Report cover image

Survey of Library Science Faculty: Developments in Library Science Curriculum

Published Oct 28, 2025
Length 76 Pages
SKU # PF20773217

Description

This comprehensive study offers an in-depth look at how library science programs across the United States are evolving to meet emerging demand for new library science courses and curricula.

What’s Inside the Report?

Drawing on survey data from library science faculty at institutions of all ranks and sizes, the report explores current trends, challenges, and innovations in library science education. Readers will find:

Faculty perspectives on curriculum modernization, technology integration, and the balance between theory and practice.
Quantitative and qualitative insights into the ease of developing new courses, the demand for artificial intelligence (AI) content, and alignment with job market needs.
Breakdowns by institution type, enrollment, academic title, and more.
Five Key Findings from the Survey

Strong Demand for AI in Curricula
Nearly 80% of faculty support offering a basic course in artificial intelligence, with a sizable minority already implementing such courses. However, 64% believe current AI coverage is insufficient, signaling a major area for growth.
Job Market Alignment Is a Priority
About 73% of respondents agree that library science curricula should more closely reflect professional requirements and job market demands, especially among mid-ranked programs and faculty teaching two courses.
Skills Gaps in Programming and Management
Programming and management skills are notably under-emphasized, with 44% of faculty indicating that programming is not taught enough and a similar share expressing concern about management training.
Experiential Learning and Technology Integration
Faculty across all tiers advocate for more hands-on, practice-based learning and greater integration of emerging technologies such as AI, blockchain, and cloud computing. Calls for curricular flexibility and modernization are widespread.
Equity and Inclusion Content Is Polarized
While nearly half of respondents feel equity issues are covered “about right,” views diverge sharply by institution type and political orientation, with some calling for more emphasis and others for less.

Table of Contents

76 Pages
Table 1.1 How difficult is it at your institution to develop new courses in emerging or neglected areas of library science?
Table 2.1 Should your department offer a basic course in use of artificial intelligence in your field?
Table 3.1 Do you agree or disagree: My department should make a greater effort to relate curricula to professional requirements and job market demands.
Table 4.1 Do you agree or disagree: We should aggressively introduce AI into the educational process, developing from our own and other resources subject specific chatbots, tutorials, assessment vehicles and other aids enhanced with the help of artificial intelligence
Table 5 Your current curricula stresses the following subjects too much, not enough or about right

Search Inside Report

How Do Licenses Work?
Request A Sample
Head shot

Questions or Comments?

Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.