
Shock Wave Therapy Device Patent Landscape Report and Forecast 2024-2032
Description
Shock Wave Therapy Device Patent Landscape Report and Forecast 2024-2032
Oncolytic Virus Cancer Therapy Drug Pipeline Analysis 2024
The drug pipeline is significantly driven by the increasing interest in oncolytic virus cancer therapy, with innovative developments making it a major focus in oncology. The therapy involves using genetically modified viruses to selectively infect and kill cancer cells while sparing normal tissues. This approach is gaining traction due to its potential to enhance immune responses and improve treatment outcomes.
Key Takeaways
- Major companies involved in the oncolytic virus cancer therapy drug pipeline market include Oncostar LLC, Lokon Pharma AB, Binhui Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou Converd Co., Ltd., Syneos Health, Inc., Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., and Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc.
- The current drug pipeline for oncolytic virus cancer therapy includes promising candidates such as talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), pelareorep, CAVATAK, and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), among others. These therapies are at various stages of development and offer new hopes for innovative cancer treatment options.
- Regulatory agencies are providing support through expedited pathways for drug approvals and designations, encouraging rapid development and market availability of new therapies.
The oncolytic virus cancer therapy drug pipeline analysis provides an overview of recent advancements and ongoing clinical trials. The report highlights progress in targeted therapies and immunotherapies, aiming for improved survival rates and quality of life. It covers innovative approaches such as checkpoint inhibitors that enhance immune response and antibody-drug conjugates that deliver cytotoxic agents directly to cancer cells. The competitive landscape examines collaborations and strategic partnerships that accelerate R&D. It also discusses regulatory milestones achieved by investigational drugs, highlighting their impact on future treatment paradigms, and promising more effective and personalized treatment options for oncolytic virus cancer therapy patients.
Oncolytic Virus Cancer Therapy Drug Pipeline Outlook
Oncolytic virus cancer therapy represents a novel approach to cancer treatment by using viruses that selectively infect and destroy cancer cells. These therapies are designed to target specific tumors, inducing an immune response that helps eradicate the cancer. The therapy can be categorized into different stages, such as early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic, each requiring tailored strategies. Treatment often involves combining viral therapy with other modalities like chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy.
Advances in oncolytic viruses and targeted delivery systems are enhancing cancer therapy, offering promising long-term outcomes. The market is witnessing increased investment in R&D and regulatory approvals for innovative drugs, underscoring a dynamic landscape focused on improving survival rates and patient care.
In 2024, significant advancements in Oncolytic Virus Cancer Therapy treatment were highlighted by the FDA-approved granted rare pediatric disease designation to the oncolytic adenovirus VCN-01 for the treatment of retinoblastoma, a rare pediatric eye cancer. This designation aims to promote the development of new therapies for rare diseases affecting children, highlighting the potential of VCN-01 in cancer therapy.
These approvals and ongoing developments underscore the dynamic and evolving nature of oncolytic virus cancer therapy, offering new treatment options and hope for improved patient outcomes.
Oncolytic Virus Cancer Therapy- Pipeline Drug Profiles
Recent developments in oncolytic virus cancer therapy treatment have introduced several promising drugs currently in clinical trials:
- CF33-hNIS: An oncolytic poxvirus engineered to selectively target and destroy cancer cells. It is designed to enhance anti-tumor immune responses, potentially improving treatment outcomes for various cancers.
- R130: An oncolytic virus that targets and replicates within tumor cells, leading to cell lysis. It is being evaluated for its ability to stimulate the immune system and improve therapeutic efficacy against cancer.
- LOAd703: A genetically engineered adenovirus that delivers immune-stimulating agents directly to tumors. It is designed to enhance the immune response and improve the effectiveness of cancer therapies.
- OH2: An oncolytic herpes simplex virus engineered to selectively infect and kill cancer cells. It is being studied for its potential to boost immune responses and improve clinical outcomes in cancer treatment.
This section of the report covers the analysis oncolytic virus cancer therapy drugs based on various segmentations such as:
Analysis by Route of Administration
- Oral
- Parenteral
- Others
Analysis by Phase
According to EMR analysis, Phase I clinical trials dominate the oncolytic virus cancer herapy drug pipeline. The number of oncolytic virus cancer therapy drugs currently in Phase 1 clinical trials varies as new trials are continually initiated and completed. However, as of the latest data, there are over 40 ongoing Phase 1 trials for oncolytic virus cancer therapy drugs worldwide. These trials involve a wide range of therapeutic approaches, including targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and combination treatments.
- Preclinical Phase: Laboratory and animal studies to assess safety and efficacy.
- Phase I: Small-scale human trials focusing on safety and dosage.
- Phase II: Larger trials to evaluate efficacy and side effects.
- Phase III: Large-scale trials to confirm effectiveness, monitor side effects, and compare with standard treatments.
- Phase IV: Post-marketing studies to gather more information on risks, benefits, and optimal use.
- Small Molecule
- Polymer
- Monoclonal Antibody
- Peptides
- Gene Therapy
Oncolytic Virus Cancer Therapy Drug Clinical Trials Assessment- Competitive Dynamics
Here are a few notable participants involved in oncolytic virus cancer therapy research and development:
These advancements represent significant steps forward in oncolytic virus cancer therapy treatment, potentially offering patients more effective and less burdensome options.
Oncostar LLC
Oncostar LLC, a leader in oncolytic virus development, specializes in engineered viral platforms designed to selectively target and destroy cancer cells. By harnessing advanced virotherapy techniques, Oncostar offers innovative cancer treatment solutions that focus on precision and effectiveness, aiming to revolutionize how cancer is treated through targeted viral therapies.
Lokon Pharma AB
Lokon Pharma AB, based in Sweden, is pioneering advanced oncolytic virus therapies using proprietary technologies that enhance anti-tumor immunity and therapeutic efficacy. The company is dedicated to creating cutting-edge treatments that leverage the body's immune system to fight cancer, focusing on improving outcomes and expanding therapeutic possibilities in oncology.
Binhui Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Binhui Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., located in China, is at the forefront of developing oncolytic viruses designed to stimulate robust immune responses. The company's research emphasizes enhancing cancer treatment outcomes by using viruses to both directly kill cancer cells and activate the immune system, offering new hope for effective cancer management.
Hangzhou Converd Co., Ltd.
Hangzhou Converd Co., Ltd., also based in China, is focused on developing innovative oncolytic virus therapies targeting various cancers. The company leverages viral mechanisms to induce tumor cell lysis and stimulate the immune system, aiming to deliver groundbreaking treatments that improve the efficacy of cancer care through innovative virotherapy solutions.
Other key players in the market include Syneos Health, Inc., Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Enterprise Innovation Inc.
Reasons To Purchase This Report
The Oncolytic Virus Cancer Therapy drug pipeline analysis report offers invaluable insights into the latest advancements and future trends in oncolytic virus cancer therapy treatment. It provides detailed evaluations of emerging therapies, pipeline assessment, and competitive landscape analysis, enabling informed investment decisions and strategic planning.
Key Questions Answered in the Oncolytic Virus Cancer Therapy Drug Pipeline Analysis Report
- What is the current state of the oncolytic virus cancer therapy drug pipeline?
- How many companies are currently involved in oncolytic virus cancer therapy drug development?
- What is the number of drugs in Phase III and Phase IV trials for oncolytic virus cancer therapy?
- Which organisations are at the forefront of oncolytic virus cancer therapy drug research?
- What are the effectiveness and safety profiles of the drugs in the oncolytic virus cancer therapy pipeline?
- What opportunities and challenges exist in the oncolytic virus cancer therapy clinical trial landscape?
- Which companies are leading the major clinical trials for oncolytic virus cancer therapy drugs?
- Which regions are involved in clinical trials for oncolytic virus cancer therapy?
- What are the recent clinical trial results for oncolytic virus cancer therapy drugs?
- What are the emerging trends in oncolytic virus cancer therapy clinical trials?
Table of Contents
200 Pages
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Executive Summary
- 3 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device Market Overview
- 3.1 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
- 3.2 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
- 4 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device Market Segmentation
- 4.1 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device Market (2017-2032) By Product Type
- 4.1.1 Market Overview
- 4.1.2 Mobile Shockwave Therapy Devices
- 4.1.3 Fixed Shockwave Therapy Devices
- 4.2 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device Market (2017-2032) by Technology
- 4.2.1 Market Overview
- 4.2.2 Electromagnetic Technique
- 4.2.3 Electrohydraulic Technique
- 4.2.4 Piezoelectric Technique
- 4.2.5 Radial Technique
- 4.2.6 Others
- 4.3 Others Global Shock Wave Therapy Device Market (2017-2032) by Application
- 4.3.1 Market Overview
- 4.3.2 Orthopedic
- 4.3.3 Cardiology
- 4.3.4 Others
- 4.4 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device Market (2017-2032) by End User
- 4.4.1 Market Overview
- 4.4.2 Hospitals
- 4.4.3 Physiotherapy Clinics
- 4.4.4 Ambulatory Care
- 4.4.5 Others
- 5 Global Market Dynamics
- 5.1 Market Drivers and Constraints
- 5.2 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
- 5.3 PESTEL Analysis
- 5.4 Industry Events, Initiatives, and Trends
- 5.5 Value Chain Analysis
- 6 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device Patent Landscape Analysis
- 6.1 Patent Distribution by Publication Year
- 6.2 Patent Distribution by Application Year
- 6.3 Patent Distribution by Priority Year
- 6.4 Analysis by Type of Patent
- 6.4.1 Granted Patents
- 6.4.2 Patent Application
- 6.4.3 Amended Application
- 6.4.4 Search Report
- 6.5 Analysis by Legal Status
- 6.5.1 Active
- 6.5.2 Pending
- 6.5.3 Expired/Discontinued
- 6.6 Analysis by Patent Jurisdiction
- 6.7 Analysis by Patent Age
- 6.8 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
- 6.9 Average Time to Publish a Patent
- 6.9.1 By Entities
- 6.9.2 By Jurisdiction
- 6.9.3 By Technology
- 6.10 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic and Non-Academic)
- 6.11 Analysis by Top Applicants
- 6.12 Analysis by Top Inventors
- 7 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device Patent Analysis by Technology
- 7.1 Total Patents by Top Technologies
- 7.2 Time Evolution of Patents by Technology
- 7.3 Emerging Technologies
- 7.4 Patent Segmentation, By Product Type
- 7.4.1 Time Evolution by Number of Patents
- 7.4.2 Time Evolution by Number of Patent Families
- 7.4.3 Analysis by Type of Entity (Academic vs Non-Academic)
- 7.4.4 Analysis by Top Applicants
- 7.4.5 Analysis by Top Inventors
- 7.5 Patent Segmentation, By Technology
- *Complete technology list will be provided in the report.
- 8 EMR Patent Valuation Analysis
- 8.1 Assessment Methodology
- 8.2 High Value Patents
- 8.3 Medium Value Patents
- 8.4 Low Value Patents
- 9 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device – Top 10 Players Patent Analysis
- 9.1 Top 10 Entities by Number of Patents
- 9.2 Analysis by Publication Year
- 9.3 Analysis by Application Year
- 9.4 Analysis by Priority Year
- 9.5 Analysis by Type of Patent
- 9.6 Analysis by Jurisdiction
- 9.7 Analysis by Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) Codes
- 9.8 Analysis by Source of Innovation
- 9.9 Analysis by Forward and Backward Citations
- 9.10 Analysis by Legal Status
- 9.11 Analysis by Patent Age
- 9.12 Analysis by Key Inventors
- 9.13 Entity Dynamics
- 9.13.1 Analysis by Type of Player (Academic vs Non-Academic)
- 9.13.2 Analysis by Collaboration
- 9.13.3 Analysis by Technology
- 9.13.4 Newcomers
- 9.13.4.1 Start-up Companies
- 9.13.4.2 Established Companies
- 10 Patent Profile of Key Players
- 10.1 Medtronic Inc.
- 10.1.1 Product Portfolio
- 10.1.2 Patent Portfolio by Patent Families
- 10.1.3 Time Evolution of Patents
- 10.1.4 Geographical Patent Coverage
- 10.1.5 Patent Analysis by Technology
- 10.1.6 Patent News and Developments
- 10.1.7 Financial Analysis
- 10.1.8 SWOT Analysis
- 10.2 Pacesetter Inc.
- 10.3 Cardiac Pacemakers Inc.
- 10.4 Guided Therapy Systems LLC
- 10.5 Zoll Medical Corp.
- 11 Future Trends
- 12 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device Landscape (Additional Insight) *
- 12.1 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device: Developers Landscape
- 12.1.1 Analysis by Year of Establishment
- 12.1.2 Analysis by Company Size
- 12.1.3 Analysis by Region
- 12.2 Global Shock Wave Therapy Device: Product Landscape
- 12.2.1 Analysis by Product Type
- 12.2.2 Analysis by Application
- *Additional insights are not provided in the standard report.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.