Pin Market, Global, 2024 & 2031
- Chart 11-2: Bone Pin Units Sold, Global, 2024
- Chart 11-3: Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 – 2031
- Chart 11-4: Leading Competitors, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2024
- Figure 11-1: Bone Pin Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2)
- Figure 11-2: Bone Pin Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2)
- Figure 11-3: Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 – 2031
- Figure 11-4: Units Sold by Region, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 – 2031
- Figure 11-5: Average Selling Price by Region, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 – 2031 (US$)
- Figure 11-6: Market Value by Region, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2021 – 2031 (US$M)
- Figure 11-7: Leading Competitors, Bone Pin Market, Global, 2024
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
