Water Recycle & Reuse Technologies Market by Technology (Activated Sludge, Ion Exchange, Membrane Bioreactor), Source Water (Brackish Water, Greywater, Rainwater), Plant Scale, Application - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Water Desalination Equipment Market was valued at USD 8.73 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 9.42 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.43%, reaching USD 16.69 billion by 2032.
An authoritative introduction that frames desalination equipment as a strategic component of resilient water systems amid technological, policy, and energy transitions
The desalination equipment landscape is at an inflection point where accelerating demand for resilient water supplies intersects with rapidly evolving technology, policy, and energy paradigms. This executive summary distills current drivers and near-term inflection points that industry leaders, investors, and public-sector planners should prioritize. It frames how modular deployments, integrated energy strategies, and tighter import regimes are reshaping procurement, financing, and project delivery across municipal, industrial, and commercial applications.
As stakeholders navigate aging water infrastructure and growing climate-driven stress on conventional freshwater sources, desalination has shifted from a niche contingency to a mainstream component of water security planning. Leading practitioners are increasingly combining desalination technology choices with energy sourcing strategies to optimize lifecycle costs and reduce operational carbon intensity. At the same time, supply chain complexity and trade policy developments are prompting a reappraisal of vendor selection criteria, localization strategies, and balance-sheet exposures tied to long-lead equipment and spares.
This introduction sets the stage for a focused examination of transformational shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation nuances, regional differentiators, and targeted recommendations. The synthesis that follows is designed to inform immediate commercial decisions while enabling mid-term strategic planning that anticipates technological maturation and regulatory change.
How converging innovations in membranes, electrodialysis, and renewable integration are redefining procurement, operations, and resilience across desalination deployments
The desalination sector is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging technological innovation, decarbonization pressures, and changing procurement logics. Advances in membrane technology, electrodialysis process control, and solar-powered desalination solutions are expanding the range of viable use cases from remote industrial sites to urban water utilities. Consequently, buyers are moving beyond single-dimension selection criteria and instead evaluating systems through combined lenses of energy integration, modularity, and lifecycle serviceability.
Concurrently, energy strategies are redefining the competitive landscape. The integration of renewable energy and hybrid systems has advanced from pilot projects to commercially scalable models in many regions, enabling lower operational emissions and improved resilience against fuel price volatility. This trend is prompting original equipment manufacturers to embed energy optimization features and digital monitoring into product roadmaps, while project owners are increasingly evaluating total cost of operation and carbon metrics alongside capital expenditure.
Procurement behavior is also shifting. There is a discernible move toward contracting structures that emphasize performance guarantees, long-term operations and maintenance partnerships, and locally anchored supply chains to mitigate trade friction and shorten lead times. These combined forces are accelerating the maturation of desalination as a mainstream, configurable tool for water security rather than a one-off, capital-intensive utility project.
The cumulative consequences of 2025 tariff changes on supply chains, procurement strategies, and technology selection across the desalination equipment ecosystem
The introduction of tariffs and trade policy adjustments in 2025 created a cumulative impact across the desalination equipment value chain, influencing sourcing strategies, cost structures, and supplier choices. For many project developers and equipment buyers, higher import duties on key components intensified the need to evaluate local manufacturing capacity and supplier diversification. This has led to a rebalancing of procurement risk, where near-term price effects are assessed alongside longer-term benefits of localization and reduced lead-time exposure.
In practical terms, project timelines and capital allocation decisions were influenced by the additional complexity of tariff-inclusive procurement. Buyers responded by renegotiating contracts to include clearer escalation clauses, by increasing inventory buffers for critical spares, and by leveraging modular or plug-and-play designs to allow substitution of components sourced domestically or from lower-tariff jurisdictions. Meanwhile, manufacturers accelerated partnerships with regional assemblers and service providers to maintain contractual competitiveness and preserve margins.
Importantly, the tariff environment also sharpened stakeholder focus on energy costs and operational efficiencies. Higher upfront costs drove a greater emphasis on systems that reduce long-term operational expenditure, such as advanced energy recovery devices, low-fouling membranes, and solutions optimized for renewable energy integration. Overall, the 2025 tariff developments catalyzed a pragmatic shift toward supply chain resilience, contractual clarity, and technology combinations that mitigate the financial and operational implications of trade policy volatility.
Segmentation-driven insights that reveal how technology choice, energy sourcing, installation type, water feedstock, and application priorities shape procurement and operations
A nuanced segmentation framework clarifies how technical, operational, and commercial decisions diverge across technology type, energy source, installation form, water feedstock, and end-user application. Technology choices such as Electrodialysis, Reverse Osmosis, and Solar Desalination inform not only capital design but also maintenance regimes and integration pathways with energy systems. These technical decisions are closely linked to energy sourcing considerations, where conventional energy options including fossil fuels and natural gas are weighed against renewable alternatives like geothermal, solar, and wind energy in order to manage operating costs and emissions profiles.
Installation type differentiates project delivery and lifecycle complexity; fixed desalination installations are integrated into permanent infrastructure networks and require different contracting models and capital planning than portable desalination units designed for temporary or rapidly deployable water needs. The selection of water source-brackish water, river water, seawater, or wastewater-has immediate implications for pretreatment requirements, membrane selection, and the feasibility of energy recovery strategies, which in turn affect operational resilience.
Application segments reveal diverse commercial pressures and performance priorities. Commercial users pursue solutions that balance cost and footprint constraints, industrial clients such as mining, oil & gas, paper & pulp, and power generation prioritize reliability and throughput, and municipal projects emphasize regulatory compliance, long-term affordability, and integration with broader water management systems. Understanding how these segmentation axes interact is essential for product roadmaps, commercial models, and service offerings that resonate with each buyer cohort.
Regional dynamics and regulatory nuances across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape procurement, financing, and technology adoption
Regional dynamics materially influence technology adoption, financing pathways, and regulatory frameworks for desalination equipment, with distinct patterns across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, demand tends to be shaped by a combination of municipal modernization programs and industrial needs, with an increasing focus on hybrid energy solutions and public-private partnership models that de-risk long-term operations. North American and Latin American procurement strategies often prioritize service models and lifecycle agreements that limit exposure to complex O&M responsibilities.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory environment and resource pressures create differentiated market behaviors. The Middle East remains a high-volume adopter of large-scale seawater desalination, while certain African markets prioritize modular and portable systems to address distributed water access challenges. In Europe, stringent environmental standards and climate commitments drive adoption of lower-carbon solutions and rigorous lifecycle assessments, influencing which technologies and energy integrations gain traction.
The Asia-Pacific region displays a broad spectrum of demand dynamics, from highly industrialized coastal economies executing large-scale seawater projects to island nations and remote communities that rely on compact, renewable-driven desalination units. Regional financing mechanisms, local content requirements, and geopolitical trade relationships further shape how projects are structured and which vendors are competitive in each geography.
Competitive strategies and product evolution among equipment providers focusing on modularity, integrated services, and energy-optimized solutions to capture diverse end-user needs
Competitive dynamics among equipment manufacturers and solution providers are evolving as companies place greater emphasis on integrated offerings, service contracts, and energy-optimized systems. Leading suppliers are expanding their portfolios to bundle advanced membranes, energy recovery devices, digital monitoring, and long-term operations and maintenance to provide clearer total-cost-of-ownership propositions. Strategic partnerships with energy providers and local service firms have become common, enabling vendors to offer turnkey solutions that reduce integration risk for buyers.
At the product level, there is a noticeable shift toward modularity and standardization to shorten delivery cycles and facilitate component interchangeability in response to supply chain and tariff pressures. Companies that invest in digital platforms for predictive maintenance and remote operations gain an advantage in securing multi-year service agreements. Meanwhile, competitive differentiation increasingly depends on demonstrable operational performance, low lifecycle emissions, and the ability to deploy hybrid energy architectures.
In this environment, new entrants and niche technology providers can compete by focusing on specialized segments-such as solar-driven desalination for off-grid sites or electrodialysis solutions for brackish water-while incumbents leverage scale, financing capacity, and existing utility relationships to pursue large municipal and industrial contracts. Competitive positioning will hinge on the ability to combine technical excellence with adaptable commercial models and proven field performance.
Actionable recommendations for leaders to build resilient supply chains, integrate energy strategies, and deploy outcome-focused commercial models for desalination
Industry leaders should prioritize several actionable initiatives to capture near-term opportunities while building resilience against policy and energy volatility. First, pursue modular designs and standardized interfaces that enable component substitution and reduce lead-time sensitivity; this approach lowers procurement friction and supports faster deployment cycles. Second, deepen partnerships with regional assemblers and service firms to localize value chains where tariffs or logistics create cost and timing risks, while maintaining core R&D and quality controls centrally.
Third, integrate energy strategy into product development and project bids by incorporating energy recovery, hybrid renewable integration, and smart controls that optimize efficiency under variable conditions. This not only reduces operational exposure to fuel price swings but also aligns projects with emerging environmental procurement criteria. Fourth, adopt outcome-based contracting models that align vendor incentives with long-term performance and water quality outcomes, thereby shifting buyer focus from upfront capital cost to predictable lifecycle results.
Finally, invest in digital tools for predictive maintenance, remote diagnostics, and asset performance management to reduce downtime and extend membrane life. Complement these technical investments with flexible commercial terms-such as phased rollouts and performance-linked payments-to lower barriers for municipal and industrial buyers to adopt advanced desalination solutions.
A transparent, multi-method research methodology combining primary interviews, secondary analysis, supply chain mapping, and scenario validation to ensure robust conclusions
The analysis in this report synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs through a transparent, multi-method research methodology designed to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary research included structured interviews with equipment manufacturers, project developers, utility operators, and technical consultants to capture first-hand perspectives on procurement practices, technology performance, and operational challenges. These conversations provided contemporaneous insights into how tariff shifts and energy integration strategies are affecting decisions in the field.
Secondary research encompassed a systematic review of industry literature, technology white papers, regulatory guidance, and publicly available project documentation to triangulate trends and validate vendor claims. Supply chain mapping and component-level analysis were performed to identify critical nodes, lead-time drivers, and potential single points of failure, while scenario analysis explored plausible operational and procurement responses to policy and energy shocks.
Data synthesis employed cross-validation across sources to reduce bias and ensure the report’s conclusions are grounded in multiple lines of evidence. The methodology emphasizes transparency in assumptions and limitation statements, and it supports tailored follow-up analysis-such as techno-economic modeling or regional policy impact studies-when commissioned by stakeholders seeking bespoke insights.
A conclusive synthesis highlighting the strategic inflection points, technology imperatives, and procurement adaptations necessary for sustainable desalination deployment
In conclusion, desalination equipment is transitioning from an occasional contingency measure to a strategic, configurable component of water resilience strategies across municipal, industrial, and commercial contexts. Technological advances, especially in membrane efficiency, electrodialysis control systems, and renewable-powered desalination, are expanding viable use cases and enabling operators to better manage lifecycle costs and emissions. At the same time, trade policy developments and tariff shifts have underscored the importance of supply chain diversification, localization where feasible, and contractual clarity to protect project economics and timelines.
Looking ahead, organizations that align product development with integrated energy strategies, invest in modularity and digital performance capabilities, and adopt outcome-based commercial frameworks will be best positioned to capture growth opportunities while mitigating operational and policy risks. These strategic moves will facilitate faster deployments, improved asset utilization, and more predictable long-term performance-outcomes that matter for water security, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder confidence.
This executive summary provides a foundation for deeper technical, financial, and regional analysis and is intended to guide informed, actionable decision-making by stakeholders seeking to accelerate adoption and optimize the performance of desalination solutions.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
An authoritative introduction that frames desalination equipment as a strategic component of resilient water systems amid technological, policy, and energy transitions
The desalination equipment landscape is at an inflection point where accelerating demand for resilient water supplies intersects with rapidly evolving technology, policy, and energy paradigms. This executive summary distills current drivers and near-term inflection points that industry leaders, investors, and public-sector planners should prioritize. It frames how modular deployments, integrated energy strategies, and tighter import regimes are reshaping procurement, financing, and project delivery across municipal, industrial, and commercial applications.
As stakeholders navigate aging water infrastructure and growing climate-driven stress on conventional freshwater sources, desalination has shifted from a niche contingency to a mainstream component of water security planning. Leading practitioners are increasingly combining desalination technology choices with energy sourcing strategies to optimize lifecycle costs and reduce operational carbon intensity. At the same time, supply chain complexity and trade policy developments are prompting a reappraisal of vendor selection criteria, localization strategies, and balance-sheet exposures tied to long-lead equipment and spares.
This introduction sets the stage for a focused examination of transformational shifts, tariff impacts, segmentation nuances, regional differentiators, and targeted recommendations. The synthesis that follows is designed to inform immediate commercial decisions while enabling mid-term strategic planning that anticipates technological maturation and regulatory change.
How converging innovations in membranes, electrodialysis, and renewable integration are redefining procurement, operations, and resilience across desalination deployments
The desalination sector is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging technological innovation, decarbonization pressures, and changing procurement logics. Advances in membrane technology, electrodialysis process control, and solar-powered desalination solutions are expanding the range of viable use cases from remote industrial sites to urban water utilities. Consequently, buyers are moving beyond single-dimension selection criteria and instead evaluating systems through combined lenses of energy integration, modularity, and lifecycle serviceability.
Concurrently, energy strategies are redefining the competitive landscape. The integration of renewable energy and hybrid systems has advanced from pilot projects to commercially scalable models in many regions, enabling lower operational emissions and improved resilience against fuel price volatility. This trend is prompting original equipment manufacturers to embed energy optimization features and digital monitoring into product roadmaps, while project owners are increasingly evaluating total cost of operation and carbon metrics alongside capital expenditure.
Procurement behavior is also shifting. There is a discernible move toward contracting structures that emphasize performance guarantees, long-term operations and maintenance partnerships, and locally anchored supply chains to mitigate trade friction and shorten lead times. These combined forces are accelerating the maturation of desalination as a mainstream, configurable tool for water security rather than a one-off, capital-intensive utility project.
The cumulative consequences of 2025 tariff changes on supply chains, procurement strategies, and technology selection across the desalination equipment ecosystem
The introduction of tariffs and trade policy adjustments in 2025 created a cumulative impact across the desalination equipment value chain, influencing sourcing strategies, cost structures, and supplier choices. For many project developers and equipment buyers, higher import duties on key components intensified the need to evaluate local manufacturing capacity and supplier diversification. This has led to a rebalancing of procurement risk, where near-term price effects are assessed alongside longer-term benefits of localization and reduced lead-time exposure.
In practical terms, project timelines and capital allocation decisions were influenced by the additional complexity of tariff-inclusive procurement. Buyers responded by renegotiating contracts to include clearer escalation clauses, by increasing inventory buffers for critical spares, and by leveraging modular or plug-and-play designs to allow substitution of components sourced domestically or from lower-tariff jurisdictions. Meanwhile, manufacturers accelerated partnerships with regional assemblers and service providers to maintain contractual competitiveness and preserve margins.
Importantly, the tariff environment also sharpened stakeholder focus on energy costs and operational efficiencies. Higher upfront costs drove a greater emphasis on systems that reduce long-term operational expenditure, such as advanced energy recovery devices, low-fouling membranes, and solutions optimized for renewable energy integration. Overall, the 2025 tariff developments catalyzed a pragmatic shift toward supply chain resilience, contractual clarity, and technology combinations that mitigate the financial and operational implications of trade policy volatility.
Segmentation-driven insights that reveal how technology choice, energy sourcing, installation type, water feedstock, and application priorities shape procurement and operations
A nuanced segmentation framework clarifies how technical, operational, and commercial decisions diverge across technology type, energy source, installation form, water feedstock, and end-user application. Technology choices such as Electrodialysis, Reverse Osmosis, and Solar Desalination inform not only capital design but also maintenance regimes and integration pathways with energy systems. These technical decisions are closely linked to energy sourcing considerations, where conventional energy options including fossil fuels and natural gas are weighed against renewable alternatives like geothermal, solar, and wind energy in order to manage operating costs and emissions profiles.
Installation type differentiates project delivery and lifecycle complexity; fixed desalination installations are integrated into permanent infrastructure networks and require different contracting models and capital planning than portable desalination units designed for temporary or rapidly deployable water needs. The selection of water source-brackish water, river water, seawater, or wastewater-has immediate implications for pretreatment requirements, membrane selection, and the feasibility of energy recovery strategies, which in turn affect operational resilience.
Application segments reveal diverse commercial pressures and performance priorities. Commercial users pursue solutions that balance cost and footprint constraints, industrial clients such as mining, oil & gas, paper & pulp, and power generation prioritize reliability and throughput, and municipal projects emphasize regulatory compliance, long-term affordability, and integration with broader water management systems. Understanding how these segmentation axes interact is essential for product roadmaps, commercial models, and service offerings that resonate with each buyer cohort.
Regional dynamics and regulatory nuances across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape procurement, financing, and technology adoption
Regional dynamics materially influence technology adoption, financing pathways, and regulatory frameworks for desalination equipment, with distinct patterns across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, demand tends to be shaped by a combination of municipal modernization programs and industrial needs, with an increasing focus on hybrid energy solutions and public-private partnership models that de-risk long-term operations. North American and Latin American procurement strategies often prioritize service models and lifecycle agreements that limit exposure to complex O&M responsibilities.
Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, the regulatory environment and resource pressures create differentiated market behaviors. The Middle East remains a high-volume adopter of large-scale seawater desalination, while certain African markets prioritize modular and portable systems to address distributed water access challenges. In Europe, stringent environmental standards and climate commitments drive adoption of lower-carbon solutions and rigorous lifecycle assessments, influencing which technologies and energy integrations gain traction.
The Asia-Pacific region displays a broad spectrum of demand dynamics, from highly industrialized coastal economies executing large-scale seawater projects to island nations and remote communities that rely on compact, renewable-driven desalination units. Regional financing mechanisms, local content requirements, and geopolitical trade relationships further shape how projects are structured and which vendors are competitive in each geography.
Competitive strategies and product evolution among equipment providers focusing on modularity, integrated services, and energy-optimized solutions to capture diverse end-user needs
Competitive dynamics among equipment manufacturers and solution providers are evolving as companies place greater emphasis on integrated offerings, service contracts, and energy-optimized systems. Leading suppliers are expanding their portfolios to bundle advanced membranes, energy recovery devices, digital monitoring, and long-term operations and maintenance to provide clearer total-cost-of-ownership propositions. Strategic partnerships with energy providers and local service firms have become common, enabling vendors to offer turnkey solutions that reduce integration risk for buyers.
At the product level, there is a noticeable shift toward modularity and standardization to shorten delivery cycles and facilitate component interchangeability in response to supply chain and tariff pressures. Companies that invest in digital platforms for predictive maintenance and remote operations gain an advantage in securing multi-year service agreements. Meanwhile, competitive differentiation increasingly depends on demonstrable operational performance, low lifecycle emissions, and the ability to deploy hybrid energy architectures.
In this environment, new entrants and niche technology providers can compete by focusing on specialized segments-such as solar-driven desalination for off-grid sites or electrodialysis solutions for brackish water-while incumbents leverage scale, financing capacity, and existing utility relationships to pursue large municipal and industrial contracts. Competitive positioning will hinge on the ability to combine technical excellence with adaptable commercial models and proven field performance.
Actionable recommendations for leaders to build resilient supply chains, integrate energy strategies, and deploy outcome-focused commercial models for desalination
Industry leaders should prioritize several actionable initiatives to capture near-term opportunities while building resilience against policy and energy volatility. First, pursue modular designs and standardized interfaces that enable component substitution and reduce lead-time sensitivity; this approach lowers procurement friction and supports faster deployment cycles. Second, deepen partnerships with regional assemblers and service firms to localize value chains where tariffs or logistics create cost and timing risks, while maintaining core R&D and quality controls centrally.
Third, integrate energy strategy into product development and project bids by incorporating energy recovery, hybrid renewable integration, and smart controls that optimize efficiency under variable conditions. This not only reduces operational exposure to fuel price swings but also aligns projects with emerging environmental procurement criteria. Fourth, adopt outcome-based contracting models that align vendor incentives with long-term performance and water quality outcomes, thereby shifting buyer focus from upfront capital cost to predictable lifecycle results.
Finally, invest in digital tools for predictive maintenance, remote diagnostics, and asset performance management to reduce downtime and extend membrane life. Complement these technical investments with flexible commercial terms-such as phased rollouts and performance-linked payments-to lower barriers for municipal and industrial buyers to adopt advanced desalination solutions.
A transparent, multi-method research methodology combining primary interviews, secondary analysis, supply chain mapping, and scenario validation to ensure robust conclusions
The analysis in this report synthesizes qualitative and quantitative inputs through a transparent, multi-method research methodology designed to ensure robustness and relevance. Primary research included structured interviews with equipment manufacturers, project developers, utility operators, and technical consultants to capture first-hand perspectives on procurement practices, technology performance, and operational challenges. These conversations provided contemporaneous insights into how tariff shifts and energy integration strategies are affecting decisions in the field.
Secondary research encompassed a systematic review of industry literature, technology white papers, regulatory guidance, and publicly available project documentation to triangulate trends and validate vendor claims. Supply chain mapping and component-level analysis were performed to identify critical nodes, lead-time drivers, and potential single points of failure, while scenario analysis explored plausible operational and procurement responses to policy and energy shocks.
Data synthesis employed cross-validation across sources to reduce bias and ensure the report’s conclusions are grounded in multiple lines of evidence. The methodology emphasizes transparency in assumptions and limitation statements, and it supports tailored follow-up analysis-such as techno-economic modeling or regional policy impact studies-when commissioned by stakeholders seeking bespoke insights.
A conclusive synthesis highlighting the strategic inflection points, technology imperatives, and procurement adaptations necessary for sustainable desalination deployment
In conclusion, desalination equipment is transitioning from an occasional contingency measure to a strategic, configurable component of water resilience strategies across municipal, industrial, and commercial contexts. Technological advances, especially in membrane efficiency, electrodialysis control systems, and renewable-powered desalination, are expanding viable use cases and enabling operators to better manage lifecycle costs and emissions. At the same time, trade policy developments and tariff shifts have underscored the importance of supply chain diversification, localization where feasible, and contractual clarity to protect project economics and timelines.
Looking ahead, organizations that align product development with integrated energy strategies, invest in modularity and digital performance capabilities, and adopt outcome-based commercial frameworks will be best positioned to capture growth opportunities while mitigating operational and policy risks. These strategic moves will facilitate faster deployments, improved asset utilization, and more predictable long-term performance-outcomes that matter for water security, regulatory compliance, and stakeholder confidence.
This executive summary provides a foundation for deeper technical, financial, and regional analysis and is intended to guide informed, actionable decision-making by stakeholders seeking to accelerate adoption and optimize the performance of desalination solutions.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
188 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Deployment of advanced membrane bioreactor systems with integrated sensors for optimized water recovery
- 5.2. Application of novel electrochemical oxidation processes for efficient removal of trace organic contaminants
- 5.3. Scaling up decentralized modular treatment units for on-site industrial water recycling in manufacturing
- 5.4. Adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning for predictive maintenance in wastewater reuse plants
- 5.5. Incorporation of renewable energy powered desalination coupled with brine concentration recovery processes
- 5.6. Development of hybrid advanced oxidation and biofiltration systems for pharmaceutical wastewater reuse
- 5.7. Commercialization of zirconium and titanium based nanofiltration membranes for selective pollutant removal
- 5.8. Implementation of digital twin technology to simulate and optimize water reuse plant operations in real time
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Water Recycle & Reuse Technologies Market, by Technology
- 8.1. Activated Sludge
- 8.2. Ion Exchange
- 8.3. Membrane Bioreactor
- 8.4. Nanofiltration
- 8.5. Reverse Osmosis
- 8.5.1. Spiral Wound Membrane
- 8.5.2. Tubular Membrane
- 8.6. Ultrafiltration
- 8.6.1. Capillary Membrane
- 8.6.2. Hollow Fiber Membrane
- 8.7. Uv Disinfection
- 9. Water Recycle & Reuse Technologies Market, by Source Water
- 9.1. Brackish Water
- 9.2. Greywater
- 9.3. Rainwater
- 9.4. Stormwater
- 9.5. Wastewater Effluent
- 9.5.1. Domestic Wastewater Effluent
- 9.5.2. Industrial Wastewater Effluent
- 10. Water Recycle & Reuse Technologies Market, by Plant Scale
- 10.1. Large Scale
- 10.2. Medium Scale
- 10.3. Small Scale
- 11. Water Recycle & Reuse Technologies Market, by Application
- 11.1. Commercial
- 11.2. Industrial
- 11.2.1. Chemical And Petrochemical
- 11.2.2. Food And Beverage
- 11.2.3. Oil And Gas
- 11.2.4. Pharmaceutical
- 11.2.5. Power Generation
- 11.2.6. Pulp And Paper
- 11.3. Municipal
- 11.4. Residential
- 12. Water Recycle & Reuse Technologies Market, by Region
- 12.1. Americas
- 12.1.1. North America
- 12.1.2. Latin America
- 12.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 12.2.1. Europe
- 12.2.2. Middle East
- 12.2.3. Africa
- 12.3. Asia-Pacific
- 13. Water Recycle & Reuse Technologies Market, by Group
- 13.1. ASEAN
- 13.2. GCC
- 13.3. European Union
- 13.4. BRICS
- 13.5. G7
- 13.6. NATO
- 14. Water Recycle & Reuse Technologies Market, by Country
- 14.1. United States
- 14.2. Canada
- 14.3. Mexico
- 14.4. Brazil
- 14.5. United Kingdom
- 14.6. Germany
- 14.7. France
- 14.8. Russia
- 14.9. Italy
- 14.10. Spain
- 14.11. China
- 14.12. India
- 14.13. Japan
- 14.14. Australia
- 14.15. South Korea
- 15. Competitive Landscape
- 15.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 15.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 15.3. Competitive Analysis
- 15.3.1. A.O. Smith.
- 15.3.2. Alfa Laval Ltd
- 15.3.3. Aquatech
- 15.3.4. Arvia Water Technologies Ltd.
- 15.3.5. ClearBlu Environmental
- 15.3.6. Concurrent Technologies Corporation
- 15.3.7. DuPont de Nemours, Inc.
- 15.3.8. Ecolab Inc.
- 15.3.9. Epic Cleantec Inc.
- 15.3.10. Evoqua Water Technologies LLC
- 15.3.11. Fluence Corporation
- 15.3.12. General Electric Company
- 15.3.13. Gradiant Corporation
- 15.3.14. H2O Innovation Inc.
- 15.3.15. Hitachi, Ltd.
- 15.3.16. J Mark Systems Inc.
- 15.3.17. KUBOTA Corporation
- 15.3.18. Lenntech B.V.
- 15.3.19. Melbourne Water
- 15.3.20. OVIVO Inc.
- 15.3.21. Pall Corporation.
- 15.3.22. Pentair plc
- 15.3.23. ProChem, Inc.
- 15.3.24. Siemens AG
- 15.3.25. SUEZ Group
- 15.3.26. Tangent Company LLC
- 15.3.27. Tetra Tech, Inc.
- 15.3.28. Veolia Environnement SA
- 15.3.29. Xylem Inc.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
