Report cover image

Saudi Arabia Wound Care Management Devices - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2025 - 2030)

Published Jun 23, 2025
Length 70 Pages
SKU # MOI20474395

Description

Saudi Arabia Wound Care Management Devices Market Analysis

The Saudi Arabia wound care management devices market is valued at USD 230.51 million in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 290.49 million by 2030, advancing at a 4.73% CAGR. Sustained funding under Vision 2030, demographic aging, and high diabetes prevalence are moving the market from basic dressings to sophisticated negative-pressure and smart monitoring systems . Hospitals remain the principal buyers, yet home-health and retail channels are enlarging as insurance coverage broadens and telehealth platforms mature. Domestic manufacturing incentives under the “Made in Saudi” program are shortening supply chains and tempering import costs. Competitive intensity is rising because multinational device makers are pairing with Saudi distributors to meet localization quotas while defending technology leadership.

Saudi Arabia Wound Care Management Devices Market Trends and Insights

Rising Prevalence of Diabetes & Diabetic-Foot Ulcers

Diabetes affects 17.7% of Saudi adults and drives a steady inflow of chronic wound cases that require advanced care. Diabetic foot ulcers alone cost SAR 6,684.9 (USD 1,782.6) per patient each year at tertiary hospitals, a figure that motivates payers to adopt preventive dressings and NPWT. Only 35% of patients possess adequate foot-care knowledge, so education campaigns are expanding device uptake . Urban demand clusters in Riyadh and Jeddah steer distributors toward city-center wound clinics, while new smart dressings achieving 99.75% closure by day 14 signal rapid technology migration into standard protocols .

Surge in Surgical Procedures Under Vision 2030 Hospitals Program

Government plans call for 26,000–43,000 new beds by 2030, and rising operating-room volumes are elevating demand for closure products that shorten healing times. Annual health spending reached SAR 214 billion (USD 57.04 billion) in 2023, and procurement teams now rate infection-control metrics when awarding contracts. Negative-pressure therapy cuts surgical site infections by 77% compared with standard dressings, so adoption accelerates in flagship hospitals. AI-assisted planning at King Faisal Specialist Hospital reinforces the shift toward sensor-enabled dressings that integrate with digital records.

High Cost of Advanced Dressings & Devices

Premium systems carry steep upfront prices, and rural hospitals restrict purchases to essential stock. Vision 2030 insurance reforms promise wider coverage, yet immediate budgets remain tight. Clinical studies prove NPWT lowers total costs by EUR 4,155.98 per closed wound, but procurement still focuses on sticker price. Engineers have produced low-cost NPWT using wall suction at USD 4 per change, signaling a value tier for budget-constrained sites.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  1. Growing Geriatric Population with Chronic Wounds
  2. Government Capex on Local Medical-Device Manufacturing
  3. Reimbursement Gaps for Outpatient NPWT and Dressings

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Wound Care products held 64.54% of the Saudi Arabia wound care management devices market in 2024, underscoring their position as the default solution set for both chronic and acute wounds. Volume growth is tied to the high diabetes load and nationwide directives that prioritize pressure-ulcer prevention in long-stay wards. Advanced hydrofiber, silver-impregnated, and bioelectric dressings are expanding fastest because clinical teams link them to shorter bed stays and infection avoidance. Mandatory NPWT adoption in MOH hospitals further amplifies consumable demand, while real-time telemetry modules that upload exudate data are being trialed in tertiary centers.

The Wound Closure category, though smaller, is tracking a 5.51% CAGR as surgical throughput rises under Vision 2030. Surgeons favor traditional sutures for cost reasons, yet tissue adhesives and bio-resorbable staples are gaining credibility in teaching hospitals that publish outcome data. Suppliers co-locate field trainers to improve technique adoption and to counter conservative practice norms. Topical antimicrobials reinforce both categories because infection control remains a central KPI in public procurement scoring.

Chronic Wounds commanded 61.21% share of the Saudi Arabia wound care management devices market size in 2024, reflecting diabetic foot ulcers, venous ulcers, and pressure injuries concentrated in urban settings. Extended healing cycles prompt payers to reimburse advanced dressings that reduce readmissions, and specialty foot clinics in Riyadh now serve as referral hubs for complex cases. Machine-learning triage tools classify ulcer severity and recommend product bundles, which streamlines inventory planning.

Acute Wounds are expanding at a 5.65% CAGR through 2030, propelled by trauma center upgrades and elective surgery growth. The Saudi Arabia wound care management devices market size for surgical wounds is rising in line with bed additions, and burn units in Jeddah have adopted enzymatic debridement kits that shorten OR time. Military hospitals also act as early adopters of bio-resorbable closure technology for combat injuries, providing proof points that diffuse to civilian facilities.

The Saudi Arabia Wound Care Management Devices Market is Segmented by Product (Wound Care [Dressings, Wound-Care Devices, and More] and Wound Closure [Sutures, Surgical Staplers, and More]), Wound Type (Chronic Wounds and Acute Wounds), End User (Hospitals & Specialty Wound Clinics and More), and Mode of Purchase (Institutional Procurement and Retail / OTC Channel). The Market and Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  1. Solventum
  2. Smiths Group
  3. Molnlycke Health Care
  4. Convatec Plc
  5. Johnson & Johnson
  6. B. Braun
  7. Coloplast
  8. Medtronic
  9. Cardinal Health
  10. Urgo Medical
  11. Hartmann Group
  12. Lohmann & Rauscher
  13. Medline Industries
  14. Advanced Medical Solutions Group
  15. Organogenesis Holdings
  16. Integra LifeSciences (Derma Sciences)
  17. Hollister
  18. Essity (BSN medical)
  19. Baxter

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support
Please note: The report will take approximately 2 business days to prepare and deliver.

Table of Contents

70 Pages
1 Introduction
1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 Research Methodology
3 Executive Summary
4 Market Landscape
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Rising prevalence of diabetes & diabetic-foot ulcers
4.2.2 Surge in surgical procedures under Vision 2030 hospitals program
4.2.3 Growing geriatric population with chronic wounds
4.2.4 Government capex on local medical-device manufacturing
4.2.5 Mandatory NPWT adoption in new MOH wound-care protocols
4.2.6 Expansion of home-health & tele-wound monitoring services
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High cost of advanced dressings & devices
4.3.2 Reimbursement gaps for outpatient NPWT and dressings
4.3.3 Cold-chain limits for bioactive dressings in rural areas
4.3.4 Low adoption of bio-resorbable closure devices
4.4 Regulatory Landscape
4.5 Technological Outlook
4.6 Porters Five Forces Analysis
4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
5 Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value)
5.1 By Product
5.1.1 Wound Care
5.1.1.1 Dressings
5.1.1.1.1 Traditional Gauze & Tape Dressings
5.1.1.1.2 Advanced Dressings
5.1.1.2 Wound-Care Devices
5.1.1.2.1 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)
5.1.1.2.2 Oxygen & Hyperbaric Systems
5.1.1.2.3 Electrical Stimulation Devices
5.1.1.2.4 Other Wound Care Devices
5.1.1.3 Topical Agents
5.1.1.4 Other Wound Care Products
5.1.2 Wound Closure
5.1.2.1 Sutures
5.1.2.2 Surgical Staplers
5.1.2.3 Tissue Adhesives, Strips, Sealants & Glues
5.2 By Wound Type
5.2.1 Chronic Wounds
5.2.1.1 Diabetic Foot Ulcer
5.2.1.2 Pressure Ulcer
5.2.1.3 Venous Leg Ulcer
5.2.1.4 Other Chronic Wounds
5.2.2 Acute Wounds
5.2.2.1 Surgical/Traumatic Wounds
5.2.2.2 Burns
5.2.2.3 Other Acute Wounds
5.3 By End User
5.3.1 Hospitals & Specialty Wound Clinics
5.3.2 Long-term Care Facilities
5.3.3 Home-Healthcare Settings
5.4 By Mode of Purchase
5.4.1 Institutional Procurement
5.4.2 Retail / OTC Channel
6 Competitive Landscape
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Market Share Analysis
6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
6.3.1 Solventum
6.3.2 Smith & Nephew
6.3.3 Molnlycke Health Care
6.3.4 Convatec Plc
6.3.5 Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon)
6.3.6 B. Braun SE
6.3.7 Coloplast A/S
6.3.8 Medtronic Plc
6.3.9 Cardinal Health
6.3.10 Urgo Medical
6.3.11 Hartmann Group
6.3.12 Lohmann & Rauscher
6.3.13 Medline Industries
6.3.14 Advanced Medical Solutions Group
6.3.15 Organogenesis Holdings
6.3.16 Integra LifeSciences (Derma Sciences)
6.3.17 Hollister Incorporated
6.3.18 Essity (BSN medical)
6.3.19 Baxter International
7 Market Opportunities & Future Outlook
7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment
How Do Licenses Work?
Request A Sample
Head shot

Questions or Comments?

Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.