2026 Global: Computer-Assisted Coding Market-Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Computer-Assisted Coding Market-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for computer-assisted coding market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the computer-assisted coding market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
3M Health Information Systems remains a dominant force in the computer-assisted coding (CAC) market, offering the 3M 360 Encompass suite that integrates CAC, clinical documentation improvement (CDI), and analytics to accelerate coding accuracy and reimbursement workflows while leveraging NLP and AI to suggest codes from unstructured clinical notes. Optum (UnitedHealth Group) provides enterprise-grade CAC solutions focused on predictive analytics, compliance tracking, and scalability for large health systems, positioning its Professional CAC to reduce manual coding effort and denials across complex revenue-cycle operations. Oracle Health (including the former Cerner business) delivers cloud-native CAC and revenue-cycle capabilities with deep EHR integration following its acquisition of Cerner, enabling real-time coding assistance and secure data management across hospital environments. Dolbey Systems’ Fusion CAC emphasizes speech recognition, patented machine-learning models, and flexible deployment for hospitals and clinics, and has been repeatedly recognized by industry evaluators for strong performance in the CAC category. Microsoft (via its acquisition of Nuance) blends Dragon Medical One speech-recognition technology with CAC and ambient clinical intelligence to improve documentation capture and downstream coding accuracy, leveraging Azure for cloud scalability and advanced ML tooling. TruCode (Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.) supplies highly configurable coding engines and EHR-embedded modules that prioritize interoperability and regulatory agility, supporting precise code assignment and revenue optimization for clinical and coding teams.
Dolbey, Nuance/Microsoft, and Cerner/Oracle are complemented by a cohort of specialist and emerging vendors that address specific market needs: Dolbey (speech and hybrid CAC) and Nuance (speech-enabled documentation and CAC) extend clinician-facing capture to automated code suggestion and CDI workflows. CodaMetrix and Nym Health represent newer AI-native entrants delivering contextual or autonomous coding engines that process multi-source clinical data, maintain audit trails, and aim to reduce manual coder hours through high-accuracy clinical-language understanding (CLU) models and enterprise integrations. ezDI and MModal (now part of broader enterprise offerings) provide integrated CAC platforms combining NLP/NLU, analytics, and workflow orchestration to support both inpatient and outpatient coding use cases while enabling continuous learning from coder feedback. Alpha II, ZyDoc, and Dolbey-style niche vendors continue to serve provider segments that require configurable rule engines, code-lookup tools, or transcription-linked CAC, preserving interoperability with EHRs and practice-management systems for smaller hospitals and physician groups.
Market leaders differentiate by product breadth, EHR integration depth, AI maturity, and deployment models: 3M and Optum compete on enterprise reach and analytics-driven revenue-cycle outcomes, Oracle leverages large-system EHR footprints for seamless workflow integration, and Microsoft/Nuance focus on clinician capture through speech and ambient intelligence to upstream documentation quality. Specialist AI vendors such as CodaMetrix and Nym Health compete on autonomous or near-autonomous coding accuracy and auditability, while Dolbey, TruCode, ezDI, Alpha II, and ZyDoc provide modular solutions attractive for mid-size systems or specialty practices where configurability, patented ML for voice/text, and embedded coding engines drive adoption. Ongoing market trends include cloud migration, tighter EHR-CAC interoperability, expanded use of deep language models for CLU, and vendor consolidation as enterprise EHR and cloud providers continue to acquire or integrate CAC capabilities to support end-to-end revenue-cycle automation.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for computer-assisted coding market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the computer-assisted coding market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
3M Health Information Systems remains a dominant force in the computer-assisted coding (CAC) market, offering the 3M 360 Encompass suite that integrates CAC, clinical documentation improvement (CDI), and analytics to accelerate coding accuracy and reimbursement workflows while leveraging NLP and AI to suggest codes from unstructured clinical notes. Optum (UnitedHealth Group) provides enterprise-grade CAC solutions focused on predictive analytics, compliance tracking, and scalability for large health systems, positioning its Professional CAC to reduce manual coding effort and denials across complex revenue-cycle operations. Oracle Health (including the former Cerner business) delivers cloud-native CAC and revenue-cycle capabilities with deep EHR integration following its acquisition of Cerner, enabling real-time coding assistance and secure data management across hospital environments. Dolbey Systems’ Fusion CAC emphasizes speech recognition, patented machine-learning models, and flexible deployment for hospitals and clinics, and has been repeatedly recognized by industry evaluators for strong performance in the CAC category. Microsoft (via its acquisition of Nuance) blends Dragon Medical One speech-recognition technology with CAC and ambient clinical intelligence to improve documentation capture and downstream coding accuracy, leveraging Azure for cloud scalability and advanced ML tooling. TruCode (Computer Programs and Systems, Inc.) supplies highly configurable coding engines and EHR-embedded modules that prioritize interoperability and regulatory agility, supporting precise code assignment and revenue optimization for clinical and coding teams.
Dolbey, Nuance/Microsoft, and Cerner/Oracle are complemented by a cohort of specialist and emerging vendors that address specific market needs: Dolbey (speech and hybrid CAC) and Nuance (speech-enabled documentation and CAC) extend clinician-facing capture to automated code suggestion and CDI workflows. CodaMetrix and Nym Health represent newer AI-native entrants delivering contextual or autonomous coding engines that process multi-source clinical data, maintain audit trails, and aim to reduce manual coder hours through high-accuracy clinical-language understanding (CLU) models and enterprise integrations. ezDI and MModal (now part of broader enterprise offerings) provide integrated CAC platforms combining NLP/NLU, analytics, and workflow orchestration to support both inpatient and outpatient coding use cases while enabling continuous learning from coder feedback. Alpha II, ZyDoc, and Dolbey-style niche vendors continue to serve provider segments that require configurable rule engines, code-lookup tools, or transcription-linked CAC, preserving interoperability with EHRs and practice-management systems for smaller hospitals and physician groups.
Market leaders differentiate by product breadth, EHR integration depth, AI maturity, and deployment models: 3M and Optum compete on enterprise reach and analytics-driven revenue-cycle outcomes, Oracle leverages large-system EHR footprints for seamless workflow integration, and Microsoft/Nuance focus on clinician capture through speech and ambient intelligence to upstream documentation quality. Specialist AI vendors such as CodaMetrix and Nym Health compete on autonomous or near-autonomous coding accuracy and auditability, while Dolbey, TruCode, ezDI, Alpha II, and ZyDoc provide modular solutions attractive for mid-size systems or specialty practices where configurability, patented ML for voice/text, and embedded coding engines drive adoption. Ongoing market trends include cloud migration, tighter EHR-CAC interoperability, expanded use of deep language models for CLU, and vendor consolidation as enterprise EHR and cloud providers continue to acquire or integrate CAC capabilities to support end-to-end revenue-cycle automation.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.