Anesthesia Laryngeal Masks

Global Anesthesia Laryngeal Masks Market to Reach US$353.9 Million by 2030

The global market for Anesthesia Laryngeal Masks estimated at US$251.7 Million in the year 2024, is expected to reach US$353.9 Million by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 5.8% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Single-Use Laryngeal Masks, one of the segments analyzed in the report, is expected to record a 4.8% CAGR and reach US$230.5 Million by the end of the analysis period. Growth in the Reusable Laryngeal Masks segment is estimated at 8.1% CAGR over the analysis period.

The U.S. Market is Estimated at US$68.6 Million While China is Forecast to Grow at 9.0% CAGR

The Anesthesia Laryngeal Masks market in the U.S. is estimated at US$68.6 Million in the year 2024. China, the world`s second largest economy, is forecast to reach a projected market size of US$71.1 Million by the year 2030 trailing a CAGR of 9.0% over the analysis period 2024-2030. Among the other noteworthy geographic markets are Japan and Canada, each forecast to grow at a CAGR of 2.9% and 5.7% respectively over the analysis period. Within Europe, Germany is forecast to grow at approximately 3.8% CAGR.

Global Anesthesia Laryngeal Masks Market – Key Trends & Drivers Summarized

Why Are Laryngeal Masks Gaining Preference in Modern Anesthetic Practice?

Laryngeal masks are increasingly becoming the airway management device of choice in numerous surgical and emergency care settings, largely due to their safety profile, ease of use, and versatility. These supraglottic airway devices have carved out a significant space between traditional face masks and more invasive endotracheal intubation, offering clinicians an efficient alternative that requires less technical skill and causes less patient discomfort. One of the primary reasons for their growing adoption is the ability to maintain an open airway without the need for laryngoscopy, which reduces the risk of trauma to the vocal cords, throat, and oral cavity. This benefit is particularly important in outpatient or short-duration surgical procedures where quick recovery and minimal postoperative complications are priorities. Furthermore, the device’s relatively non-invasive nature makes it suitable for use in patients where intubation is either difficult or contraindicated, such as those with cervical spine injuries or anatomical anomalies.

The adoption of laryngeal masks is also increasing in pediatric and geriatric populations, where fragile airway structures and higher anesthetic risks necessitate a more gentle approach. The device’s design allows for spontaneous or controlled ventilation, making it ideal for a range of surgical specialties, including urology, gynecology, and ophthalmology. Additionally, advancements in mask technology have led to the development of variants with improved sealing capabilities and integrated gastric drainage channels, reducing the risk of aspiration during anesthesia. This has extended their application to procedures that were previously considered high-risk for supraglottic airway use. Training programs and anesthesia guidelines now frequently include laryngeal mask insertion as a core skill, reflecting its prominence in clinical practice. Overall, the shift toward minimally invasive and patient-friendly anesthesia protocols is making laryngeal masks an essential tool in the modern anesthesiologist’s arsenal.

How Are Technological Innovations Enhancing Laryngeal Mask Design and Functionality?

The evolution of laryngeal masks has been significantly shaped by continuous technological innovation, aimed at improving patient outcomes, procedural efficiency, and safety. Early-generation devices were designed for basic airway management during elective procedures, but modern iterations offer far more advanced features. High-performance materials such as medical-grade silicone and thermoplastic elastomers are now commonly used, offering superior biocompatibility, flexibility, and durability. These materials also conform better to patient anatomy, creating more effective seals while reducing mucosal injury. Some laryngeal masks are now equipped with reinforced airways or built-in bite blocks to prevent occlusion during patient movement or in longer surgical procedures. This allows clinicians to maintain uninterrupted ventilation, even under challenging conditions.

Another critical innovation is the introduction of second-generation laryngeal masks that include gastric access ports. This addition enables the use of orogastric tubes for suctioning stomach contents, significantly lowering the risk of regurgitation and aspiration. These features have made laryngeal masks viable for use in emergency medicine and trauma care, expanding their role beyond elective surgical settings. Furthermore, imaging compatibility with fiberoptic scopes has enhanced their utility in difficult airway scenarios and allows for guided intubation when needed. Ergonomic enhancements, including improved cuff inflation systems and color-coded size indicators, are also simplifying clinical use and reducing the margin for error. Some newer models are even designed for single-use, thereby minimizing infection risks and improving sterility control in operating rooms. Collectively, these design advancements are pushing the boundaries of what laryngeal masks can achieve, making them indispensable in both routine and complex airway management scenarios.

Which Clinical and Operational Factors Are Driving Increased Utilization of Laryngeal Masks?

The growing use of anesthesia laryngeal masks is not solely due to technological superiority but is also closely tied to broader trends in clinical practice and healthcare delivery. One such trend is the global rise in outpatient surgeries, fueled by both cost-saving initiatives and patient preference for shorter hospital stays. Laryngeal masks are particularly well suited to ambulatory procedures, where speed, simplicity, and patient recovery are critical. Their use minimizes the need for muscle relaxants and deep anesthesia, allowing for quicker postoperative awakening and reduced incidence of sore throat or hoarseness. From a procedural standpoint, they are easier to insert than endotracheal tubes and often do not require the depth of sedation or muscle paralysis necessary for intubation, reducing both anesthesia time and associated drug usage.

Operational efficiency is another key driver. In high-volume surgical centers and resource-constrained environments, laryngeal masks offer a faster turnover between cases due to their ease of placement and lower complication rates. This streamlining of the perioperative process translates into cost savings, particularly in settings where time and manpower are critical resources. Additionally, healthcare providers are increasingly focused on risk reduction and improved safety protocols. Laryngeal masks offer a more controlled and predictable airway solution in patients with comorbidities such as obesity or sleep apnea, where airway management can be complicated. These benefits align well with enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols that emphasize minimal invasiveness and reduced physiological disruption. With training and familiarity increasing across the clinical spectrum—from anesthesiologists to emergency medicine physicians and paramedics—the role of laryngeal masks continues to expand, cementing their place in contemporary airway management strategies.

What Are the Main Forces Driving Growth in the Global Anesthesia Laryngeal Masks Market?

The growth in the global anesthesia laryngeal masks market is being driven by a combination of demographic, clinical, and technological forces. An aging global population is contributing to a rising number of surgeries, particularly those related to cardiovascular, orthopedic, and neurological conditions—many of which require general anesthesia. Laryngeal masks offer a safer, less traumatic airway solution for older patients who may have complex health profiles or fragile airways. At the same time, the global increase in minimally invasive surgeries, where quick and reliable airway access is critical, is driving demand for devices that balance performance with patient safety. These procedures often have shorter durations and recovery times, for which laryngeal masks are ideally suited, supporting their growing integration into surgical protocols across diverse specialties.

On the technological front, product innovation is expanding market potential by meeting the needs of both high- and low-resource settings. Reusable and disposable variants cater to different institutional requirements, while environmentally conscious healthcare systems are prompting manufacturers to develop sustainable, recyclable models. Regulatory support, including device approvals and the inclusion of laryngeal masks in clinical practice guidelines, has bolstered physician confidence and accelerated market penetration. Educational efforts by manufacturers, combined with training programs led by professional anesthesia societies, are improving device adoption in emerging markets. Furthermore, rising investment in hospital infrastructure and perioperative care in Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and parts of Africa is creating new opportunities for market expansion. The convergence of these factors—clinical suitability, economic practicality, and technological evolution—is fueling steady growth in the anesthesia laryngeal masks market, making it a dynamic segment within the global medical devices industry.

SCOPE OF STUDY:

The report analyzes the Anesthesia Laryngeal Masks market in terms of units by the following Segments, and Geographic Regions/Countries:

Segments:
Product (Single-Use Laryngeal Masks, Reusable Laryngeal Masks); End-Use (Hospitals End-Use, Clinics End-Use, Ambulatory Surgery Centers End-Use)

Geographic Regions/Countries:
World; United States; Canada; Japan; China; Europe (France; Germany; Italy; United Kingdom; Spain; Russia; and Rest of Europe); Asia-Pacific (Australia; India; South Korea; and Rest of Asia-Pacific); Latin America (Argentina; Brazil; Mexico; and Rest of Latin America); Middle East (Iran; Israel; Saudi Arabia; United Arab Emirates; and Rest of Middle East); and Africa.

Select Competitors (Total 36 Featured) -

• Ambu A/S
• Armstrong Medical Ltd
• Besmed Health Business Corp.
• Cardinal Health Inc.
• Dynarex Corporation
• Flexicare Medical Ltd.
• GaleMed Corporation
• Hitec Medical Co., Ltd.
• HSINER Co., Ltd.
• Intersurgical Ltd.
• KindWell Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.
• Legend Medical Devices, Inc.
• Medline Industries, LP
• Medtronic plc
• Narang Medical Ltd.
• Sharn Anesthesia, Inc.
• Smiths Medical
• Sterimed Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd.
• Teleflex Incorporated
• VBM Medizintechnik GmbH

AI INTEGRATIONS
We`re transforming market and competitive intelligence with validated expert content and AI tools.

Instead of following the general norm of querying LLMs and Industry-specific SLMs, we built repositories of content curated from domain experts worldwide including video transcripts, blogs, search engines research, and massive amounts of enterprise, product/service, and market data.

TARIFF IMPACT FACTOR
Our new release incorporates impact of tariffs on geographical markets as we predict a shift in competitiveness of companies based on HQ country, manufacturing base, exports and imports (finished goods and OEM). This intricate and multifaceted market reality will impact competitors by increasing the Cost of Goods Sold (COGS), reducing profitability, reconfiguring supply chains, amongst other micro and macro market dynamics.

Please note: Reports are sold as single-site single-user licenses. Electronic versions require 24-48 hours as each copy is customized to the client with digital controls and custom watermarks. The Publisher uses digital controls protecting against copying and printing is restricted to one full copy to be used at the same location.

The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view the report. Upon ordering an electronic version, the Publisher will provide a link to download the purchased report.

Prior to fulfillment of an order, the client will be required to sign a document detailing the purchase terms for a publication from this publisher.