Report cover image

Endoscopic Stricture Management - Market Share Analysis, Industry Trends & Statistics, Growth Forecasts (2025 - 2030)

Published Jul 04, 2025
Length 120 Pages
SKU # MOI20478771

Description

Endoscopic Stricture Management Market Analysis

The Endoscopic stricture management market size stands at USD 0.92 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 1.21 billion by 2030, translating into a 5.63% CAGR. Expanding outpatient capacity, rapid device innovation, and payer support for minimally invasive treatments are steering hospitals and physicians away from open surgery toward endoscopic solutions. Balloon dilators, drug-coated platforms, biodegradable stents, and lumen-apposing metal stents shorten recovery times and lower complication risks, which aligns with payer incentives to cut inpatient costs. A steady rise in gastrointestinal strictures among older adults keeps procedure volumes growing, while ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) capture a rising share of cases once restricted to inpatient wards. Competitive intensity is building as major suppliers broaden portfolios, vertical integration gains momentum, and emerging companies secure investment for next-generation technologies .

Global Endoscopic Stricture Management Market Trends and Insights

Growing Geriatric Population & Rising GI-Stricture Burden

Esophageal stricture prevalence reached 203.1 cases per 100,000 among commercially insured adults and 1,123.5 cases per 100,000 in Medicare beneficiaries, driving USD 1.39 billion in annual costs . Older patients often present with reflux-induced strictures or anastomotic scarring that require repeated dilations or stenting. Untreated strictures lead to malnutrition and aspiration, creating additional system costs. As longevity rises across developed economies, healthcare planners anticipate heavier reliance on endoscopic treatment pathways that cost less than surgical reconstruction yet deliver durable results.

Preference for Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Dilation

Endoscopic balloon dilation achieves 67.1% success in urethral strictures and improves maximum urinary flow, while drug-coated balloons show 77.8% freedom from re-intervention at two years versus 23.6% for standard therapy. Patient demand for fast recovery and lower pain dovetails with payer pressure to limit inpatient stays . Hospitals and ASCs invest in advanced scopes and dilation platforms, and younger gastroenterologists—trained heavily in therapeutic endoscopy—are driving faster adoption in daily practice.

High Device & Procedure Costs

Premium-priced LAMS and drug-coated balloons exceed capital budgets in many emerging economies, and payers often hesitate to grant quick coverage when long-term savings remain unproven. Hospitals juggle needs across cardiology, oncology, and surgery, often delaying purchases of advanced endoscopy systems. Utilization management controls can restrict access, slowing the Endoscopic stricture management market in cost-sensitive regions.

Other drivers and restraints analyzed in the detailed report include:

  1. Continuous Product Innovation: Multi-Stage Balloons & Biodegradable Stents
  2. Expanding Reimbursement for Outpatient Stricture Procedures
  3. Shortage of Trained Interventional Endoscopists

For complete list of drivers and restraints, kindly check the Table Of Contents.

Segment Analysis

Stents controlled 45.41% of the Endoscopic stricture management market in 2024 owing to their established role in maintaining luminal patency when strictures are complex or malignant. Balloon dilators lead growth at a 6.45% CAGR thanks to drug-coated surfaces and controllable inflation profiles. The Endoscopic stricture management market size for stents is projected to expand steadily, yet balloons increasingly capture repeat procedures as physicians value their lower perforation risk. Boston Scientific’s CRE balloon platform improves fluoroscopic visibility, while Merit Medical’s Wrapsody stent extends use into dialysis access, signaling cross-specialty opportunity. Bougie dilators continue to decline as single-use economics and controlled dilation favor balloons. Drug-coated balloons incorporating paclitaxel showed 77.8% freedom from repeat procedure in the ROBUST III trial, encouraging physicians to adopt them in recurrent benign strictures. Biodegradable stents eliminate removal procedures, and LAMS address migration with wider flanges.

The emerging “others” category—incision devices, anti-scarring injectables, and AI-guided dilation platforms—remains a small slice but attracts venture interest. Suppliers design devices that fit both hospital and ASC workflows, focusing on reusability and lower per-case cost to widen adoption across income settings. As patent cliffs approach for early-generation metal stents, companies differentiate through coatings, delivery ergonomics, and evidence bundles that document real-world savings.

Esophageal cases held 51.45% share in 2024, reflecting reflux prevalence and post-surgical anastomotic scarring. The Endoscopic stricture management market share for esophageal disease stays high because benign strictures often require multiple dilations over a lifetime. Duodenal procedures, however, grow at a 6.44% CAGR through 2030 as improved imaging and device-assisted enteroscopy increase detection of small-bowel lesions. Olympus earned FDA clearance for its EZ1500 series scopes with extended depth-of-field optics, improving duodenal lesion visibility. Biliary strictures remain steady, treated mainly with stent placement.

Cross-specialty uptake in urology, hepatology, and colorectal surgery supports the “others” bucket, where urethral and pancreatic applications adopt balloon and stent know-how from gastroenterology. Location drives therapy choice: benign esophageal strictures prefer balloons first, while malignant obstructions move directly to metal stents. In Asia-Pacific, higher prevalence of biliary and duodenal strictures nudges R&D toward devices sized for narrower lumens common in that population set.

The Endoscopic Stricture Management Market Report is Segmented by Product Type (Balloon Dilators, Bougie Dilators, Stents, Others), Stricture Location (Esophageal, Biliary, Duodenal, Others), End-User (Hospitals, Ambulatory Surgical Centers, Others), Procedure Setting (Inpatient, Outpatient), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Geography Analysis

North America captured 41.34% of Endoscopic stricture management market revenue in 2024 and remains the technology bellwether. Medicare site-neutral rules and broad private payor alignment nurture outpatient migration, while strong fellowship pipelines ensure a deep bench of interventional endoscopists. Device makers often launch first in the United States to leverage early adopter clinics that generate pivotal data.

Asia-Pacific is forecast to lead growth with a 6.66% CAGR through 2030. China’s annual endoscopic ultrasound procedures rose from 207,166 in 2012 to 464,182 in 2019, revealing swift uptake of advanced tools even as per-capita usage trails developed nations. India rolled out AI-driven detection software that lifted adenoma detection rates in pilot sites, showing technology leapfrogging potential. Japan remains the region’s procedure volume leader, aided by universal coverage and public awareness campaigns that catch strictures earlier. Australia and South Korea invest in high-definition systems and medical tourism, luring regional patients.

Europe holds a mature yet slower-growing position. Rigorous training standards—250 supervised EUS cases for credentialing—uphold quality, but budget caps temper switching to premium DCBs and LAMS. Germany and the United Kingdom maintain strong hospital-based volumes, while Nordic countries push outpatient growth via bundled payments.

South America and the Middle East & Africa are emerging opportunity zones. Brazil’s unified procurement for public hospitals helps negotiate pricing, boosting stent access. South Africa leads sub-Saharan adoption through private-public hospital clusters, yet rural gaps remain. Tele-mentoring and modular endoscopy suites aim to solve workforce shortages in these regions.

List of Companies Covered in this Report:

  1. Boston Scientific
  2. Olympus
  3. Beckton Dickinson
  4. Cook Group
  5. Conmed
  6. STERIS
  7. Medi-Globe
  8. Hobbs Medical
  9. PanMed
  10. Merit Medical Systems
  11. Micro-tech
  12. Laborie
  13. Medtronic
  14. Karl Storz
  15. Taewoong Medical
  16. Endo-Flex
  17. PENTAX Medical (HOYA)
  18. ELLA-CS s.r.o.
  19. M.I. Tech Co., Ltd.
  20. Stryker
  21. Changzhou Health MicroPort Medical Device Co., Ltd.

Additional Benefits:

  • The market estimate (ME) sheet in Excel format
  • 3 months of analyst support
Please note: The report will take approximately 2 business days to prepare and deliver.

Table of Contents

120 Pages
1 Introduction
1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study
2 Research Methodology
3 Executive Summary
4 Market Landscape
4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
4.2.1 Growing Geriatric Population & Rising GI?Stricture Burden
4.2.2 Preference For Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Dilation
4.2.3 Continuous Product Innovation: Multi-Stage Balloons & Biodegradable Stents
4.2.4 Expanding Reimbursement for Outpatient Stricture Procedures
4.2.5 Early Clinical Success of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents
4.2.6 Emergence Of Patient-Managed Self-Dilation Protocols
4.3 Market Restraints
4.3.1 High Device & Procedure Costs
4.3.2 Shortage Of Trained Interventional Endoscopists
4.3.3 Safety Concerns Over Off-Label LAMS Use in Benign Strictures
4.3.4 Limited Long-Term Data for Drug-Coated Balloon Approvals
4.4 Regulatory Landscape
4.5 Technological Outlook
4.6 Porters Five Forces Analysis
4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
5 Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)
5.1 By Product Type
5.1.1 Balloon Dilators
5.1.2 Bougie Dilators
5.1.3 Stents
5.1.4 Others
5.2 By Stricture Location
5.2.1 Esophageal
5.2.2 Biliary
5.2.3 Duodenal
5.2.4 Others
5.3 By End-user
5.3.1 Hospitals
5.3.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
5.3.3 Others
5.4 By Procedure Setting
5.4.1 Inpatient
5.4.2 Outpatient
5.5 By Geography
5.5.1 North America
5.5.1.1 United States
5.5.1.2 Canada
5.5.1.3 Mexico
5.5.2 Europe
5.5.2.1 Germany
5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
5.5.2.3 France
5.5.2.4 Italy
5.5.2.5 Spain
5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
5.5.3.1 China
5.5.3.2 Japan
5.5.3.3 India
5.5.3.4 Australia
5.5.3.5 South Korea
5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
5.5.4 Middle East and Africa
5.5.4.1 GCC
5.5.4.2 South Africa
5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
5.5.5 South America
5.5.5.1 Brazil
5.5.5.2 Argentina
5.5.5.3 Rest of South America
6 Competitive Landscape
6.1 Market Concentration
6.2 Market Share Analysis
6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
6.3.1 Boston Scientific Corporation
6.3.2 Olympus Corporation
6.3.3 Becton, Dickinson and Company
6.3.4 Cook Medical LLC
6.3.5 CONMED Corporation
6.3.6 STERIS
6.3.7 Medi-Globe Corporation
6.3.8 Hobbs Medical Inc.
6.3.9 PanMed US
6.3.10 Merit Medical Systems
6.3.11 Micro-Tech Endoscopy
6.3.12 Laborie
6.3.13 Medtronic plc
6.3.14 Karl Storz SE & Co. KG
6.3.15 Taewoong Medical Co., Ltd.
6.3.16 Endo-Flex GmbH
6.3.17 PENTAX Medical (HOYA)
6.3.18 ELLA-CS s.r.o.
6.3.19 M.I. Tech Co., Ltd.
6.3.20 Stryker Corporation
6.3.21 Changzhou Health MicroPort Medical Device Co., Ltd.
7 Market Opportunities & Future Outlook
7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment
How Do Licenses Work?
Request A Sample
Head shot

Questions or Comments?

Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.