Water & Wastewater Management Market by Treatment Technology (Advanced Processes, Biological Treatment, Chemical Treatment), Source (Groundwater, Seawater, Surface Water), Treatment Stage, Application, End Use Industry - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Waste Recycling Services Market was valued at USD 65.10 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 69.42 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 6.85%, reaching USD 110.66 billion by 2032.
A comprehensive framing of the waste recycling services sector highlighting the convergence of policy, technology, and commercial strategy that demands rapid strategic adaptation
The waste recycling services sector sits at the intersection of environmental urgency, regulatory complexity, and rapid technological innovation. In recent years, policymakers, corporate sustainability functions, and municipal authorities have intensified focus on circular economy objectives, driving a shift away from linear waste disposal models toward integrated recycling ecosystems. This transition demands that service providers re-evaluate capabilities across collection, sorting, processing, and end-user engagement, while investors and planners reassess operational models and value chains.
Stakeholders now must navigate overlapping drivers: stricter materials policy, shifting consumer expectations, and emerging processing technologies that unlock new value from previously discarded streams. As a result, leadership teams must align commercial strategy with practical investments in infrastructure, digitization, and workforce development. The narrative that follows outlines the structural shifts, policy shocks, segmentation dynamics, regional patterns, and recommended actions that define competitive advantage in this evolving market. Through this context-setting introduction, readers will understand why integrated thinking and rapid adaptation are essential for capturing both environmental and economic value.
An account of the sweeping structural and technological shifts reshaping recycling value chains, policy obligations, and commercial business models that determine competitive advantage
The waste recycling landscape is undergoing transformative shifts that recalibrate value chains, stakeholder roles, and investment priorities. First, regulation-driven demand is accelerating quality requirements for recycled outputs, prompting investment in advanced sorting and pre-treatment capabilities to meet stringent feedstock specifications. Concurrently, technological innovation in mechanical, chemical, and thermal recycling pathways is expanding the universe of recyclable materials, which reconfigures downstream partnerships between processors and end-use industries.
Market participants also face shifting supply dynamics driven by changes in collection systems and consumer behavior, which create both volatility and opportunity in material streams. New commercial models that integrate collection, consultancy, and processing are emerging, while data-driven logistics and digital traceability tools enable higher recovery rates and more transparent material provenance. Furthermore, strategic emphasis on product stewardship and extended producer responsibility is moving responsibility upstream, compelling manufacturers to design for recyclability and to collaborate more closely with service providers. Taken together, these shifts redefine competitive advantage around technical capability, regulatory intelligence, and collaborative commercial models.
A focused analysis of how 2025 tariff policy shifts reconfigured trade flows, investment priorities, and operational strategies across the recycling supply chain
Tariff policy changes in 2025 introduced a new set of practical constraints and incentives that have ripple effects across collection economics, processing flows, and export-import logistics. Higher duties on certain recovered materials and inbound recycled-content imports altered the comparative economics of domestic processing versus cross-border shipment, prompting companies to re-assess sourcing strategies and to invest in local capacity where commercially viable. These tariff adjustments also increased the importance of flexible processing routes, since tariffs amplify the value of onshoring capable infrastructure that can pivot between material grades and process types.
In reaction to these trade measures, service providers revised contractual terms with municipal and commercial customers to reflect higher transportation and compliance costs. At the same time, several firms accelerated partnerships and joint ventures with local processors to secure continuity of feedstock and to avoid tariff exposure. Investors and operators likewise re-prioritized projects that reduce exposure to cross-border price signals by increasing domestic throughput efficiency and expanding downstream integration. The cumulative impact of the 2025 tariff environment thus highlights how trade policy can materially influence investment timing, operational design, and the strategic allocation of processing capacity.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis revealing material-specific processing needs, service delivery models, customer and collection dynamics, and sectoral end-user demand drivers
A granular segmentation lens reveals where value creation concentrates and where capability gaps persist. Based on material type, the market comprises E-Waste, Glass, Metals, Organic Waste, Paper & Cardboard, and Plastics; within metals the distinction between Ferrous Metals and Non-Ferrous Metals matters for downstream demand, and Non-Ferrous Metals further subdivide into Aluminum and Copper, while plastics span specific resin grades such as HDPE, LDPE, PET, PP, PS, and PVC, each requiring distinct processing and end-market routes. Based on service type, the universe includes Collection & Transportation, Consultancy & Support, Processing & Recycling, and Sorting & Pre-Treatment, and the interplay among these services defines margin pools and differentiation opportunities.
Customer type segmentation separates Commercial, Industrial, Municipal, and Residential users, which affects contract design, collection frequency, and contamination profiles, while collection method segmentation-Curbside Collection, Deposit/Refund Programs, Drop-Off Collection, and On-Site Pick-Up-shapes material quality and logistics efficiency. Process type segmentation spans Biological Recycling, Chemical Recycling, Mechanical Recycling, and Thermal Recycling, a taxonomy that maps to feedstock suitability and capital intensity. Finally, end user industry segmentation across Automotive, Construction, Electronics, Food & Beverage, and Manufacturing clarifies demand pull for specific recycled materials and indicates where closed-loop partnerships will deliver the greatest commercial and environmental returns. Together, these layered segmentations guide strategic prioritization, enabling firms to target investments in processing technology, contract models, and marketplace positioning with greater precision.
Regional perspective highlighting how regulatory intensity, infrastructure maturity, and industrial demand shape differentiated recycling strategies across global markets
Regional dynamics create differentiated pathways for growth and resilience across the waste recycling services landscape. In the Americas, regulatory momentum combined with investor interest in domestic processing has prioritized investments in advanced sorting and metallurgy capabilities, while municipal innovation in collection models supports higher material capture rates. The regulatory emphasis on extended producer responsibility and recycled content standards is catalyzing upstream design changes and stimulating partnerships between manufacturers and service providers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a mosaic of policy stringency and infrastructure maturity, with several markets leading in deposit-refund schemes and ambitious circularity legislation, which has driven technology deployment and cross-sector collaboration. Meanwhile, capacity gaps in other subregions create opportunities for targeted investment and public-private partnerships. Asia-Pacific features diverse market maturity levels; some economies are scaling up chemical and thermal recycling pathways to manage complex polymer streams, while others focus on improving collection infrastructure and reducing contamination. Across all regions, international trade policy, local regulations, and industrial demand converge to shape where and how recycling ecosystems expand, requiring companies to adopt regionally nuanced strategies and to pursue selective localization of processing assets.
Insight into how technological differentiation, vertical integration, and strategic partnerships define competitive positioning and value capture in recycling services
Competitive dynamics in the sector hinge on a mix of technological capability, integrated service offerings, and strategic partnerships rather than simple scale alone. Leading organizations invest in proprietary sorting and process control technologies to reduce contamination and improve output quality, while others focus on expanding service depth through consultancy and logistics to secure long-term contracts with municipal and commercial customers. Collaboration between material processors and product manufacturers increasingly defines value creation, enabling closed-loop supply arrangements for high-value streams such as aluminum, certain polymers, and specialized e-waste components.
Market entrants and incumbents alike are exploring vertical integration to capture margin across collection, sorting, and processing, but success depends on execution discipline and the ability to manage capital intensity. Strategic alliances-spanning engineering firms, technology providers, and end-user manufacturers-accelerate access to advanced recycling pathways without incurring full capital burdens. At the same time, operational excellence in contamination management and feedstock traceability has emerged as a differentiator, as many buyers now demand certified provenance and quality assurances. Consequently, competitive positioning rests on a coherent combination of technical capability, commercial relationships, and demonstrated environmental performance.
Actionable strategic priorities for senior executives to enhance processing flexibility, secure feedstock, strengthen partnerships, and institutionalize regulatory foresight
Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of actions that balance near-term resilience with long-term strategic positioning. First, prioritize investments in flexible processing platforms that can handle multiple material grades and pivot between mechanical, chemical, and thermal routes as feedstock composition evolves. Second, strengthen contractual arrangements with material suppliers and municipal partners to secure feedstock continuity and to share risk associated with policy and tariff fluctuations. Third, adopt digital traceability systems to demonstrate material provenance and to enable premium pricing for certified recycled outputs.
Leaders should also cultivate partnerships with manufacturers to develop design-for-recycling standards and closed-loop supply agreements that align product specifications with available recycling pathways. Additionally, expanding advisory and consultancy offerings will help capture incremental revenues while deepening customer relationships. Finally, embed regulatory monitoring and scenario planning into strategic decision cycles so that organizations can proactively adjust investments and operations in response to policy shifts. By sequencing these initiatives-starting with flexible processing, then securing feedstock, and finally formalizing commercial partnerships-organizations can accelerate growth while mitigating risk.
A transparent mixed-methods research approach combining primary interviews, secondary analysis, data triangulation, and expert validation to underpin actionable conclusions
The research methodology combines triangulated primary and secondary inputs to ensure analytical robustness and practical relevance. Primary research incorporated structured interviews with senior executives across service providers, municipal operators, technology vendors, and downstream manufacturers, alongside targeted discussions with policy advisors and institutional investors to capture strategic intent and implementation barriers. Secondary research reviewed a wide array of publicly available technical papers, regulatory texts, industry association releases, and operational case studies to map technology readiness and policy frameworks.
Data synthesis employed triangulation techniques that cross-validate qualitative insights with operational benchmarks and technology performance indicators. Segmentation mapping followed a hypothesis-driven approach, testing material-specific processing pathways against service delivery models and end-user demand signals. Quality assurance included peer review by sector experts and iterative validation with interview participants to reduce bias and confirm interpretive accuracy. Limitations of the study are acknowledged, including the evolving nature of policy and technology that can alter trajectories; therefore, scenario-based sensitivity analysis supplements the base findings to illustrate plausible directional outcomes under alternative regulatory or trade conditions.
A conclusive synthesis emphasizing the imperative for adaptable technology, strategic partnerships, and regionalized operational resilience to capture circular economy value
In conclusion, the waste recycling services sector is at a pivotal juncture where regulatory pressure, technological progress, and shifting commercial expectations converge to redefine success factors. Organizations that invest in adaptable processing technologies, secure reliable feedstock streams, and forge close partnerships with manufacturers and municipalities will be best positioned to deliver both environmental benefits and commercial returns. The 2025 trade policy adjustments have underscored the need for strategic localization and operational flexibility, while segmentation insights highlight that targeted focus-whether on specific materials, service lines, or end-use industries-yields clearer pathways to differentiation.
Moving forward, leaders should integrate regulatory foresight and scenario planning into capital allocation decisions and prioritize investments that allow portfolio agility across process types and regions. By doing so, firms can convert regulatory and market complexity into competitive advantage, accelerating the transition to circular models while protecting profitability and resilience.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A comprehensive framing of the waste recycling services sector highlighting the convergence of policy, technology, and commercial strategy that demands rapid strategic adaptation
The waste recycling services sector sits at the intersection of environmental urgency, regulatory complexity, and rapid technological innovation. In recent years, policymakers, corporate sustainability functions, and municipal authorities have intensified focus on circular economy objectives, driving a shift away from linear waste disposal models toward integrated recycling ecosystems. This transition demands that service providers re-evaluate capabilities across collection, sorting, processing, and end-user engagement, while investors and planners reassess operational models and value chains.
Stakeholders now must navigate overlapping drivers: stricter materials policy, shifting consumer expectations, and emerging processing technologies that unlock new value from previously discarded streams. As a result, leadership teams must align commercial strategy with practical investments in infrastructure, digitization, and workforce development. The narrative that follows outlines the structural shifts, policy shocks, segmentation dynamics, regional patterns, and recommended actions that define competitive advantage in this evolving market. Through this context-setting introduction, readers will understand why integrated thinking and rapid adaptation are essential for capturing both environmental and economic value.
An account of the sweeping structural and technological shifts reshaping recycling value chains, policy obligations, and commercial business models that determine competitive advantage
The waste recycling landscape is undergoing transformative shifts that recalibrate value chains, stakeholder roles, and investment priorities. First, regulation-driven demand is accelerating quality requirements for recycled outputs, prompting investment in advanced sorting and pre-treatment capabilities to meet stringent feedstock specifications. Concurrently, technological innovation in mechanical, chemical, and thermal recycling pathways is expanding the universe of recyclable materials, which reconfigures downstream partnerships between processors and end-use industries.
Market participants also face shifting supply dynamics driven by changes in collection systems and consumer behavior, which create both volatility and opportunity in material streams. New commercial models that integrate collection, consultancy, and processing are emerging, while data-driven logistics and digital traceability tools enable higher recovery rates and more transparent material provenance. Furthermore, strategic emphasis on product stewardship and extended producer responsibility is moving responsibility upstream, compelling manufacturers to design for recyclability and to collaborate more closely with service providers. Taken together, these shifts redefine competitive advantage around technical capability, regulatory intelligence, and collaborative commercial models.
A focused analysis of how 2025 tariff policy shifts reconfigured trade flows, investment priorities, and operational strategies across the recycling supply chain
Tariff policy changes in 2025 introduced a new set of practical constraints and incentives that have ripple effects across collection economics, processing flows, and export-import logistics. Higher duties on certain recovered materials and inbound recycled-content imports altered the comparative economics of domestic processing versus cross-border shipment, prompting companies to re-assess sourcing strategies and to invest in local capacity where commercially viable. These tariff adjustments also increased the importance of flexible processing routes, since tariffs amplify the value of onshoring capable infrastructure that can pivot between material grades and process types.
In reaction to these trade measures, service providers revised contractual terms with municipal and commercial customers to reflect higher transportation and compliance costs. At the same time, several firms accelerated partnerships and joint ventures with local processors to secure continuity of feedstock and to avoid tariff exposure. Investors and operators likewise re-prioritized projects that reduce exposure to cross-border price signals by increasing domestic throughput efficiency and expanding downstream integration. The cumulative impact of the 2025 tariff environment thus highlights how trade policy can materially influence investment timing, operational design, and the strategic allocation of processing capacity.
Comprehensive segmentation analysis revealing material-specific processing needs, service delivery models, customer and collection dynamics, and sectoral end-user demand drivers
A granular segmentation lens reveals where value creation concentrates and where capability gaps persist. Based on material type, the market comprises E-Waste, Glass, Metals, Organic Waste, Paper & Cardboard, and Plastics; within metals the distinction between Ferrous Metals and Non-Ferrous Metals matters for downstream demand, and Non-Ferrous Metals further subdivide into Aluminum and Copper, while plastics span specific resin grades such as HDPE, LDPE, PET, PP, PS, and PVC, each requiring distinct processing and end-market routes. Based on service type, the universe includes Collection & Transportation, Consultancy & Support, Processing & Recycling, and Sorting & Pre-Treatment, and the interplay among these services defines margin pools and differentiation opportunities.
Customer type segmentation separates Commercial, Industrial, Municipal, and Residential users, which affects contract design, collection frequency, and contamination profiles, while collection method segmentation-Curbside Collection, Deposit/Refund Programs, Drop-Off Collection, and On-Site Pick-Up-shapes material quality and logistics efficiency. Process type segmentation spans Biological Recycling, Chemical Recycling, Mechanical Recycling, and Thermal Recycling, a taxonomy that maps to feedstock suitability and capital intensity. Finally, end user industry segmentation across Automotive, Construction, Electronics, Food & Beverage, and Manufacturing clarifies demand pull for specific recycled materials and indicates where closed-loop partnerships will deliver the greatest commercial and environmental returns. Together, these layered segmentations guide strategic prioritization, enabling firms to target investments in processing technology, contract models, and marketplace positioning with greater precision.
Regional perspective highlighting how regulatory intensity, infrastructure maturity, and industrial demand shape differentiated recycling strategies across global markets
Regional dynamics create differentiated pathways for growth and resilience across the waste recycling services landscape. In the Americas, regulatory momentum combined with investor interest in domestic processing has prioritized investments in advanced sorting and metallurgy capabilities, while municipal innovation in collection models supports higher material capture rates. The regulatory emphasis on extended producer responsibility and recycled content standards is catalyzing upstream design changes and stimulating partnerships between manufacturers and service providers.
Europe, Middle East & Africa present a mosaic of policy stringency and infrastructure maturity, with several markets leading in deposit-refund schemes and ambitious circularity legislation, which has driven technology deployment and cross-sector collaboration. Meanwhile, capacity gaps in other subregions create opportunities for targeted investment and public-private partnerships. Asia-Pacific features diverse market maturity levels; some economies are scaling up chemical and thermal recycling pathways to manage complex polymer streams, while others focus on improving collection infrastructure and reducing contamination. Across all regions, international trade policy, local regulations, and industrial demand converge to shape where and how recycling ecosystems expand, requiring companies to adopt regionally nuanced strategies and to pursue selective localization of processing assets.
Insight into how technological differentiation, vertical integration, and strategic partnerships define competitive positioning and value capture in recycling services
Competitive dynamics in the sector hinge on a mix of technological capability, integrated service offerings, and strategic partnerships rather than simple scale alone. Leading organizations invest in proprietary sorting and process control technologies to reduce contamination and improve output quality, while others focus on expanding service depth through consultancy and logistics to secure long-term contracts with municipal and commercial customers. Collaboration between material processors and product manufacturers increasingly defines value creation, enabling closed-loop supply arrangements for high-value streams such as aluminum, certain polymers, and specialized e-waste components.
Market entrants and incumbents alike are exploring vertical integration to capture margin across collection, sorting, and processing, but success depends on execution discipline and the ability to manage capital intensity. Strategic alliances-spanning engineering firms, technology providers, and end-user manufacturers-accelerate access to advanced recycling pathways without incurring full capital burdens. At the same time, operational excellence in contamination management and feedstock traceability has emerged as a differentiator, as many buyers now demand certified provenance and quality assurances. Consequently, competitive positioning rests on a coherent combination of technical capability, commercial relationships, and demonstrated environmental performance.
Actionable strategic priorities for senior executives to enhance processing flexibility, secure feedstock, strengthen partnerships, and institutionalize regulatory foresight
Industry leaders should pursue a coordinated set of actions that balance near-term resilience with long-term strategic positioning. First, prioritize investments in flexible processing platforms that can handle multiple material grades and pivot between mechanical, chemical, and thermal routes as feedstock composition evolves. Second, strengthen contractual arrangements with material suppliers and municipal partners to secure feedstock continuity and to share risk associated with policy and tariff fluctuations. Third, adopt digital traceability systems to demonstrate material provenance and to enable premium pricing for certified recycled outputs.
Leaders should also cultivate partnerships with manufacturers to develop design-for-recycling standards and closed-loop supply agreements that align product specifications with available recycling pathways. Additionally, expanding advisory and consultancy offerings will help capture incremental revenues while deepening customer relationships. Finally, embed regulatory monitoring and scenario planning into strategic decision cycles so that organizations can proactively adjust investments and operations in response to policy shifts. By sequencing these initiatives-starting with flexible processing, then securing feedstock, and finally formalizing commercial partnerships-organizations can accelerate growth while mitigating risk.
A transparent mixed-methods research approach combining primary interviews, secondary analysis, data triangulation, and expert validation to underpin actionable conclusions
The research methodology combines triangulated primary and secondary inputs to ensure analytical robustness and practical relevance. Primary research incorporated structured interviews with senior executives across service providers, municipal operators, technology vendors, and downstream manufacturers, alongside targeted discussions with policy advisors and institutional investors to capture strategic intent and implementation barriers. Secondary research reviewed a wide array of publicly available technical papers, regulatory texts, industry association releases, and operational case studies to map technology readiness and policy frameworks.
Data synthesis employed triangulation techniques that cross-validate qualitative insights with operational benchmarks and technology performance indicators. Segmentation mapping followed a hypothesis-driven approach, testing material-specific processing pathways against service delivery models and end-user demand signals. Quality assurance included peer review by sector experts and iterative validation with interview participants to reduce bias and confirm interpretive accuracy. Limitations of the study are acknowledged, including the evolving nature of policy and technology that can alter trajectories; therefore, scenario-based sensitivity analysis supplements the base findings to illustrate plausible directional outcomes under alternative regulatory or trade conditions.
A conclusive synthesis emphasizing the imperative for adaptable technology, strategic partnerships, and regionalized operational resilience to capture circular economy value
In conclusion, the waste recycling services sector is at a pivotal juncture where regulatory pressure, technological progress, and shifting commercial expectations converge to redefine success factors. Organizations that invest in adaptable processing technologies, secure reliable feedstock streams, and forge close partnerships with manufacturers and municipalities will be best positioned to deliver both environmental benefits and commercial returns. The 2025 trade policy adjustments have underscored the need for strategic localization and operational flexibility, while segmentation insights highlight that targeted focus-whether on specific materials, service lines, or end-use industries-yields clearer pathways to differentiation.
Moving forward, leaders should integrate regulatory foresight and scenario planning into capital allocation decisions and prioritize investments that allow portfolio agility across process types and regions. By doing so, firms can convert regulatory and market complexity into competitive advantage, accelerating the transition to circular models while protecting profitability and resilience.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
188 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Rapid adoption of sensor-driven water quality monitoring for real-time decision making
- 5.2. Integration of predictive analytics and AI to optimize wastewater treatment plant operations
- 5.3. Deployment of advanced membrane filtration technologies to remove emerging contaminants in water reuse applications
- 5.4. Implementation of circular water economy models emphasizing resource recovery from municipal wastewater streams
- 5.5. Expansion of decentralized wastewater treatment solutions for sustainable urban and rural communities
- 5.6. Utilization of digital twin technology for predictive maintenance and energy efficiency in treatment facilities
- 5.7. Growing investment in nutrient recovery systems to produce value-added byproducts from wastewater treatment
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Water & Wastewater Management Market, by Treatment Technology
- 8.1. Advanced Processes
- 8.1.1. Advanced Oxidation
- 8.1.2. Electrodialysis
- 8.2. Biological Treatment
- 8.2.1. Activated Sludge
- 8.2.2. Biofilm
- 8.2.3. Membrane Bioreactor
- 8.3. Chemical Treatment
- 8.3.1. Coagulation
- 8.3.2. Flocculation
- 8.3.3. Ion Exchange
- 8.4. Disinfection
- 8.4.1. Chlorination
- 8.4.2. Ozonation
- 8.4.3. Ultraviolet
- 8.5. Membrane Separation
- 8.5.1. Microfiltration
- 8.5.2. Nanofiltration
- 8.5.3. Reverse Osmosis
- 8.5.4. Ultrafiltration
- 9. Water & Wastewater Management Market, by Source
- 9.1. Groundwater
- 9.2. Seawater
- 9.3. Surface Water
- 9.4. Wastewater
- 10. Water & Wastewater Management Market, by Treatment Stage
- 10.1. Primary Treatment
- 10.2. Secondary Treatment
- 10.3. Tertiary Treatment
- 11. Water & Wastewater Management Market, by Application
- 11.1. Collection & Monitoring
- 11.2. Distribution & Transmission
- 11.3. Water Treatment
- 12. Water & Wastewater Management Market, by End Use Industry
- 12.1. Commercial
- 12.2. Industrial
- 12.2.1. Chemicals & Petrochemicals
- 12.2.2. Food & Beverage
- 12.2.3. Oil & Gas
- 12.2.4. Pharmaceuticals
- 12.2.5. Power Generation
- 12.2.6. Pulp & Paper
- 12.3. Municipal
- 12.4. Residential
- 13. Water & Wastewater Management Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Water & Wastewater Management Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Water & Wastewater Management Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. ABB Ltd.
- 16.3.2. American Water Works Company, Inc.
- 16.3.3. Aqua America, Inc.
- 16.3.4. Aries Chemical, Inc.
- 16.3.5. Calgon Carbon Corporation
- 16.3.6. China Everbright Water Ltd.
- 16.3.7. Cortec Corporation
- 16.3.8. Deccan Water Treatment Pvt. Ltd.
- 16.3.9. Ecolab Inc.
- 16.3.10. Evoqua Water Technologies LLC
- 16.3.11. H2O Innovation Inc.
- 16.3.12. Innospec Inc.
- 16.3.13. Italmatch Chemicals S.p.A.
- 16.3.14. Ovivo Inc.
- 16.3.15. Saur SAS
- 16.3.16. Suez S.A.
- 16.3.17. SWA Water Australia
- 16.3.18. Thames Water Utilities Limited
- 16.3.19. Thermax Limited
- 16.3.20. Trojan Technologies Group ULC
- 16.3.21. United Utilities Group PLC
- 16.3.22. Veolia Environnement SA
- 16.3.23. Wog Group
- 16.3.24. WSP Global Inc.
- 16.3.25. Xylem Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
