Bioenergy Power Generation Market Forecasts to 2032 – Global Analysis By Source (Solid Biofuels, Biogas, Liquid Biofuels, and Municipal Solid Waste), Technology (Combustion, Gasification, Anaerobic Digestion, Landfill Gas Recovery, and Other Technologies)
Description
According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Biodiversity Credit Market is accounted for $0.74 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach $12.41 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 49.4% during the forecast period. The biodiversity credit enables private investment to support conservation outcomes by creating tradable credits tied to verifiable biodiversity gains, habitat restoration, species recovery, or invasive species control. Corporates purchase credits to mitigate biodiversity impacts from operations, aligning with nature-positive commitments. Robust monitoring, standardized metrics, and long-term governance are essential for credibility and permanence.
Market Dynamics:
Driver:
Increasing regulatory mandates and international agreements
The primary driver for the biodiversity credit market is the surge in regulatory mandates and international agreements, such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. These frameworks establish clear, actionable targets for nations and corporations, legally compelling them to account for and offset their environmental impacts. This creates a compliance-driven demand for biodiversity credits, transforming voluntary conservation actions into a regulated necessity. Consequently, these policies are directly catalyzing market growth by establishing a non-negotiable demand base for certified biodiversity gains.
Restraint:
Limited market infrastructure, transparency, and liquidity
The primary driver for the biodiversity credit market is the surge in regulatory mandates and international agreements, such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. These frameworks establish clear, actionable targets for nations and corporations, legally compelling them to account for and offset their environmental impacts. This creates a compliance-driven demand for biodiversity credits, transforming voluntary conservation actions into a regulated necessity. Consequently, these policies are directly catalyzing market growth by establishing a non-negotiable demand base for certified biodiversity gains.
Opportunity:
Integration with carbon markets and payment for ecosystem services
A substantial opportunity lies in the integration of biodiversity credits with established environmental markets, particularly carbon trading and Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes. This approach allows for the bundling of credits, enabling buyers to address climate and biodiversity goals simultaneously, thereby enhancing project value and attracting a broader investor base. Moreover, this integration fosters a more holistic approach to natural capital management, creating synergistic benefits and unlocking new, blended finance models that can significantly accelerate market expansion.
Threat:
Advancements in sensor technology
The analysis identifies a paradoxical threat from rapid advancements in remote sensor technology and AI-driven monitoring. While beneficial for verification, these technologies are making it cheaper and more reliable for corporations to implement direct, in-house biodiversity impact monitoring. These improvements could reduce their dependence on purchasing third-party credits for compliance reporting. As a result, the demand for formal biodiversity credit units may be undermined if companies choose to manage obligations through direct, technologically enabled stewardship rather than market participation.
Covid-19 Impact:
The COVID-19 pandemic initially disrupted the biodiversity credit market by causing project delays, halting field research, and diverting government and corporate funding towards immediate economic relief. However, the crisis also served as a profound catalyst by highlighting the critical link between ecosystem degradation and global health risks. This increased awareness has led to more attention from policymakers and businesses towards investing in nature-friendly projects after the pandemic, which has created a stronger and more lasting need for biodiversity credits as part of efforts to improve and rebuild.
The habitat restoration credits segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period
The habitat restoration credits segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, driven by its direct alignment with pressing global priorities like land degradation neutrality and its tangible, measurable outcomes. These projects, encompassing reforestation and wetland rehabilitation, often have well-established methodologies for credit quantification, which reduces investor uncertainty. Furthermore, they frequently generate co-benefits such as soil conservation and water purification, enhancing their value and making them a preferred choice for both public funding and corporate sustainability investments seeking verifiable impact.
The coral reef & marine biodiversity projects segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period
Over the forecast period, the coral reef & marine biodiversity projects segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, reflecting a surge in concern for ocean health and the immense economic value of coastal ecosystems. Blue bonds and ocean-focused ESG mandates, which target critically endangered marine habitats, fuel this growth. Additionally, technological advancements in marine monitoring are improving the credibility of these projects, unlocking new investment into a previously challenging environment, and positioning this niche for rapid expansion from its current smaller base.
Region with largest share:
During the forecast period, the Europe region is expected to hold the largest market share. The EU's ambitious regulatory landscape, which includes the Nature Restoration Law and stringent corporate due diligence requirements, firmly anchors this leadership. These policies are creating a compliance-driven demand unparalleled in other regions. Moreover, high levels of corporate environmental awareness and early mover initiatives, particularly in countries like France and the UK, provide a mature ecosystem for market development and transaction volume, solidifying Europe's dominant position.
Region with highest CAGR:
During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to grow the fastest, driven by its rich biodiversity that is at great risk, along with a surge in national policies aimed at protecting nature. Furthermore, the region is a major recipient of international biodiversity finance and is seeing growing voluntary corporate demand. This combination of high need, evolving regulation, and increasing investment creates a potent environment for the rapid scaling of biodiversity credit projects.
Key players in the market
Some of the key players in Biodiversity Credit Market include Verra, Gold Standard, Plan Vivo Foundation, GreenCollar, Wildlife Works, Natural Capital Partners, BioCarbon Standard, Regen Network, Cercarbono, Ecosphere+, Forest Trends, Ecosystem Marketplace, Biodiversity Credit Alliance, Conservation International, Wildlife Conservation Society, and The Biodiversity Consultancy.
Key Developments:
In July 2025, Plan Vivo opened its PV Nature Biodiversity Standard to multiple third-party data analytic providers so projects can choose approved partners for biodiversity quantification. It strengthens the PV Nature biodiversity credit pipeline by standardising measurement of biodiversity outcomes while scaling access for projects seeking Plan Vivo biodiversity credits.
In June 2025, the BioCarbon Standard released version 2.0 of its Sustainable Development Safeguards tool, tightening requirements around community rights, land use and biodiversity safeguards for registered mitigation projects. It reinforces that BioCarbon-certified activities must demonstrate robust biodiversity and social protections, supporting the integrity of any nature- or biodiversity-linked credits issued under the standard.
In February 2025, Gold Standard released its “Funding Nature: An evident business investment” update, announcing work on a corporate nature framework that will sit alongside its emerging biodiversity impact framework and market assessment for biodiversity impact units. It is designed to guide companies in using high-integrity biodiversity credit and nature-impact mechanisms as part of their net-zero and nature-positive strategies.
Credit Types Covered:
• Habitat Restoration Credits
• Species Protection Credits
• Conservation Management Credits
• Landscape/Watershed Credits
• Mixed/Integrated Credits
Project Types Covered:
• Reforestation & Afforestation
• Wetland & Peatland Restoration
• Coral Reef & Marine Biodiversity Projects
• Grassland & Savannah Restoration
• Wildlife Corridors & Protected Areas
• Agricultural Biodiversity Enhancement
Buyer Types Covered:
• Compliance Buyers
• Voluntary Buyers
• Philanthropic Buyers
• Institutional Investors
Sales Channels Covered:
• Direct/Project Developers
• Marketplaces & Exchanges
• Brokers & Aggregators
• Government Offset Programs
End Users Covered:
• Corporates (ESG/CSR-driven)
• Government & Public Sector
• NGOs & Conservation Agencies
• Landowners & Community Groups
• Financial Institutions & Investors
Regions Covered:
• North America
US
Canada
Mexico
• Europe
Germany
UK
Italy
France
Spain
Rest of Europe
• Asia Pacific
Japan
China
India
Australia
New Zealand
South Korea
Rest of Asia Pacific
• South America
Argentina
Brazil
Chile
Rest of South America
• Middle East & Africa
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Qatar
South Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa
What our report offers:
- Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
- Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
- Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
- Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
- Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
- Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
- Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
- Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements
Market Dynamics:
Driver:
Increasing regulatory mandates and international agreements
The primary driver for the biodiversity credit market is the surge in regulatory mandates and international agreements, such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. These frameworks establish clear, actionable targets for nations and corporations, legally compelling them to account for and offset their environmental impacts. This creates a compliance-driven demand for biodiversity credits, transforming voluntary conservation actions into a regulated necessity. Consequently, these policies are directly catalyzing market growth by establishing a non-negotiable demand base for certified biodiversity gains.
Restraint:
Limited market infrastructure, transparency, and liquidity
The primary driver for the biodiversity credit market is the surge in regulatory mandates and international agreements, such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. These frameworks establish clear, actionable targets for nations and corporations, legally compelling them to account for and offset their environmental impacts. This creates a compliance-driven demand for biodiversity credits, transforming voluntary conservation actions into a regulated necessity. Consequently, these policies are directly catalyzing market growth by establishing a non-negotiable demand base for certified biodiversity gains.
Opportunity:
Integration with carbon markets and payment for ecosystem services
A substantial opportunity lies in the integration of biodiversity credits with established environmental markets, particularly carbon trading and Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes. This approach allows for the bundling of credits, enabling buyers to address climate and biodiversity goals simultaneously, thereby enhancing project value and attracting a broader investor base. Moreover, this integration fosters a more holistic approach to natural capital management, creating synergistic benefits and unlocking new, blended finance models that can significantly accelerate market expansion.
Threat:
Advancements in sensor technology
The analysis identifies a paradoxical threat from rapid advancements in remote sensor technology and AI-driven monitoring. While beneficial for verification, these technologies are making it cheaper and more reliable for corporations to implement direct, in-house biodiversity impact monitoring. These improvements could reduce their dependence on purchasing third-party credits for compliance reporting. As a result, the demand for formal biodiversity credit units may be undermined if companies choose to manage obligations through direct, technologically enabled stewardship rather than market participation.
Covid-19 Impact:
The COVID-19 pandemic initially disrupted the biodiversity credit market by causing project delays, halting field research, and diverting government and corporate funding towards immediate economic relief. However, the crisis also served as a profound catalyst by highlighting the critical link between ecosystem degradation and global health risks. This increased awareness has led to more attention from policymakers and businesses towards investing in nature-friendly projects after the pandemic, which has created a stronger and more lasting need for biodiversity credits as part of efforts to improve and rebuild.
The habitat restoration credits segment is expected to be the largest during the forecast period
The habitat restoration credits segment is expected to account for the largest market share during the forecast period, driven by its direct alignment with pressing global priorities like land degradation neutrality and its tangible, measurable outcomes. These projects, encompassing reforestation and wetland rehabilitation, often have well-established methodologies for credit quantification, which reduces investor uncertainty. Furthermore, they frequently generate co-benefits such as soil conservation and water purification, enhancing their value and making them a preferred choice for both public funding and corporate sustainability investments seeking verifiable impact.
The coral reef & marine biodiversity projects segment is expected to have the highest CAGR during the forecast period
Over the forecast period, the coral reef & marine biodiversity projects segment is predicted to witness the highest growth rate, reflecting a surge in concern for ocean health and the immense economic value of coastal ecosystems. Blue bonds and ocean-focused ESG mandates, which target critically endangered marine habitats, fuel this growth. Additionally, technological advancements in marine monitoring are improving the credibility of these projects, unlocking new investment into a previously challenging environment, and positioning this niche for rapid expansion from its current smaller base.
Region with largest share:
During the forecast period, the Europe region is expected to hold the largest market share. The EU's ambitious regulatory landscape, which includes the Nature Restoration Law and stringent corporate due diligence requirements, firmly anchors this leadership. These policies are creating a compliance-driven demand unparalleled in other regions. Moreover, high levels of corporate environmental awareness and early mover initiatives, particularly in countries like France and the UK, provide a mature ecosystem for market development and transaction volume, solidifying Europe's dominant position.
Region with highest CAGR:
During the forecast period, the Asia Pacific region is expected to grow the fastest, driven by its rich biodiversity that is at great risk, along with a surge in national policies aimed at protecting nature. Furthermore, the region is a major recipient of international biodiversity finance and is seeing growing voluntary corporate demand. This combination of high need, evolving regulation, and increasing investment creates a potent environment for the rapid scaling of biodiversity credit projects.
Key players in the market
Some of the key players in Biodiversity Credit Market include Verra, Gold Standard, Plan Vivo Foundation, GreenCollar, Wildlife Works, Natural Capital Partners, BioCarbon Standard, Regen Network, Cercarbono, Ecosphere+, Forest Trends, Ecosystem Marketplace, Biodiversity Credit Alliance, Conservation International, Wildlife Conservation Society, and The Biodiversity Consultancy.
Key Developments:
In July 2025, Plan Vivo opened its PV Nature Biodiversity Standard to multiple third-party data analytic providers so projects can choose approved partners for biodiversity quantification. It strengthens the PV Nature biodiversity credit pipeline by standardising measurement of biodiversity outcomes while scaling access for projects seeking Plan Vivo biodiversity credits.
In June 2025, the BioCarbon Standard released version 2.0 of its Sustainable Development Safeguards tool, tightening requirements around community rights, land use and biodiversity safeguards for registered mitigation projects. It reinforces that BioCarbon-certified activities must demonstrate robust biodiversity and social protections, supporting the integrity of any nature- or biodiversity-linked credits issued under the standard.
In February 2025, Gold Standard released its “Funding Nature: An evident business investment” update, announcing work on a corporate nature framework that will sit alongside its emerging biodiversity impact framework and market assessment for biodiversity impact units. It is designed to guide companies in using high-integrity biodiversity credit and nature-impact mechanisms as part of their net-zero and nature-positive strategies.
Credit Types Covered:
• Habitat Restoration Credits
• Species Protection Credits
• Conservation Management Credits
• Landscape/Watershed Credits
• Mixed/Integrated Credits
Project Types Covered:
• Reforestation & Afforestation
• Wetland & Peatland Restoration
• Coral Reef & Marine Biodiversity Projects
• Grassland & Savannah Restoration
• Wildlife Corridors & Protected Areas
• Agricultural Biodiversity Enhancement
Buyer Types Covered:
• Compliance Buyers
• Voluntary Buyers
• Philanthropic Buyers
• Institutional Investors
Sales Channels Covered:
• Direct/Project Developers
• Marketplaces & Exchanges
• Brokers & Aggregators
• Government Offset Programs
End Users Covered:
• Corporates (ESG/CSR-driven)
• Government & Public Sector
• NGOs & Conservation Agencies
• Landowners & Community Groups
• Financial Institutions & Investors
Regions Covered:
• North America
US
Canada
Mexico
• Europe
Germany
UK
Italy
France
Spain
Rest of Europe
• Asia Pacific
Japan
China
India
Australia
New Zealand
South Korea
Rest of Asia Pacific
• South America
Argentina
Brazil
Chile
Rest of South America
• Middle East & Africa
Saudi Arabia
UAE
Qatar
South Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa
What our report offers:
- Market share assessments for the regional and country-level segments
- Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
- Covers Market data for the years 2024, 2025, 2026, 2028, and 2032
- Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
- Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
- Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
- Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
- Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements
Table of Contents
200 Pages
- 1 Executive Summary
- 2 Preface
- 2.1 Abstract
- 2.2 Stake Holders
- 2.3 Research Scope
- 2.4 Research Methodology
- 2.4.1 Data Mining
- 2.4.2 Data Analysis
- 2.4.3 Data Validation
- 2.4.4 Research Approach
- 2.5 Research Sources
- 2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
- 2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
- 2.5.3 Assumptions
- 3 Market Trend Analysis
- 3.1 Introduction
- 3.2 Drivers
- 3.3 Restraints
- 3.4 Opportunities
- 3.5 Threats
- 3.6 Technology Analysis
- 3.7 Application Analysis
- 3.8 End User Analysis
- 3.9 Emerging Markets
- 3.10 Impact of Covid-19
- 4 Porters Five Force Analysis
- 4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
- 4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
- 4.3 Threat of substitutes
- 4.4 Threat of new entrants
- 4.5 Competitive rivalry
- 5 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market, By Source
- 5.1 Introduction
- 5.2 Solid Biofuels
- 5.2.1 Wood and Woody Biomass
- 5.2.2 Agricultural Residues and Waste
- 5.2.3 Energy Crops
- 5.3 Biogas
- 5.3.1 Animal Manure
- 5.3.2 Sewage Sludge
- 5.3.3 Industrial & Food Waste AD
- 5.4 Liquid Biofuels
- 5.5 Municipal Solid Waste (MSW)
- 6 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market, By Technology
- 6.1 Introduction
- 6.2 Combustion (Steam Turbines)
- 6.3 Gasification
- 6.4 Anaerobic Digestion
- 6.5 Landfill Gas Recovery
- 6.6 Other Technologies
- 7 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market, By Application
- 7.1 Introduction
- 7.2 Baseload Power Generation
- 7.3 Peak Load Shaving
- 7.4 Combined Heat and Power (CHP)/Cogeneration
- 8 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market, By End User
- 8.1 Introduction
- 8.2 Utilities/Centralized Power Plants
- 8.3 Independent Power Producers (IPPs)
- 8.4 Commercial & Industrial (C&I)
- 8.5 Residential
- 9 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market, By Geography
- 9.1 Introduction
- 9.2 North America
- 9.2.1 US
- 9.2.2 Canada
- 9.2.3 Mexico
- 9.3 Europe
- 9.3.1 Germany
- 9.3.2 UK
- 9.3.3 Italy
- 9.3.4 France
- 9.3.5 Spain
- 9.3.6 Rest of Europe
- 9.4 Asia Pacific
- 9.4.1 Japan
- 9.4.2 China
- 9.4.3 India
- 9.4.4 Australia
- 9.4.5 New Zealand
- 9.4.6 South Korea
- 9.4.7 Rest of Asia Pacific
- 9.5 South America
- 9.5.1 Argentina
- 9.5.2 Brazil
- 9.5.3 Chile
- 9.5.4 Rest of South America
- 9.6 Middle East & Africa
- 9.6.1 Saudi Arabia
- 9.6.2 UAE
- 9.6.3 Qatar
- 9.6.4 South Africa
- 9.6.5 Rest of Middle East & Africa
- 10 Key Developments
- 10.1 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations and Joint Ventures
- 10.2 Acquisitions & Mergers
- 10.3 New Product Launch
- 10.4 Expansions
- 10.5 Other Key Strategies
- 11 Company Profiling
- 11.1 Drax Group plc
- 11.2 Veolia Environnement S.A.
- 11.3 ANDRITZ AG
- 11.4 Wärtsilä Corporation
- 11.5 ENGIE SA
- 11.6 RWE AG
- 11.7 Covanta Holding Corporation
- 11.8 Enviva Inc.
- 11.9 Fortum Oyj
- 11.10 Enel S.p.A.
- 11.11 Abengoa S.A.
- 11.12 Renewable Energy Group, Inc.
- 11.13 POET LLC
- 11.14 Stora Enso Oyj
- 11.15 Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.
- 11.16 Hitachi Zosen Inova AG
- 11.17 Siemens Energy AG
- List of Tables
- 1 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Region (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 2 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Source (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 3 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Solid Biofuels (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 4 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Wood and Woody Biomass (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 5 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Agricultural Residues and Waste (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 6 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Energy Crops (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 7 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Biogas (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 8 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Animal Manure (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 9 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Sewage Sludge (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 10 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Industrial & Food Waste AD (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 11 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Liquid Biofuels (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 12 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 13 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Technology (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 14 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Combustion (Steam Turbines) (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 15 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Gasification (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 16 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Anaerobic Digestion (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 17 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Landfill Gas Recovery (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 18 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Other Technologies (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 19 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Application (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 20 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Baseload Power Generation (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 21 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Peak Load Shaving (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 22 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Combined Heat and Power (CHP)/Cogeneration (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 23 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By End User (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 24 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Utilities/Centralized Power Plants (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 25 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Independent Power Producers (IPPs) (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 26 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Commercial & Industrial (C&I) (2024–2032) ($MN)
- 27 Global Bioenergy Power Generation Market Outlook, By Residential (2024–2032) ($MN)
- Note: Tables for North America, Europe, APAC, South America, and Middle East & Africa Regions are also represented in the same manner as above.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.