2026 Global: Continuous Testing Market-Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Continuous Testing Market-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for continuous testing market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the continuous testing market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Apexon, Accenture, Cognizant, Cigniti, Qualitest, Persistent Systems, Tech Mahindra, UST, Infosys, and Capgemini are widely recognized as major companies operating in the continuous testing market, each offering platforms and services that embed testing into CI/CD pipelines and support shift‑left, AI‑assisted and DevOps‑aligned quality engineering practices; Apexon emphasizes AI‑led end‑to‑end testing and GenAI accelerators for test generation and coverage, Accenture integrates quality engineering with business strategy through its QE&A unit and cloud‑native test ecosystems, Cognizant’s Digital Assurance & Quality Engineering focuses on predictive analytics and CI/CD integration for real‑time feedback, Cigniti delivers continuous testing via platforms like BlueSwan™ powered by AI/ML and specialized CoEs, Qualitest provides advanced AI testing accelerators (Qualisense/Qualigen) and full‑lifecycle automation for regulated industries, Persistent Systems embeds GenAI into domain‑specific testing and offers extensive CI/CD orchestration, Tech Mahindra couples CI/CD testing with platforms like MAGiX and CONPASS and emphasizes DevSecOps observability, UST scales continuous testing with AI‑based NoSkript™ for automated lifecycle management, Infosys advances self‑healing test automation and its IQAP for predictive test optimization, and Capgemini applies SmartQA frameworks combining cloud automation and digital twin testing to enable risk‑based continuous validation.
These providers differentiate through industry focus, IP and tool ecosystems, and delivery models: several (Infosys, Cognizant, Capgemini, Accenture, Tech Mahindra) leverage global systems‑integration scale to embed continuous testing into large enterprise digital transformations and offer broad portfolios spanning performance, security, and compliance testing alongside QA engineering platforms and predictive analytics. Pure‑play and specialist players (Cigniti, Qualitest, Apexon, UST) emphasize speed and depth in automation, domain‑specific frameworks, and GenAI accelerators that generate tests, prioritize coverage, and reduce test debt; they often market platform‑led offerings that integrate with popular CI/CD tools, provide scriptless or low‑code test creation, and support observability and monitoring to feed continuous feedback loops. Persistent Systems and Apexon highlight domain tailoring (e.g., healthcare, financial messaging, ERP), while Accenture and Capgemini focus on aligning testing KPIs with business outcomes and risk models to justify continuous testing investments in regulated or mission‑critical environments.
Adoption drivers across these vendors include the need for faster release cycles, reduction of manual regression effort through test automation and self‑healing suites, integration of AI/ML for test optimization and defect prediction, and stronger CI/CD/DevSecOps alignment to find defects earlier and reduce production risk; buyers select providers based on scale, industry expertise, proprietary accelerators, and the ability to embed testing into engineering workflows and observability stacks, with enterprises prioritizing vendors that demonstrate measurable reductions in cycle time and release‑risk through automated continuous validation and predictive test analytics.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for continuous testing market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the continuous testing market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Apexon, Accenture, Cognizant, Cigniti, Qualitest, Persistent Systems, Tech Mahindra, UST, Infosys, and Capgemini are widely recognized as major companies operating in the continuous testing market, each offering platforms and services that embed testing into CI/CD pipelines and support shift‑left, AI‑assisted and DevOps‑aligned quality engineering practices; Apexon emphasizes AI‑led end‑to‑end testing and GenAI accelerators for test generation and coverage, Accenture integrates quality engineering with business strategy through its QE&A unit and cloud‑native test ecosystems, Cognizant’s Digital Assurance & Quality Engineering focuses on predictive analytics and CI/CD integration for real‑time feedback, Cigniti delivers continuous testing via platforms like BlueSwan™ powered by AI/ML and specialized CoEs, Qualitest provides advanced AI testing accelerators (Qualisense/Qualigen) and full‑lifecycle automation for regulated industries, Persistent Systems embeds GenAI into domain‑specific testing and offers extensive CI/CD orchestration, Tech Mahindra couples CI/CD testing with platforms like MAGiX and CONPASS and emphasizes DevSecOps observability, UST scales continuous testing with AI‑based NoSkript™ for automated lifecycle management, Infosys advances self‑healing test automation and its IQAP for predictive test optimization, and Capgemini applies SmartQA frameworks combining cloud automation and digital twin testing to enable risk‑based continuous validation.
These providers differentiate through industry focus, IP and tool ecosystems, and delivery models: several (Infosys, Cognizant, Capgemini, Accenture, Tech Mahindra) leverage global systems‑integration scale to embed continuous testing into large enterprise digital transformations and offer broad portfolios spanning performance, security, and compliance testing alongside QA engineering platforms and predictive analytics. Pure‑play and specialist players (Cigniti, Qualitest, Apexon, UST) emphasize speed and depth in automation, domain‑specific frameworks, and GenAI accelerators that generate tests, prioritize coverage, and reduce test debt; they often market platform‑led offerings that integrate with popular CI/CD tools, provide scriptless or low‑code test creation, and support observability and monitoring to feed continuous feedback loops. Persistent Systems and Apexon highlight domain tailoring (e.g., healthcare, financial messaging, ERP), while Accenture and Capgemini focus on aligning testing KPIs with business outcomes and risk models to justify continuous testing investments in regulated or mission‑critical environments.
Adoption drivers across these vendors include the need for faster release cycles, reduction of manual regression effort through test automation and self‑healing suites, integration of AI/ML for test optimization and defect prediction, and stronger CI/CD/DevSecOps alignment to find defects earlier and reduce production risk; buyers select providers based on scale, industry expertise, proprietary accelerators, and the ability to embed testing into engineering workflows and observability stacks, with enterprises prioritizing vendors that demonstrate measurable reductions in cycle time and release‑risk through automated continuous validation and predictive test analytics.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.