2026 Global: Aerospace Insurance-Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: Aerospace Insurance-Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for aerospace insurance by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the aerospace insurance market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Ten major companies dominate the aerospace insurance sector, each bringing distinct capacity, specialty lines, and global reach that shape underwriting and placement strategies. Marsh McLennan, Aon, and WTW (Willis Towers Watson) are the leading global brokers that place large aviation and aerospace programs and negotiate long-term agreements with insurers, leveraging extensive market relationships and analytics to secure multi-layered capacity for airlines, manufacturers, and space operators. Among primary insurers and underwriters, American International Group (AIG), Chubb, and Berkshire Hathaway are frequently cited as top providers of hull, liability, and war/terrorism cover for commercial and general aviation customers; AIG and Chubb are notable for large market shares in U.S. aircraft insurance and deep Lloyd’s and multinational operations while Berkshire Hathaway offers both primary and reinsurance capacity with strong balance-sheet support. Munich Re and Swiss Re (and their operating units such as ERGO/Swiss Re’s aviation teams) are the dominant reinsurers in aerospace, providing treaty and facultative reinsurance capacity, advanced catastrophe modeling, and specialist engineering expertise that support complex airline and manufacturer programs and the growing needs of space insurance.
Global Aerospace, Tokio Marine (including HCC/Avemco units), and Great American (American Financial Group) are important specialist underwriters and carriers focused on tailored aviation products for everything from piston GA hull and liability to commercial airline and MRO exposures; Global Aerospace emphasizes bespoke placements backed by multiple secure insurer partners and a large portfolio of GA and airline clients, while Tokio Marine’s aviation units bring Lloyd’s-syndicate access and wide product breadth across cargo, hull, and specialty war-risk cover. Insurer-led specialist groups such as IAT Re and other specialty reinsurers supply excess and layered capacity that is critical when fronting carriers and brokers seek to assemble high-limit placements for airlines, manufacturers, and space ventures. Large brokerage houses—Arthur J. Gallagher, Lockton, Howden and Alliant—also function as major market-makers for aerospace insurance by structuring complex programs, advising on risk engineering, and placing coverage across global insurer and reinsurer panels.
Market dynamics in recent years — including several high-profile airline losses, evolving manufacturing and MRO exposures, and greater emphasis on risk quality — have pushed capacity providers to be more selective while maintaining broadly healthy capital availability, prompting shifts in pricing, longer-term agreements, and more granular underwriting for aerospace lines. The interplay between powerful global brokers that aggregate demand and specialty carriers and reinsurers that supply capacity means successful aerospace placements increasingly rely on multi-layered structures, sophisticated exposure modeling, and proactive risk-management services; clients with strong safety records and transparent claims histories typically obtain more favorable terms and access to long-term capacity commitments.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for aerospace insurance by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the aerospace insurance market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
Ten major companies dominate the aerospace insurance sector, each bringing distinct capacity, specialty lines, and global reach that shape underwriting and placement strategies. Marsh McLennan, Aon, and WTW (Willis Towers Watson) are the leading global brokers that place large aviation and aerospace programs and negotiate long-term agreements with insurers, leveraging extensive market relationships and analytics to secure multi-layered capacity for airlines, manufacturers, and space operators. Among primary insurers and underwriters, American International Group (AIG), Chubb, and Berkshire Hathaway are frequently cited as top providers of hull, liability, and war/terrorism cover for commercial and general aviation customers; AIG and Chubb are notable for large market shares in U.S. aircraft insurance and deep Lloyd’s and multinational operations while Berkshire Hathaway offers both primary and reinsurance capacity with strong balance-sheet support. Munich Re and Swiss Re (and their operating units such as ERGO/Swiss Re’s aviation teams) are the dominant reinsurers in aerospace, providing treaty and facultative reinsurance capacity, advanced catastrophe modeling, and specialist engineering expertise that support complex airline and manufacturer programs and the growing needs of space insurance.
Global Aerospace, Tokio Marine (including HCC/Avemco units), and Great American (American Financial Group) are important specialist underwriters and carriers focused on tailored aviation products for everything from piston GA hull and liability to commercial airline and MRO exposures; Global Aerospace emphasizes bespoke placements backed by multiple secure insurer partners and a large portfolio of GA and airline clients, while Tokio Marine’s aviation units bring Lloyd’s-syndicate access and wide product breadth across cargo, hull, and specialty war-risk cover. Insurer-led specialist groups such as IAT Re and other specialty reinsurers supply excess and layered capacity that is critical when fronting carriers and brokers seek to assemble high-limit placements for airlines, manufacturers, and space ventures. Large brokerage houses—Arthur J. Gallagher, Lockton, Howden and Alliant—also function as major market-makers for aerospace insurance by structuring complex programs, advising on risk engineering, and placing coverage across global insurer and reinsurer panels.
Market dynamics in recent years — including several high-profile airline losses, evolving manufacturing and MRO exposures, and greater emphasis on risk quality — have pushed capacity providers to be more selective while maintaining broadly healthy capital availability, prompting shifts in pricing, longer-term agreements, and more granular underwriting for aerospace lines. The interplay between powerful global brokers that aggregate demand and specialty carriers and reinsurers that supply capacity means successful aerospace placements increasingly rely on multi-layered structures, sophisticated exposure modeling, and proactive risk-management services; clients with strong safety records and transparent claims histories typically obtain more favorable terms and access to long-term capacity commitments.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.