2026 Global: Compression Bandages-Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Compression Bandages-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for compression bandages by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the compression bandages market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
3M Company, Essity AB, Cardinal Health Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic Plc, Smith & Nephew plc, Medline Industries Inc., B. Braun Melsungen AG, ConvaTec Group Plc, and Medi GmbH & Co. KG dominate the compression bandages market.
These leaders leverage innovation in materials and design to address venous disorders, lymphedema, and wound care needs. 3M Company excels with cohesive bandages, compression wraps, and multi-layer systems validated for hospital and home use, integrating science-driven textiles for superior pressure control. Essity AB, through brands like JOBST, offers advanced garments with SoftFit technology for comfort and moisture management, bolstered by acquisitions and expansions in emerging markets. Cardinal Health Inc. provides comprehensive portfolios for clinical efficacy, while Johnson & Johnson delivers reliable bandages rooted in its longstanding healthcare expertise. Medtronic Plc focuses on strategic products enhancing vascular care, and Smith & Nephew plc innovates with programmable wraps and sensor-integrated systems via research collaborations. This top tier commands significant market share through global distribution and R&D investments.
Medline Industries Inc., B. Braun Melsungen AG, ConvaTec Group Plc, and Medi GmbH & Co. KG round out the ten majors, emphasizing specialized solutions amid moderate market consolidation where five to six players hold 50-55% share. Medline Industries Inc. supplies broad wound management options, competing effectively in North America. B. Braun Melsungen AG advances compression for circulatory issues, aligning with international standards. ConvaTec Group Plc specializes in hydrofiber dressings and smart technologies for chronic wounds across 110 countries. Medi GmbH & Co. KG leads in knit products like Mediven and Circaid for venous/lymphatic therapy, with facilities worldwide and digital adherence tools. These firms drive growth via pneumatic devices, antimicrobial finishes, and patient-centric features, navigating regulatory shifts and rising chronic conditions. Their competitive benchmarking highlights strengths in innovation, from 3M's digital monitoring to Essity's anatomical fits.
Beyond the core ten, companies like Coloplast A/S, Paul Hartmann AG, Mölnlycke Health Care AB, Lohmann & Rauscher, and DJO Global expand the landscape with pneumatic systems and custom garments. BSN Medical (Essity subsidiary) enhances JOBST via 3D-knitting and partnerships, while Sigvaris and Juzo focus on stylish, moisture-wicking textiles. Market leaders prioritize evidence-based development, sustainability, and education to boost adherence in aging populations facing diabetes and injuries, projecting steady expansion through 2025.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for compression bandages by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the compression bandages market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
3M Company, Essity AB, Cardinal Health Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic Plc, Smith & Nephew plc, Medline Industries Inc., B. Braun Melsungen AG, ConvaTec Group Plc, and Medi GmbH & Co. KG dominate the compression bandages market.
These leaders leverage innovation in materials and design to address venous disorders, lymphedema, and wound care needs. 3M Company excels with cohesive bandages, compression wraps, and multi-layer systems validated for hospital and home use, integrating science-driven textiles for superior pressure control. Essity AB, through brands like JOBST, offers advanced garments with SoftFit technology for comfort and moisture management, bolstered by acquisitions and expansions in emerging markets. Cardinal Health Inc. provides comprehensive portfolios for clinical efficacy, while Johnson & Johnson delivers reliable bandages rooted in its longstanding healthcare expertise. Medtronic Plc focuses on strategic products enhancing vascular care, and Smith & Nephew plc innovates with programmable wraps and sensor-integrated systems via research collaborations. This top tier commands significant market share through global distribution and R&D investments.
Medline Industries Inc., B. Braun Melsungen AG, ConvaTec Group Plc, and Medi GmbH & Co. KG round out the ten majors, emphasizing specialized solutions amid moderate market consolidation where five to six players hold 50-55% share. Medline Industries Inc. supplies broad wound management options, competing effectively in North America. B. Braun Melsungen AG advances compression for circulatory issues, aligning with international standards. ConvaTec Group Plc specializes in hydrofiber dressings and smart technologies for chronic wounds across 110 countries. Medi GmbH & Co. KG leads in knit products like Mediven and Circaid for venous/lymphatic therapy, with facilities worldwide and digital adherence tools. These firms drive growth via pneumatic devices, antimicrobial finishes, and patient-centric features, navigating regulatory shifts and rising chronic conditions. Their competitive benchmarking highlights strengths in innovation, from 3M's digital monitoring to Essity's anatomical fits.
Beyond the core ten, companies like Coloplast A/S, Paul Hartmann AG, Mölnlycke Health Care AB, Lohmann & Rauscher, and DJO Global expand the landscape with pneumatic systems and custom garments. BSN Medical (Essity subsidiary) enhances JOBST via 3D-knitting and partnerships, while Sigvaris and Juzo focus on stylish, moisture-wicking textiles. Market leaders prioritize evidence-based development, sustainability, and education to boost adherence in aging populations facing diabetes and injuries, projecting steady expansion through 2025.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.