2026 Global: Aliphatic Hydrocarbon Solvents And Thinners Market-Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Aliphatic Hydrocarbon Solvents And Thinners Market-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents and thinners market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents and thinners market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
BASF SE, Dow Inc., Evonik Industries, Croda International, Clariant, Nouryon, Solvay, Stepan Company, Helena Agri-Enterprises, and Corteva Agriscience are widely recognized as ten major companies shaping the agricultural surfactants market due to their extensive product portfolios, global distribution networks, and active R&D programs that target efficacy and sustainability improvements in crop protection formulations. BASF leverages its AgChem additives and broad chemical expertise to supply surfactants that enhance adhesion, spreading and penetration for herbicides and fungicides. Dow provides formulation chemistries and specialty surfactant technologies aimed at cereal and grain applications and precision agriculture formats. Evonik and Croda both emphasize specialty chemistries and bio-based or performance-focused adjuvants—Evonik with silicone and polyether chemistries for drone and low-dose applications and Croda with sustainable formulation ingredients used across agrochemical portfolios. Clariant and Nouryon have positioned bio-EO and green ethoxylate product lines as lower-carbon, life-cycle-verified alternatives that meet increasing regulatory and customer demands for reduced environmental impact. Solvay concentrates on silicone–polyether combinations and formulation systems that improve spreading at reduced dose rates, targeting both conventional spray and emerging drone-based delivery systems. Stepan, with a long history in surfactants, supplies a broad range of nonionic and specialty surfactants tailored to agricultural customers seeking scalable, cost-effective wetting and spreading solutions. Helena Agri-Enterprises couples its product supply with distribution and agronomic services, creating recurring revenue models through retail channels and application support in North American markets. Corteva integrates adjuvant offerings into its crop protection ecosystem, aligning surfactant products with crop-specific recommendations and digital decision tools for variable-rate applications.
These firms differentiate themselves through investment in sustainable chemistries, novel delivery formats, and service integration, reflecting market drivers toward bio-based surfactants, regulatory pressure, and precision agriculture adoption. Several companies report specific sustainability achievements and product innovations—Nouryon’s low-carbon ethoxylates and Clariant’s bio-EO surfactants with verified Scope 3 reductions illustrate life-cycle focus in supplier roadmaps. Product innovation also targets operational needs: Evonik’s BREAK-THRU line and Solvay’s silicone–polyether blends address requirements for drone spraying, low-volume applications, and improved rainfastness at lower active doses. Market analyses show the sector is moderately concentrated, with leading players such as BASF, Corteva, Nouryon, Solvay, and Helena together holding a meaningful share while numerous regional formulators and distributors serve crop- and country-specific needs. Regional leadership varies; North America remains a dominant revenue source due to large-scale farming and fast adoption of advanced adjuvants, while Asia-Pacific growth emphasizes cost-effective and bio-based alternatives for staple crops.
Competitive strategies among these ten companies include portfolio expansion through M&A, targeted R&D collaborations with agrochemical formulators, and scaling manufacturing to meet both conventional and green-surfactant demand. Several firms are extending services—spray diagnostics, water analysis, and agronomic advisory—to differentiate commodity surfactants and lock in downstream users. The combined effect of technical specialization (silicone, polyether, bio-EO), commercial integration (distribution and agronomy), and sustainability commitments positions these companies to lead market growth, estimated to expand through the decade as demand for efficient, lower-impact adjuvants increases in cereal, pulses, fruits and vegetable crop applications.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents and thinners market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the aliphatic hydrocarbon solvents and thinners market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
BASF SE, Dow Inc., Evonik Industries, Croda International, Clariant, Nouryon, Solvay, Stepan Company, Helena Agri-Enterprises, and Corteva Agriscience are widely recognized as ten major companies shaping the agricultural surfactants market due to their extensive product portfolios, global distribution networks, and active R&D programs that target efficacy and sustainability improvements in crop protection formulations. BASF leverages its AgChem additives and broad chemical expertise to supply surfactants that enhance adhesion, spreading and penetration for herbicides and fungicides. Dow provides formulation chemistries and specialty surfactant technologies aimed at cereal and grain applications and precision agriculture formats. Evonik and Croda both emphasize specialty chemistries and bio-based or performance-focused adjuvants—Evonik with silicone and polyether chemistries for drone and low-dose applications and Croda with sustainable formulation ingredients used across agrochemical portfolios. Clariant and Nouryon have positioned bio-EO and green ethoxylate product lines as lower-carbon, life-cycle-verified alternatives that meet increasing regulatory and customer demands for reduced environmental impact. Solvay concentrates on silicone–polyether combinations and formulation systems that improve spreading at reduced dose rates, targeting both conventional spray and emerging drone-based delivery systems. Stepan, with a long history in surfactants, supplies a broad range of nonionic and specialty surfactants tailored to agricultural customers seeking scalable, cost-effective wetting and spreading solutions. Helena Agri-Enterprises couples its product supply with distribution and agronomic services, creating recurring revenue models through retail channels and application support in North American markets. Corteva integrates adjuvant offerings into its crop protection ecosystem, aligning surfactant products with crop-specific recommendations and digital decision tools for variable-rate applications.
These firms differentiate themselves through investment in sustainable chemistries, novel delivery formats, and service integration, reflecting market drivers toward bio-based surfactants, regulatory pressure, and precision agriculture adoption. Several companies report specific sustainability achievements and product innovations—Nouryon’s low-carbon ethoxylates and Clariant’s bio-EO surfactants with verified Scope 3 reductions illustrate life-cycle focus in supplier roadmaps. Product innovation also targets operational needs: Evonik’s BREAK-THRU line and Solvay’s silicone–polyether blends address requirements for drone spraying, low-volume applications, and improved rainfastness at lower active doses. Market analyses show the sector is moderately concentrated, with leading players such as BASF, Corteva, Nouryon, Solvay, and Helena together holding a meaningful share while numerous regional formulators and distributors serve crop- and country-specific needs. Regional leadership varies; North America remains a dominant revenue source due to large-scale farming and fast adoption of advanced adjuvants, while Asia-Pacific growth emphasizes cost-effective and bio-based alternatives for staple crops.
Competitive strategies among these ten companies include portfolio expansion through M&A, targeted R&D collaborations with agrochemical formulators, and scaling manufacturing to meet both conventional and green-surfactant demand. Several firms are extending services—spray diagnostics, water analysis, and agronomic advisory—to differentiate commodity surfactants and lock in downstream users. The combined effect of technical specialization (silicone, polyether, bio-EO), commercial integration (distribution and agronomy), and sustainability commitments positions these companies to lead market growth, estimated to expand through the decade as demand for efficient, lower-impact adjuvants increases in cereal, pulses, fruits and vegetable crop applications.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.