eGRC Market by Solution Type (Integrated GRC Platform, Point Solution), Organization Size (Large Enterprise, Small And Medium Enterprise), Service Type, Compliance Type, Risk Type, Deployment Mode, Industry Vertical - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The eGRC Market was valued at USD 18.75 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 21.12 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 13.03%, reaching USD 49.97 billion by 2032.
Framing governance risk and compliance as interdependent strategic capabilities that require unified data taxonomies process alignment and cross-functional oversight
The executive summary opens with a concise introduction that frames governance, risk and compliance as strategically interdependent capabilities rather than isolated control functions. As organizations accelerate digital initiatives, the need to align compliance obligations with enterprise risk appetite and business objectives has become more acute. This landscape requires boards and senior leaders to re-evaluate legacy approaches and to prioritize integrated oversight across policy, risk, audit and third-party management.
This report synthesizes current drivers, technology trends and regulatory pressures that are shaping how enterprises structure eGRC programs. It emphasizes the shift from reactive compliance toward forward-looking risk orchestration, where continuous monitoring, automated controls and cross-functional data models enable faster, evidence-based decisions. The introduction highlights the importance of establishing unified data taxonomies and governance frameworks that reduce duplication of effort and enable consistent reporting to stakeholders.
To set the stage for the following analysis, the introduction also outlines the research scope and the domains addressed in subsequent sections, including solution and deployment differentiation, organizational impacts, sector-specific compliance considerations, and regional regulatory influences. This framing helps readers focus on practical implications and immediate priorities for strengthening compliance resilience while supporting strategic growth initiatives.
How technology automation and regulatory complexity are reshaping eGRC approaches toward integrated platforms targeted point solutions and risk based prioritization
Organizations are experiencing transformative shifts in the landscape of governance, risk and compliance driven by technological, regulatory and operational inflection points. Cloud adoption and the proliferation of SaaS applications have decentralized data and control surfaces, prompting a rethinking of traditional perimeter-based compliance models. At the same time, automation, artificial intelligence and advanced analytics are enabling continuous control monitoring, anomaly detection and predictive risk scoring, shifting resources toward exception handling and strategic risk reduction.
Regulatory complexity is increasing globally, with privacy, anti-corruption, financial reporting and cybersecurity rules evolving in tandem. This complexity is driving demand for integrated approaches that connect policy management, compliance workflows and audit trails into a single source of truth. In practice, organizations are converging on platform-based solutions while retaining specialized point capabilities for domain-specific needs such as audit management and vendor risk management.
Operationally, there is a notable move toward risk-based prioritization, underpinned by richer risk taxonomies that integrate compliance risk, financial risk and IT risk. Vendors and in-house teams are responding by delivering modular architectures that support rapid configuration and interoperability. As a result, leaders must balance investment in scalable platforms with targeted point solutions to ensure both breadth of coverage and depth of domain expertise. These shifts require updated governance practices, talent development and cross-silo collaboration to realize measurable improvements in risk posture and regulatory readiness.
Assessing the cumulative operational and compliance consequences of recent tariff changes that indirectly intensify vendor risk management and third party oversight across supply chains
Tariff changes and trade policy adjustments in the United States during 2025 introduced new operational considerations for organizations that rely on cross-border supply chains and offshore service providers. Although tariffs are often discussed in the context of goods, their indirect effects extend into compliance, vendor risk and third-party management practices as suppliers reassess sourcing strategies, pricing models and contractual terms. These shifts can translate into amended vendor due diligence requirements, renegotiated service level agreements and heightened scrutiny of financial and operational resilience across supplier ecosystems.
Consequently, compliance programs must adapt by incorporating trade policy indicators into vendor risk scoring and by ensuring contractual frameworks capture escalation paths for cost pass-throughs and regulatory changes. Data flows that underpin compliance evidence-including transactional records, shipping documentation and supplier attestations-may need more robust validation controls when suppliers relocate or change jurisdictional exposure. In parallel, organizations should reassess insurance coverage, contingency plans and audit sampling strategies to account for supplier consolidation or diversification triggered by tariff impacts.
This cumulative dynamic underscores the importance of scenario-based planning and stress-testing of third-party arrangements. Incorporating macroeconomic levers such as tariffs into risk modeling improves the fidelity of enterprise risk assessments and supports decision-making around alternative sourcing, inventory strategies and supplier diversification. Ultimately, organizations that proactively integrate trade policy considerations into eGRC processes will be better positioned to maintain compliance continuity and operational stability in the face of shifting geopolitical and economic conditions.
Deep segmentation driven insights that distinguish platform versus point solution tradeoffs diverse deployment preferences and sector specific compliance imperatives shaping procurement
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated adoption patterns and capability priorities across solution types, deployment modes, organization sizes, service offerings, industry verticals, compliance types and risk typologies. Based on Solution Type, distinctions emerge between integrated GRC platforms that emphasize unified data models and workflow orchestration, and point solutions that focus on specialized capabilities such as audit management, compliance management, policy management, risk management and vendor risk management. These differences influence procurement criteria, integration complexity and upgrade lifecycles, as buyers weigh end-to-end visibility against depth of functionality for high-risk domains.
Based on Deployment Mode, cloud-first deployments deliver rapid scalability and easier integration with modern data sources, whereas on premise environments continue to persist in highly regulated or legacy-dependent contexts where organizations retain direct control over sensitive systems. Based on Organization Size, large enterprises often prioritize platform extensibility and centralized governance capabilities to manage distributed operations, while small and medium enterprises look for cost-effective, easy-to-deploy solutions that provide immediate compliance value without extensive customization.
Based on Service Type, managed services can accelerate time-to-value and provide operational continuity for organizations lacking internal specialist resources, whereas professional services drive customization, implementation, and process optimization that align tools with complex regulatory or legacy environments. Based on Industry Vertical, sectors such as banking, financial services and insurance, energy and utilities, government, healthcare, IT and telecom, manufacturing and retail consumer goods each bring unique compliance drivers and risk exposure that influence solution choice and integration priorities. Based on Compliance Type, frameworks centered on FCPA, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS and SOX prescribe discrete control sets and evidence requirements that shape module selection and reporting templates. Finally, based on Risk Type, organizations address compliance risk, financial risk, IT risk, operational risk and strategic risk with distinct methodologies, escalation paths and tolerance thresholds, necessitating tailored analytics and governance processes to ensure effective oversight and remediation.
How regional regulatory priorities infrastructure maturity and operational realities across the Americas EMEA and Asia Pacific shape differentiated eGRC strategies
Regional dynamics substantially influence how organizations prioritize eGRC investments and implement governance frameworks. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on privacy, financial regulation and corporate governance has encouraged adoption of cloud-based tools and enhanced third-party due diligence, while board-level scrutiny demands concise cross-functional reporting and evidence of control effectiveness. Organizations operating across multiple states and jurisdictions are consolidating reporting frameworks to streamline compliance workflows and to maintain consistent audit readiness.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory environment is characterized by stringent data protection regimes, sectoral rules and evolving national standards, requiring robust policy management and localized control mappings. Enterprises in these regions often seek solutions that provide strong data residency controls and granular consent management, alongside integration with national reporting systems. Compliance practices here must balance EU-wide frameworks with country-specific obligations and regional geopolitical considerations.
Across Asia-Pacific, rapid digital transformation, diverse regulatory maturity and a mix of emerging and established markets drive heterogeneous adoption patterns. Organizations prioritize scalable cloud deployments where infrastructure and partner ecosystems support quick rollouts, yet they also require flexible configurations to meet local compliance and language requirements. Across all regions, cross-border operations intensify the need for centralized governance models that enable consistent risk taxonomy, while local adaptations ensure regulatory alignment and operational effectiveness.
Vendor differentiation driven by open architectures automated control frameworks and service led delivery models that accelerate integration and sustain compliance operations
Company-level insights focus on how leading vendors are differentiating through modular architectures, interoperability, and service portfolios that support both enterprise-scale integration and rapid deployment for smaller organizations. Vendors that provide strong APIs, connector libraries and support for common data standards enable faster integration with existing security, IT service management and finance systems, reducing the manual effort associated with evidence collection and reporting. Those offering robust professional services and managed service options help organizations accelerate adoption and maintain continuous compliance as regulatory expectations evolve.
Competitive positioning is also influenced by investments in analytics and automation capabilities that reduce time spent on routine compliance tasks. Companies that embed workflow automation, intelligent control testing and risk scoring into their platforms enhance operational efficiency and enable teams to focus on higher-value activities such as risk remediation and strategic advisory. Partnerships and ecosystem strategies further extend value by integrating domain-specific capabilities such as privacy management, incident response and supply chain assurance. Observing vendor roadmaps and implementation case studies provides buyers with evidence of practical scalability, configuration flexibility and long-term support commitments that are critical for sustained eGRC effectiveness.
Practical strategic actions for leaders to unify data taxonomies automate controls and balance platform scale with point solution depth to accelerate compliance resilience
Industry leaders should prioritize a pragmatic set of actions to strengthen governance, risk and compliance outcomes while preserving agility. First, consolidate data models and establish common taxonomies across policy, risk, audit and third-party domains to enable consistent reporting and analytics. This foundational work reduces duplication, improves control traceability, and facilitates faster root cause analysis when issues arise. Next, adopt a hybrid approach that combines the breadth of integrated platforms with targeted point solutions where deep domain functionality is required, ensuring both comprehensive coverage and specialist depth.
Leaders should also invest in process automation and intelligent monitoring to shift teams from transactional activities to strategic risk management. Upskilling programs should focus on data literacy, risk analytics and cross-functional collaboration to enable faster interpretation of control signals and more effective remediation. Additionally, embed scenario-based planning-including trade policy and supply chain disruptions-into third-party risk assessments and continuity planning. Finally, partner selection should emphasize interoperability, extensibility and transparent roadmap commitments, and governance forums should be retooled to deliver timely, decision-ready insights to executives and boards. Together, these actions create a resilient, scalable, and outcomes-focused eGRC capability.
A transparent mixed methods research approach combining practitioner interviews benchmark analysis and scenario evaluation to validate capabilities and practical applicability
The research methodology combines qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure rigorous and reproducible insights. Primary research included structured interviews with compliance leaders, risk officers, audit executives and technology buyers to capture real-world priorities, procurement drivers and implementation challenges. Secondary research comprised a review of regulatory frameworks, vendor documentation, technical white papers and industry commentary to validate solution capabilities and to contextualize regional and sector-specific nuances.
Analytical methods applied include comparative capability mapping, vendor feature benchmarking and scenario analysis to evaluate how solutions perform across defined use cases and risk types. Data triangulation was employed to reconcile vendor claims with practitioner experiences and documented regulatory requirements. The methodology emphasizes transparency by documenting assumptions, interview protocols and inclusion criteria for vendors and use cases. This approach supports reproducibility and enables readers to interpret findings relative to their organizational context and to adapt recommended practices accordingly.
Closing insights on how integrated governance and targeted specialization together enable resilient compliance frameworks and measurable enterprise risk reduction
In conclusion, the evolving eGRC landscape demands that organizations treat governance, risk and compliance as integrated strategic capabilities rather than siloed functions. Technological advancements, shifting regulatory expectations and operational interdependencies require a coordinated response that unifies data, automates routine control activities, and applies domain-specific depth where risk exposure is highest. Cross-functional collaboration and a clear governance architecture are essential to transform insights into measurable improvements in control effectiveness and decision-making speed.
Leaders that balance the adoption of integrated platforms with targeted point solutions, that incorporate trade policy and supply chain scenarios into third-party risk modeling, and that prioritize interoperability and extensibility in procurement decisions will be better positioned to sustain compliance across complex operating environments. Ultimately, the goal is to move from compliance as a cost center to compliance as an enabler of strategic resilience and trusted enterprise operations. The findings and frameworks presented here offer a practical foundation for immediate actions and longer-term capability building.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing governance risk and compliance as interdependent strategic capabilities that require unified data taxonomies process alignment and cross-functional oversight
The executive summary opens with a concise introduction that frames governance, risk and compliance as strategically interdependent capabilities rather than isolated control functions. As organizations accelerate digital initiatives, the need to align compliance obligations with enterprise risk appetite and business objectives has become more acute. This landscape requires boards and senior leaders to re-evaluate legacy approaches and to prioritize integrated oversight across policy, risk, audit and third-party management.
This report synthesizes current drivers, technology trends and regulatory pressures that are shaping how enterprises structure eGRC programs. It emphasizes the shift from reactive compliance toward forward-looking risk orchestration, where continuous monitoring, automated controls and cross-functional data models enable faster, evidence-based decisions. The introduction highlights the importance of establishing unified data taxonomies and governance frameworks that reduce duplication of effort and enable consistent reporting to stakeholders.
To set the stage for the following analysis, the introduction also outlines the research scope and the domains addressed in subsequent sections, including solution and deployment differentiation, organizational impacts, sector-specific compliance considerations, and regional regulatory influences. This framing helps readers focus on practical implications and immediate priorities for strengthening compliance resilience while supporting strategic growth initiatives.
How technology automation and regulatory complexity are reshaping eGRC approaches toward integrated platforms targeted point solutions and risk based prioritization
Organizations are experiencing transformative shifts in the landscape of governance, risk and compliance driven by technological, regulatory and operational inflection points. Cloud adoption and the proliferation of SaaS applications have decentralized data and control surfaces, prompting a rethinking of traditional perimeter-based compliance models. At the same time, automation, artificial intelligence and advanced analytics are enabling continuous control monitoring, anomaly detection and predictive risk scoring, shifting resources toward exception handling and strategic risk reduction.
Regulatory complexity is increasing globally, with privacy, anti-corruption, financial reporting and cybersecurity rules evolving in tandem. This complexity is driving demand for integrated approaches that connect policy management, compliance workflows and audit trails into a single source of truth. In practice, organizations are converging on platform-based solutions while retaining specialized point capabilities for domain-specific needs such as audit management and vendor risk management.
Operationally, there is a notable move toward risk-based prioritization, underpinned by richer risk taxonomies that integrate compliance risk, financial risk and IT risk. Vendors and in-house teams are responding by delivering modular architectures that support rapid configuration and interoperability. As a result, leaders must balance investment in scalable platforms with targeted point solutions to ensure both breadth of coverage and depth of domain expertise. These shifts require updated governance practices, talent development and cross-silo collaboration to realize measurable improvements in risk posture and regulatory readiness.
Assessing the cumulative operational and compliance consequences of recent tariff changes that indirectly intensify vendor risk management and third party oversight across supply chains
Tariff changes and trade policy adjustments in the United States during 2025 introduced new operational considerations for organizations that rely on cross-border supply chains and offshore service providers. Although tariffs are often discussed in the context of goods, their indirect effects extend into compliance, vendor risk and third-party management practices as suppliers reassess sourcing strategies, pricing models and contractual terms. These shifts can translate into amended vendor due diligence requirements, renegotiated service level agreements and heightened scrutiny of financial and operational resilience across supplier ecosystems.
Consequently, compliance programs must adapt by incorporating trade policy indicators into vendor risk scoring and by ensuring contractual frameworks capture escalation paths for cost pass-throughs and regulatory changes. Data flows that underpin compliance evidence-including transactional records, shipping documentation and supplier attestations-may need more robust validation controls when suppliers relocate or change jurisdictional exposure. In parallel, organizations should reassess insurance coverage, contingency plans and audit sampling strategies to account for supplier consolidation or diversification triggered by tariff impacts.
This cumulative dynamic underscores the importance of scenario-based planning and stress-testing of third-party arrangements. Incorporating macroeconomic levers such as tariffs into risk modeling improves the fidelity of enterprise risk assessments and supports decision-making around alternative sourcing, inventory strategies and supplier diversification. Ultimately, organizations that proactively integrate trade policy considerations into eGRC processes will be better positioned to maintain compliance continuity and operational stability in the face of shifting geopolitical and economic conditions.
Deep segmentation driven insights that distinguish platform versus point solution tradeoffs diverse deployment preferences and sector specific compliance imperatives shaping procurement
Segmentation analysis reveals differentiated adoption patterns and capability priorities across solution types, deployment modes, organization sizes, service offerings, industry verticals, compliance types and risk typologies. Based on Solution Type, distinctions emerge between integrated GRC platforms that emphasize unified data models and workflow orchestration, and point solutions that focus on specialized capabilities such as audit management, compliance management, policy management, risk management and vendor risk management. These differences influence procurement criteria, integration complexity and upgrade lifecycles, as buyers weigh end-to-end visibility against depth of functionality for high-risk domains.
Based on Deployment Mode, cloud-first deployments deliver rapid scalability and easier integration with modern data sources, whereas on premise environments continue to persist in highly regulated or legacy-dependent contexts where organizations retain direct control over sensitive systems. Based on Organization Size, large enterprises often prioritize platform extensibility and centralized governance capabilities to manage distributed operations, while small and medium enterprises look for cost-effective, easy-to-deploy solutions that provide immediate compliance value without extensive customization.
Based on Service Type, managed services can accelerate time-to-value and provide operational continuity for organizations lacking internal specialist resources, whereas professional services drive customization, implementation, and process optimization that align tools with complex regulatory or legacy environments. Based on Industry Vertical, sectors such as banking, financial services and insurance, energy and utilities, government, healthcare, IT and telecom, manufacturing and retail consumer goods each bring unique compliance drivers and risk exposure that influence solution choice and integration priorities. Based on Compliance Type, frameworks centered on FCPA, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS and SOX prescribe discrete control sets and evidence requirements that shape module selection and reporting templates. Finally, based on Risk Type, organizations address compliance risk, financial risk, IT risk, operational risk and strategic risk with distinct methodologies, escalation paths and tolerance thresholds, necessitating tailored analytics and governance processes to ensure effective oversight and remediation.
How regional regulatory priorities infrastructure maturity and operational realities across the Americas EMEA and Asia Pacific shape differentiated eGRC strategies
Regional dynamics substantially influence how organizations prioritize eGRC investments and implement governance frameworks. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on privacy, financial regulation and corporate governance has encouraged adoption of cloud-based tools and enhanced third-party due diligence, while board-level scrutiny demands concise cross-functional reporting and evidence of control effectiveness. Organizations operating across multiple states and jurisdictions are consolidating reporting frameworks to streamline compliance workflows and to maintain consistent audit readiness.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory environment is characterized by stringent data protection regimes, sectoral rules and evolving national standards, requiring robust policy management and localized control mappings. Enterprises in these regions often seek solutions that provide strong data residency controls and granular consent management, alongside integration with national reporting systems. Compliance practices here must balance EU-wide frameworks with country-specific obligations and regional geopolitical considerations.
Across Asia-Pacific, rapid digital transformation, diverse regulatory maturity and a mix of emerging and established markets drive heterogeneous adoption patterns. Organizations prioritize scalable cloud deployments where infrastructure and partner ecosystems support quick rollouts, yet they also require flexible configurations to meet local compliance and language requirements. Across all regions, cross-border operations intensify the need for centralized governance models that enable consistent risk taxonomy, while local adaptations ensure regulatory alignment and operational effectiveness.
Vendor differentiation driven by open architectures automated control frameworks and service led delivery models that accelerate integration and sustain compliance operations
Company-level insights focus on how leading vendors are differentiating through modular architectures, interoperability, and service portfolios that support both enterprise-scale integration and rapid deployment for smaller organizations. Vendors that provide strong APIs, connector libraries and support for common data standards enable faster integration with existing security, IT service management and finance systems, reducing the manual effort associated with evidence collection and reporting. Those offering robust professional services and managed service options help organizations accelerate adoption and maintain continuous compliance as regulatory expectations evolve.
Competitive positioning is also influenced by investments in analytics and automation capabilities that reduce time spent on routine compliance tasks. Companies that embed workflow automation, intelligent control testing and risk scoring into their platforms enhance operational efficiency and enable teams to focus on higher-value activities such as risk remediation and strategic advisory. Partnerships and ecosystem strategies further extend value by integrating domain-specific capabilities such as privacy management, incident response and supply chain assurance. Observing vendor roadmaps and implementation case studies provides buyers with evidence of practical scalability, configuration flexibility and long-term support commitments that are critical for sustained eGRC effectiveness.
Practical strategic actions for leaders to unify data taxonomies automate controls and balance platform scale with point solution depth to accelerate compliance resilience
Industry leaders should prioritize a pragmatic set of actions to strengthen governance, risk and compliance outcomes while preserving agility. First, consolidate data models and establish common taxonomies across policy, risk, audit and third-party domains to enable consistent reporting and analytics. This foundational work reduces duplication, improves control traceability, and facilitates faster root cause analysis when issues arise. Next, adopt a hybrid approach that combines the breadth of integrated platforms with targeted point solutions where deep domain functionality is required, ensuring both comprehensive coverage and specialist depth.
Leaders should also invest in process automation and intelligent monitoring to shift teams from transactional activities to strategic risk management. Upskilling programs should focus on data literacy, risk analytics and cross-functional collaboration to enable faster interpretation of control signals and more effective remediation. Additionally, embed scenario-based planning-including trade policy and supply chain disruptions-into third-party risk assessments and continuity planning. Finally, partner selection should emphasize interoperability, extensibility and transparent roadmap commitments, and governance forums should be retooled to deliver timely, decision-ready insights to executives and boards. Together, these actions create a resilient, scalable, and outcomes-focused eGRC capability.
A transparent mixed methods research approach combining practitioner interviews benchmark analysis and scenario evaluation to validate capabilities and practical applicability
The research methodology combines qualitative and quantitative techniques to ensure rigorous and reproducible insights. Primary research included structured interviews with compliance leaders, risk officers, audit executives and technology buyers to capture real-world priorities, procurement drivers and implementation challenges. Secondary research comprised a review of regulatory frameworks, vendor documentation, technical white papers and industry commentary to validate solution capabilities and to contextualize regional and sector-specific nuances.
Analytical methods applied include comparative capability mapping, vendor feature benchmarking and scenario analysis to evaluate how solutions perform across defined use cases and risk types. Data triangulation was employed to reconcile vendor claims with practitioner experiences and documented regulatory requirements. The methodology emphasizes transparency by documenting assumptions, interview protocols and inclusion criteria for vendors and use cases. This approach supports reproducibility and enables readers to interpret findings relative to their organizational context and to adapt recommended practices accordingly.
Closing insights on how integrated governance and targeted specialization together enable resilient compliance frameworks and measurable enterprise risk reduction
In conclusion, the evolving eGRC landscape demands that organizations treat governance, risk and compliance as integrated strategic capabilities rather than siloed functions. Technological advancements, shifting regulatory expectations and operational interdependencies require a coordinated response that unifies data, automates routine control activities, and applies domain-specific depth where risk exposure is highest. Cross-functional collaboration and a clear governance architecture are essential to transform insights into measurable improvements in control effectiveness and decision-making speed.
Leaders that balance the adoption of integrated platforms with targeted point solutions, that incorporate trade policy and supply chain scenarios into third-party risk modeling, and that prioritize interoperability and extensibility in procurement decisions will be better positioned to sustain compliance across complex operating environments. Ultimately, the goal is to move from compliance as a cost center to compliance as an enabler of strategic resilience and trusted enterprise operations. The findings and frameworks presented here offer a practical foundation for immediate actions and longer-term capability building.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
190 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of AI-driven predictive analytics for real-time risk management insights
- 5.2. Integration of continuous monitoring and automation in cloud-based eGRC platforms
- 5.3. Expansion of ESG compliance requirements driving integrated governance frameworks
- 5.4. Emergence of third-party and supply chain risk management in eGRC solutions
- 5.5. Regulatory pressure from data privacy laws pushing for automated compliance workflows
- 5.6. Demand for centralized compliance management to address remote and hybrid workforce risks
- 5.7. Incorporation of blockchain technology to ensure transparent audit trails in GRC
- 5.8. Use of machine learning models to detect and mitigate insider threats in real time
- 5.9. Deployment of unified dashboards aggregating multi-domain risk metrics for executives
- 5.10. Evolution of cyber risk quantification tools within eGRC platforms for board reporting
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. eGRC Market, by Solution Type
- 8.1. Integrated GRC Platform
- 8.2. Point Solution
- 8.2.1. Audit Management
- 8.2.2. Compliance Management
- 8.2.3. Policy Management
- 8.2.4. Risk Management
- 8.2.5. Vendor Risk Management
- 9. eGRC Market, by Organization Size
- 9.1. Large Enterprise
- 9.2. Small And Medium Enterprise
- 10. eGRC Market, by Service Type
- 10.1. Managed Services
- 10.2. Professional Services
- 11. eGRC Market, by Compliance Type
- 11.1. Fcpa
- 11.2. Gdpr
- 11.3. Hipaa
- 11.4. Pci Dss
- 11.5. Sox
- 12. eGRC Market, by Risk Type
- 12.1. Compliance Risk
- 12.2. Financial Risk
- 12.3. It Risk
- 12.4. Operational Risk
- 12.5. Strategic Risk
- 13. eGRC Market, by Deployment Mode
- 13.1. Cloud
- 13.2. On Premise
- 14. eGRC Market, by Industry Vertical
- 14.1. Banking Financial Services Insurance
- 14.2. Energy Utilities
- 14.3. Government
- 14.4. Healthcare
- 14.5. It And Telecom
- 14.6. Manufacturing
- 14.7. Retail Consumer Goods
- 15. eGRC Market, by Region
- 15.1. Americas
- 15.1.1. North America
- 15.1.2. Latin America
- 15.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 15.2.1. Europe
- 15.2.2. Middle East
- 15.2.3. Africa
- 15.3. Asia-Pacific
- 16. eGRC Market, by Group
- 16.1. ASEAN
- 16.2. GCC
- 16.3. European Union
- 16.4. BRICS
- 16.5. G7
- 16.6. NATO
- 17. eGRC Market, by Country
- 17.1. United States
- 17.2. Canada
- 17.3. Mexico
- 17.4. Brazil
- 17.5. United Kingdom
- 17.6. Germany
- 17.7. France
- 17.8. Russia
- 17.9. Italy
- 17.10. Spain
- 17.11. China
- 17.12. India
- 17.13. Japan
- 17.14. Australia
- 17.15. South Korea
- 18. Competitive Landscape
- 18.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 18.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 18.3. Competitive Analysis
- 18.3.1. MetricStream, Inc.
- 18.3.2. IBM Corporation
- 18.3.3. SAP SE
- 18.3.4. ServiceNow, Inc.
- 18.3.5. RSA Security LLC
- 18.3.6. NAVEX Global, Inc.
- 18.3.7. Oracle Corporation
- 18.3.8. SAI Global Limited
- 18.3.9. Wolters Kluwer N.V.
- 18.3.10. Diligent Corporation
- 18.3.11. Microsoft Corporation
- 18.3.12. Thomson Reuters Corporation
- 18.3.13. SAS Institute Inc.
- 18.3.14. Workiva Inc.
- 18.3.15. OneTrust, LLC
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
