
Cervical Dystonia Market Report and Forecast 2024-2032
Description
Cervical Dystonia Market Report and Forecast 2024-2032
Cervical Dystonia Market Report and Forecast 2024-2032
The cervical dystonia market size is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.8% during the forecast period of 2024-2032. The key drivers of the market growth are the increasing awareness and diagnosis of cervical dystonia, the rising demand for botulinum toxin injections, the development of novel therapies and devices, and the growing geriatric population.
Cervical dystonia, also known as spasmodic torticollis, is a rare and chronic condition that affects the muscles of the neck, causing them to twist and tilt in abnormal postures. It can cause pain, discomfort, and difficulty in performing daily activities. The exact cause of cervical dystonia is unknown, but it may be related to genetic factors, environmental triggers, or brain abnormalities. The prevalence of cervical dystonia is estimated to be between 57 and 280 per million people worldwide, with a higher incidence in women and older age groups. The diagnosis of cervical dystonia is based on clinical examination and medical history, and the treatment options include oral medications, botulinum toxin injections, surgery, and physical therapy.
Cervical Dystonia Epidemiology
The epidemiology of cervical dystonia in the market is influenced by several factors, such as the geographic distribution, the age and gender distribution, the diagnostic criteria, and the data sources. According to a systematic review and meta-analysis by Epidemiology International, the global prevalence of cervical dystonia was 158.67 per million people, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 94.38-222.96, based on 29 studies from 16 countries. The prevalence was higher in Europe (193.77 per million) than in North America (120.77 per million) and Asia (86.43 per million). The prevalence was also higher in women (228.77 per million) than in men (88.57 per million), and in older age groups (40-59 years: 235.96 per million; 60-79 years: 392.92 per million) than in younger age groups (20-39 years: 59.82 per million; <20 years: 10.59 per million). The diagnosis of cervical dystonia was based on various criteria, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), or the clinical judgment of physicians. The data sources included population-based surveys, hospital-based registries, or insurance databases.
Cervical Dystonia Market Drivers and Constraints
- Increasing awareness and diagnosis of cervical dystonia: The awareness and recognition of cervical dystonia as a distinct neurological disorder has improved in recent years, leading to more accurate and timely diagnosis of the condition. This has resulted in increased demand for treatment and support services for patients with cervical dystonia. Moreover, the availability of diagnostic tools such as electromyography (EMG) and genetic testing has facilitated the identification and classification of cervical dystonia subtypes, which may help in tailoring the treatment to individual needs and preferences.
- Rising demand for botulinum toxin injections: Botulinum toxin injections are the mainstay of treatment for cervical dystonia, as they can reduce muscle spasms and improve the posture and quality of life of the patients. Botulinum toxin injections are available in four types: A (Botox, Dysport, Xeomin), B (Myobloc, Neurobloc), C, and D. Among them, type A is the most widely used and has the longest duration of action. The global botulinum toxin market was valued at USD 4.7 billion in 2019 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 7.5% from 2020 to 2027, driven by the increasing applications of botulinum toxin in various therapeutic and cosmetic areas, including cervical dystonia.
- Development of novel therapies and devices: Besides botulinum toxin injections, there are several other therapies and devices that are being developed or investigated for the treatment of cervical dystonia. These include oral medications such as dopamine agonists, anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, and cannabinoids; intrathecal baclofen pumps; deep brain stimulation (DBS); transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS); and ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. These therapies and devices aim to provide more effective, safe, and convenient options for patients with cervical dystonia who are refractory to or intolerant of botulinum toxin injections or oral medications.
- Growing geriatric population: The prevalence of cervical dystonia increases with age, and the condition is more common in older adults than in younger ones. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the global population aged 60 years and over was 962 million in 2017 and is expected to double to 2.1 billion by 2050. As the aging population grows, so does the potential market for cervical dystonia treatment, as more people may develop or seek treatment for the condition.
- High cost of treatment: The treatment of cervical dystonia can be expensive, especially for botulinum toxin injections and surgical procedures. The average cost of a single botulinum toxin injection for cervical dystonia in the US ranges from USD 300 to USD 600, depending on the dose and type of botulinum toxin used. The cost of DBS surgery for cervical dystonia can range from USD> 50,000 to USD 100,000, depending on the location and complexity of the procedure. These costs may pose a significant burden for patients and their families, especially in low- and middle-income countries, where access to affordable and quality health care is limited.
- Adverse effects of medications and injections: The medications and injections used for cervical dystonia can cause various side effects, such as dry mouth, nausea, drowsiness, headache, pain, swelling, bruising, infection, weakness, dysphagia, and dysphonia. In some cases, these side effects can be severe or life-threatening, such as allergic reactions, botulinum toxin spread, or hemorrhage. These side effects may affect the compliance and satisfaction of the patients and limit the use of certain medications and injections for cervical dystonia treatment.
- Lack of reimbursement policies: The reimbursement policies for cervical dystonia treatment vary widely across different countries and regions, and often depend on the type and severity of the condition, the availability and efficacy of the treatment, and the insurance coverage and regulations. In some countries, such as the US, Canada, and Australia, botulinum toxin injections are covered by public or private health insurance plans for cervical dystonia, but the coverage may be partial or subject to certain conditions and limitations. In other countries, such as India, China, and Brazil, botulinum toxin injections are not covered by any health insurance plans and have to be paid out-of-pocket by the patients. The lack of reimbursement policies may deter some patients from seeking or continuing treatment for cervical dystonia, especially if they have low income or limited resources.
- Emergence of gene therapy:
- Launch of new devices and technologies
- Expansion of botulinum toxin market
Cervical Dystonia Market Segmentation
Market Breakup by Type
- Retrocollis
- Anterocollis
- Laterocollis
- Torticollis
- Others
- Oral Therapy
- Intravenous
- Surgery
- Others
- Hospitals
- Homecare
- Specialty Clinics
- Others
- United States
- EU-4 and the United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
United Kingdom
- Japan
- China
The key players in the market include AbbVie Inc., Ipsen Pharma, Galderma SA, Revance Therapeutics Inc., AEON Biopharma, Merz Pharmaceuticals, US World Meds, Tercica Inc., Boston Scientific Corporation, Allergan Inc., and Solstice neurosciences lnc. These players are engaged in various strategies, such as product launches and approvals, mergers and acquisitions, collaborations and partnerships, research and development, and expansion, to gain a competitive edge and increase their market share.
Table of Contents
160 Pages
- 1 Preface
- 1.1 Objectives of the Study
- 1.2 Key Assumptions
- 1.3 Report Coverage – Key Segmentation and Scope
- 1.4 Research Methodology
- 2 Executive Summary
- 3 Cervical Dystonia Market Overview – 8 Major Markets
- 3.1 Cervical Dystonia Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
- 3.2 Cervical Dystonia Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
- 4 Cervical Dystonia Overview
- 4.1 Guidelines and Stages
- 4.2 Pathophysiology
- 4.3 Screening and Diagnosis
- 4.4 Treatment Pathway
- 5 Patient Profile
- 5.1 Patient Profile Overview
- 5.2 Patient Psychology and Emotional Impact Factors
- 5.3 Risk Assessment and Treatment Success Rate
- 6 Cervical Dystonia Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast – 8 Major Markets
- 6.1 8MM Epidemiology Scenario Overview (2017-2032)
- 6.2 United States Cervical Dystonia Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast (2017-2032)
- 6.3 EU-4 and United Kingdom Cervical Dystonia Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast (2017-2032)
- 6.3.1 Germany Cervical Dystonia Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast (2017-2032)
- 6.3.2 France Cervical Dystonia Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast (2017-2032)
- 6.3.3 Italy Cervical Dystonia Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast (2017-2032)
- 6.3.4 Spain Cervical Dystonia Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast (2017-2032)
- 6.3.5 United Kingdom Cervical Dystonia Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast (2017-2032)
- 6.4 Japan Cervical Dystonia Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast (2017-2032)
- 6.5 China Cervical Dystonia Epidemiology Scenario and Forecast (2017-2032)
- 7 Cervical Dystonia Market Landscape – 8 Major Markets
- 7.1 Cervical Dystonia: Developers Landscape
- 7.1.1 Analysis by Year of Establishment
- 7.1.2 Analysis by Company Size
- 7.1.3 Analysis by Region
- 7.2 Cervical Dystonia: Product Landscape
- 7.2.1 Analysis by Type
- 7.2.2 Analysis by Therapy
- 8 Cervical Dystonia Challenges and Unmet Needs
- 8.1 Treatment Pathway Challenges
- 8.2 Compliance and Drop-Out Analysis
- 8.3 Awareness and Prevention Gaps
- 9 Cost of Treatment
- 10 Cervical Dystonia Market Dynamics
- 10.1 Market Drivers and Constraints
- 10.2 SWOT Analysis
- 10.3 Porter’s Five Forces Model
- 10.4 Key Demand Indicators
- 10.5 Key Price Indicators
- 10.6 Industry Events, Initiatives, and Trends
- 10.7 Value Chain Analysis
- 11 Cervical Dystonia Market Segmentation (2017-2032) - 8 Major Markets
- 11.1 Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by Type
- 11.1.1 Market Overview
- 11.1.2 Retrocollis
- 11.1.3 Anterocollis
- 11.1.4 Laterocollis
- 11.1.5 Torticollis
- 11.1.6 Others
- 11.2 Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by Therapy
- 11.2.1 Market Overview
- 11.2.2 Oral Therapy
- 11.2.3 Intravenous
- 11.2.4 Surgery
- 11.2.5 Others
- 11.3 Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by End User
- 11.3.1 Market Overview
- 11.3.2 Hospitals
- 11.3.3 Homecare
- 11.3.4 Specialty Clinics
- 11.3.5 Others
- 11.4 Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by Region
- 11.4.1 Market Overview
- 11.4.2 United States
- 11.4.3 EU-4 and the United Kingdom
- 11.4.3.1 Germany
- 11.4.3.2 France
- 11.4.3.3 Italy
- 11.4.3.4 Spain
- 11.4.3.5 United Kingdom
- 11.4.4 Japan
- 11.4.5 China
- 12 United States Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032)
- 12.1 United States Cervical Dystonia Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
- 12.2 United States Cervical Dystonia Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
- 12.3 United States Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by Type
- 12.3.1 Market Overview
- 12.3.2 Medication
- 12.3.3 Organ Transplantation
- 12.3.4 Oxygen Therapy
- 12.3.5 Others
- 12.4 United States Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by Therapy
- 12.4.1 Market Overview
- 12.4.2 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- 12.4.3 Hepatic cirrhosis
- 12.4.4 Renal fibrosis
- 12.4.5 Cutaneous fibrosis
- 12.4.6 Others
- 13 EU-4 and United Kingdom Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032)
- 13.1 EU-4 and United Kingdom Cervical Dystonia Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
- 13.2 EU-4 and United Kingdom Cervical Dystonia Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
- 13.3 EU-4 and United Kingdom Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by Type
- 13.3.1 Market Overview
- 13.3.2 Medication
- 13.3.3 Organ Transplantation
- 13.3.4 Oxygen Therapy
- 13.3.5 Others
- 13.4 EU-4 and United Kingdom Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by Therapy
- 13.4.1 Market Overview
- 13.4.2 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- 13.4.3 Hepatic cirrhosis
- 13.4.4 Renal fibrosis
- 13.4.5 Cutaneous fibrosis
- 13.4.6 Others
- 14 Japan Cervical Dystonia Market
- 14.1 Japan Cervical Dystonia Market Historical Value (2017-2023)
- 14.2 Japan Cervical Dystonia Market Forecast Value (2024-2032)
- 14.3 Japan Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by Type
- 14.3.1 Market Overview
- 14.3.2 Medication
- 14.3.3 Organ Transplantation
- 14.3.4 Oxygen Therapy
- 14.3.5 Others
- 14.4 Japan Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by Therapy
- 14.4.1 Market Overview
- 14.4.2 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- 14.4.3 Hepatic cirrhosis
- 14.4.4 Renal fibrosis
- 14.4.5 Cutaneous fibrosis
- 14.4.6 Others
- 15 China Cervical Dystonia Market
- 15.1 China Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) Historical Value (2017-2023)
- 15.2 China Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) Forecast Value (2024-2032)
- 15.3 China Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by Type
- 15.3.1 Market Overview
- 15.3.2 Medication
- 15.3.3 Organ Transplantation
- 15.3.4 Oxygen Therapy
- 15.3.5 Others
- 15.4 China Cervical Dystonia Market (2017-2032) by Therapy
- 15.4.1 Market Overview
- 15.4.2 Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
- 15.4.3 Hepatic cirrhosis
- 15.4.4 Renal fibrosis
- 15.4.5 Cutaneous fibrosis
- 15.4.6 Others
- 16 Regulatory Framework
- 16.1 Regulatory Overview
- 16.1.1 US FDA
- 16.1.2 EU EMA
- 16.1.3 Japan PMDA
- 16.1.4 Others
- 17 Patent Analysis
- 17.1 Analysis by Type of Patent
- 17.2 Analysis by Publication Year
- 17.3 Analysis by Issuing Authority
- 17.4 Analysis by Patent Age
- 17.5 Analysis by CPC Analysis
- 17.6 Analysis by Patent Valuation
- 17.7 Analysis by Key Players
- 18 Grants Analysis
- 18.1 Analysis by Year
- 18.2 Analysis by Amount Awarded
- 18.3 Analysis by Issuing Authority
- 18.4 Analysis by Grant Application
- 18.5 Analysis by Funding Institute
- 18.6 Analysis by NIH Departments
- 18.7 Analysis by Recipient Organization
- 19 Clinical Trials Analysis
- 19.1 Analysis by Trial Registration Year
- 19.2 Analysis by Trial Status
- 19.3 Analysis by Trial Phase
- 19.4 Analysis by Therapeutic Area
- 19.5 Analysis by Geography
- 20 Funding and Investment Analysis
- 20.1 Analysis by Funding Instances
- 20.2 Analysis by Type of Funding
- 20.3 Analysis by Funding Amount
- 20.4 Analysis by Leading Players
- 20.5 Analysis by Leading Investors
- 20.6 Analysis by Geography
- 21 Partnership and Collaborations Analysis
- 21.1 Analysis by Partnership Instances
- 21.2 Analysis by Type of Partnership
- 21.3 Analysis by Leading Players
- 21.4 Analysis by Geography
- 22 Supplier Landscape
- 22.1 AbbVie Inc.
- 22.1.1 Financial Analysis
- 22.1.2 Product Portfolio
- 22.1.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
- 22.1.4 Mergers and Acquisition
- 22.1.5 Certifications
- 22.2 Ipsen Pharma
- 22.2.1 Financial Analysis
- 22.2.2 Product Portfolio
- 22.2.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
- 22.2.4 Mergers and Acquisition
- 22.2.5 Certifications
- 22.3 Galderma SA
- 22.3.1 Financial Analysis
- 22.3.2 Product Portfolio
- 22.3.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
- 22.3.4 Mergers and Acquisition
- 22.3.5 Certifications
- 22.4 Revance Therapeutics Inc.
- 22.4.1 Financial Analysis
- 22.4.2 Product Portfolio
- 22.4.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
- 22.4.4 Mergers and Acquisition
- 22.4.5 Certifications
- 22.5 AEON Biopharma
- 22.5.1 Financial Analysis
- 22.5.2 Product Portfolio
- 22.5.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
- 22.5.4 Mergers and Acquisition
- 22.5.5 Certifications
- 22.6 Merz Pharmaceuticals
- 22.6.1 Financial Analysis
- 22.6.2 Product Portfolio
- 22.6.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
- 22.6.4 Mergers and Acquisition
- 22.6.5 Certifications
- 22.7 US World Meds
- 22.7.1 Financial Analysis
- 22.7.2 Product Portfolio
- 22.7.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
- 22.7.4 Mergers and Acquisition
- 22.7.5 Certifications
- 22.8 Tercica Inc.
- 22.8.1 Financial Analysis
- 22.8.2 Product Portfolio
- 22.8.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
- 22.8.4 Mergers and Acquisition
- 22.8.5 Certifications
- 22.9 Boston Scientific Corporation
- 22.9.1 Financial Analysis
- 22.9.2 Product Portfolio
- 22.9.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
- 22.9.4 Mergers and Acquisition
- 22.9.5 Certifications
- 22.10 Allergan Inc.
- 22.10.1 Financial Analysis
- 22.10.2 Product Portfolio
- 22.10.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
- 22.10.4 Mergers and Acquisition
- 22.10.5 Certifications
- 22.11 Solstice neurosciences lnc.
- 22.11.1 Financial Analysis
- 22.11.2 Product Portfolio
- 22.11.3 Demographic Reach and Achievements
- 22.11.4 Mergers and Acquisition
- 22.11.5 Certifications
- List not exhaustive
- 23 Cervical Dystonia Treatment Drugs - Distribution Model (Additional Insight)
- 23.1 Overview
- 23.2 Potential Distributors
- 23.3 Key Parameters for Distribution Partner Assessment
- 24 Key Opinion Leaders (KOL) Insights (Additional Insight)
- 25 Company Competitiveness Analysis (Additional Insight)
- 25.1 Very Small Companies
- 25.2 Small Companies
- 25.3 Mid-Sized Companies
- 25.4 Large Companies
- 25.5 Very Large Companies
- 26 Payment Methods (Additional Insight)
- 26.1 Government Funded
- 26.2 Private Insurance
- 26.3 Out-of-Pocket
- *Additional insights provided are customisable as per client requirements.
- *The coverage of the Market Landscape section depends on the data availability and may cover a minimum of 80% of the total market. The EMR team strives to make this section as comprehensive as possible.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.