Virtual Classroom Market by Product Type (Hardware, Services, Software), End User Industry (BFSI, Healthcare, Manufacturing), Deployment Mode - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Virtual Classroom Market was valued at USD 25.45 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 30.60 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 20.00%, reaching USD 109.49 billion by 2032.
Opening context setting that defines the virtual classroom executive summary, clarifies scope and objectives, and highlights the strategic value proposition
This executive summary introduces a structured, evidence-based view of the virtual classroom domain, establishing the scope and objectives that guide the analysis. The introduction situates the study within the context of accelerated digital learning adoption, highlighting the primary aims: to synthesize recent shifts in technology and pedagogy, to examine supply-side and demand-side dynamics, and to surface actionable implications for senior leaders across education and enterprise environments. By framing the inquiry around stakeholder needs and operational constraints, the introduction sets expectations for pragmatism and strategic relevance rather than theoretical exploration.
The approach prioritizes transparent reasoning and methodological rigor, while foregrounding the needs of decision-makers who require both high-level synthesis and operational guidance. Readers are oriented to the principal themes covered: transformation drivers, policy and economic headwinds, segmentation patterns, regional differentiators, competitive positioning, and recommended responses. This section also clarifies what the report does not aim to do, which is to provide prescriptive technological endorsements; instead, it focuses on evidence-informed trade-offs and implementation-ready considerations. Transitioning from context to analysis, the introduction prepares readers to navigate subsequent sections with a clear sense of purpose, scope, and the expected value that follows from the insights presented.
Analysis of transformative shifts reshaping virtual classroom ecosystems, focusing on technology adoption, pedagogical evolution, and rising stakeholder expectations
The landscape of virtual classrooms is being reshaped by a combination of technological breakthroughs, evolving pedagogical approaches, and a recalibration of stakeholder expectations. Emerging technologies such as AI-driven personalization, adaptive assessment engines, and low-latency collaboration tools are enabling more responsive and scalable learning experiences, and these capabilities are accelerating integration between content, assessment, and analytics platforms. At the same time, educators and corporate trainers are moving from content delivery models to competency-based and micro-credential frameworks that prioritize measurable outcomes and modular learning journeys.
Operationally, institutions are transitioning from pilot-centric experimentation to broader program-level deployments, which places new emphasis on interoperability, vendor ecosystems, and change management. Data governance and privacy concerns have risen in priority, prompting more mature approaches to consent, anonymization, and platform security. Meanwhile, funding models and procurement cycles are evolving as stakeholders seek predictable total cost of ownership and clearer evidence of impact. Taken together, these shifts compel organizations to reassess long-standing assumptions about platform choice, instructional design, and vendor relationships, and to adopt more iterative, evidence-driven strategies for scaling virtual classroom initiatives.
Comprehensive review of cumulative impact of United States tariffs in 2025 on virtual classroom supply chains, procurement strategies, and vendor relationships
The policy environment and tariff decisions in the United States during 2025 have exerted discernible pressure on supply chain configurations, component procurement strategies, and vendor contracting practices that affect virtual classroom deployments. For hardware-dependent solutions, changes in import duties and compliance requirements have prompted procurement teams to reassess supplier portfolios, prioritize regional sourcing, and explore longer-term service agreements to hedge volatility. These adjustments have encouraged closer collaboration between institutional buyers and vendors to maintain delivery timelines and to preserve deployment roadmaps.
On the software and services side, cost pass-through effects and shifting vendor margins have led organizations to renegotiate licensing terms, emphasize cloud-native consumption models, and accelerate migration to subscription arrangements where predictable operating expenses are preferable to capital-intensive purchases. The tariff environment has also catalyzed a reassessment of vendor risk and contractual flexibility, with more attention paid to escalation clauses, lead-time guarantees, and spare-part availability. Consequently, procurement playbooks have adapted to emphasize supplier resilience, modular architectures that reduce single-vendor dependence, and contractual frameworks designed to withstand policy-induced supply disruptions.
In-depth segmentation insights revealing differentiated demand dynamics across product types, end-user industries, and deployment modes driving adoption patterns
Segmentation reveals differentiated demand dynamics and distinct operational priorities across product types, end-user industries, and deployment models. Based on product type, the market is studied across Hardware, Services, and Software. The Hardware component is further examined through Networking Devices, Servers, and Storage Devices, each requiring unique procurement, deployment, and lifecycle strategies. The Services component is considered across Consulting, Integration, and Support, reflecting the importance of advisory, technical enablement, and ongoing maintenance. The Software component is analyzed through Licensed and Subscription approaches, highlighting how licensing models shape total cost of ownership considerations and upgrade pathways.
When viewed through the lens of end-user industry, the market is studied across Bfsi, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Retail, and Telecom, each sector exhibiting particular compliance, interoperability, and content localization requirements that influence solution selection and deployment cadence. Differences in regulatory frameworks and user expectations drive distinct adoption patterns and supporting service models. Based on deployment mode, the market is studied across Cloud and On Premise options, which present trade-offs between scalability, control, latency, and integration complexity. Collectively, these segmentation dimensions illustrate how product architectures, industry-specific constraints, and deployment preferences converge to shape procurement priorities, integration strategies, and vendor selection criteria.
Strategic regional insights examining demand drivers, infrastructure readiness, and policy influences across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics play a decisive role in shaping adoption pathways and implementation risk for virtual classroom initiatives. The Americas often foregrounds rapid innovation adoption driven by private-sector investment and cross-border vendor activity, with institutions prioritizing scalability, analytics, and partnership frameworks that support rapid rollouts. North American procurement teams increasingly emphasize enterprise-grade security and integration with existing identity and learning management systems, while Latin American markets balance cost sensitivity with a strong appetite for mobile-first delivery and localized content.
Europe, Middle East & Africa manifests a mosaic of regulatory complexity and market maturity, where data protection rules, language diversity, and public sector procurement norms influence both vendor strategies and deployment timelines. Institutions in this geography tend to prioritize compliance, interoperability, and solutions that accommodate multilingual and inclusive design. Asia-Pacific displays high heterogeneity, with advanced economies focusing on AI-enabled personalization and hybrid learning models, while emerging markets emphasize affordability, resilient connectivity, and partnerships that accelerate capacity-building. Across these regions, infrastructure readiness, policy direction, and institutional funding models collectively determine the pace and shape of virtual classroom adoption.
Company-level intelligence on competitive positioning, partnership trajectories, and capability gaps shaping provider strategies in virtual classroom solutions
Company-level insight centers on how vendors differentiate through product breadth, integration capabilities, and service delivery models. Market leaders tend to emphasize platform extensibility, API-driven interoperability, and robust analytics, which together support enterprise-scale deployments and data-driven program evaluation. Differentiation also emerges from strategic partnerships and vertical-specific content ecosystems, enabling providers to address sectoral compliance and pedagogy requirements more effectively than single-product approaches.
Mid-tier and niche providers often compete through focused domain expertise, localized implementation support, or cost-efficient delivery models that target specific industry segments or geographic markets. These firms frequently pursue channel partnerships and integration alliances to extend reach and to compensate for narrower product portfolios. Across the vendor community, capability gaps frequently surface around end-to-end orchestration, change management services, and transparent outcomes reporting, presenting opportunities for companies to expand service offerings or to pursue inorganic growth through targeted acquisitions. Observing vendor trajectories reveals that the combination of technology maturity, integration footprints, and professional services depth will determine competitive positioning going forward.
Practical and prioritized recommendations tailored for industry leaders to accelerate adoption, optimize investments, and mitigate operational and regulatory risks
Leaders should pursue a set of prioritized, practical actions that balance near-term stability with longer-term strategic positioning. First, investors and procurement executives should reorient vendor selection criteria to value interoperability, modularity, and proven integration outcomes, while also negotiating contractual terms that protect against supply and policy volatility. Second, learning and product leaders should accelerate pilots that combine adaptive content, assessment, and analytics to validate pedagogical impact, thereby reducing risk when scaling. These pilots must include rigorous success metrics and stakeholder feedback loops to inform iterative improvement.
Third, organizations should strengthen data governance and privacy practices to build trust and to ensure compliance across jurisdictions. Fourth, technology teams should adopt hybrid deployment strategies that provide cloud scalability where feasible while retaining on-premise control for latency-sensitive or highly regulated workloads. Fifth, leaders should invest in capability-building around instructional design and change management, recognizing that technology adoption is inseparable from human and organizational factors. Together, these recommendations form a cohesive roadmap that enables institutions to capture value from virtual classroom investments while managing operational and regulatory risk.
Transparent research methodology detailing data collection, qualitative and quantitative techniques, validation steps, and analytical frameworks used
The methodology underpinning this analysis combined structured primary research with rigorous secondary validation to ensure balanced, actionable findings. Primary inputs were drawn from interviews with procurement officers, learning designers, IT leaders, and vendor executives, enabling a granular view of decision criteria, implementation challenges, and operational priorities. Secondary review encompassed policy documents, technical whitepapers, and public disclosures to corroborate trends observed in interviews and to provide current context for regulatory and infrastructure considerations.
Data synthesis followed a mixed-methods approach, integrating thematic coding of qualitative inputs with comparative analysis across segmentation and regional dimensions. Validation steps included cross-referencing vendor claims with independent case evidence and triangulating stakeholder perspectives to surface recurring patterns. Where appropriate, sensitivity checks were applied to ensure that conclusions were robust to alternative interpretations of source material. The analytical framework prioritized pragmatic applicability, ensuring that each insight maps to identifiable stakeholders and to specific decision levers relevant to procurement, implementation, and measurement.
Conclusive synthesis of insights linking strategic implications, risk considerations, and near-term priorities for stakeholders in virtual classroom initiatives
The conclusion synthesizes the report’s core implications for organizations navigating the virtual classroom transition. Key takeaways emphasize that successful initiatives require alignment across technology, pedagogy, and organizational capability. Technology choices should be guided by interoperability and outcomes orientation rather than feature density alone, while pedagogical models must evolve to prioritize micro-credentials and competency-based assessment where appropriate. Organizational readiness, including governance, training, and procurement agility, will determine whether technology investments translate into measurable learning or performance improvements.
Risk considerations include geopolitical and policy-driven supply chain disruptions, data protection requirements, and the potential for vendor lock-in without modular architectures. Priorities for near-term action center on strengthening supplier resilience, piloting outcome-focused solutions, and formalizing data governance. In sum, stakeholders that adopt an evidence-driven, phased approach-grounded in clear metrics and flexible deployment architectures-will be best positioned to realize the benefits of virtual classroom investments while controlling cost and operational complexity.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Opening context setting that defines the virtual classroom executive summary, clarifies scope and objectives, and highlights the strategic value proposition
This executive summary introduces a structured, evidence-based view of the virtual classroom domain, establishing the scope and objectives that guide the analysis. The introduction situates the study within the context of accelerated digital learning adoption, highlighting the primary aims: to synthesize recent shifts in technology and pedagogy, to examine supply-side and demand-side dynamics, and to surface actionable implications for senior leaders across education and enterprise environments. By framing the inquiry around stakeholder needs and operational constraints, the introduction sets expectations for pragmatism and strategic relevance rather than theoretical exploration.
The approach prioritizes transparent reasoning and methodological rigor, while foregrounding the needs of decision-makers who require both high-level synthesis and operational guidance. Readers are oriented to the principal themes covered: transformation drivers, policy and economic headwinds, segmentation patterns, regional differentiators, competitive positioning, and recommended responses. This section also clarifies what the report does not aim to do, which is to provide prescriptive technological endorsements; instead, it focuses on evidence-informed trade-offs and implementation-ready considerations. Transitioning from context to analysis, the introduction prepares readers to navigate subsequent sections with a clear sense of purpose, scope, and the expected value that follows from the insights presented.
Analysis of transformative shifts reshaping virtual classroom ecosystems, focusing on technology adoption, pedagogical evolution, and rising stakeholder expectations
The landscape of virtual classrooms is being reshaped by a combination of technological breakthroughs, evolving pedagogical approaches, and a recalibration of stakeholder expectations. Emerging technologies such as AI-driven personalization, adaptive assessment engines, and low-latency collaboration tools are enabling more responsive and scalable learning experiences, and these capabilities are accelerating integration between content, assessment, and analytics platforms. At the same time, educators and corporate trainers are moving from content delivery models to competency-based and micro-credential frameworks that prioritize measurable outcomes and modular learning journeys.
Operationally, institutions are transitioning from pilot-centric experimentation to broader program-level deployments, which places new emphasis on interoperability, vendor ecosystems, and change management. Data governance and privacy concerns have risen in priority, prompting more mature approaches to consent, anonymization, and platform security. Meanwhile, funding models and procurement cycles are evolving as stakeholders seek predictable total cost of ownership and clearer evidence of impact. Taken together, these shifts compel organizations to reassess long-standing assumptions about platform choice, instructional design, and vendor relationships, and to adopt more iterative, evidence-driven strategies for scaling virtual classroom initiatives.
Comprehensive review of cumulative impact of United States tariffs in 2025 on virtual classroom supply chains, procurement strategies, and vendor relationships
The policy environment and tariff decisions in the United States during 2025 have exerted discernible pressure on supply chain configurations, component procurement strategies, and vendor contracting practices that affect virtual classroom deployments. For hardware-dependent solutions, changes in import duties and compliance requirements have prompted procurement teams to reassess supplier portfolios, prioritize regional sourcing, and explore longer-term service agreements to hedge volatility. These adjustments have encouraged closer collaboration between institutional buyers and vendors to maintain delivery timelines and to preserve deployment roadmaps.
On the software and services side, cost pass-through effects and shifting vendor margins have led organizations to renegotiate licensing terms, emphasize cloud-native consumption models, and accelerate migration to subscription arrangements where predictable operating expenses are preferable to capital-intensive purchases. The tariff environment has also catalyzed a reassessment of vendor risk and contractual flexibility, with more attention paid to escalation clauses, lead-time guarantees, and spare-part availability. Consequently, procurement playbooks have adapted to emphasize supplier resilience, modular architectures that reduce single-vendor dependence, and contractual frameworks designed to withstand policy-induced supply disruptions.
In-depth segmentation insights revealing differentiated demand dynamics across product types, end-user industries, and deployment modes driving adoption patterns
Segmentation reveals differentiated demand dynamics and distinct operational priorities across product types, end-user industries, and deployment models. Based on product type, the market is studied across Hardware, Services, and Software. The Hardware component is further examined through Networking Devices, Servers, and Storage Devices, each requiring unique procurement, deployment, and lifecycle strategies. The Services component is considered across Consulting, Integration, and Support, reflecting the importance of advisory, technical enablement, and ongoing maintenance. The Software component is analyzed through Licensed and Subscription approaches, highlighting how licensing models shape total cost of ownership considerations and upgrade pathways.
When viewed through the lens of end-user industry, the market is studied across Bfsi, Healthcare, Manufacturing, Retail, and Telecom, each sector exhibiting particular compliance, interoperability, and content localization requirements that influence solution selection and deployment cadence. Differences in regulatory frameworks and user expectations drive distinct adoption patterns and supporting service models. Based on deployment mode, the market is studied across Cloud and On Premise options, which present trade-offs between scalability, control, latency, and integration complexity. Collectively, these segmentation dimensions illustrate how product architectures, industry-specific constraints, and deployment preferences converge to shape procurement priorities, integration strategies, and vendor selection criteria.
Strategic regional insights examining demand drivers, infrastructure readiness, and policy influences across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific
Regional dynamics play a decisive role in shaping adoption pathways and implementation risk for virtual classroom initiatives. The Americas often foregrounds rapid innovation adoption driven by private-sector investment and cross-border vendor activity, with institutions prioritizing scalability, analytics, and partnership frameworks that support rapid rollouts. North American procurement teams increasingly emphasize enterprise-grade security and integration with existing identity and learning management systems, while Latin American markets balance cost sensitivity with a strong appetite for mobile-first delivery and localized content.
Europe, Middle East & Africa manifests a mosaic of regulatory complexity and market maturity, where data protection rules, language diversity, and public sector procurement norms influence both vendor strategies and deployment timelines. Institutions in this geography tend to prioritize compliance, interoperability, and solutions that accommodate multilingual and inclusive design. Asia-Pacific displays high heterogeneity, with advanced economies focusing on AI-enabled personalization and hybrid learning models, while emerging markets emphasize affordability, resilient connectivity, and partnerships that accelerate capacity-building. Across these regions, infrastructure readiness, policy direction, and institutional funding models collectively determine the pace and shape of virtual classroom adoption.
Company-level intelligence on competitive positioning, partnership trajectories, and capability gaps shaping provider strategies in virtual classroom solutions
Company-level insight centers on how vendors differentiate through product breadth, integration capabilities, and service delivery models. Market leaders tend to emphasize platform extensibility, API-driven interoperability, and robust analytics, which together support enterprise-scale deployments and data-driven program evaluation. Differentiation also emerges from strategic partnerships and vertical-specific content ecosystems, enabling providers to address sectoral compliance and pedagogy requirements more effectively than single-product approaches.
Mid-tier and niche providers often compete through focused domain expertise, localized implementation support, or cost-efficient delivery models that target specific industry segments or geographic markets. These firms frequently pursue channel partnerships and integration alliances to extend reach and to compensate for narrower product portfolios. Across the vendor community, capability gaps frequently surface around end-to-end orchestration, change management services, and transparent outcomes reporting, presenting opportunities for companies to expand service offerings or to pursue inorganic growth through targeted acquisitions. Observing vendor trajectories reveals that the combination of technology maturity, integration footprints, and professional services depth will determine competitive positioning going forward.
Practical and prioritized recommendations tailored for industry leaders to accelerate adoption, optimize investments, and mitigate operational and regulatory risks
Leaders should pursue a set of prioritized, practical actions that balance near-term stability with longer-term strategic positioning. First, investors and procurement executives should reorient vendor selection criteria to value interoperability, modularity, and proven integration outcomes, while also negotiating contractual terms that protect against supply and policy volatility. Second, learning and product leaders should accelerate pilots that combine adaptive content, assessment, and analytics to validate pedagogical impact, thereby reducing risk when scaling. These pilots must include rigorous success metrics and stakeholder feedback loops to inform iterative improvement.
Third, organizations should strengthen data governance and privacy practices to build trust and to ensure compliance across jurisdictions. Fourth, technology teams should adopt hybrid deployment strategies that provide cloud scalability where feasible while retaining on-premise control for latency-sensitive or highly regulated workloads. Fifth, leaders should invest in capability-building around instructional design and change management, recognizing that technology adoption is inseparable from human and organizational factors. Together, these recommendations form a cohesive roadmap that enables institutions to capture value from virtual classroom investments while managing operational and regulatory risk.
Transparent research methodology detailing data collection, qualitative and quantitative techniques, validation steps, and analytical frameworks used
The methodology underpinning this analysis combined structured primary research with rigorous secondary validation to ensure balanced, actionable findings. Primary inputs were drawn from interviews with procurement officers, learning designers, IT leaders, and vendor executives, enabling a granular view of decision criteria, implementation challenges, and operational priorities. Secondary review encompassed policy documents, technical whitepapers, and public disclosures to corroborate trends observed in interviews and to provide current context for regulatory and infrastructure considerations.
Data synthesis followed a mixed-methods approach, integrating thematic coding of qualitative inputs with comparative analysis across segmentation and regional dimensions. Validation steps included cross-referencing vendor claims with independent case evidence and triangulating stakeholder perspectives to surface recurring patterns. Where appropriate, sensitivity checks were applied to ensure that conclusions were robust to alternative interpretations of source material. The analytical framework prioritized pragmatic applicability, ensuring that each insight maps to identifiable stakeholders and to specific decision levers relevant to procurement, implementation, and measurement.
Conclusive synthesis of insights linking strategic implications, risk considerations, and near-term priorities for stakeholders in virtual classroom initiatives
The conclusion synthesizes the report’s core implications for organizations navigating the virtual classroom transition. Key takeaways emphasize that successful initiatives require alignment across technology, pedagogy, and organizational capability. Technology choices should be guided by interoperability and outcomes orientation rather than feature density alone, while pedagogical models must evolve to prioritize micro-credentials and competency-based assessment where appropriate. Organizational readiness, including governance, training, and procurement agility, will determine whether technology investments translate into measurable learning or performance improvements.
Risk considerations include geopolitical and policy-driven supply chain disruptions, data protection requirements, and the potential for vendor lock-in without modular architectures. Priorities for near-term action center on strengthening supplier resilience, piloting outcome-focused solutions, and formalizing data governance. In sum, stakeholders that adopt an evidence-driven, phased approach-grounded in clear metrics and flexible deployment architectures-will be best positioned to realize the benefits of virtual classroom investments while controlling cost and operational complexity.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
192 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Widespread adoption of generative AI tools transforming content creation workflows in digital marketing
- 5.2. Growing consumer demand for sustainable packaging driving innovation in supply chain logistics
- 5.3. Integration of blockchain-based digital identity verification in online education platforms
- 5.4. Expansion of telemedicine services through AI-driven diagnostics and virtual care platforms
- 5.5. Surge in electric vehicle adoption catalyzing development of fast charging infrastructure networks
- 5.6. Rise of social commerce ecosystems leveraging live streaming and shoppable video experiences
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Virtual Classroom Market, by Product Type
- 8.1. Hardware
- 8.1.1. Networking Devices
- 8.1.2. Servers
- 8.1.3. Storage Devices
- 8.2. Services
- 8.2.1. Consulting
- 8.2.2. Integration
- 8.2.3. Support
- 8.3. Software
- 8.3.1. Licensed
- 8.3.2. Subscription
- 9. Virtual Classroom Market, by End User Industry
- 9.1. BFSI
- 9.2. Healthcare
- 9.3. Manufacturing
- 9.4. Retail
- 9.5. Telecom
- 10. Virtual Classroom Market, by Deployment Mode
- 10.1. Cloud
- 10.2. On Premise
- 11. Virtual Classroom Market, by Region
- 11.1. Americas
- 11.1.1. North America
- 11.1.2. Latin America
- 11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 11.2.1. Europe
- 11.2.2. Middle East
- 11.2.3. Africa
- 11.3. Asia-Pacific
- 12. Virtual Classroom Market, by Group
- 12.1. ASEAN
- 12.2. GCC
- 12.3. European Union
- 12.4. BRICS
- 12.5. G7
- 12.6. NATO
- 13. Virtual Classroom Market, by Country
- 13.1. United States
- 13.2. Canada
- 13.3. Mexico
- 13.4. Brazil
- 13.5. United Kingdom
- 13.6. Germany
- 13.7. France
- 13.8. Russia
- 13.9. Italy
- 13.10. Spain
- 13.11. China
- 13.12. India
- 13.13. Japan
- 13.14. Australia
- 13.15. South Korea
- 14. Competitive Landscape
- 14.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 14.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 14.3. Competitive Analysis
- 14.3.1. Adobe Inc.
- 14.3.2. Airmeet
- 14.3.3. BigBlueButton
- 14.3.4. Blackboard Inc.
- 14.3.5. BrainCert
- 14.3.6. BYJU'S
- 14.3.7. Cisco Systems Inc.
- 14.3.8. ClassIn
- 14.3.9. Coursera Inc.
- 14.3.10. D2L Corporation
- 14.3.11. Docebo
- 14.3.12. Duolingo Inc.
- 14.3.13. edX LLC
- 14.3.14. Electa Communications Ltd.
- 14.3.15. Google LLC
- 14.3.16. Instructure Inc. (Canvas)
- 14.3.17. Kaltura Inc.
- 14.3.18. LearnCube
- 14.3.19. LinkedIn Corporation
- 14.3.20. Microsoft Corporation
- 14.3.21. Moodle
- 14.3.22. Pearson plc
- 14.3.23. SAP SE
- 14.3.24. Skillsoft Corporation
- 14.3.25. Zoom Video Communications Inc
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
