2026 Global: Carbon Management Software Market-Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Carbon Management Software Market-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for carbon management software market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the carbon management software market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Watershed, Persefoni, Microsoft, SAP, and IBM are widely recognized as major players in the carbon management software market, each addressing enterprise needs with distinct strengths and enterprise integrations. Watershed is notable for its audit‑grade data collection, comprehensive Scope 1–3 measurement, and scenario planning tools used by large multinational clients, making it a go‑to for rigorous compliance and decarbonization programs. Persefoni positions itself as a Climate Management and Accounting Platform (CMAP) with a calculation engine aligned to reporting frameworks and strong adoption among financial institutions and large enterprises for audit‑ready carbon accounting. Microsoft’s Sustainability Manager leverages the Azure cloud and Power BI integration to provide scalable analytics and real‑time monitoring for organizations already embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem. SAP embeds emissions tracking into enterprise resource planning and offers integrated EHS and sustainability modules that appeal to organizations seeking end‑to‑end operational and compliance workflows across complex global operations. IBM’s Environmental Intelligence Suite combines AI, predictive analytics, and utility data management to help large corporations integrate carbon data with broader enterprise systems and climate risk modeling for regulatory and operational decision making.
A second group of influential vendors—Watershed‑adjacent specialists and fast‑growing innovators—includes SINAI, Sweep, Gravity, Envizi (IBM/Envizi offering), and Emitwise/Watershed acquisitions and consolidations that have shaped the competitive landscape. SINAI emphasizes audit‑grade accounting paired with economic decision tools like internal carbon pricing and MACC modeling, targeting clients that require investable decarbonization business cases and TÜV‑certified methodologies. Sweep focuses on target management, AI insights, and assisting companies to move from reporting toward measurable decarbonization impact, earning recognition for market‑leading capabilities in target tracking and query assistance. Gravity is highlighted for enterprise carbon accounting and energy management with strong automated data collection and abatement opportunity identification, winning Verdantix recognition for functionality in energy‑intensive and complex supply‑chain environments. Envizi, integrated under IBM, specializes in utility and property portfolio data management and automated bill processing to ensure data quality in emissions inventories. Emitwise, now operating within broader platforms like Watershed, brought machine‑learning supply‑chain emissions capabilities that continue to influence Scope‑3 measurement approaches.
Other notable vendors rounding out the top tier include Greenly, Sphera, Enablon, and Workiva, which together illustrate market breadth from user‑friendly SMB solutions to industrial EHS integrations and ESG reporting tie‑ins. Greenly offers accessible, scalable carbon accounting packages suited for companies beginning their sustainability journeys and seeking compliant reporting outputs. Sphera and Enablon (and other legacy EHS players) serve asset‑intensive industries with integrated risk, safety, and emissions modules, appealing to chemical, oil & gas, and manufacturing clients that require operational risk and compliance convergence with carbon management. Workiva extends ESG reporting capabilities with carbon tracking that links financial and operational systems for streamlined disclosure workflows. The market is dynamic, with consolidation, Verdantix benchmarking, and vendor differentiation around AI, Scope‑3 analytics, energy management, and audit‑grade accounting shaping buyer decisions and vendor roadmaps.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for carbon management software market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the carbon management software market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Watershed, Persefoni, Microsoft, SAP, and IBM are widely recognized as major players in the carbon management software market, each addressing enterprise needs with distinct strengths and enterprise integrations. Watershed is notable for its audit‑grade data collection, comprehensive Scope 1–3 measurement, and scenario planning tools used by large multinational clients, making it a go‑to for rigorous compliance and decarbonization programs. Persefoni positions itself as a Climate Management and Accounting Platform (CMAP) with a calculation engine aligned to reporting frameworks and strong adoption among financial institutions and large enterprises for audit‑ready carbon accounting. Microsoft’s Sustainability Manager leverages the Azure cloud and Power BI integration to provide scalable analytics and real‑time monitoring for organizations already embedded in the Microsoft ecosystem. SAP embeds emissions tracking into enterprise resource planning and offers integrated EHS and sustainability modules that appeal to organizations seeking end‑to‑end operational and compliance workflows across complex global operations. IBM’s Environmental Intelligence Suite combines AI, predictive analytics, and utility data management to help large corporations integrate carbon data with broader enterprise systems and climate risk modeling for regulatory and operational decision making.
A second group of influential vendors—Watershed‑adjacent specialists and fast‑growing innovators—includes SINAI, Sweep, Gravity, Envizi (IBM/Envizi offering), and Emitwise/Watershed acquisitions and consolidations that have shaped the competitive landscape. SINAI emphasizes audit‑grade accounting paired with economic decision tools like internal carbon pricing and MACC modeling, targeting clients that require investable decarbonization business cases and TÜV‑certified methodologies. Sweep focuses on target management, AI insights, and assisting companies to move from reporting toward measurable decarbonization impact, earning recognition for market‑leading capabilities in target tracking and query assistance. Gravity is highlighted for enterprise carbon accounting and energy management with strong automated data collection and abatement opportunity identification, winning Verdantix recognition for functionality in energy‑intensive and complex supply‑chain environments. Envizi, integrated under IBM, specializes in utility and property portfolio data management and automated bill processing to ensure data quality in emissions inventories. Emitwise, now operating within broader platforms like Watershed, brought machine‑learning supply‑chain emissions capabilities that continue to influence Scope‑3 measurement approaches.
Other notable vendors rounding out the top tier include Greenly, Sphera, Enablon, and Workiva, which together illustrate market breadth from user‑friendly SMB solutions to industrial EHS integrations and ESG reporting tie‑ins. Greenly offers accessible, scalable carbon accounting packages suited for companies beginning their sustainability journeys and seeking compliant reporting outputs. Sphera and Enablon (and other legacy EHS players) serve asset‑intensive industries with integrated risk, safety, and emissions modules, appealing to chemical, oil & gas, and manufacturing clients that require operational risk and compliance convergence with carbon management. Workiva extends ESG reporting capabilities with carbon tracking that links financial and operational systems for streamlined disclosure workflows. The market is dynamic, with consolidation, Verdantix benchmarking, and vendor differentiation around AI, Scope‑3 analytics, energy management, and audit‑grade accounting shaping buyer decisions and vendor roadmaps.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.