Survey of Cataloging & Metadata Librarians: Plans for BIBFRAME
Description
This timely report offers a detailed look into how metadata professionals, primarily from U.S. research universities, are preparing for the transition to BIBFRAME, the Library of Congress’s new bibliographic framework designed to replace MARC.
The report is based on responses from 47 metadata librarians, providing a rich dataset that explores current practices, future plans, and institutional readiness for BIBFRAME adoption. The study is now available in PDF format for \$95, with a print edition shipping October 29, 2025, also priced at $95.
Key Findings from the Report Include:
Limited Current Use of BIBFRAME
Only 6.38% of surveyed librarians reported any current use of BIBFRAME in their cataloging workflows, indicating that widespread adoption is still in its early stages.
Training Gaps Identified
Just 17.02% of respondents felt they had received adequate training in BIBFRAME, highlighting a significant need for professional development and institutional support.
High Interest in Linked Data
A strong majority—74.47%—expressed interest in learning more about linked data applications in cataloging, suggesting a growing awareness of BIBFRAME’s potential benefits.
Institutional Planning Still Nascent
Only 10.64% of institutions represented in the survey had formal plans in place for BIBFRAME implementation, underscoring the need for strategic planning across the sector.
Confidence in BIBFRAME’s Future
Despite low current usage, 53.19% of respondents believe BIBFRAME will eventually become the dominant bibliographic framework, reflecting cautious optimism about its long-term viability.
Cataloging Standards Still Dominated by MARC
Over 85% of respondents reported that MARC remains the primary cataloging standard in their institutions, reinforcing the scale of the transition challenge ahead.
This comprehensive analysis is an essential resource for library administrators, metadata specialists, and information science educators seeking to understand and navigate the evolving landscape of bibliographic description.
The report is based on responses from 47 metadata librarians, providing a rich dataset that explores current practices, future plans, and institutional readiness for BIBFRAME adoption. The study is now available in PDF format for \$95, with a print edition shipping October 29, 2025, also priced at $95.
Key Findings from the Report Include:
Limited Current Use of BIBFRAME
Only 6.38% of surveyed librarians reported any current use of BIBFRAME in their cataloging workflows, indicating that widespread adoption is still in its early stages.
Training Gaps Identified
Just 17.02% of respondents felt they had received adequate training in BIBFRAME, highlighting a significant need for professional development and institutional support.
High Interest in Linked Data
A strong majority—74.47%—expressed interest in learning more about linked data applications in cataloging, suggesting a growing awareness of BIBFRAME’s potential benefits.
Institutional Planning Still Nascent
Only 10.64% of institutions represented in the survey had formal plans in place for BIBFRAME implementation, underscoring the need for strategic planning across the sector.
Confidence in BIBFRAME’s Future
Despite low current usage, 53.19% of respondents believe BIBFRAME will eventually become the dominant bibliographic framework, reflecting cautious optimism about its long-term viability.
Cataloging Standards Still Dominated by MARC
Over 85% of respondents reported that MARC remains the primary cataloging standard in their institutions, reinforcing the scale of the transition challenge ahead.
This comprehensive analysis is an essential resource for library administrators, metadata specialists, and information science educators seeking to understand and navigate the evolving landscape of bibliographic description.
Table of Contents
107 Pages
- Table 1.1 How familiar are you with BIBFRAME?
- Table 2.1 Is your library currently implementing BIBFRAME?
- Table 3.1 If your library is using BIBFRAME. at what stage would you describe your implementation?
- Table 4.1 How has BIBFRAME affected your cataloging workflow compared to MARC?
- Table 5 Which staff members are most involved in your BIBFRAME activities? (Select all that apply)
- Table 6 What forms of training have you or your colleagues received on BIBFRAME? (Select all that apply)
- Table 7 Which systems or tools are you using to implement BIBFRAME? (Select all that apply)
- Table 8 What benefits has your library seen from using BIBFRAME so far? (Select all that apply)
- Table 9.1 How much staff time is currently dedicated to BIBFRAME-related activities in your library's metadata efforts?
- Table 10.1 Has your library integrated BIBFRAME with other linked data initiatives?
- Table 10.1 Has your library integrated BIBFRAME with other linked data initiatives?
- Table 11.1 How satisfied are you with vendor/system support for BIBFRAME?
- Table 12.1 What are your library’s future plans for BIBFRAME?
- Table 13.1 Is your library collaborating with other institutions or consortia on BIBFRAME-related work?
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.


