
United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Overview,2030
Description
The United States antimicrobial packaging market represents a sophisticated sector within the broader packaging industry, encompassing materials and technologies specifically engineered to inhibit or eliminate the growth of microorganisms including bacteria, fungi, molds, and yeasts on packaged products and packaging surfaces they. This specialized packaging incorporates antimicrobial agents either directly into the packaging material during manufacturing or applies them as surface coatings, creating an active barrier that extends product shelf life, maintains product integrity, and enhances consumer safety across multiple industries. Regulatory complexities across different regions within the United States create a labyrinthine compliance landscape that antimicrobial packaging manufacturers must navigate, as state-level regulations, county health department requirements, and municipal ordinances can vary significantly even within single states, complicating nationwide product launches and distribution strategies. California's stringent Proposition sixty-five requirements for chemical disclosures differ markedly from regulatory approaches in Texas or Florida, forcing packaging companies to develop multiple product variants or adopt the most restrictive formulations nationwide to ensure market access across all American jurisdictions. The United States Department of Agriculture has implemented programs supporting bio-based packaging materials derived from agricultural feedstocks, providing research grants and market development assistance for companies developing antimicrobial packaging from renewable resources rather than petroleum-based plastics. State-level initiatives in progressive jurisdictions like California, Oregon, Washington, and Massachusetts have established ambitious targets for packaging waste reduction, recycled content requirements, and compostability standards that indirectly shape antimicrobial packaging development priorities by creating regulatory pressures and market opportunities for environmentally preferable alternatives.
According to the research report ""US Antimicrobial Packaging Market Overview, 2030,"" published by Bonafide Research, the US Antimicrobial Packaging market is anticipated to grow at 5.29% CAGR from 2025 to 2030. Collaborations between packaging giants and antimicrobial tech companies have accelerated across the United States as established packaging manufacturers seek to rapidly incorporate antimicrobial capabilities into their product portfolios through partnerships with specialized technology firms possessing proprietary antimicrobial formulations and application expertise. These collaborations leverage the complementary strengths of large-scale packaging manufacturers like Amcor, Berry Global, and Sealed Air, which possess manufacturing capacity, customer relationships, and distribution networks, with innovative antimicrobial technology companies like Microban International, BioCote, and PolyOne that have developed advanced antimicrobial additives and surface treatments but lack direct access to major packaging end-user markets. Microban International, headquartered in Huntersville, North Carolina, exemplifies the antimicrobial technology partner model, having established itself as a premier provider of built-in antimicrobial product protection through hundreds of partnerships with manufacturers across diverse industries including packaging, textiles, consumer electronics, and building materials. The company operates through a business model centered on technology licensing and co-branding arrangements, where manufacturing partners incorporate Microban antimicrobial additives into their products and leverage the Microban brand recognition to communicate enhanced hygiene benefits to end consumers, creating mutual value through technology monetization for Microban and product differentiation for manufacturing partners. In the packaging sector specifically, Microban International has developed collaborative relationships with major American packaging producers including Perfect Pallets Incorporated, which partnered with the antimicrobial technology provider to integrate antimicrobial protection into reusable plastic pallets used throughout supply chains, demonstrating how antimicrobial technology collaborations extend beyond consumer-facing food packaging into industrial packaging applications where hygiene and contamination control impact operational efficiency and product safety.
In the United States, antimicrobial packaging is dominated by plastic-based materials, largely owing to the versatility, processing maturity, and cost efficiency of polymer films and sheets in food, pharmaceutical, and consumer goods sectors. Plastics provide excellent moisture and oxygen barrier properties, and they allow relatively straightforward incorporation of antimicrobial additives or coatings. Because converters already have extensive infrastructure for polymer processing such as extrusion, lamination, coating, plastic antimicrobials have scaled faster in U.S. markets. Paperboard and cardboard, though growing in interest due to sustainability pressures, often require surface coatings or lamination to impart antimicrobial properties, their adoption is slower because achieving durability, moisture resistance, and consistent antimicrobial functionality is more technically challenging. Biopolymers like PLA, PHA, starch blends are an emerging material class in the U.S. antimicrobial packaging space, receiving increasing investment especially in niche or premium segments that emphasize compostability and eco credentials. However, regulatory scrutiny, mechanical performance, and cost remain barriers to their mainstream use. Other materials such as metal foils, aluminum laminates, glass, or nonwoven fabrics play only limited roles in antimicrobial packaging applications in the U.S., often in specialty or hybrid formats like foil laminates in aseptic packs. Given these dynamics, plastic remains the leading material type in U.S. antimicrobial packaging, while biopolymers and paperboard are positioning for future growth under sustainability and regulatory pressures.
When it comes to packaging formats in the U.S. antimicrobial packaging space, pouches are currently the most widely adopted type. The flexibility, low material usage, ease of sealing, and ability to include barrier layers make them ideal for embedding antimicrobial functions without dramatically reengineering the package design. Stand up pouches, retort pouches, and barrier laminates are common vehicles for antimicrobial coatings or additives, used especially in ready meals, snacks, and perishable foods. Bags are also significant, particularly in meat, produce, and bulk applications, where antimicrobial features can inhibit surface microbial growth or cross contamination. Trays such as rigid or semi rigid find use in meat, poultry, deli and prepared food packaging; antimicrobial liners or films may be bonded to tray surfaces or overwrapped. Cups & lids are prominent in single serve dairy, yogurt, desserts, or fresh produce; antimicrobial inner coatings help maintain product safety and shelf life. Carton packages, typically composed of paperboard with internal barrier liners, are less common for direct antimicrobial roles in U.S. but are used in secondary or support roles such as cartons containing antimicrobial lined inner sleeves for dry goods or pharmaceuticals. In more specialized or novel uses, other formats like blister packs, sachets, films, films over wraps under antimicrobial regimes are used in pharmaceutical, personal care, or small-format food items. The U.S. market sees pouches leading in adoption because they strike a balance between cost, performance, consumer convenience, and ease of integrating antimicrobial features in high volume production.
In the U.S. antimicrobial packaging domain, organic acids are among the most commonly used antimicrobial agents, particularly in food packaging, because they are relatively well understood, accepted under food contact regulations, and deliver microbial suppression without extreme toxicity. Lactic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid derivatives are often incorporated into films or coatings that come into contact with fresh produce, meat, cheese, and deli products. Plant extracts like essential oils, phenolic, flavonoids are a growing trend especially under clean label or premium product positioning, though challenges remain around volatility, strong aroma, migration, and consistency of action. In niche or high value product lines, bacteriocins and enzymes for instance, nisin, lysozyme are gaining interest for their targeted antimicrobial behavior and potentially lower impact on sensory attributes, though at present their adoption is much more limited in U.S. packaging than acids or synthetic agents. The “other agents” category is where metal ions or nanoparticle silver, copper, zinc oxide and synthetic antimicrobials come into play, particularly in medical, pharmaceutical, or high performance food packaging where sterility, extended shelf life, or antimicrobial robustness are required. Silver ion additives embedded in plastics are relatively common in U.S. antimicrobial plastics for healthcare, medical devices, or premium food packaging. Given regulatory familiarity, balance of cost and performance, and integration ease, organic acids remain the leading antimicrobial agent in U.S. antimicrobial packaging, while plant extracts, enzymes, and metal based agents are evolving in differentiated niches.
In the United States, active antimicrobial packaging technology currently stands as the dominant approach used across most industries, particularly in food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, and consumer goods. This technology involves the direct incorporation of antimicrobial agents either embedded into the packaging material itself or applied as surface coatings allowing for immediate interaction with microbial contaminants upon contact. While active technology leads in adoption, the real innovation frontier lies in controlled-release antimicrobial packaging. This advanced form of packaging is being increasingly explored in the U.S., especially in segments like fresh produce, organic foods, high-value meats, and sensitive pharmaceutical products. Controlled-release systems are designed to gradually dispense antimicrobial agents over time or in response to environmental triggers such as changes in temperature, humidity, pH levels, or the presence of specific enzymes or gases. In the U.S., major universities, packaging R&D centers and private companies are investing in the development of microencapsulation techniques, nano-carriers, and stimuli-responsive barrier films. These technologies allow for precision control in when and how antimicrobials are released, aligning with a growing industry demand for smarter, longer-lasting, and more sustainable packaging. Many solutions now combine both systems active and controlled-release to create hybrid packaging that delivers immediate protection while maintaining antimicrobial action during storage and transit.
Considered in this report
• Historic Year: 2019
• Base year: 2024
• Estimated year: 2025
• Forecast year: 2030
Aspects covered in this report
• Antimicrobial Packaging Market with its value and forecast along with its segments
• Various drivers and challenges
• On-going trends and developments
• Top profiled companies
• Strategic recommendation
By Material Type
• Plastic
• Paperboard
• Biopolymers
• Others
By Pack Type
• Pouches
• Bags
• Trays
• Carton Packages
• Cups & Lids
• Others
By Anti-Microbial Agent
• Organic Acids
• Plant Extracts
• Bacteriocins & Enzymes
• Others (Metal Ions, Synthetic)
By Technology
• Active Packaging Technology
• Controlled Release Packaging
According to the research report ""US Antimicrobial Packaging Market Overview, 2030,"" published by Bonafide Research, the US Antimicrobial Packaging market is anticipated to grow at 5.29% CAGR from 2025 to 2030. Collaborations between packaging giants and antimicrobial tech companies have accelerated across the United States as established packaging manufacturers seek to rapidly incorporate antimicrobial capabilities into their product portfolios through partnerships with specialized technology firms possessing proprietary antimicrobial formulations and application expertise. These collaborations leverage the complementary strengths of large-scale packaging manufacturers like Amcor, Berry Global, and Sealed Air, which possess manufacturing capacity, customer relationships, and distribution networks, with innovative antimicrobial technology companies like Microban International, BioCote, and PolyOne that have developed advanced antimicrobial additives and surface treatments but lack direct access to major packaging end-user markets. Microban International, headquartered in Huntersville, North Carolina, exemplifies the antimicrobial technology partner model, having established itself as a premier provider of built-in antimicrobial product protection through hundreds of partnerships with manufacturers across diverse industries including packaging, textiles, consumer electronics, and building materials. The company operates through a business model centered on technology licensing and co-branding arrangements, where manufacturing partners incorporate Microban antimicrobial additives into their products and leverage the Microban brand recognition to communicate enhanced hygiene benefits to end consumers, creating mutual value through technology monetization for Microban and product differentiation for manufacturing partners. In the packaging sector specifically, Microban International has developed collaborative relationships with major American packaging producers including Perfect Pallets Incorporated, which partnered with the antimicrobial technology provider to integrate antimicrobial protection into reusable plastic pallets used throughout supply chains, demonstrating how antimicrobial technology collaborations extend beyond consumer-facing food packaging into industrial packaging applications where hygiene and contamination control impact operational efficiency and product safety.
In the United States, antimicrobial packaging is dominated by plastic-based materials, largely owing to the versatility, processing maturity, and cost efficiency of polymer films and sheets in food, pharmaceutical, and consumer goods sectors. Plastics provide excellent moisture and oxygen barrier properties, and they allow relatively straightforward incorporation of antimicrobial additives or coatings. Because converters already have extensive infrastructure for polymer processing such as extrusion, lamination, coating, plastic antimicrobials have scaled faster in U.S. markets. Paperboard and cardboard, though growing in interest due to sustainability pressures, often require surface coatings or lamination to impart antimicrobial properties, their adoption is slower because achieving durability, moisture resistance, and consistent antimicrobial functionality is more technically challenging. Biopolymers like PLA, PHA, starch blends are an emerging material class in the U.S. antimicrobial packaging space, receiving increasing investment especially in niche or premium segments that emphasize compostability and eco credentials. However, regulatory scrutiny, mechanical performance, and cost remain barriers to their mainstream use. Other materials such as metal foils, aluminum laminates, glass, or nonwoven fabrics play only limited roles in antimicrobial packaging applications in the U.S., often in specialty or hybrid formats like foil laminates in aseptic packs. Given these dynamics, plastic remains the leading material type in U.S. antimicrobial packaging, while biopolymers and paperboard are positioning for future growth under sustainability and regulatory pressures.
When it comes to packaging formats in the U.S. antimicrobial packaging space, pouches are currently the most widely adopted type. The flexibility, low material usage, ease of sealing, and ability to include barrier layers make them ideal for embedding antimicrobial functions without dramatically reengineering the package design. Stand up pouches, retort pouches, and barrier laminates are common vehicles for antimicrobial coatings or additives, used especially in ready meals, snacks, and perishable foods. Bags are also significant, particularly in meat, produce, and bulk applications, where antimicrobial features can inhibit surface microbial growth or cross contamination. Trays such as rigid or semi rigid find use in meat, poultry, deli and prepared food packaging; antimicrobial liners or films may be bonded to tray surfaces or overwrapped. Cups & lids are prominent in single serve dairy, yogurt, desserts, or fresh produce; antimicrobial inner coatings help maintain product safety and shelf life. Carton packages, typically composed of paperboard with internal barrier liners, are less common for direct antimicrobial roles in U.S. but are used in secondary or support roles such as cartons containing antimicrobial lined inner sleeves for dry goods or pharmaceuticals. In more specialized or novel uses, other formats like blister packs, sachets, films, films over wraps under antimicrobial regimes are used in pharmaceutical, personal care, or small-format food items. The U.S. market sees pouches leading in adoption because they strike a balance between cost, performance, consumer convenience, and ease of integrating antimicrobial features in high volume production.
In the U.S. antimicrobial packaging domain, organic acids are among the most commonly used antimicrobial agents, particularly in food packaging, because they are relatively well understood, accepted under food contact regulations, and deliver microbial suppression without extreme toxicity. Lactic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid derivatives are often incorporated into films or coatings that come into contact with fresh produce, meat, cheese, and deli products. Plant extracts like essential oils, phenolic, flavonoids are a growing trend especially under clean label or premium product positioning, though challenges remain around volatility, strong aroma, migration, and consistency of action. In niche or high value product lines, bacteriocins and enzymes for instance, nisin, lysozyme are gaining interest for their targeted antimicrobial behavior and potentially lower impact on sensory attributes, though at present their adoption is much more limited in U.S. packaging than acids or synthetic agents. The “other agents” category is where metal ions or nanoparticle silver, copper, zinc oxide and synthetic antimicrobials come into play, particularly in medical, pharmaceutical, or high performance food packaging where sterility, extended shelf life, or antimicrobial robustness are required. Silver ion additives embedded in plastics are relatively common in U.S. antimicrobial plastics for healthcare, medical devices, or premium food packaging. Given regulatory familiarity, balance of cost and performance, and integration ease, organic acids remain the leading antimicrobial agent in U.S. antimicrobial packaging, while plant extracts, enzymes, and metal based agents are evolving in differentiated niches.
In the United States, active antimicrobial packaging technology currently stands as the dominant approach used across most industries, particularly in food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, and consumer goods. This technology involves the direct incorporation of antimicrobial agents either embedded into the packaging material itself or applied as surface coatings allowing for immediate interaction with microbial contaminants upon contact. While active technology leads in adoption, the real innovation frontier lies in controlled-release antimicrobial packaging. This advanced form of packaging is being increasingly explored in the U.S., especially in segments like fresh produce, organic foods, high-value meats, and sensitive pharmaceutical products. Controlled-release systems are designed to gradually dispense antimicrobial agents over time or in response to environmental triggers such as changes in temperature, humidity, pH levels, or the presence of specific enzymes or gases. In the U.S., major universities, packaging R&D centers and private companies are investing in the development of microencapsulation techniques, nano-carriers, and stimuli-responsive barrier films. These technologies allow for precision control in when and how antimicrobials are released, aligning with a growing industry demand for smarter, longer-lasting, and more sustainable packaging. Many solutions now combine both systems active and controlled-release to create hybrid packaging that delivers immediate protection while maintaining antimicrobial action during storage and transit.
Considered in this report
• Historic Year: 2019
• Base year: 2024
• Estimated year: 2025
• Forecast year: 2030
Aspects covered in this report
• Antimicrobial Packaging Market with its value and forecast along with its segments
• Various drivers and challenges
• On-going trends and developments
• Top profiled companies
• Strategic recommendation
By Material Type
• Plastic
• Paperboard
• Biopolymers
• Others
By Pack Type
• Pouches
• Bags
• Trays
• Carton Packages
• Cups & Lids
• Others
By Anti-Microbial Agent
• Organic Acids
• Plant Extracts
• Bacteriocins & Enzymes
• Others (Metal Ions, Synthetic)
By Technology
• Active Packaging Technology
• Controlled Release Packaging
Table of Contents
80 Pages
- 1. Executive Summary
- 2. Market Structure
- 2.1. Market Considerate
- 2.2. Assumptions
- 2.3. Limitations
- 2.4. Abbreviations
- 2.5. Sources
- 2.6. Definitions
- 3. Research Methodology
- 3.1. Secondary Research
- 3.2. Primary Data Collection
- 3.3. Market Formation & Validation
- 3.4. Report Writing, Quality Check & Delivery
- 4. United States Geography
- 4.1. Population Distribution Table
- 4.2. United States Macro Economic Indicators
- 5. Market Dynamics
- 5.1. Key Insights
- 5.2. Recent Developments
- 5.3. Market Drivers & Opportunities
- 5.4. Market Restraints & Challenges
- 5.5. Market Trends
- 5.6. Supply chain Analysis
- 5.7. Policy & Regulatory Framework
- 5.8. Industry Experts Views
- 6. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Overview
- 6.1. Market Size By Value
- 6.2. Market Size and Forecast, By Material Type
- 6.3. Market Size and Forecast, By Pack Type
- 6.4. Market Size and Forecast, By Anti-Microbial Agent
- 6.5. Market Size and Forecast, By Technology
- 6.6. Market Size and Forecast, By Region
- 7. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Segmentations
- 7.1. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market, By Material Type
- 7.1.1. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Plastic, 2019-2030
- 7.1.2. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Paperboard, 2019-2030
- 7.1.3. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Biopolymers, 2019-2030
- 7.1.4. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Others, 2019-2030
- 7.2. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market, By Pack Type
- 7.2.1. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Pouches, 2019-2030
- 7.2.2. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Bags, 2019-2030
- 7.2.3. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Trays, 2019-2030
- 7.2.4. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Carton Packages, 2019-2030
- 7.2.5. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Cups & Lids, 2019-2030
- 7.2.6. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Others, 2019-2030
- 7.3. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market, By Anti-Microbial Agent
- 7.3.1. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Organic Acids, 2019-2030
- 7.3.2. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Plant Extracts, 2019-2030
- 7.3.3. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Bacteriocins & Enzymes, 2019-2030
- 7.3.4. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Others (Metal Ions, Synthetic), 2019-2030
- 7.4. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market, By Technology
- 7.4.1. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Active Packaging Technology, 2019-2030
- 7.4.2. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By Controlled Release Packaging, 2019-2030
- 7.5. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market, By Region
- 7.5.1. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By North, 2019-2030
- 7.5.2. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By East, 2019-2030
- 7.5.3. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By West, 2019-2030
- 7.5.4. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size, By South, 2019-2030
- 8. United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Opportunity Assessment
- 8.1. By Material Type, 2025 to 2030
- 8.2. By Pack Type, 2025 to 2030
- 8.3. By Anti-Microbial Agent, 2025 to 2030
- 8.4. By Technology, 2025 to 2030
- 8.5. By Region, 2025 to 2030
- 9. Competitive Landscape
- 9.1. Porter's Five Forces
- 9.2. Company Profile
- 9.2.1. Company 1
- 9.2.1.1. Company Snapshot
- 9.2.1.2. Company Overview
- 9.2.1.3. Financial Highlights
- 9.2.1.4. Geographic Insights
- 9.2.1.5. Business Segment & Performance
- 9.2.1.6. Product Portfolio
- 9.2.1.7. Key Executives
- 9.2.1.8. Strategic Moves & Developments
- 9.2.2. Company 2
- 9.2.3. Company 3
- 9.2.4. Company 4
- 9.2.5. Company 5
- 9.2.6. Company 6
- 9.2.7. Company 7
- 9.2.8. Company 8
- 10. Strategic Recommendations
- 11. Disclaimer
- List of Figures
- Figure 1: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size By Value (2019, 2024 & 2030F) (in USD Million)
- Figure 2: Market Attractiveness Index, By Material Type
- Figure 3: Market Attractiveness Index, By Pack Type
- Figure 4: Market Attractiveness Index, By Anti-Microbial Agent
- Figure 5: Market Attractiveness Index, By Technology
- Figure 6: Market Attractiveness Index, By Region
- Figure 7: Porter's Five Forces of United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market
- List of Tables
- Table 1: Influencing Factors for Antimicrobial Packaging Market, 2024
- Table 2: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size and Forecast, By Material Type (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Million)
- Table 3: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size and Forecast, By Pack Type (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Million)
- Table 4: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size and Forecast, By Anti-Microbial Agent (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Million)
- Table 5: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size and Forecast, By Technology (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Million)
- Table 6: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size and Forecast, By Region (2019 to 2030F) (In USD Million)
- Table 7: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Plastic (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 8: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Paperboard (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 9: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Biopolymers (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 10: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Others (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 11: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Pouches (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 12: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Bags (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 13: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Trays (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 14: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Carton Packages (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 15: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Cups & Lids (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 16: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Others (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 17: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Organic Acids (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 18: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Plant Extracts (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 19: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Bacteriocins & Enzymes (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 20: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Others (Metal Ions, Synthetic) (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 21: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Active Packaging Technology (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 22: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of Controlled Release Packaging (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 23: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of North (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 24: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of East (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 25: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of West (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
- Table 26: United States Antimicrobial Packaging Market Size of South (2019 to 2030) in USD Million
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.