Veterinary Imaging Market by Imaging Modality (Computed Tomography, Endoscopy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging), Animal Type (Equine, Exotic, Large Animal), Product Type, End User, Sales Channel - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Veterinary Imaging Market was valued at USD 2.22 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 2.39 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 7.72%, reaching USD 4.03 billion by 2032.
Comprehensive orientation to current veterinary imaging drivers, clinical adoption patterns, technological enablers, and operational priorities shaping investment choices
The veterinary imaging landscape has entered a phase of accelerated technical maturation and operational integration, driven by increasing clinical demand across diverse animal types and care settings. Advances in detector technologies, portable ultrasound miniaturization, and cross-compatible software platforms have reshaped how clinicians approach diagnostics, enabling richer anatomical and functional insights with faster turnaround times. Concurrently, heightened expectations for image quality, workflow efficiency, and interoperability are prompting veterinary clinics and hospitals to reevaluate legacy systems and pursue upgrades that align with evolving clinical protocols and owner expectations.
Across research institutes and diagnostic laboratories, multidisciplinary teams are leveraging imaging modalities previously confined to human medicine, adapting protocols for animal physiology and species diversity. This transfer of capability is complemented by an expanding vendor ecosystem delivering both hardware and integrated software solutions that facilitate multi-modality reading, 3D reconstruction, and digital archiving. As stakeholders prioritize patient throughput, diagnostic confidence, and operational resilience, imaging investments are increasingly assessed not only on technical specifications but also on lifecycle serviceability, data security, and the ability to integrate into broader clinical information systems. Moving forward, these drivers will determine where capital flows and which product configurations achieve sustained adoption.
How modality convergence, portable technologies, and evolving distribution models are reshaping clinical workflows, access, and vendor service expectations in veterinary imaging
Over the last several years, transformative shifts have recalibrated the veterinary imaging landscape, with innovation and organizational change reinforcing one another. First, modality convergence and software-driven enhancements have enabled smaller practices to adopt capabilities once restricted to tertiary centers, thereby decentralizing advanced diagnostics. Second, the rise of portable and cart-based ultrasound systems and the refinement of low-field MRI options have expanded access in ambulatory and field settings, enabling new clinical workflows for equine and large-animal practice. Third, the integration of imaging into multimodal diagnostic pathways-paired with enhanced laboratory analytics and teleconsultation services-has improved diagnostic throughput and clinical decision-making.
In addition, supply chain modernization and shifting distribution strategies have altered how products reach end users. Manufacturers increasingly emphasize modular designs, remote diagnostics, and subscription-based software services to reduce downtime and improve upgrade paths. Regulatory attention on radiation safety, device interoperability, and data governance has grown, prompting vendors and clinics to adopt more rigorous compliance frameworks. Taken together, these shifts are not isolated; they create reinforcing feedback loops whereby technological advances enable new clinical models, which in turn generate demand for further innovation and tailored service models.
Operational and procurement consequences of tariff-induced cost pressures and how regional sourcing, financing, and modular product design mitigate exposure
The imposition of tariffs in major jurisdictions has introduced cost pressures across the supply chain that merit careful operational and strategic consideration. Tariff-driven cost increases for imported components and finished imaging systems have influenced procurement timing and vendor selection, prompting some buyers to re-evaluate total cost of ownership and maintenance agreements. Many suppliers have responded by optimizing regional manufacturing footprints, qualifying alternate component sources, and increasing localization efforts to mitigate exposure to border-adjusted levies.
In practice, clinics and hospitals that rely on high-capital equipment-such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging systems-have increasingly scrutinized financing terms, service coverage, and upgrade pathways to preserve budgetary flexibility. Meanwhile, distributors and channel partners are adapting pricing and stocking strategies to smooth supply interruptions and absorb short-term cost shocks. Importantly, the most resilient organizations combine near-term tactical responses, such as renegotiating service contracts and establishing local spare part inventories, with longer-term strategic moves like supplier diversification and investing in equipment that offers modularity and upgradeability to lessen sensitivity to tariff volatility.
In-depth segmentation analysis combining modality, species, end-user setting, product architecture, and channel dynamics to reveal targeted adoption and service imperatives
Segment-level dynamics reveal differentiated demand drivers across modalities, animal types, end users, product types, and sales channels that inform targeted commercial strategies. By imaging modality, the landscape includes computed tomography with multi slice and single slice variants, endoscopy available in flexible and rigid formats, magnetic resonance imaging offered as high field and low field systems, nuclear imaging covering gamma camera and PET technologies, ultrasound divided between cart based and portable units, and X ray available as computed radiography and digital radiography, with each modality exhibiting distinct clinical use cases and service requirements. When considering animal type, diagnostic needs vary markedly between equine populations-spanning pony, race horse, and work horse profiles-and exotic species such as avian and reptile patients, while large animal practice centers on cattle and swine, and small animal clinics focus on cats and dogs, each cohort presenting unique anatomical and handling considerations that influence modality preference and accessory selection.
End users range from diagnostic laboratories and research institutes to veterinary clinics and hospitals, and their operational priorities differ from throughput optimization and advanced analytical capabilities at labs to ergonomic, space-conscious, and cost-effective solutions in clinics. Regarding product type, hardware investments encompass CT systems, endoscopy systems, MRI systems, nuclear imaging systems, radiography systems, and ultrasound systems, while software offerings include 3D imaging suites, picture archiving and communication systems, and workflow software that enable imaging lifecycle management and remote interpretation. Finally, sales channels bifurcate into direct sales and distributor sales, with distributor networks classified as global or local partners, and these routes to market affect after-sales service models, lead times, and customer support expectations. Integrating these segmentation perspectives helps vendors and buyers identify where capabilities, pricing, and service models must align to achieve clinical adoption and operational sustainability.
Regional adoption drivers, regulatory influences, and infrastructure realities across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape modality demand and service models
Regional patterns reflect diverse adoption drivers, regulatory environments, and infrastructure maturity across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, each shaping purchase behavior and clinical practice standards. In the Americas, a well-developed private veterinary sector and advanced tertiary care centers support demand for high-end modalities and integrated software, while smaller practices continue to adopt portable and cost-effective imaging options to enhance primary care services. Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization in some markets and variable reimbursement models in others create differentiated adoption paths, with emphasis on radiation safety, data protection, and cross-border consultation services that influence vendor compliance and product feature sets. Transitioning to Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, expanding pet ownership, and investment in veterinary education have driven interest in a range of solutions from portable ultrasound for first-contact clinics to more sophisticated imaging in academic and specialty centers.
These regional nuances inform how manufacturers prioritize product variants, training programs, and service delivery models. For example, in regions with extensive field-based large animal practice, ruggedized portable equipment and streamlined maintenance offerings are particularly valuable. Conversely, in markets with dense hospital networks and teaching institutions, integration capabilities, advanced software, and high-resolution modalities command greater attention. Recognizing these regional patterns enables stakeholders to tailor commercial approaches that resonate with local clinical and operational realities.
Assessment of the competitive ecosystem revealing how product innovation, software integration, and service capabilities determine vendor differentiation and customer retention
Competitive dynamics in veterinary imaging are characterized by a mix of global OEMs, specialized veterinary equipment vendors, software-focused innovators, and service-oriented partners that together create a complex ecosystem. Manufacturers of core imaging hardware are increasingly differentiating through modular architectures, remote diagnostics, and extended warranties to reduce downtime and total cost of ownership. At the same time, software vendors emphasize interoperability, vendor-neutral archiving, and advanced visualization capabilities such as 3D reconstruction and automated measurement tools to add clinical value and streamline workflows.
Channel partners and distributors play a critical role in training, installation, and field service, particularly in regions with geographical or logistical constraints. Meanwhile, research institutes and diagnostic laboratories act as early adopters for novel applications and protocol optimization, often collaborating with industry on validation studies. The most agile companies combine product excellence with robust service networks and flexible commercial terms, enabling adoption across disparate clinical settings. Strategic partnerships between hardware vendors and software integrators are becoming central to offering bundled solutions that address both clinical and administrative pain points, and these alliances increasingly determine market momentum and customer retention.
Actionable priorities for vendors and clinical leaders to enhance equipment resilience, interoperability, training, and commercial flexibility to drive adoption and retention
Industry leaders seeking to capitalize on the evolving veterinary imaging landscape should pursue a set of pragmatic, actionable priorities that align technology with clinical practice and service delivery. First, invest in modular product designs and remote diagnostic capabilities to reduce downtime and simplify upgrades, thereby improving lifecycle economics for buyers. Second, prioritize software interoperability and adherence to open standards to support multi-vendor environments and seamless integration with practice management systems; this enhances clinical workflows and enables value-added services such as teleconsultation and centralized reading.
Third, develop localized training and certification programs tailored to species-specific protocols and ergonomic considerations, which will improve diagnostic consistency and user confidence. Fourth, reconfigure distribution and inventory strategies to include regional spare part stocking and responsive field service, particularly in geographies with limited vendor presence. Fifth, explore flexible commercial models, including equipment-as-a-service and bundled software subscriptions, to lower adoption barriers for smaller clinics while preserving recurring revenue streams. Finally, engage with clinical end users and research institutes in co-development initiatives to validate emerging applications and generate peer-reviewed evidence that supports clinical adoption and reimbursement where applicable. Implementing these recommendations will strengthen market positioning and accelerate the translation of innovation into routine clinical practice.
Rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining literature synthesis, expert interviews, site observations, and cross-validation to ensure actionable and unbiased insights
The research behind these insights combined systematic secondary research with structured primary engagements to ensure rigor, relevance, and triangulation of findings. Secondary inputs included technical literature, regulatory guidance documents, product manuals, and published clinical protocols, which informed an initial mapping of modality capabilities, typical clinical applications, and safety considerations. Primary research comprised in-depth interviews with practicing veterinarians, imaging technologists, service engineers, and procurement professionals, enabling a grounded understanding of real-world workflows, pain points, and buying behavior. These interviews were supplemented by site visits to representative clinics and laboratories where equipment handling, room layouts, and maintenance practices were observed and documented.
Data validation involved cross-referencing interview insights with technical specifications and vendor-provided documentation, while expert panels reviewed draft interpretations to surface potential biases and refine conclusions. Methodological safeguards included transparent documentation of interview protocols, anonymization of proprietary information, and ethical clearance for field observations. Analytical techniques emphasized thematic synthesis, comparative modality assessment, and scenario-based implications rather than numerical forecasting. The result is a robust evidence base that links observed clinical needs and operational constraints to technological and commercial recommendations.
Concluding synthesis on aligning technological innovation, operational resilience, and evidence-based practices to translate veterinary imaging advances into routine clinical value
In closing, the veterinary imaging domain is at an inflection point where technological advances, shifting clinical expectations, and evolving commercial models intersect to create new opportunities and practical challenges. Innovations in modality design, software integration, and service delivery are lowering barriers to adoption across a broader array of clinical settings while amplifying the importance of interoperability, training, and localized support. Regional and species-specific nuances remain highly influential in determining which modalities and service models gain traction, and they should guide tailored go-to-market strategies.
Organizations that balance product innovation with resilient supply chains, flexible commercial terms, and evidence-driven clinical validation will be best positioned to translate capability into consistent clinical use. By focusing on modularity, remote support, and seamless software integration, stakeholders can enhance diagnostic utility while managing lifecycle costs. Ultimately, aligning technological development with the pragmatic realities of veterinary practice will accelerate adoption and improve outcomes for animal patients and the clinicians who care for them.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Comprehensive orientation to current veterinary imaging drivers, clinical adoption patterns, technological enablers, and operational priorities shaping investment choices
The veterinary imaging landscape has entered a phase of accelerated technical maturation and operational integration, driven by increasing clinical demand across diverse animal types and care settings. Advances in detector technologies, portable ultrasound miniaturization, and cross-compatible software platforms have reshaped how clinicians approach diagnostics, enabling richer anatomical and functional insights with faster turnaround times. Concurrently, heightened expectations for image quality, workflow efficiency, and interoperability are prompting veterinary clinics and hospitals to reevaluate legacy systems and pursue upgrades that align with evolving clinical protocols and owner expectations.
Across research institutes and diagnostic laboratories, multidisciplinary teams are leveraging imaging modalities previously confined to human medicine, adapting protocols for animal physiology and species diversity. This transfer of capability is complemented by an expanding vendor ecosystem delivering both hardware and integrated software solutions that facilitate multi-modality reading, 3D reconstruction, and digital archiving. As stakeholders prioritize patient throughput, diagnostic confidence, and operational resilience, imaging investments are increasingly assessed not only on technical specifications but also on lifecycle serviceability, data security, and the ability to integrate into broader clinical information systems. Moving forward, these drivers will determine where capital flows and which product configurations achieve sustained adoption.
How modality convergence, portable technologies, and evolving distribution models are reshaping clinical workflows, access, and vendor service expectations in veterinary imaging
Over the last several years, transformative shifts have recalibrated the veterinary imaging landscape, with innovation and organizational change reinforcing one another. First, modality convergence and software-driven enhancements have enabled smaller practices to adopt capabilities once restricted to tertiary centers, thereby decentralizing advanced diagnostics. Second, the rise of portable and cart-based ultrasound systems and the refinement of low-field MRI options have expanded access in ambulatory and field settings, enabling new clinical workflows for equine and large-animal practice. Third, the integration of imaging into multimodal diagnostic pathways-paired with enhanced laboratory analytics and teleconsultation services-has improved diagnostic throughput and clinical decision-making.
In addition, supply chain modernization and shifting distribution strategies have altered how products reach end users. Manufacturers increasingly emphasize modular designs, remote diagnostics, and subscription-based software services to reduce downtime and improve upgrade paths. Regulatory attention on radiation safety, device interoperability, and data governance has grown, prompting vendors and clinics to adopt more rigorous compliance frameworks. Taken together, these shifts are not isolated; they create reinforcing feedback loops whereby technological advances enable new clinical models, which in turn generate demand for further innovation and tailored service models.
Operational and procurement consequences of tariff-induced cost pressures and how regional sourcing, financing, and modular product design mitigate exposure
The imposition of tariffs in major jurisdictions has introduced cost pressures across the supply chain that merit careful operational and strategic consideration. Tariff-driven cost increases for imported components and finished imaging systems have influenced procurement timing and vendor selection, prompting some buyers to re-evaluate total cost of ownership and maintenance agreements. Many suppliers have responded by optimizing regional manufacturing footprints, qualifying alternate component sources, and increasing localization efforts to mitigate exposure to border-adjusted levies.
In practice, clinics and hospitals that rely on high-capital equipment-such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging systems-have increasingly scrutinized financing terms, service coverage, and upgrade pathways to preserve budgetary flexibility. Meanwhile, distributors and channel partners are adapting pricing and stocking strategies to smooth supply interruptions and absorb short-term cost shocks. Importantly, the most resilient organizations combine near-term tactical responses, such as renegotiating service contracts and establishing local spare part inventories, with longer-term strategic moves like supplier diversification and investing in equipment that offers modularity and upgradeability to lessen sensitivity to tariff volatility.
In-depth segmentation analysis combining modality, species, end-user setting, product architecture, and channel dynamics to reveal targeted adoption and service imperatives
Segment-level dynamics reveal differentiated demand drivers across modalities, animal types, end users, product types, and sales channels that inform targeted commercial strategies. By imaging modality, the landscape includes computed tomography with multi slice and single slice variants, endoscopy available in flexible and rigid formats, magnetic resonance imaging offered as high field and low field systems, nuclear imaging covering gamma camera and PET technologies, ultrasound divided between cart based and portable units, and X ray available as computed radiography and digital radiography, with each modality exhibiting distinct clinical use cases and service requirements. When considering animal type, diagnostic needs vary markedly between equine populations-spanning pony, race horse, and work horse profiles-and exotic species such as avian and reptile patients, while large animal practice centers on cattle and swine, and small animal clinics focus on cats and dogs, each cohort presenting unique anatomical and handling considerations that influence modality preference and accessory selection.
End users range from diagnostic laboratories and research institutes to veterinary clinics and hospitals, and their operational priorities differ from throughput optimization and advanced analytical capabilities at labs to ergonomic, space-conscious, and cost-effective solutions in clinics. Regarding product type, hardware investments encompass CT systems, endoscopy systems, MRI systems, nuclear imaging systems, radiography systems, and ultrasound systems, while software offerings include 3D imaging suites, picture archiving and communication systems, and workflow software that enable imaging lifecycle management and remote interpretation. Finally, sales channels bifurcate into direct sales and distributor sales, with distributor networks classified as global or local partners, and these routes to market affect after-sales service models, lead times, and customer support expectations. Integrating these segmentation perspectives helps vendors and buyers identify where capabilities, pricing, and service models must align to achieve clinical adoption and operational sustainability.
Regional adoption drivers, regulatory influences, and infrastructure realities across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that shape modality demand and service models
Regional patterns reflect diverse adoption drivers, regulatory environments, and infrastructure maturity across the Americas, Europe, Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific, each shaping purchase behavior and clinical practice standards. In the Americas, a well-developed private veterinary sector and advanced tertiary care centers support demand for high-end modalities and integrated software, while smaller practices continue to adopt portable and cost-effective imaging options to enhance primary care services. Across Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization in some markets and variable reimbursement models in others create differentiated adoption paths, with emphasis on radiation safety, data protection, and cross-border consultation services that influence vendor compliance and product feature sets. Transitioning to Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, expanding pet ownership, and investment in veterinary education have driven interest in a range of solutions from portable ultrasound for first-contact clinics to more sophisticated imaging in academic and specialty centers.
These regional nuances inform how manufacturers prioritize product variants, training programs, and service delivery models. For example, in regions with extensive field-based large animal practice, ruggedized portable equipment and streamlined maintenance offerings are particularly valuable. Conversely, in markets with dense hospital networks and teaching institutions, integration capabilities, advanced software, and high-resolution modalities command greater attention. Recognizing these regional patterns enables stakeholders to tailor commercial approaches that resonate with local clinical and operational realities.
Assessment of the competitive ecosystem revealing how product innovation, software integration, and service capabilities determine vendor differentiation and customer retention
Competitive dynamics in veterinary imaging are characterized by a mix of global OEMs, specialized veterinary equipment vendors, software-focused innovators, and service-oriented partners that together create a complex ecosystem. Manufacturers of core imaging hardware are increasingly differentiating through modular architectures, remote diagnostics, and extended warranties to reduce downtime and total cost of ownership. At the same time, software vendors emphasize interoperability, vendor-neutral archiving, and advanced visualization capabilities such as 3D reconstruction and automated measurement tools to add clinical value and streamline workflows.
Channel partners and distributors play a critical role in training, installation, and field service, particularly in regions with geographical or logistical constraints. Meanwhile, research institutes and diagnostic laboratories act as early adopters for novel applications and protocol optimization, often collaborating with industry on validation studies. The most agile companies combine product excellence with robust service networks and flexible commercial terms, enabling adoption across disparate clinical settings. Strategic partnerships between hardware vendors and software integrators are becoming central to offering bundled solutions that address both clinical and administrative pain points, and these alliances increasingly determine market momentum and customer retention.
Actionable priorities for vendors and clinical leaders to enhance equipment resilience, interoperability, training, and commercial flexibility to drive adoption and retention
Industry leaders seeking to capitalize on the evolving veterinary imaging landscape should pursue a set of pragmatic, actionable priorities that align technology with clinical practice and service delivery. First, invest in modular product designs and remote diagnostic capabilities to reduce downtime and simplify upgrades, thereby improving lifecycle economics for buyers. Second, prioritize software interoperability and adherence to open standards to support multi-vendor environments and seamless integration with practice management systems; this enhances clinical workflows and enables value-added services such as teleconsultation and centralized reading.
Third, develop localized training and certification programs tailored to species-specific protocols and ergonomic considerations, which will improve diagnostic consistency and user confidence. Fourth, reconfigure distribution and inventory strategies to include regional spare part stocking and responsive field service, particularly in geographies with limited vendor presence. Fifth, explore flexible commercial models, including equipment-as-a-service and bundled software subscriptions, to lower adoption barriers for smaller clinics while preserving recurring revenue streams. Finally, engage with clinical end users and research institutes in co-development initiatives to validate emerging applications and generate peer-reviewed evidence that supports clinical adoption and reimbursement where applicable. Implementing these recommendations will strengthen market positioning and accelerate the translation of innovation into routine clinical practice.
Rigorous mixed-methods research approach combining literature synthesis, expert interviews, site observations, and cross-validation to ensure actionable and unbiased insights
The research behind these insights combined systematic secondary research with structured primary engagements to ensure rigor, relevance, and triangulation of findings. Secondary inputs included technical literature, regulatory guidance documents, product manuals, and published clinical protocols, which informed an initial mapping of modality capabilities, typical clinical applications, and safety considerations. Primary research comprised in-depth interviews with practicing veterinarians, imaging technologists, service engineers, and procurement professionals, enabling a grounded understanding of real-world workflows, pain points, and buying behavior. These interviews were supplemented by site visits to representative clinics and laboratories where equipment handling, room layouts, and maintenance practices were observed and documented.
Data validation involved cross-referencing interview insights with technical specifications and vendor-provided documentation, while expert panels reviewed draft interpretations to surface potential biases and refine conclusions. Methodological safeguards included transparent documentation of interview protocols, anonymization of proprietary information, and ethical clearance for field observations. Analytical techniques emphasized thematic synthesis, comparative modality assessment, and scenario-based implications rather than numerical forecasting. The result is a robust evidence base that links observed clinical needs and operational constraints to technological and commercial recommendations.
Concluding synthesis on aligning technological innovation, operational resilience, and evidence-based practices to translate veterinary imaging advances into routine clinical value
In closing, the veterinary imaging domain is at an inflection point where technological advances, shifting clinical expectations, and evolving commercial models intersect to create new opportunities and practical challenges. Innovations in modality design, software integration, and service delivery are lowering barriers to adoption across a broader array of clinical settings while amplifying the importance of interoperability, training, and localized support. Regional and species-specific nuances remain highly influential in determining which modalities and service models gain traction, and they should guide tailored go-to-market strategies.
Organizations that balance product innovation with resilient supply chains, flexible commercial terms, and evidence-driven clinical validation will be best positioned to translate capability into consistent clinical use. By focusing on modularity, remote support, and seamless software integration, stakeholders can enhance diagnostic utility while managing lifecycle costs. Ultimately, aligning technological development with the pragmatic realities of veterinary practice will accelerate adoption and improve outcomes for animal patients and the clinicians who care for them.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
199 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Implementation of artificial intelligence models for automated interpretation of veterinary imaging scans
- 5.2. Adoption of portable ultrasound devices for real-time bedside diagnostics in small animal practices
- 5.3. Integration of advanced 3D reconstruction software for precise surgical planning in veterinary orthopedics
- 5.4. Development of contrast-enhanced ultrasound protocols for early detection of soft tissue pathologies in companion animals
- 5.5. Use of cloud-based veterinary imaging platforms for secure storage and remote second opinions by specialists
- 5.6. Application of high-field magnetic resonance imaging systems in equine musculoskeletal injury assessment
- 5.7. Emergence of handheld digital radiography units for on-farm livestock health monitoring and disease control
- 5.8. Standardization of DICOM workflows and interoperability practices across multi-veterinary imaging centers
- 5.9. Expansion of teleradiology services enabling global collaboration between veterinary specialists and regional clinics
- 5.10. Integration of radiomics and machine learning for predictive analytics in canine oncology imaging studies
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Veterinary Imaging Market, by Imaging Modality
- 8.1. Computed Tomography
- 8.1.1. Multi Slice
- 8.1.2. Single Slice
- 8.2. Endoscopy
- 8.2.1. Flexible
- 8.2.2. Rigid
- 8.3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 8.3.1. High Field
- 8.3.2. Low Field
- 8.4. Nuclear Imaging
- 8.4.1. Gamma Camera
- 8.4.2. PET
- 8.5. Ultrasound
- 8.5.1. Cart Based
- 8.5.2. Portable
- 8.6. X Ray
- 8.6.1. Computed Radiography
- 8.6.2. Digital Radiography
- 9. Veterinary Imaging Market, by Animal Type
- 9.1. Equine
- 9.1.1. Pony
- 9.1.2. Race Horse
- 9.1.3. Work Horse
- 9.2. Exotic
- 9.2.1. Avian
- 9.2.2. Reptile
- 9.3. Large Animal
- 9.3.1. Cattle
- 9.3.2. Swine
- 9.4. Small Animal
- 9.4.1. Cat
- 9.4.2. Dog
- 10. Veterinary Imaging Market, by Product Type
- 10.1. Hardware
- 10.1.1. CT Systems
- 10.1.2. Endoscopy Systems
- 10.1.3. MRI Systems
- 10.1.4. Nuclear Imaging Systems
- 10.1.5. Radiography Systems
- 10.1.6. Ultrasound Systems
- 10.2. Software
- 10.2.1. 3D Imaging Software
- 10.2.2. PACS
- 10.2.3. Workflow Software
- 11. Veterinary Imaging Market, by End User
- 11.1. Diagnostic Laboratory
- 11.2. Research Institute
- 11.3. Veterinary Clinic
- 11.4. Veterinary Hospital
- 12. Veterinary Imaging Market, by Sales Channel
- 12.1. Direct Sales
- 12.2. Distributor Sales
- 12.2.1. Global Distributor
- 12.2.2. Local Distributor
- 13. Veterinary Imaging Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Veterinary Imaging Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Veterinary Imaging Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. BMV MEDTECH GROUP CO., LTD.
- 16.3.2. Canon Inc.
- 16.3.3. Carestream Health, Inc.
- 16.3.4. CHISON Medical Technologies Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.5. Clarius Mobile Health Corp.
- 16.3.6. Covetrus, Inc.
- 16.3.7. Diagnostic Imaging Systems, Inc.
- 16.3.8. DRAMIŃSKI S. A.
- 16.3.9. E.I. Medical Imaging
- 16.3.10. Edan Instruments, Inc.
- 16.3.11. Esaote S.p.A.
- 16.3.12. FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation
- 16.3.13. GE HealthCare
- 16.3.14. Heska Corporation by Mars, Incorporated
- 16.3.15. IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
- 16.3.16. IMV Imaging (UK) Ltd.
- 16.3.17. Interson Corporation
- 16.3.18. Leltek Inc.
- 16.3.19. Lepu Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.20. Promed Technology Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.21. ReproScan
- 16.3.22. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.23. Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.24. Siemens AG
- 16.3.25. SonoScape Medical Corp.
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
