2026 Global: 3D Ultrasound Device Market -Competitive Review (2032) report
Description
The 2026 Global: 3D Ultrasound Device Market -Competitive Review (2031) report features the global market size and projected growth/decline data for the period 2021 through 2032. The report primarily provides an examination of the business strategies for the ten largest global companies in the market and how their strategies differ.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for 3d ultrasound device market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the 3d ultrasound device market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
GE HealthCare, Philips, and Samsung Medison lead the 3D ultrasound device market with broad portfolios spanning high-end console systems, portable units, and specialized women’s‑health platforms; GE’s Voluson series is widely recognized for volumetric fetal imaging and advanced rendering, supported by substantial R&D investment and clinical partnerships. Philips’ EPIQ/EPIQ Elite platforms focus on image clarity, workflow automation and AI‑assisted presets that speed exams and improve placental and fetal visualization. Samsung Medison emphasizes HD/4D rendering technologies (RealisticVue/CrystalVue) and AI-driven tools for anomaly detection and report automation, capturing notable share in obstetrics and elective 3D/4D studios. Canon Medical and Siemens (Acuson) compete strongly in clinical markets with systems that integrate wide‑field imaging, harmonic modes and AI workflow features, positioning both companies as major suppliers for hospitals and specialty centers that require robust 3D capabilities and enterprise support.
Mindray, Fujifilm (including Sonosite for point‑of‑care), and Hitachi (now part of Hitachi‑Aloka portfolios) serve diverse price and use segments by offering cost‑effective volumetric probes and compact consoles that make 3D/4D imaging accessible to outpatient clinics, mobile providers, and emerging markets; Mindray is noted for value‑oriented 3D/4D models used in startups and mobile studios, while Fujifilm’s handheld/portable lines extend 3D functionality into point‑of‑care workflows. Esaote and Konica Minolta supply specialty and regional customers with targeted 3D applications—Esaote for musculoskeletal and point‑of‑care niches and Konica Minolta for integrated imaging and IT solutions—backed by localized service and training that matter for adoption of volumetric imaging in non‑obstetric specialties. BK Medical (now part of GE in some segments) and other niche vendors contribute to the ecosystem by providing specialized transducers and intraoperative 3D probes for urology, colorectal and surgical guidance, expanding the clinical reach of volumetric ultrasound beyond fetal imaging.
Together these ten companies—GE HealthCare, Philips, Samsung Medison, Canon Medical, Siemens Healthineers, Mindray, Fujifilm/SonoSite, Hitachi, Esaote/Konica Minolta (regional leaders), and BK Medical/other niche transducer specialists—define the competitive landscape for 3D ultrasound by balancing flagship research‑driven platforms, mid‑range systems for clinics and studios, and compact/POCUS devices for bedside and mobile use. Market differentiation rests on factors such as rendering quality (HD Live/RealisticVue/TrueVue), AI and automation for plane selection and reporting, probe ergonomics and volumetric transducer performance, service and upgrade pathways, and pricing tiers that determine adoption across hospitals, maternal‑fetal centers, elective 3D/4D studios, and point‑of‑care settings.
Perry/Hope Partners' reports provide the most accurate industry forecasts based on our proprietary economic models. Our forecasts project the product market size nationally and by regions for 2021 to 2032 using regression analysis in our modeling. and Perry/Hope is the only market research publisher that utilizes both longitudinal (historical) and vertical (from market section to market division to market class) analysis, since we study every manufactured product in the countries we analyze. The report also provides written analysis on the market definition, market segments, and SWOT analysis (market strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats).
The market study aims at estimating the market size and the growth potential of this market. Topics analyzed within the report include a detailed breakdown of the global markets for 3d ultrasound device market by geography and historical trend. The scope of the report extends to sizing of the 3d ultrasound device market market and global market trends with market data for 2024 as the base year, 2025 and 2026 as the estimate years with projection of CAGR from 2027 to 2032.
The report also features a list of the top ten largest global players in the market. A review of each company includes 1) an estimate of the market share, 2) a listing of the products and/or services in the market, and 3) the features of these products and/or services in the market. The report has a chapter on Comparative Business Strategies for the largest four players. An example of the Comparative Business Strategies analysis would be -- How does Netflix's business strategy to expand its market share in the global online streaming compare to Amazon Prime's business strategy through its video products and services?
The ten market players in this report and a brief synopsis of their participation in the market are:
GE HealthCare, Philips, and Samsung Medison lead the 3D ultrasound device market with broad portfolios spanning high-end console systems, portable units, and specialized women’s‑health platforms; GE’s Voluson series is widely recognized for volumetric fetal imaging and advanced rendering, supported by substantial R&D investment and clinical partnerships. Philips’ EPIQ/EPIQ Elite platforms focus on image clarity, workflow automation and AI‑assisted presets that speed exams and improve placental and fetal visualization. Samsung Medison emphasizes HD/4D rendering technologies (RealisticVue/CrystalVue) and AI-driven tools for anomaly detection and report automation, capturing notable share in obstetrics and elective 3D/4D studios. Canon Medical and Siemens (Acuson) compete strongly in clinical markets with systems that integrate wide‑field imaging, harmonic modes and AI workflow features, positioning both companies as major suppliers for hospitals and specialty centers that require robust 3D capabilities and enterprise support.
Mindray, Fujifilm (including Sonosite for point‑of‑care), and Hitachi (now part of Hitachi‑Aloka portfolios) serve diverse price and use segments by offering cost‑effective volumetric probes and compact consoles that make 3D/4D imaging accessible to outpatient clinics, mobile providers, and emerging markets; Mindray is noted for value‑oriented 3D/4D models used in startups and mobile studios, while Fujifilm’s handheld/portable lines extend 3D functionality into point‑of‑care workflows. Esaote and Konica Minolta supply specialty and regional customers with targeted 3D applications—Esaote for musculoskeletal and point‑of‑care niches and Konica Minolta for integrated imaging and IT solutions—backed by localized service and training that matter for adoption of volumetric imaging in non‑obstetric specialties. BK Medical (now part of GE in some segments) and other niche vendors contribute to the ecosystem by providing specialized transducers and intraoperative 3D probes for urology, colorectal and surgical guidance, expanding the clinical reach of volumetric ultrasound beyond fetal imaging.
Together these ten companies—GE HealthCare, Philips, Samsung Medison, Canon Medical, Siemens Healthineers, Mindray, Fujifilm/SonoSite, Hitachi, Esaote/Konica Minolta (regional leaders), and BK Medical/other niche transducer specialists—define the competitive landscape for 3D ultrasound by balancing flagship research‑driven platforms, mid‑range systems for clinics and studios, and compact/POCUS devices for bedside and mobile use. Market differentiation rests on factors such as rendering quality (HD Live/RealisticVue/TrueVue), AI and automation for plane selection and reporting, probe ergonomics and volumetric transducer performance, service and upgrade pathways, and pricing tiers that determine adoption across hospitals, maternal‑fetal centers, elective 3D/4D studios, and point‑of‑care settings.
Table of Contents
32 Pages
- 1.0 Scope of Report and Methodology
- 2.0 Market SWOT Analysis and Players
- 2.1 Market Definition
- 2.2 Market Segments
- 2.3 Market Strengths
- 2.4 Market Weaknesses
- 2.5 Market Threats
- 2.6 Market Opportunities
- 2.7 Major Players
- 3.0 Competitive Analysis
- 3.1 Market Player 1
- 3.2 Market Player 2
- 3.3 Market Player 3
- 3.4 Market Player 4
- 3.5 Market Player 5
- 3.6 Market Player 6
- 3.7 Market Player 7
- 3.8 Market Player 8
- 3.9 Market Player 9
- 3.10 Market Player 10
- 4.0 Comparative Business Strategies
- 4.1 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 2
- 4.2 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 3
- 4.3 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 1 and 4
- 4.4 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 3
- 4.5 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 2 and 4
- 4.6 Comparative Business Strategies of Player 3 and 4
- 5.0 Appendix
Search Inside Report
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.