Survey of Law School Faculty 2025: Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Legal Education
Description
This comprehensive survey, conducted among 114 law school faculty members, offers valuable insights into how AI is reshaping the landscape of legal education and the legal profession.
The survey data is meticulously broken down by various factors, including the size and public/private status of law schools, approximate law school rankings, and numerous personal characteristics such as scholarly subject focus, work title, gender, and age. The study also presents detailed opinions from faculty on how they think AI should or should not be incorporated into law school curricula and the extent to which students should be trained in AI use.
Here are four essential findings from the survey:
Current Impact of AI on Legal Industry Hiring:
A significant portion of faculty members (51.75%) are uncertain about whether the growing use of AI has led to a decrease in demand for new associates at major law firms and other employers of legal talent . Only 16.67% believe there has been a decline, while 29.82% do not perceive any decrease .
Expected Future Impact of AI on Hiring:
Looking ahead, the faculty's views shift towards a more pessimistic outlook. Nearly half (46.49%) expect a future decline in demand for new associates due to AI, with only 19.30% disagreeing . This indicates a growing concern about the long-term implications of AI on legal employment.
Perception of AI Misuse in Coursework:
Faculty members estimate that, on average, 20.13% of students misuse AI in assignments in deceptive or counterproductive ways . This perception varies significantly, with some faculty reporting misuse rates as high as 90% .
Support for AI Integration in Legal Education:
There is strong support for incorporating AI into required core law school courses, with 71.93% of faculty members in favor . This support is even higher for integrating AI into legal research and writing courses, with 77.19% in favor .
The survey also delves into open-ended commentary, revealing themes such as the need for AI literacy, the uneven impact of AI across different law schools and practice areas, and the importance of higher-order skills in the AI-driven legal landscape.
The survey data is meticulously broken down by various factors, including the size and public/private status of law schools, approximate law school rankings, and numerous personal characteristics such as scholarly subject focus, work title, gender, and age. The study also presents detailed opinions from faculty on how they think AI should or should not be incorporated into law school curricula and the extent to which students should be trained in AI use.
Here are four essential findings from the survey:
Current Impact of AI on Legal Industry Hiring:
A significant portion of faculty members (51.75%) are uncertain about whether the growing use of AI has led to a decrease in demand for new associates at major law firms and other employers of legal talent . Only 16.67% believe there has been a decline, while 29.82% do not perceive any decrease .
Expected Future Impact of AI on Hiring:
Looking ahead, the faculty's views shift towards a more pessimistic outlook. Nearly half (46.49%) expect a future decline in demand for new associates due to AI, with only 19.30% disagreeing . This indicates a growing concern about the long-term implications of AI on legal employment.
Perception of AI Misuse in Coursework:
Faculty members estimate that, on average, 20.13% of students misuse AI in assignments in deceptive or counterproductive ways . This perception varies significantly, with some faculty reporting misuse rates as high as 90% .
Support for AI Integration in Legal Education:
There is strong support for incorporating AI into required core law school courses, with 71.93% of faculty members in favor . This support is even higher for integrating AI into legal research and writing courses, with 77.19% in favor .
The survey also delves into open-ended commentary, revealing themes such as the need for AI literacy, the uneven impact of AI across different law schools and practice areas, and the importance of higher-order skills in the AI-driven legal landscape.
Table of Contents
56 Pages
- Table 1.1 In your opinion, has the growing use of artificial intelligence led to a decrease in demand for new associates at major law firms and other employers of legal talent?
- Table 2.1 In your opinion, will the growing use of artificial intelligence lead to a decrease in demand for new associates at major law firms and other employers of legal talent?
- Table 3.1 What percentage of your students would you say abuse use of AI in assignments in ways that are deceptive or counterproductive?
- Table 4.1 Should use of AI in legal research and writing be incorporated into required, core law school courses?
- Table 5.1 How adequately are law students in your law school trained in appropriate use of artificial intelligence?
- Table 6.1 Should your law school incorporate use of AI into legal writing and research courses?
- Table 7.1 The significant use of artificial intelligence in research assignments for law students will lead to better prepared lawyers. worse prepared lawyers or have no significant impact?
- Table 8.1 Which phrase best represents your feelings about how artificial intelligence should be incorporated into law school curricula?
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.