2026 Global: Clinical Communication And Collaboration Market-Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Clinical Communication And Collaboration Market-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for clinical communication and collaboration market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the clinical communication and collaboration market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
TigerConnect, Vocera Communications (Stryker), Spok, PerfectServe, and TigerConnect-adjacent enterprise players such as Cisco Systems and Microsoft dominate the Clinical Communication and Collaboration (CC&C) market through broad EHR-integrated messaging, alerting and workflow orchestration capabilities that large health systems require; TigerConnect is widely cited for secure, mobile-first messaging and deep system integrations, Vocera (now part of Stryker) is noted for voice-led and hands‑free clinical workflows and device-based communication, Spok remains a leader for pager‑to‑mobile transitions and enterprise alerting, PerfectServe focuses on intelligent routing and on‑call scheduling that optimizes care-team delivery, Cisco brings large‑scale networking, unified communications and clinical collaboration fabrics suited to complex hospital deployments, and Microsoft supplies cloud, Teams-based secure collaboration and identity services that many health systems leverage for interoperability and telehealth extensions.
Oracle Health (Cerner), Epic Systems, Imprivata, and Ascom are crucial incumbents that shape CC&C procurement and integration decisions because of their entrenched EHR, authentication, and device ecosystems; Epic’s collaboration capabilities and implementation model influence hospital purchasing and integration strategies for clinical messaging, Oracle Health (formerly Cerner) integrates communications into clinical workflows and enterprise planning, Imprivata contributes identity‑centric access control and secure messaging that meet stringent compliance requirements in regulated environments, and Ascom offers nurse‑call, alarm management and integrated communication solutions targeted at complex acute and long‑term care settings. These vendors typically compete on depth of EHR integration, escalation and alarm‑management features, and the ability to deliver closed‑loop communications that reduce alarm fatigue and improve response times.
A secondary tier of specialized vendors — including OnPage, Telmediq/PerfectServe family offerings, QliqSOFT, Mobile Heartbeat (Voalte/Baxter/Hillrom lineage), Symplr (Halo Health), and rapidly evolving startups like Connexall and OhMD — fills functional niches such as critical alerting, schedule‑aware routing, patient engagement messaging, and legacy pager replacement. OnPage specializes in critical alerting with alert‑until‑read and escalation workflows for incident‑sensitive contexts, Telmediq and PerfectServe emphasize AI routing and enterprise scheduling for complex on‑call models, QliqSOFT and OhMD address patient texting and virtual care integration, and Connexall focuses on interoperability and device alarm bridging across hospital systems. Market selection typically hinges on hospital size and maturity, existing EHR footprint, required hardware (e.g., Vocera badges), and priorities such as voice workflows, identity management, or patient engagement, with KLAS and industry reports reporting varied customer satisfaction tied to implementation support and integration depth.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for clinical communication and collaboration market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the clinical communication and collaboration market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
TigerConnect, Vocera Communications (Stryker), Spok, PerfectServe, and TigerConnect-adjacent enterprise players such as Cisco Systems and Microsoft dominate the Clinical Communication and Collaboration (CC&C) market through broad EHR-integrated messaging, alerting and workflow orchestration capabilities that large health systems require; TigerConnect is widely cited for secure, mobile-first messaging and deep system integrations, Vocera (now part of Stryker) is noted for voice-led and hands‑free clinical workflows and device-based communication, Spok remains a leader for pager‑to‑mobile transitions and enterprise alerting, PerfectServe focuses on intelligent routing and on‑call scheduling that optimizes care-team delivery, Cisco brings large‑scale networking, unified communications and clinical collaboration fabrics suited to complex hospital deployments, and Microsoft supplies cloud, Teams-based secure collaboration and identity services that many health systems leverage for interoperability and telehealth extensions.
Oracle Health (Cerner), Epic Systems, Imprivata, and Ascom are crucial incumbents that shape CC&C procurement and integration decisions because of their entrenched EHR, authentication, and device ecosystems; Epic’s collaboration capabilities and implementation model influence hospital purchasing and integration strategies for clinical messaging, Oracle Health (formerly Cerner) integrates communications into clinical workflows and enterprise planning, Imprivata contributes identity‑centric access control and secure messaging that meet stringent compliance requirements in regulated environments, and Ascom offers nurse‑call, alarm management and integrated communication solutions targeted at complex acute and long‑term care settings. These vendors typically compete on depth of EHR integration, escalation and alarm‑management features, and the ability to deliver closed‑loop communications that reduce alarm fatigue and improve response times.
A secondary tier of specialized vendors — including OnPage, Telmediq/PerfectServe family offerings, QliqSOFT, Mobile Heartbeat (Voalte/Baxter/Hillrom lineage), Symplr (Halo Health), and rapidly evolving startups like Connexall and OhMD — fills functional niches such as critical alerting, schedule‑aware routing, patient engagement messaging, and legacy pager replacement. OnPage specializes in critical alerting with alert‑until‑read and escalation workflows for incident‑sensitive contexts, Telmediq and PerfectServe emphasize AI routing and enterprise scheduling for complex on‑call models, QliqSOFT and OhMD address patient texting and virtual care integration, and Connexall focuses on interoperability and device alarm bridging across hospital systems. Market selection typically hinges on hospital size and maturity, existing EHR footprint, required hardware (e.g., Vocera badges), and priorities such as voice workflows, identity management, or patient engagement, with KLAS and industry reports reporting varied customer satisfaction tied to implementation support and integration depth.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.