2026 Global: Bicycle Locks Market -Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Bicycle Locks Market -Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for bicycle locks market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the bicycle locks market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
The Bicycle Locks Market is dominated by a mix of long-established security manufacturers and innovative niche brands that together define product categories such as U‑locks, chain locks, folding locks, wearable locks, and anti‑angle‑grinder systems. Abus is a leading incumbent known for high‑security U‑locks and folding locks—its Granit and Bordo lines carry top independent ratings and are widely used for e‑bikes and urban riders. Kryptonite remains a major global player with its New York U‑Lock and extensive warranty/service programs that keep it prominent in both consumer and dealer channels. OnGuard (Magnum/OnGuard family) has earned strong reviews for robust chain and U‑lock designs like the RockSolid and Mastiff, gaining traction by balancing weight, portability, and Sold Secure ratings. Litelok is an innovation leader in composite, anti‑angle‑grinder D‑locks (X1, X3 and Core ranges) that reviewers repeatedly name best‑in‑test for grinder resistance and practical usability, making it influential in higher‑security segments and e‑bike protection. Hiplok introduced wearable and portable chain locks and has pushed anti‑angle‑grinder technology with its 1000 Series and wearable D‑locks, positioning the brand strongly where transportability and novel form factors matter. Kryptonite, Abus and OnGuard are often cited as the “big three” for mainstream buyers, while Litelok and Hiplok represent the newer wave of specialist innovators that have shifted expectations about grinder resistance and wearability.
Other notable companies shape the market by owning particular niches, distribution strengths or price points. Foldylock dominates secure folding locks with compact, high‑rated designs that appeal to commuters seeking portability without sacrificing Sold Secure ratings. Zéfal and Seatylock (Foldylock’s Compact cited alongside Seatylock in reviews) serve budget and folding‑lock shoppers with lighter, lower‑cost options that expand market reach for casual riders. Muc‑Off and Ottolock are smaller but visible through accessory integration (AirTag holders, compact combination locks) and marketing to tech‑savvy cyclists who prioritize convenience and multi‑device security features. On the heavier end, chain specialists like Abus’ chain ranges and OnGuard’s Mastiff provide solutions for stationary security and e‑bike owners, where mass and chain length trade off against cut resistance and anchoring versatility. Several legacy locksmith and security manufacturers also supply OEM and aftermarket anchors, mounting systems, and motorcycle security products that cross‑sell into bicycle channels, keeping the competitive landscape broad.
Market dynamics are shaped by rising e‑bike ownership, increasing prevalence of cordless angle grinders among thieves, and insurer security requirements, which together drive demand for angle‑grinder‑resistant designs and high Sold Secure/independent test ratings. Brands that combine independent lab performance with practical features—manageable weight, wearable formats, and retail warranties—tend to capture premium segments, while lower‑cost companies compete on price and convenience for short‑term or low‑risk use cases. Continued innovation (composite armouring, grinder‑disintegrating materials, wearable chains) plus strong after‑sales programs and distribution into big‑box, specialist bike shops, and online channels will determine which companies expand share as urban cycling and e‑bike markets grow.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for bicycle locks market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the bicycle locks market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
The Bicycle Locks Market is dominated by a mix of long-established security manufacturers and innovative niche brands that together define product categories such as U‑locks, chain locks, folding locks, wearable locks, and anti‑angle‑grinder systems. Abus is a leading incumbent known for high‑security U‑locks and folding locks—its Granit and Bordo lines carry top independent ratings and are widely used for e‑bikes and urban riders. Kryptonite remains a major global player with its New York U‑Lock and extensive warranty/service programs that keep it prominent in both consumer and dealer channels. OnGuard (Magnum/OnGuard family) has earned strong reviews for robust chain and U‑lock designs like the RockSolid and Mastiff, gaining traction by balancing weight, portability, and Sold Secure ratings. Litelok is an innovation leader in composite, anti‑angle‑grinder D‑locks (X1, X3 and Core ranges) that reviewers repeatedly name best‑in‑test for grinder resistance and practical usability, making it influential in higher‑security segments and e‑bike protection. Hiplok introduced wearable and portable chain locks and has pushed anti‑angle‑grinder technology with its 1000 Series and wearable D‑locks, positioning the brand strongly where transportability and novel form factors matter. Kryptonite, Abus and OnGuard are often cited as the “big three” for mainstream buyers, while Litelok and Hiplok represent the newer wave of specialist innovators that have shifted expectations about grinder resistance and wearability.
Other notable companies shape the market by owning particular niches, distribution strengths or price points. Foldylock dominates secure folding locks with compact, high‑rated designs that appeal to commuters seeking portability without sacrificing Sold Secure ratings. Zéfal and Seatylock (Foldylock’s Compact cited alongside Seatylock in reviews) serve budget and folding‑lock shoppers with lighter, lower‑cost options that expand market reach for casual riders. Muc‑Off and Ottolock are smaller but visible through accessory integration (AirTag holders, compact combination locks) and marketing to tech‑savvy cyclists who prioritize convenience and multi‑device security features. On the heavier end, chain specialists like Abus’ chain ranges and OnGuard’s Mastiff provide solutions for stationary security and e‑bike owners, where mass and chain length trade off against cut resistance and anchoring versatility. Several legacy locksmith and security manufacturers also supply OEM and aftermarket anchors, mounting systems, and motorcycle security products that cross‑sell into bicycle channels, keeping the competitive landscape broad.
Market dynamics are shaped by rising e‑bike ownership, increasing prevalence of cordless angle grinders among thieves, and insurer security requirements, which together drive demand for angle‑grinder‑resistant designs and high Sold Secure/independent test ratings. Brands that combine independent lab performance with practical features—manageable weight, wearable formats, and retail warranties—tend to capture premium segments, while lower‑cost companies compete on price and convenience for short‑term or low‑risk use cases. Continued innovation (composite armouring, grinder‑disintegrating materials, wearable chains) plus strong after‑sales programs and distribution into big‑box, specialist bike shops, and online channels will determine which companies expand share as urban cycling and e‑bike markets grow.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
