E-commerce Logistics Market by Service Type (Inventory Management, Order Fulfillment Services, Transportation), Providers Type (Dropshipping, Fourth-Party Logistics, In-House Logistics), Operation, Type, Delivery Model, Business Model, Payment Method, End
Description
The E-commerce Logistics Market was valued at USD 301.37 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 354.56 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 18.78%, reaching USD 1,194.67 billion by 2032.
Framing the contemporary e-commerce logistics landscape with clear executive priorities to align operational capability and customer expectations across complex fulfillment networks
E-commerce logistics sits at the intersection of customer expectations, operational complexity, and relentless innovation. Consumers demand immediacy, visibility, and low friction while merchants and platforms balance margin pressure against the imperative to maintain brand experience. Consequently, logistics leaders must orchestrate a network of inventory locations, transportation lanes, fulfillment strategies, and technology integrations to deliver consistently across high variability in demand and fulfillment geography.
This executive summary synthesizes operational trends, policy impacts, segmentation intelligence, regional differentiators, and company-level dynamics to support senior leaders and investors in making pragmatic choices. It frames the challenge set faced by logistics operators, highlights structural shifts shaping long-term competitiveness, and outlines prioritized actions to align capability investments with evolving customer and regulatory realities.
Understanding the profound technological, consumer behavior, and supply chain resilience shifts that are transforming end-to-end e-commerce logistics models and capital allocation
Major tectonic shifts are redefining how logistics networks are designed and operated, driven by technological acceleration, shifting consumer behavior, and evolving policy frameworks. Automation and robotics are reducing per-unit handling time in high-density facilities while edge computing and IoT devices are improving real-time decisioning across transit and storage nodes. At the same time, consumers increasingly expect transparent end-to-end visibility, narrow delivery windows, and seamless returns, prompting providers to rearchitect processes and reassign capital to capabilities that directly influence the customer experience.
In parallel, strategic supply chain decisions are being reshaped by risk management priorities. Organizations are diversifying sourcing and distribution footprints to mitigate concentration risk, adopting hybrid fulfillment models that blend in-house and third-party capabilities, and experimenting with micro-fulfillment closer to urban demand centers. These changes are reinforced by new partnerships among carriers, technology companies, and retailers that emphasize data sharing, dynamic capacity allocation, and commercially aligned service-level agreements to maintain resilience while containing cost inflation.
Analyzing how the 2025 U.S. tariff adjustments have materially influenced sourcing, routing, compliance burden, and fulfillment strategies across cross-border e-commerce operations
Tariff shifts implemented in the United States during 2025 have created a ripple effect across cross-border e-commerce flows, supplier strategies, and logistics operations. As import duties and related compliance requirements increased for specific product categories, supply chain participants responded by reassessing sourcing regions, optimizing tariff classification practices, and reprioritizing inventory placement to reduce duty exposure. These adaptations often manifested as extended lead times for certain SKUs, increased administrative overhead for customs clearance, and heightened scrutiny of product valuation and origin documentation.
Consequently, logistics providers and merchants adjusted their routing and freight mode choices to balance landed cost and delivery reliability. Airfreight and expedited ocean services were selectively used for high-margin or time-sensitive goods, while non-critical volumes were consolidated into slower modes to minimize tariff-driven cost escalation. In addition, investment in cross-border trade compliance tools and partnerships with customs brokers intensified, enabling more accurate landed-cost calculations at the point of sale and reducing surprises at delivery. The net effect emphasized the importance of elastic fulfillment networks and scenario planning to preserve margin and service continuity under evolving trade policy conditions.
Deep segmentation intelligence revealing how service types, provider models, delivery options, payment channels, and industry verticals determine logistics priorities and capability investments
Segment-level distinctions reveal where operational complexity concentrates and where strategic opportunity lies, since service type, provider model, operational scope, logistics type, delivery model, business orientation, payment method, and end-use industry each carry distinct cost, technology, and partnership implications. Based on Service Type the market is studied across Inventory Management, Order Fulfillment Services, Transportation, and Warehousing & Storage, with Transportation further studied across Airways, Railways, Roadways, and Waterways and Warehousing & Storage further analyzed across Domestic Warehousing and International Warehousing. This granularity clarifies investment priorities: inventory management and order fulfillment increasingly require software-enabled orchestration while transportation choice drives unit cost and delivery speed trade-offs.
Provider type delineates whether enterprises rely on Dropshipping, Fourth-Party Logistics, In-House Logistics, or Third-Party Logistics, and each model changes who owns customer experience and capital intensity. Operational scope divided into Domestic and International affects regulatory complexity and inventory placement strategies, whereas the distinction between Forward Logistics and Reverse Logistics highlights the structural differences in process flows and cost recovery dynamics. Delivery model segmentation into Next Day Delivery, Same Day Delivery, and Standard Delivery reflects divergent expectations and cost structures. Business Model distinctions between Business-to-Business and Business-to-Consumer alter parcel sizing and service level demands. Payment method segmentation across Credit/Debit Cards, Digital Wallets, and Internet Banking interacts with fraud and reconciliation workflows. Finally, differences by End-Use Industry such as Automotive, Books & Media, Consumer Electronics, Fashion & Apparel, Food & Beverages, Health & Beauty, and Home & Kitchen demonstrate how product characteristics govern packaging, temperature control, and return profiles. Together these segmentation lenses inform which capabilities are foundational, which are differentiating, and where scale or specialization unlocks margin and service advantages.
Comparative regional analysis highlighting the distinct operational, regulatory, and consumer-driven factors shaping logistics strategies across major global geographies
Regional dynamics continue to define competitive advantage and risk exposure, with distinct operating models and policy environments shaping logistics strategies. In the Americas, fragmentation in urban delivery networks, a strong carrier ecosystem, and a mature e-commerce consumer base drive experimentation with last-mile consolidation, dedicated delivery fleets, and partnerships among retailers and local carriers. Regulatory considerations and cross-border trade corridors also influence decisions around nearshoring and multi-node inventory strategies.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a mosaic of regulatory regimes, infrastructure maturity levels, and consumer preferences, requiring flexible fulfillment strategies that can adapt to dense urban cores and dispersed rural demand. Data privacy standards and cross-border customs frameworks further complicate pan-regional operations. Asia-Pacific remains characterized by rapid innovation in fulfillment automation, high adoption of mobile-first payment systems, and dense domestic express networks that favor same-day and next-day delivery services, while regional trade agreements and manufacturing concentration continue to make it a central node for global supply chains. These regional differences necessitate tailored tactical responses rather than one-size-fits-all network designs.
Insights into how leading logistics providers are combining technology integration, network expansion, and partnership strategies to redefine service tiers and customer value
Leading companies are leveraging differentiated mixes of technology, network design, and commercial models to carve durable competitive positions. Some providers are investing heavily in modular fulfillment technology and API-driven integrations to become the orchestration layer for omnichannel merchants, while others double down on asset-light models that scale through marketplace partnerships and capacity aggregation. Strategic acquisitions and alliances are being used to expand geographic reach, accelerate last-mile presence, or add vertical-specific capabilities such as temperature-controlled warehousing or returns processing.
In addition, firms that successfully combine proprietary data assets with a consultative commercial approach are winning high-value contracts by offering outcome-based SLAs and transparent cost-to-serve analytics. The most adaptive players balance capital investments in automation with flexible capacity strategies that can scale seasonally, and they cultivate partner ecosystems that include carriers, technology vendors, and customs specialists to provide end-to-end solutions for complex cross-border flows. Overall, competitive differentiation increasingly emerges from the integration of technology, operational execution, and bespoke commercial constructs rather than from single-point service advantages.
Practical, prioritized operational and strategic recommendations to build resilient, customer-centered logistics operations and optimize investments in automation and partnerships
Industry leaders should prioritize a balanced program of operational resilience, customer-centric service design, and disciplined technology adoption to convert strategic intent into measurable outcomes. Begin by mapping critical failure points across the end-to-end fulfillment lifecycle and then prioritize investments in predictive exception management and real-time visibility to reduce resolution times and improve customer communications. Simultaneously, evaluate a hybrid provider strategy that blends in-house control over core fulfillment with third-party and fourth-party capabilities for scalable peak demand management.
Invest in modular automation and open APIs to avoid vendor lock-in and accelerate integration with merchant platforms. Strengthen cross-border compliance capabilities and landed-cost transparency at the point of transaction to reduce post-sale friction. Finally, implement a continuous improvement cadence that ties operational KPIs to customer lifetime value and cost-to-serve metrics, ensuring that process changes are economically justified and aligned with revenue objectives. These pragmatic steps enable executives to improve service predictability while controlling capital intensity and preserving strategic optionality.
Detailed and transparent research methodology that combines primary stakeholder interviews, secondary evidence synthesis, and cross-validation to ensure robust and actionable conclusions
This research synthesizes primary qualitative interviews with logistics executives, procurement leads, and fulfillment operations managers, supplemented by secondary analysis of publicly available regulatory documents, industry reports, carrier service notices, and technology vendor disclosures. Cross-validation was performed by triangulating statements from multiple stakeholders and verifying operational claims through case-level evidence and third-party performance indicators where available. Analytical frameworks focused on capability mapping, cost-to-serve decomposition, and scenario-based stress testing to understand how disruptive events and policy shifts translate into operational risk.
Careful attention was paid to source transparency and reproducibility: interview protocols, inclusion criteria for secondary sources, and the logic behind segmentation choices were documented to allow readers to assess the applicability of findings to their specific contexts. Limitations are acknowledged where confidential data or proprietary metrics constrained quantitative precision, and qualitative insights were prioritized to illuminate decision-making dynamics and actionable strategic choices.
Concluding strategic observations that synthesize risk, operational priorities, and investment pathways to support durable competitive advantage in e-commerce logistics
The synthesis of operational trends, tariff impacts, segmentation realities, regional differences, and competitive responses yields a coherent set of takeaways: resilient logistics requires simultaneous investments in visibility, flexible capacity, and compliance capabilities. Organizations that align fulfillment design with differentiated customer promises and that build modular, data-driven orchestration layers will be better positioned to control cost-to-serve while improving customer experience. Trade policy volatility and regional complexity underscore the need for scenario planning and adaptive inventory placement to preserve service continuity and margin integrity.
Ultimately, success in e-commerce logistics will be decided by the speed at which organizations learn from exceptions, scale proven automation and partnership models, and embed cross-functional governance that links supply chain performance to commercial objectives. Executives should treat logistics not as a cost center to be minimized in isolation but as a strategic enabler of customer retention and differentiation in highly competitive digital markets.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the contemporary e-commerce logistics landscape with clear executive priorities to align operational capability and customer expectations across complex fulfillment networks
E-commerce logistics sits at the intersection of customer expectations, operational complexity, and relentless innovation. Consumers demand immediacy, visibility, and low friction while merchants and platforms balance margin pressure against the imperative to maintain brand experience. Consequently, logistics leaders must orchestrate a network of inventory locations, transportation lanes, fulfillment strategies, and technology integrations to deliver consistently across high variability in demand and fulfillment geography.
This executive summary synthesizes operational trends, policy impacts, segmentation intelligence, regional differentiators, and company-level dynamics to support senior leaders and investors in making pragmatic choices. It frames the challenge set faced by logistics operators, highlights structural shifts shaping long-term competitiveness, and outlines prioritized actions to align capability investments with evolving customer and regulatory realities.
Understanding the profound technological, consumer behavior, and supply chain resilience shifts that are transforming end-to-end e-commerce logistics models and capital allocation
Major tectonic shifts are redefining how logistics networks are designed and operated, driven by technological acceleration, shifting consumer behavior, and evolving policy frameworks. Automation and robotics are reducing per-unit handling time in high-density facilities while edge computing and IoT devices are improving real-time decisioning across transit and storage nodes. At the same time, consumers increasingly expect transparent end-to-end visibility, narrow delivery windows, and seamless returns, prompting providers to rearchitect processes and reassign capital to capabilities that directly influence the customer experience.
In parallel, strategic supply chain decisions are being reshaped by risk management priorities. Organizations are diversifying sourcing and distribution footprints to mitigate concentration risk, adopting hybrid fulfillment models that blend in-house and third-party capabilities, and experimenting with micro-fulfillment closer to urban demand centers. These changes are reinforced by new partnerships among carriers, technology companies, and retailers that emphasize data sharing, dynamic capacity allocation, and commercially aligned service-level agreements to maintain resilience while containing cost inflation.
Analyzing how the 2025 U.S. tariff adjustments have materially influenced sourcing, routing, compliance burden, and fulfillment strategies across cross-border e-commerce operations
Tariff shifts implemented in the United States during 2025 have created a ripple effect across cross-border e-commerce flows, supplier strategies, and logistics operations. As import duties and related compliance requirements increased for specific product categories, supply chain participants responded by reassessing sourcing regions, optimizing tariff classification practices, and reprioritizing inventory placement to reduce duty exposure. These adaptations often manifested as extended lead times for certain SKUs, increased administrative overhead for customs clearance, and heightened scrutiny of product valuation and origin documentation.
Consequently, logistics providers and merchants adjusted their routing and freight mode choices to balance landed cost and delivery reliability. Airfreight and expedited ocean services were selectively used for high-margin or time-sensitive goods, while non-critical volumes were consolidated into slower modes to minimize tariff-driven cost escalation. In addition, investment in cross-border trade compliance tools and partnerships with customs brokers intensified, enabling more accurate landed-cost calculations at the point of sale and reducing surprises at delivery. The net effect emphasized the importance of elastic fulfillment networks and scenario planning to preserve margin and service continuity under evolving trade policy conditions.
Deep segmentation intelligence revealing how service types, provider models, delivery options, payment channels, and industry verticals determine logistics priorities and capability investments
Segment-level distinctions reveal where operational complexity concentrates and where strategic opportunity lies, since service type, provider model, operational scope, logistics type, delivery model, business orientation, payment method, and end-use industry each carry distinct cost, technology, and partnership implications. Based on Service Type the market is studied across Inventory Management, Order Fulfillment Services, Transportation, and Warehousing & Storage, with Transportation further studied across Airways, Railways, Roadways, and Waterways and Warehousing & Storage further analyzed across Domestic Warehousing and International Warehousing. This granularity clarifies investment priorities: inventory management and order fulfillment increasingly require software-enabled orchestration while transportation choice drives unit cost and delivery speed trade-offs.
Provider type delineates whether enterprises rely on Dropshipping, Fourth-Party Logistics, In-House Logistics, or Third-Party Logistics, and each model changes who owns customer experience and capital intensity. Operational scope divided into Domestic and International affects regulatory complexity and inventory placement strategies, whereas the distinction between Forward Logistics and Reverse Logistics highlights the structural differences in process flows and cost recovery dynamics. Delivery model segmentation into Next Day Delivery, Same Day Delivery, and Standard Delivery reflects divergent expectations and cost structures. Business Model distinctions between Business-to-Business and Business-to-Consumer alter parcel sizing and service level demands. Payment method segmentation across Credit/Debit Cards, Digital Wallets, and Internet Banking interacts with fraud and reconciliation workflows. Finally, differences by End-Use Industry such as Automotive, Books & Media, Consumer Electronics, Fashion & Apparel, Food & Beverages, Health & Beauty, and Home & Kitchen demonstrate how product characteristics govern packaging, temperature control, and return profiles. Together these segmentation lenses inform which capabilities are foundational, which are differentiating, and where scale or specialization unlocks margin and service advantages.
Comparative regional analysis highlighting the distinct operational, regulatory, and consumer-driven factors shaping logistics strategies across major global geographies
Regional dynamics continue to define competitive advantage and risk exposure, with distinct operating models and policy environments shaping logistics strategies. In the Americas, fragmentation in urban delivery networks, a strong carrier ecosystem, and a mature e-commerce consumer base drive experimentation with last-mile consolidation, dedicated delivery fleets, and partnerships among retailers and local carriers. Regulatory considerations and cross-border trade corridors also influence decisions around nearshoring and multi-node inventory strategies.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a mosaic of regulatory regimes, infrastructure maturity levels, and consumer preferences, requiring flexible fulfillment strategies that can adapt to dense urban cores and dispersed rural demand. Data privacy standards and cross-border customs frameworks further complicate pan-regional operations. Asia-Pacific remains characterized by rapid innovation in fulfillment automation, high adoption of mobile-first payment systems, and dense domestic express networks that favor same-day and next-day delivery services, while regional trade agreements and manufacturing concentration continue to make it a central node for global supply chains. These regional differences necessitate tailored tactical responses rather than one-size-fits-all network designs.
Insights into how leading logistics providers are combining technology integration, network expansion, and partnership strategies to redefine service tiers and customer value
Leading companies are leveraging differentiated mixes of technology, network design, and commercial models to carve durable competitive positions. Some providers are investing heavily in modular fulfillment technology and API-driven integrations to become the orchestration layer for omnichannel merchants, while others double down on asset-light models that scale through marketplace partnerships and capacity aggregation. Strategic acquisitions and alliances are being used to expand geographic reach, accelerate last-mile presence, or add vertical-specific capabilities such as temperature-controlled warehousing or returns processing.
In addition, firms that successfully combine proprietary data assets with a consultative commercial approach are winning high-value contracts by offering outcome-based SLAs and transparent cost-to-serve analytics. The most adaptive players balance capital investments in automation with flexible capacity strategies that can scale seasonally, and they cultivate partner ecosystems that include carriers, technology vendors, and customs specialists to provide end-to-end solutions for complex cross-border flows. Overall, competitive differentiation increasingly emerges from the integration of technology, operational execution, and bespoke commercial constructs rather than from single-point service advantages.
Practical, prioritized operational and strategic recommendations to build resilient, customer-centered logistics operations and optimize investments in automation and partnerships
Industry leaders should prioritize a balanced program of operational resilience, customer-centric service design, and disciplined technology adoption to convert strategic intent into measurable outcomes. Begin by mapping critical failure points across the end-to-end fulfillment lifecycle and then prioritize investments in predictive exception management and real-time visibility to reduce resolution times and improve customer communications. Simultaneously, evaluate a hybrid provider strategy that blends in-house control over core fulfillment with third-party and fourth-party capabilities for scalable peak demand management.
Invest in modular automation and open APIs to avoid vendor lock-in and accelerate integration with merchant platforms. Strengthen cross-border compliance capabilities and landed-cost transparency at the point of transaction to reduce post-sale friction. Finally, implement a continuous improvement cadence that ties operational KPIs to customer lifetime value and cost-to-serve metrics, ensuring that process changes are economically justified and aligned with revenue objectives. These pragmatic steps enable executives to improve service predictability while controlling capital intensity and preserving strategic optionality.
Detailed and transparent research methodology that combines primary stakeholder interviews, secondary evidence synthesis, and cross-validation to ensure robust and actionable conclusions
This research synthesizes primary qualitative interviews with logistics executives, procurement leads, and fulfillment operations managers, supplemented by secondary analysis of publicly available regulatory documents, industry reports, carrier service notices, and technology vendor disclosures. Cross-validation was performed by triangulating statements from multiple stakeholders and verifying operational claims through case-level evidence and third-party performance indicators where available. Analytical frameworks focused on capability mapping, cost-to-serve decomposition, and scenario-based stress testing to understand how disruptive events and policy shifts translate into operational risk.
Careful attention was paid to source transparency and reproducibility: interview protocols, inclusion criteria for secondary sources, and the logic behind segmentation choices were documented to allow readers to assess the applicability of findings to their specific contexts. Limitations are acknowledged where confidential data or proprietary metrics constrained quantitative precision, and qualitative insights were prioritized to illuminate decision-making dynamics and actionable strategic choices.
Concluding strategic observations that synthesize risk, operational priorities, and investment pathways to support durable competitive advantage in e-commerce logistics
The synthesis of operational trends, tariff impacts, segmentation realities, regional differences, and competitive responses yields a coherent set of takeaways: resilient logistics requires simultaneous investments in visibility, flexible capacity, and compliance capabilities. Organizations that align fulfillment design with differentiated customer promises and that build modular, data-driven orchestration layers will be better positioned to control cost-to-serve while improving customer experience. Trade policy volatility and regional complexity underscore the need for scenario planning and adaptive inventory placement to preserve service continuity and margin integrity.
Ultimately, success in e-commerce logistics will be decided by the speed at which organizations learn from exceptions, scale proven automation and partnership models, and embed cross-functional governance that links supply chain performance to commercial objectives. Executives should treat logistics not as a cost center to be minimized in isolation but as a strategic enabler of customer retention and differentiation in highly competitive digital markets.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
182 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Implementation of micro fulfillment centers across urban areas for same-day delivery
- 5.2. Integration of AI powered route optimization to reduce last mile delivery costs and delays
- 5.3. Adoption of electric and alternative fuel vehicles to achieve carbon neutral e-commerce deliveries
- 5.4. Deployment of blockchain solutions for real time supply chain transparency and security
- 5.5. Expansion of cross border e-commerce fulfillment hubs to streamline international shipping processes
- 5.6. Implementation of IoT based warehouse monitoring for real time inventory management and alerts
- 5.7. Utilization of autonomous drones and robots for contactless last mile deliveries in urban areas
- 5.8. Implementation of reverse logistics strategies to improve returns handling and customer satisfaction
- 5.9. Adoption of dynamic pricing algorithms for balancing delivery speed and cost efficiency in e-commerce logistics
- 5.10. Integration of robotic process automation in order processing to reduce fulfillment lead times and errors
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. E-commerce Logistics Market, by Service Type
- 8.1. Inventory Management
- 8.2. Order Fulfillment Services
- 8.3. Transportation
- 8.3.1. Airways
- 8.3.2. Railways
- 8.3.3. Roadways
- 8.3.4. Waterways
- 8.4. Warehousing & Storage
- 8.4.1. Domestic Warehousing
- 8.4.2. International Warehousing
- 9. E-commerce Logistics Market, by Providers Type
- 9.1. Dropshipping
- 9.2. Fourth-Party Logistics
- 9.3. In-House Logistics
- 9.4. Third-Party Logistics
- 10. E-commerce Logistics Market, by Operation
- 10.1. Domestic
- 10.2. International
- 11. E-commerce Logistics Market, by Type
- 11.1. Forward Logistics
- 11.2. Reverse Logistics
- 12. E-commerce Logistics Market, by Delivery Model
- 12.1. Next Day Delivery
- 12.2. Same Day Delivery
- 12.3. Standard Delivery
- 13. E-commerce Logistics Market, by Business Model
- 13.1. Business-to-Business
- 13.2. Business-to-Consumer
- 14. E-commerce Logistics Market, by Payment Method
- 14.1. Credit/Debit Cards
- 14.2. Digital Wallets
- 14.3. Internet Banking
- 15. E-commerce Logistics Market, by End-Use Industry
- 15.1. Automotive
- 15.2. Books & Media
- 15.3. Consumer Electronics
- 15.4. Fashion & Apparel
- 15.5. Food & Beverages
- 15.6. Health & Beauty
- 15.7. Home & Kitchen
- 16. E-commerce Logistics Market, by Region
- 16.1. Americas
- 16.1.1. North America
- 16.1.2. Latin America
- 16.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 16.2.1. Europe
- 16.2.2. Middle East
- 16.2.3. Africa
- 16.3. Asia-Pacific
- 17. E-commerce Logistics Market, by Group
- 17.1. ASEAN
- 17.2. GCC
- 17.3. European Union
- 17.4. BRICS
- 17.5. G7
- 17.6. NATO
- 18. E-commerce Logistics Market, by Country
- 18.1. United States
- 18.2. Canada
- 18.3. Mexico
- 18.4. Brazil
- 18.5. United Kingdom
- 18.6. Germany
- 18.7. France
- 18.8. Russia
- 18.9. Italy
- 18.10. Spain
- 18.11. China
- 18.12. India
- 18.13. Japan
- 18.14. Australia
- 18.15. South Korea
- 19. Competitive Landscape
- 19.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 19.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 19.3. Competitive Analysis
- 19.3.1. Amazon.com, Inc.
- 19.3.2. Aramex International
- 19.3.3. Auctane, Inc.
- 19.3.4. Blue-Grace Logistics LLC
- 19.3.5. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
- 19.3.6. CJ Logistics Corporation
- 19.3.7. Deutsche Post AG
- 19.3.8. Echo Global Logistics, Inc.
- 19.3.9. FedEx Corporation
- 19.3.10. Gati Limited
- 19.3.11. Goodman Group
- 19.3.12. GXO Logistics, Inc.
- 19.3.13. J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
- 19.3.14. Kenco Group, Inc.
- 19.3.15. Kohl's, Inc.
- 19.3.16. Locus Robotics Corporation
- 19.3.17. NIPPON EXPRESS HOLDINGS, INC.
- 19.3.18. Purolator Inc.
- 19.3.19. Rakuten Group, Inc.
- 19.3.20. ShipBob, Inc.
- 19.3.21. Shiprocket
- 19.3.22. Stord, Inc.
- 19.3.23. Walmart Inc.
- 19.3.24. XPO, Inc.
- 19.3.25. Zebra Technologies Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
