Water & Wastewater Treatment Equipment Market by Treatment Type (Biological, Chemical, Physical), Equipment Type (Disinfection, Filtration Systems, Membrane Systems), Application, End User Industry, Capacity - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Water & Wastewater Treatment Equipment Market was valued at USD 20.62 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 23.80 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 15.53%, reaching USD 65.47 billion by 2032.
Framing the strategic context for water and wastewater treatment equipment stakeholders amid evolving regulatory, technological, and operational imperatives
The water and wastewater treatment equipment landscape is undergoing a period of accelerated change driven by regulatory tightening, aging infrastructure, technological innovation, and heightened stakeholder expectations for reliability and sustainability. Across municipal and industrial settings, asset owners and operators face converging pressures: mandates to reduce pollutants and pathogens, requirements for circular water use, and obligations to improve system resilience to climate-driven extremes. These forces have elevated the importance of treatment equipment that can deliver consistent performance while reducing lifecycle cost and environmental footprint.
Given this context, procurement and engineering teams are prioritizing modularity, digital enablement, and lifecycle service models that de-risk capital investments. At the same time, manufacturers and systems integrators are responding with more integrated solutions that pair proven mechanical processes with sensing, analytics, and remote operations. In short, the market is transitioning from a supplier-of-equipment mindset toward a solutions-oriented ecosystem where interoperability, preventive maintenance, and regulatory compliance form the core value proposition. This report synthesizes those dynamics to inform strategic planning, vendor selection, and technology roadmaps.
Identifying the major transformative shifts reshaping equipment selection, delivery models, and operational priorities across the treatment ecosystem
Over the past several years, transformative shifts have reshaped how organizations approach water and wastewater treatment equipment, and several of those shifts are now maturing into industry norms. Advances in digital instrumentation and controls have moved beyond pilot projects into mainstream deployment, enabling condition-based maintenance, remote monitoring, and optimization of energy-intensive assets such as pumps and membrane systems. Simultaneously, membrane technologies and hybrid process configurations are enabling higher effluent quality with smaller footprints, prompting re-evaluation of traditional centralized treatment models.
In parallel, heightened emphasis on resource recovery and circularity is broadening the remit of treatment facilities to include nutrient capture, energy generation, and water reuse pipelines. Financing and procurement models are also adapting: performance-based contracts and service-as-a-solution offerings are gaining traction because they align incentives across owners, operators, and vendors. Regulatory scrutiny and public expectations for transparency are driving investments in monitoring and reporting capabilities, which in turn are increasing the value of sensors and controls that enable verifiable compliance. Collectively, these shifts favor vendors and operators that can integrate process expertise with digital services and flexible commercial models.
Assessing how cumulative United States tariff measures through 2025 have altered sourcing strategies, component competitiveness, and procurement risk management across the sector
Recent tariff actions in the United States have introduced additional complexity into procurement strategies for water and wastewater treatment equipment. Cumulative tariff measures enacted or proposed through 2025 have affected the competitiveness of imported components, changed supply chain routing decisions, and prompted reassessment of sourcing locations for critical subassemblies such as membranes, pumps, and instrumentation. Importantly, tariffs have not altered the fundamental drivers of investment in treatment capacity and upgrades, but they have influenced cost structures and vendor negotiations in measurable ways.
Supply chain teams have responded by diversifying supplier bases, increasing inventory of long-lead items, and exploring localized manufacturing partnerships to mitigate exposure to trade policy shifts. In some cases, equipment integrators have adapted product specifications to favor domestically sourced components or cross-qualified multiple suppliers to maintain project schedules. These adjustments have implications for project timing, warranty arrangements, and aftermarket support, as well as for the total cost of ownership calculations that owners use when evaluating technology options. While tariffs create short- to medium-term friction, they are also catalyzing resilience measures that may yield longer-term benefits in supply security and supplier relationships.
Uncovering segmentation-driven insights that link treatment processes, equipment categories, applications, end users, and capacity considerations to procurement and operational choices
A granular view of segmentation reveals distinct performance considerations and adoption patterns across treatment types, equipment classes, applications, end users, and capacity tiers. Treatment type distinctions between Biological, Chemical, and Physical processes inform technology fit and design priorities; Biological approaches such as Activated Sludge, Membrane Bioreactor, Sequencing Batch Reactor, and Trickling Filter remain central where organic load reduction is primary, whereas Chemical sub-processes like Coagulation and Flocculation, Disinfection, Ion Exchange, and pH Adjustment are essential for targeted contaminant removal and regulatory compliance. Physical processes often provide polishing and solids separation, complementing biological and chemical stages to achieve final discharge or reuse requirements.
Equipment type segmentation further clarifies where investment and innovation are concentrated: Disinfection technologies including chlorination and UV are being selected based on residual requirements and disinfection byproduct concerns, while filtration systems-cartridge, multimedia, and sand-serve diverse particulate removal roles. Membrane systems spanning hollow fiber, plate-and-frame, and spiral-wound configurations are driving compact plant designs and higher-quality effluent streams. Pumps, both centrifugal and positive displacement, remain critical for hydraulic control and energy optimization, and an expanding suite of sensors and controls-conductivity, flow metering, pH, and turbidity-are enabling real-time process management. Application segmentation between wastewater treatment and water treatment underscores differing regulatory constraints, contaminant profiles, and reuse objectives, which in turn influence technology selection.
End-user industry differences between industrial and municipal operations shape procurement cycles, capital intensity, and risk tolerance. Industrial sub-sectors such as chemicals, food and beverage, mining, oil and gas, pharmaceuticals, power generation, and pulp and paper impose specialized requirements related to effluent composition, permitting complexity, and continuity of operations. Capacity segmentation into large-scale, medium-scale, and small-scale installations affects the relative importance of modularity, on-site constructability, and the balance between capital and operating expenditures. Taken together, these segmentation lenses help stakeholders prioritize technology choices, vendor capabilities, and deployment strategies consistent with performance objectives and regulatory obligations.
Explaining how distinct regional market dynamics across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific drive varied technology adoption, financing, and operational priorities
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on technology adoption, regulatory expectations, and financing structures across the water and wastewater equipment landscape. The Americas region exhibits a mix of mature municipal infrastructure needs and industrial renewal projects, with a growing emphasis on upgrading aging systems, implementing nutrient controls, and expanding potable reuse initiatives. In North and Latin American markets, institutional procurement cycles and access to project finance shape the pace of capital investments, while local manufacturing and service networks play a pivotal role in long-term operations.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogenous picture where stringent environmental regulations in some European markets drive demand for advanced treatment solutions, while Middle Eastern countries prioritize desalination, reuse, and water security programs that favor robust membrane and energy-efficient equipment. African markets often emphasize decentralized and cost-effective options tailored to limited infrastructure contexts. Meanwhile, the Asia-Pacific region combines high-growth urbanization with industrial expansion, creating significant demand for both large-scale municipal plants and industrial treatment systems. In many Asia-Pacific markets, technological leapfrogging and rapid deployment of membrane-based and digital solutions are visible, supported by active local manufacturing ecosystems and public-private financing mechanisms. Understanding these regional nuances is essential for vendors and investors seeking to align product offerings, service models, and partnership approaches with local market conditions.
Highlighting the competitive shift toward integrated lifecycle solutions, digital services, and localized support capabilities that determine vendor differentiation and customer value
Competitive dynamics among equipment manufacturers, system integrators, and specialized service providers are increasingly defined by the ability to deliver integrated, lifecycle-focused solutions rather than stand-alone capital goods. Leading players are differentiating through modular product platforms that reduce installation time and by deploying digital offerings that enhance uptime, predictive maintenance, and compliance reporting. Strategic partnerships between OEMs and software or analytics firms are becoming more common as vendors seek to embed monitoring and optimization capabilities across installed bases.
Service propositions such as long-term performance contracts, managed services, and spare-parts ecosystems are attracting attention because they align vendor revenues with operational outcomes and offer owners predictable performance. Additionally, companies investing in localized manufacturing, parts depots, and certified service networks are better positioned to mitigate trade-related disruptions and to meet fast-track project timelines. Mergers, acquisitions, and JV activity are also reshaping the competitive map as firms seek complementary capabilities in membranes, disinfection technologies, and digital controls. Overall, the winners will be those that combine deep process engineering expertise with robust aftermarket and digital service capabilities to reduce total cost of ownership and accelerate compliance-driven upgrades.
Delivering pragmatic and prioritized strategic actions for manufacturers, integrators, and owners to capitalize on technology trends, regulatory shifts, and supply chain resilience imperatives
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of actionable measures to navigate the current landscape and to capture upside from technology and regulatory trends. First, align product roadmaps and service portfolios to emphasize modular, scalable systems that reduce installation time and accommodate varying capacity tiers, thereby improving competitiveness across large, medium, and small scale projects. Second, accelerate integration of sensors, controls, and analytics into core product offerings to enable condition-based maintenance, energy optimization, and verifiable compliance reporting, which enhances customer value and creates recurring revenue streams.
Third, develop diversified sourcing and manufacturing strategies to lower exposure to trade policy volatility and to ensure responsiveness for aftermarket support. Fourth, pursue strategic partnerships and channel models that expand local service reach and enable rapid deployment, particularly in regions with complex regulatory or logistical challenges. Finally, embed performance-based commercial models selectively to align incentives with owners and operators, while ensuring rigorous service-level definitions and risk-sharing mechanisms. By executing on these priorities with disciplined investment and focused pilot programs, leaders can strengthen their market position and deliver measurable operational benefits to their customers.
Describing a transparent, multi-source research methodology that combines technical literature, expert interviews, vendor documentation, and regulatory analysis to validate conclusions
The research underpinning this analysis synthesizes technical literature, industry standards, regulatory publications, expert interviews, and primary vendor material to assemble a coherent view of market dynamics and technology trends. Process-level descriptions draw on peer-reviewed engineering studies and accepted design practices, while insights on digitalization and aftermarket service models are grounded in interviews with procurement leaders, operations managers, and equipment suppliers. Trade policy impacts are analyzed through review of publicly available tariff schedules, customs guidance, and observed procurement responses reported by industry participants.
Where appropriate, qualitative cross-validation was applied by comparing vendor product specifications, case studies, and project commissioning reports to ensure that technology claims align with operational realities. The methodology emphasizes transparency in source types and limits reliance on single-source assertions. Although no single method can capture every local nuance, combining literature review, stakeholder interviews, and supplier documentation provides a robust foundation for the strategic conclusions and recommendations presented in this report.
Summarizing why integrated technology, lifecycle servicing, and supply chain resilience are essential for achieving regulatory compliance, performance, and long-term value
In conclusion, water and wastewater treatment equipment markets are at an inflection point where technological capability, regulatory pressure, and commercial model innovation intersect. Stakeholders who focus on interoperability, lifecycle services, and resilient supply chains will be better positioned to meet increasingly stringent effluent standards while controlling lifecycle costs. The proliferation of digital sensors and analytics is transforming maintenance paradigms, enabling predictive interventions that improve reliability and reduce energy consumption. At the same time, regional differences in regulatory regimes, financing landscapes, and infrastructure maturity require tailored go-to-market approaches that reflect local operational priorities.
As organizations plan near- and medium-term investments, they should weigh the operational benefits of advanced membranes, modular systems, and enhanced controls against practical considerations such as supply chain resilience, service coverage, and contractual alignment. By doing so, owners and vendors can capitalize on opportunities to enhance system performance, support circular water objectives, and deliver demonstrable environmental and economic benefits over asset lifecycles.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the strategic context for water and wastewater treatment equipment stakeholders amid evolving regulatory, technological, and operational imperatives
The water and wastewater treatment equipment landscape is undergoing a period of accelerated change driven by regulatory tightening, aging infrastructure, technological innovation, and heightened stakeholder expectations for reliability and sustainability. Across municipal and industrial settings, asset owners and operators face converging pressures: mandates to reduce pollutants and pathogens, requirements for circular water use, and obligations to improve system resilience to climate-driven extremes. These forces have elevated the importance of treatment equipment that can deliver consistent performance while reducing lifecycle cost and environmental footprint.
Given this context, procurement and engineering teams are prioritizing modularity, digital enablement, and lifecycle service models that de-risk capital investments. At the same time, manufacturers and systems integrators are responding with more integrated solutions that pair proven mechanical processes with sensing, analytics, and remote operations. In short, the market is transitioning from a supplier-of-equipment mindset toward a solutions-oriented ecosystem where interoperability, preventive maintenance, and regulatory compliance form the core value proposition. This report synthesizes those dynamics to inform strategic planning, vendor selection, and technology roadmaps.
Identifying the major transformative shifts reshaping equipment selection, delivery models, and operational priorities across the treatment ecosystem
Over the past several years, transformative shifts have reshaped how organizations approach water and wastewater treatment equipment, and several of those shifts are now maturing into industry norms. Advances in digital instrumentation and controls have moved beyond pilot projects into mainstream deployment, enabling condition-based maintenance, remote monitoring, and optimization of energy-intensive assets such as pumps and membrane systems. Simultaneously, membrane technologies and hybrid process configurations are enabling higher effluent quality with smaller footprints, prompting re-evaluation of traditional centralized treatment models.
In parallel, heightened emphasis on resource recovery and circularity is broadening the remit of treatment facilities to include nutrient capture, energy generation, and water reuse pipelines. Financing and procurement models are also adapting: performance-based contracts and service-as-a-solution offerings are gaining traction because they align incentives across owners, operators, and vendors. Regulatory scrutiny and public expectations for transparency are driving investments in monitoring and reporting capabilities, which in turn are increasing the value of sensors and controls that enable verifiable compliance. Collectively, these shifts favor vendors and operators that can integrate process expertise with digital services and flexible commercial models.
Assessing how cumulative United States tariff measures through 2025 have altered sourcing strategies, component competitiveness, and procurement risk management across the sector
Recent tariff actions in the United States have introduced additional complexity into procurement strategies for water and wastewater treatment equipment. Cumulative tariff measures enacted or proposed through 2025 have affected the competitiveness of imported components, changed supply chain routing decisions, and prompted reassessment of sourcing locations for critical subassemblies such as membranes, pumps, and instrumentation. Importantly, tariffs have not altered the fundamental drivers of investment in treatment capacity and upgrades, but they have influenced cost structures and vendor negotiations in measurable ways.
Supply chain teams have responded by diversifying supplier bases, increasing inventory of long-lead items, and exploring localized manufacturing partnerships to mitigate exposure to trade policy shifts. In some cases, equipment integrators have adapted product specifications to favor domestically sourced components or cross-qualified multiple suppliers to maintain project schedules. These adjustments have implications for project timing, warranty arrangements, and aftermarket support, as well as for the total cost of ownership calculations that owners use when evaluating technology options. While tariffs create short- to medium-term friction, they are also catalyzing resilience measures that may yield longer-term benefits in supply security and supplier relationships.
Uncovering segmentation-driven insights that link treatment processes, equipment categories, applications, end users, and capacity considerations to procurement and operational choices
A granular view of segmentation reveals distinct performance considerations and adoption patterns across treatment types, equipment classes, applications, end users, and capacity tiers. Treatment type distinctions between Biological, Chemical, and Physical processes inform technology fit and design priorities; Biological approaches such as Activated Sludge, Membrane Bioreactor, Sequencing Batch Reactor, and Trickling Filter remain central where organic load reduction is primary, whereas Chemical sub-processes like Coagulation and Flocculation, Disinfection, Ion Exchange, and pH Adjustment are essential for targeted contaminant removal and regulatory compliance. Physical processes often provide polishing and solids separation, complementing biological and chemical stages to achieve final discharge or reuse requirements.
Equipment type segmentation further clarifies where investment and innovation are concentrated: Disinfection technologies including chlorination and UV are being selected based on residual requirements and disinfection byproduct concerns, while filtration systems-cartridge, multimedia, and sand-serve diverse particulate removal roles. Membrane systems spanning hollow fiber, plate-and-frame, and spiral-wound configurations are driving compact plant designs and higher-quality effluent streams. Pumps, both centrifugal and positive displacement, remain critical for hydraulic control and energy optimization, and an expanding suite of sensors and controls-conductivity, flow metering, pH, and turbidity-are enabling real-time process management. Application segmentation between wastewater treatment and water treatment underscores differing regulatory constraints, contaminant profiles, and reuse objectives, which in turn influence technology selection.
End-user industry differences between industrial and municipal operations shape procurement cycles, capital intensity, and risk tolerance. Industrial sub-sectors such as chemicals, food and beverage, mining, oil and gas, pharmaceuticals, power generation, and pulp and paper impose specialized requirements related to effluent composition, permitting complexity, and continuity of operations. Capacity segmentation into large-scale, medium-scale, and small-scale installations affects the relative importance of modularity, on-site constructability, and the balance between capital and operating expenditures. Taken together, these segmentation lenses help stakeholders prioritize technology choices, vendor capabilities, and deployment strategies consistent with performance objectives and regulatory obligations.
Explaining how distinct regional market dynamics across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific drive varied technology adoption, financing, and operational priorities
Regional dynamics exert a powerful influence on technology adoption, regulatory expectations, and financing structures across the water and wastewater equipment landscape. The Americas region exhibits a mix of mature municipal infrastructure needs and industrial renewal projects, with a growing emphasis on upgrading aging systems, implementing nutrient controls, and expanding potable reuse initiatives. In North and Latin American markets, institutional procurement cycles and access to project finance shape the pace of capital investments, while local manufacturing and service networks play a pivotal role in long-term operations.
Europe, Middle East & Africa presents a heterogenous picture where stringent environmental regulations in some European markets drive demand for advanced treatment solutions, while Middle Eastern countries prioritize desalination, reuse, and water security programs that favor robust membrane and energy-efficient equipment. African markets often emphasize decentralized and cost-effective options tailored to limited infrastructure contexts. Meanwhile, the Asia-Pacific region combines high-growth urbanization with industrial expansion, creating significant demand for both large-scale municipal plants and industrial treatment systems. In many Asia-Pacific markets, technological leapfrogging and rapid deployment of membrane-based and digital solutions are visible, supported by active local manufacturing ecosystems and public-private financing mechanisms. Understanding these regional nuances is essential for vendors and investors seeking to align product offerings, service models, and partnership approaches with local market conditions.
Highlighting the competitive shift toward integrated lifecycle solutions, digital services, and localized support capabilities that determine vendor differentiation and customer value
Competitive dynamics among equipment manufacturers, system integrators, and specialized service providers are increasingly defined by the ability to deliver integrated, lifecycle-focused solutions rather than stand-alone capital goods. Leading players are differentiating through modular product platforms that reduce installation time and by deploying digital offerings that enhance uptime, predictive maintenance, and compliance reporting. Strategic partnerships between OEMs and software or analytics firms are becoming more common as vendors seek to embed monitoring and optimization capabilities across installed bases.
Service propositions such as long-term performance contracts, managed services, and spare-parts ecosystems are attracting attention because they align vendor revenues with operational outcomes and offer owners predictable performance. Additionally, companies investing in localized manufacturing, parts depots, and certified service networks are better positioned to mitigate trade-related disruptions and to meet fast-track project timelines. Mergers, acquisitions, and JV activity are also reshaping the competitive map as firms seek complementary capabilities in membranes, disinfection technologies, and digital controls. Overall, the winners will be those that combine deep process engineering expertise with robust aftermarket and digital service capabilities to reduce total cost of ownership and accelerate compliance-driven upgrades.
Delivering pragmatic and prioritized strategic actions for manufacturers, integrators, and owners to capitalize on technology trends, regulatory shifts, and supply chain resilience imperatives
Industry leaders should prioritize a set of actionable measures to navigate the current landscape and to capture upside from technology and regulatory trends. First, align product roadmaps and service portfolios to emphasize modular, scalable systems that reduce installation time and accommodate varying capacity tiers, thereby improving competitiveness across large, medium, and small scale projects. Second, accelerate integration of sensors, controls, and analytics into core product offerings to enable condition-based maintenance, energy optimization, and verifiable compliance reporting, which enhances customer value and creates recurring revenue streams.
Third, develop diversified sourcing and manufacturing strategies to lower exposure to trade policy volatility and to ensure responsiveness for aftermarket support. Fourth, pursue strategic partnerships and channel models that expand local service reach and enable rapid deployment, particularly in regions with complex regulatory or logistical challenges. Finally, embed performance-based commercial models selectively to align incentives with owners and operators, while ensuring rigorous service-level definitions and risk-sharing mechanisms. By executing on these priorities with disciplined investment and focused pilot programs, leaders can strengthen their market position and deliver measurable operational benefits to their customers.
Describing a transparent, multi-source research methodology that combines technical literature, expert interviews, vendor documentation, and regulatory analysis to validate conclusions
The research underpinning this analysis synthesizes technical literature, industry standards, regulatory publications, expert interviews, and primary vendor material to assemble a coherent view of market dynamics and technology trends. Process-level descriptions draw on peer-reviewed engineering studies and accepted design practices, while insights on digitalization and aftermarket service models are grounded in interviews with procurement leaders, operations managers, and equipment suppliers. Trade policy impacts are analyzed through review of publicly available tariff schedules, customs guidance, and observed procurement responses reported by industry participants.
Where appropriate, qualitative cross-validation was applied by comparing vendor product specifications, case studies, and project commissioning reports to ensure that technology claims align with operational realities. The methodology emphasizes transparency in source types and limits reliance on single-source assertions. Although no single method can capture every local nuance, combining literature review, stakeholder interviews, and supplier documentation provides a robust foundation for the strategic conclusions and recommendations presented in this report.
Summarizing why integrated technology, lifecycle servicing, and supply chain resilience are essential for achieving regulatory compliance, performance, and long-term value
In conclusion, water and wastewater treatment equipment markets are at an inflection point where technological capability, regulatory pressure, and commercial model innovation intersect. Stakeholders who focus on interoperability, lifecycle services, and resilient supply chains will be better positioned to meet increasingly stringent effluent standards while controlling lifecycle costs. The proliferation of digital sensors and analytics is transforming maintenance paradigms, enabling predictive interventions that improve reliability and reduce energy consumption. At the same time, regional differences in regulatory regimes, financing landscapes, and infrastructure maturity require tailored go-to-market approaches that reflect local operational priorities.
As organizations plan near- and medium-term investments, they should weigh the operational benefits of advanced membranes, modular systems, and enhanced controls against practical considerations such as supply chain resilience, service coverage, and contractual alignment. By doing so, owners and vendors can capitalize on opportunities to enhance system performance, support circular water objectives, and deliver demonstrable environmental and economic benefits over asset lifecycles.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
182 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Increasing adoption of membrane bioreactor systems for advanced wastewater reuse applications
- 5.2. Growing implementation of ultraviolet disinfection equipment to eliminate emerging micropollutants
- 5.3. Integration of real time IoT sensors and analytics for optimized operational efficiency in treatment plants
- 5.4. Rising focus on modular and skid mounted treatment units to reduce installation time and costs
- 5.5. Surge in demand for energy efficient aeration blowers and variable frequency drive systems in utilities
- 5.6. Expansion of decentralized treatment solutions to address rural and industrial water scarcity challenges
- 5.7. Development of advanced oxidation process equipment for targeted removal of persistent organic contaminants
- 5.8. Adoption of digital twins and simulation software for lifecycle management of treatment infrastructure
- 5.9. Increased investments in nutrient recovery technologies to support circular economy initiatives in wastewater
- 5.10. Shift towards chemical free treatment methods using ultraviolet advanced oxidation and electrocoagulation
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Water & Wastewater Treatment Equipment Market, by Treatment Type
- 8.1. Biological
- 8.1.1. Activated Sludge
- 8.1.2. Membrane Bioreactor
- 8.1.3. Sequencing Batch Reactor
- 8.1.4. Trickling Filter
- 8.2. Chemical
- 8.2.1. Coagulation & Flocculation
- 8.2.2. Disinfection
- 8.2.3. Ion Exchange
- 8.2.4. PH Adjustment
- 8.3. Physical
- 9. Water & Wastewater Treatment Equipment Market, by Equipment Type
- 9.1. Disinfection
- 9.1.1. Chlorination
- 9.1.2. UV
- 9.2. Filtration Systems
- 9.2.1. Cartridge
- 9.2.2. Multimedia
- 9.2.3. Sand
- 9.3. Membrane Systems
- 9.3.1. Hollow Fiber
- 9.3.2. Plate And Frame
- 9.3.3. Spiral Wound
- 9.4. Pumps
- 9.4.1. Centrifugal
- 9.4.2. Positive Displacement
- 9.5. Sensors & Controls
- 9.5.1. Conductivity Sensor
- 9.5.2. Flow Meter
- 9.5.3. PH Sensor
- 9.5.4. Turbidity Sensor
- 10. Water & Wastewater Treatment Equipment Market, by Application
- 10.1. Wastewater Treatment
- 10.2. Water Treatment
- 11. Water & Wastewater Treatment Equipment Market, by End User Industry
- 11.1. Industrial
- 11.1.1. Chemicals
- 11.1.2. Food & Beverage
- 11.1.3. Mining
- 11.1.4. Oil & Gas
- 11.1.5. Pharmaceuticals
- 11.1.6. Power Generation
- 11.1.7. Pulp & Paper
- 11.2. Municipal
- 12. Water & Wastewater Treatment Equipment Market, by Capacity
- 12.1. Large Scale
- 12.2. Medium Scale
- 12.3. Small Scale
- 13. Water & Wastewater Treatment Equipment Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Water & Wastewater Treatment Equipment Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Water & Wastewater Treatment Equipment Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. 3M Company
- 16.3.2. A.O. Smith Corporation
- 16.3.3. Accepta Water Treatment
- 16.3.4. Aquatech International LLC
- 16.3.5. BWT Holding GmbH
- 16.3.6. Calgon Carbon Corporation by Kuraray Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.7. Chembond Chemicals Limited
- 16.3.8. Culligan International Company
- 16.3.9. Danaher Corporation
- 16.3.10. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 16.3.11. Toray Industries, Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
