Vehicle-To-Infrastructure Communication Market by Communication Technology (Cellular V2X, DSRC), Component (Communication Modules, Onboard Units, Roadside Units), Offering, Deployment Type, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Vehicle to Grid Chargers Market was valued at USD 366.78 million in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 437.45 million in 2025, with a CAGR of 20.55%, reaching USD 1,636.59 million by 2032.
A strategic introduction to vehicle-to-grid chargers outlining technological enablers, regulatory catalysts, and commercial applications shaping adoption
The electrification of transport is reshaping energy systems, and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) chargers are central to that transition. V2G technology enables electric vehicles to act as distributed energy resources, providing bidirectional power flow that supports grid stability, peak shaving, and enhanced renewable integration. This capability is increasingly relevant as system operators and utilities seek flexible capacity to balance intermittent generation and as commercial and residential adopters look to optimize energy costs.
Recent developments in power electronics, communication standards, and control algorithms have matured the technical foundation for reliable bidirectional charging. Alongside these advances, evolving regulatory frameworks and utility pilot programs have moved V2G from experimental demonstrations toward scaled deployments. The confluence of these factors means that stakeholders across automotive OEMs, energy service providers, charging equipment manufacturers, and fleet operators must reassess operational models, contractual structures, and product roadmaps.
This executive-level introduction frames the subsequent analysis by clarifying the primary technological enablers, regulatory catalysts, and commercial applications for V2G chargers. It emphasizes the need for cross-industry collaboration to realize grid services, and it outlines how strategic decisions today will influence competitive positioning and value capture as V2G capabilities become more broadly adopted.
How converging technological advances, regulatory incentives, and utility procurement models are reshaping the vehicle-to-grid chargers landscape and commercial dynamics
The landscape for vehicle-to-grid chargers is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging forces in technology, policy, and energy markets. Advances in power conversion hardware and control software have reduced the reliability and latency concerns that previously constrained bidirectional charging. At the same time, interoperability initiatives and emerging standards for communications and cybersecurity are helping to de-risk integration with grid management systems and utility operations.
Policy signals and market mechanisms are also accelerating change. Capacity markets, time-of-use tariffs, and localized flexibility procurement create commercial incentives for aggregated EV assets to provide grid services. Utilities and system operators have moved from conceptual pilot programs to larger-scale demonstration projects, which has clarified technical requirements and market participation pathways. Simultaneously, vehicle OEMs and charging equipment manufacturers are embedding bidirectional capabilities into product roadmaps, enabling a broader addressable set of use cases from residential backup power to fleet-based frequency regulation.
These shifts are altering business models across the value chain. Energy service providers are refining aggregation and settlement platforms, while fleet operators and commercial property owners evaluate the total cost and resilience benefits of V2G-enabled charging. As these trends proceed, stakeholders will need to prioritize standards alignment, cybersecurity, and transparent contractual terms to ensure that technical potential translates into reliable commercial outcomes and durable partnerships.
Assessment of the cumulative impacts of recent United States tariff adjustments on procurement strategies, product design, and global supply chain resilience for V2G chargers
Recent tariff changes in the United States have produced a significant recalibration of component sourcing and supply chain planning for vehicle-to-grid chargers. Tariff adjustments affect the landed cost of power electronics, connectors, and control modules, prompting OEMs and tier suppliers to reassess procurement geographies and supplier qualifications. In response, many organizations have initiated strategic sourcing reviews that balance cost, lead times, and geopolitical risk.
These shifts have accelerated near-term supplier diversification and increased emphasis on localized production where feasible, particularly for higher-value and software-driven modules. As a result, product architecture choices are being revisited to reduce reliance on tariff-exposed components and to simplify certification across different regulatory regimes. Companies are also prioritizing long-term supplier contracts and collaborative development arrangements to secure critical inputs and maintain roadmaps despite cost volatility.
Operationally, the tariff environment has influenced pricing strategies and go-to-market timing, with some vendors sequencing launches to prioritize markets with more favorable trade conditions. The cumulative impact has been a sharpened focus on supply chain resilience, modular product design that allows substitutions without full redesign, and strengthened commercial risk assessment processes to manage pricing and margin outcomes across multi-region deployments.
Key segmentation insights describing technical, commercial, and deployment implications across charger type, power output, connectivity, vehicle class, and end-user scenarios
Understanding segmentation is essential to aligning product development and commercial strategy for vehicle-to-grid chargers. Based on Charger Type, the market differentiates between AC Chargers and DC Chargers, and this distinction informs charge session duration, converter topology, and typical deployment contexts. The AC/DC divide also affects standards compliance and interaction with onboard vehicle systems, which shapes interoperability efforts between automakers and charger suppliers.
Based on Power Output, the market is studied across Above 12 kW and Below 11 kW, and this split maps to different use cases: higher power outputs target fast turnaround commercial and fleet operations, while lower power brackets are well suited to residential and long-dwell public parking scenarios. Power class influences thermal management strategies, connector selection, and the economics of deploying energy storage alongside charging infrastructure.
Based on Charger Connectivity, the market is studied across Wired Chargers and Wireless Chargers, and connectivity choices impact maintenance models, security architectures, and user experience. Wired solutions are dominant for high-power and fleet applications due to efficiency and established standards, while wireless solutions aim to simplify user interaction and enable novel deployment formats in constrained environments.
Based on Vehicle Type, the market is studied across Battery Electric Vehicles, Fuel Cell Vehicles, and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles, and vehicle architecture drives compatibility requirements, bidirectional power handling, and energy management strategies. Different vehicle chemistries and power electronics designs require tailored interfaces and control logic to safely support vehicle-to-grid interactions.
Based on End User, the market is studied across Private and Public, and this segmentation informs ownership models, billing and settlement mechanisms, site control protocols, and the service level agreements necessary for reliable grid participation. Private deployments often focus on resilience and cost optimization for individual owners or fleets, while public deployments emphasize accessibility, interoperability, and integration with municipal energy programs.
Regional strategic insights that explain how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific dynamics determine deployment priorities, partnerships, and regulatory engagement
Regional dynamics shape the trajectory of vehicle-to-grid charger adoption and the strategic choices that manufacturers and service providers make. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on grid resilience and distributed energy resources has fostered a range of utility pilots and commercial aggregation models. Market participants in this region tend to prioritize regulatory engagement, utility partnerships, and integration with demand response programs to capture grid service revenue streams.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory clarity on emissions and ambitious renewable integration targets drive experimentation with bidirectional charging as a tool for system balancing and local energy management. Policymakers in several European markets have moved quickly to define technical standards and compatibility requirements, and this has facilitated multi-stakeholder consortia that align automotive OEMs, utilities, and infrastructure providers around interoperable solutions.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid EV adoption rates combined with diverse grid conditions have created varied pathways for V2G deployment. Some markets emphasize large-scale fleet applications and industrial use cases, while others concentrate on residential resilience and microgrid integration. Across the region, supply chain concentration and manufacturing capabilities influence sourcing strategies and the pace at which local production scales to support national electrification objectives.
These regional profiles inform go-to-market sequencing, local partnerships, and compliance planning for companies seeking to deploy V2G chargers at scale. Understanding the regulatory nuance, utility procurement processes, and customer priorities in each region is essential to tailoring commercial models and technical offerings for success.
Competitive and partnership landscape insights highlighting hardware, software, and service integration dynamics that determine vendor differentiation and procurement decisions
Competitive dynamics in the vehicle-to-grid charger space reflect a mix of established electrification players, specialized power electronics firms, and software-centric aggregators. Technical competence in bidirectional power conversion, controls, and cybersecurity is table stakes, while differentiation increasingly arises from platform capabilities that enable aggregation, energy market participation, and seamless integration with vehicle telematics.
Partnerships between charging hardware vendors and energy service providers are becoming more common as companies seek to bundle hardware with value-added services that monetize grid flexibility. Meanwhile, collaborations with automotive OEMs are essential to ensure compatibility with vehicle powertrains and to enable factory-fitted bidirectional capabilities that simplify field deployments. Firms that can offer end-to-end solutions-combining robust hardware, proven control firmware, and mature cloud-based aggregation platforms-tend to gain broader interest from large fleet and utility buyers.
Intellectual property around converter topologies, thermal management, and secure communications provides another axis of competitive advantage. Companies that can demonstrate compliance with regional regulatory and utility integration requirements while offering adaptable commercial agreements will be best positioned to capture early enterprise deployments. Scalability, serviceability, and a proven track record in joint pilot programs remain critical selection criteria for large procurement decisions.
Practical strategic recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate V2G adoption through regulatory engagement, modular design, resilient sourcing, and aggregation capabilities
For industry leaders seeking to capitalize on vehicle-to-grid opportunities, several actionable recommendations can improve strategic outcomes. First, prioritize early engagement with utilities and regulators to shape interoperability standards, participation rules, and compensation mechanisms that support viable commercial models. Proactive regulatory collaboration reduces implementation risk and opens pathways for pilots to scale.
Next, invest in modular product architectures that allow substitution of tariff-exposed components and rapid adaptation to regional technical requirements. Modular designs lower upgrade costs and facilitate quicker time-to-market across diverse regulatory contexts. Additionally, cultivate strategic supplier relationships and dual-sourcing strategies for critical components to improve resilience against geopolitical and tariff-driven supply disruptions.
Further, focus on building or partnering for aggregation and settlement platforms that can translate technical grid services into transparent revenue streams. Effective aggregation requires sophisticated telemetry, secure communications, and robust billing integrations. Finally, design flexible commercial agreements and incentive structures for fleet operators and site hosts that align incentives for reliability, availability, and grid service performance. These steps will help organizations convert technical capability into repeatable, revenue-generating deployments.
Transparent research methodology describing primary interviews, secondary source integration, engineering assessments, and scenario analysis used to produce actionable V2G insights
This research synthesized primary and secondary inputs to produce a comprehensive view of vehicle-to-grid charger opportunities and challenges. Primary research included structured interviews with stakeholders across the value chain-charging device designers, fleet operators, utility procurement managers, and integration partners-to capture real-world constraints, technical requirements, and commercial priorities. Secondary research incorporated public regulatory filings, utility pilot announcements, standards working group outputs, and patent filings to validate technical trajectories and identify emerging interoperability themes.
Analytical methods combined qualitative scenario development with component-level engineering assessment and supply chain risk mapping. The approach prioritized cross-validation between stakeholder interviews and documented program outcomes to ensure that insights reflected operational realities rather than theoretical constructs. Sensitivity analysis explored how variations in tariff regimes, policy incentives, and technology maturation rates could influence procurement strategies and product design choices.
To ensure transparency, the research documented data sources and interview protocols, applied consistent definitions for bidirectional capability and charger classifications, and flagged areas where further primary testing or pilot data would reduce uncertainty. The result is a structured evidence base designed to support strategic planning, procurement decisions, and technical roadmap development for organizations engaging with V2G technologies.
Concluding synthesis on how technical maturity, regulatory collaboration, and commercial alignment will determine the pace and shape of vehicle-to-grid charger deployment
In conclusion, vehicle-to-grid chargers represent a pivotal intersection of electrified mobility and grid modernization. Technical advances, clearer regulatory pathways, and evolving energy market structures are converging to make bidirectional charging increasingly practical and commercially viable across a growing set of use cases. Stakeholders who align product design, supply chain strategy, and regulatory engagement will unlock new value streams and strengthen operational resilience.
Adoption will not be uniform; regional policy settings, grid characteristics, and fleet concentrations will create differentiated opportunities that favor adaptable product architectures and flexible commercial models. Companies that invest early in standards alignment, robust cybersecurity, and aggregation capabilities will be best positioned to convert pilot successes into scalable deployments. The near-term imperative is to translate technical feasibility into repeatable operational capabilities and sustainable commercial propositions.
The sector’s trajectory will depend on continued collaboration across utilities, automakers, charging providers, and regulators to harmonize standards, clarify participation mechanisms, and ensure that economic incentives align with reliability objectives. With a disciplined approach to design, sourcing, and partnership, vehicle-to-grid chargers can play a meaningful role in decarbonizing transport and stabilizing modern grids.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic introduction to vehicle-to-grid chargers outlining technological enablers, regulatory catalysts, and commercial applications shaping adoption
The electrification of transport is reshaping energy systems, and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) chargers are central to that transition. V2G technology enables electric vehicles to act as distributed energy resources, providing bidirectional power flow that supports grid stability, peak shaving, and enhanced renewable integration. This capability is increasingly relevant as system operators and utilities seek flexible capacity to balance intermittent generation and as commercial and residential adopters look to optimize energy costs.
Recent developments in power electronics, communication standards, and control algorithms have matured the technical foundation for reliable bidirectional charging. Alongside these advances, evolving regulatory frameworks and utility pilot programs have moved V2G from experimental demonstrations toward scaled deployments. The confluence of these factors means that stakeholders across automotive OEMs, energy service providers, charging equipment manufacturers, and fleet operators must reassess operational models, contractual structures, and product roadmaps.
This executive-level introduction frames the subsequent analysis by clarifying the primary technological enablers, regulatory catalysts, and commercial applications for V2G chargers. It emphasizes the need for cross-industry collaboration to realize grid services, and it outlines how strategic decisions today will influence competitive positioning and value capture as V2G capabilities become more broadly adopted.
How converging technological advances, regulatory incentives, and utility procurement models are reshaping the vehicle-to-grid chargers landscape and commercial dynamics
The landscape for vehicle-to-grid chargers is undergoing transformative shifts driven by converging forces in technology, policy, and energy markets. Advances in power conversion hardware and control software have reduced the reliability and latency concerns that previously constrained bidirectional charging. At the same time, interoperability initiatives and emerging standards for communications and cybersecurity are helping to de-risk integration with grid management systems and utility operations.
Policy signals and market mechanisms are also accelerating change. Capacity markets, time-of-use tariffs, and localized flexibility procurement create commercial incentives for aggregated EV assets to provide grid services. Utilities and system operators have moved from conceptual pilot programs to larger-scale demonstration projects, which has clarified technical requirements and market participation pathways. Simultaneously, vehicle OEMs and charging equipment manufacturers are embedding bidirectional capabilities into product roadmaps, enabling a broader addressable set of use cases from residential backup power to fleet-based frequency regulation.
These shifts are altering business models across the value chain. Energy service providers are refining aggregation and settlement platforms, while fleet operators and commercial property owners evaluate the total cost and resilience benefits of V2G-enabled charging. As these trends proceed, stakeholders will need to prioritize standards alignment, cybersecurity, and transparent contractual terms to ensure that technical potential translates into reliable commercial outcomes and durable partnerships.
Assessment of the cumulative impacts of recent United States tariff adjustments on procurement strategies, product design, and global supply chain resilience for V2G chargers
Recent tariff changes in the United States have produced a significant recalibration of component sourcing and supply chain planning for vehicle-to-grid chargers. Tariff adjustments affect the landed cost of power electronics, connectors, and control modules, prompting OEMs and tier suppliers to reassess procurement geographies and supplier qualifications. In response, many organizations have initiated strategic sourcing reviews that balance cost, lead times, and geopolitical risk.
These shifts have accelerated near-term supplier diversification and increased emphasis on localized production where feasible, particularly for higher-value and software-driven modules. As a result, product architecture choices are being revisited to reduce reliance on tariff-exposed components and to simplify certification across different regulatory regimes. Companies are also prioritizing long-term supplier contracts and collaborative development arrangements to secure critical inputs and maintain roadmaps despite cost volatility.
Operationally, the tariff environment has influenced pricing strategies and go-to-market timing, with some vendors sequencing launches to prioritize markets with more favorable trade conditions. The cumulative impact has been a sharpened focus on supply chain resilience, modular product design that allows substitutions without full redesign, and strengthened commercial risk assessment processes to manage pricing and margin outcomes across multi-region deployments.
Key segmentation insights describing technical, commercial, and deployment implications across charger type, power output, connectivity, vehicle class, and end-user scenarios
Understanding segmentation is essential to aligning product development and commercial strategy for vehicle-to-grid chargers. Based on Charger Type, the market differentiates between AC Chargers and DC Chargers, and this distinction informs charge session duration, converter topology, and typical deployment contexts. The AC/DC divide also affects standards compliance and interaction with onboard vehicle systems, which shapes interoperability efforts between automakers and charger suppliers.
Based on Power Output, the market is studied across Above 12 kW and Below 11 kW, and this split maps to different use cases: higher power outputs target fast turnaround commercial and fleet operations, while lower power brackets are well suited to residential and long-dwell public parking scenarios. Power class influences thermal management strategies, connector selection, and the economics of deploying energy storage alongside charging infrastructure.
Based on Charger Connectivity, the market is studied across Wired Chargers and Wireless Chargers, and connectivity choices impact maintenance models, security architectures, and user experience. Wired solutions are dominant for high-power and fleet applications due to efficiency and established standards, while wireless solutions aim to simplify user interaction and enable novel deployment formats in constrained environments.
Based on Vehicle Type, the market is studied across Battery Electric Vehicles, Fuel Cell Vehicles, and Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles, and vehicle architecture drives compatibility requirements, bidirectional power handling, and energy management strategies. Different vehicle chemistries and power electronics designs require tailored interfaces and control logic to safely support vehicle-to-grid interactions.
Based on End User, the market is studied across Private and Public, and this segmentation informs ownership models, billing and settlement mechanisms, site control protocols, and the service level agreements necessary for reliable grid participation. Private deployments often focus on resilience and cost optimization for individual owners or fleets, while public deployments emphasize accessibility, interoperability, and integration with municipal energy programs.
Regional strategic insights that explain how Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific dynamics determine deployment priorities, partnerships, and regulatory engagement
Regional dynamics shape the trajectory of vehicle-to-grid charger adoption and the strategic choices that manufacturers and service providers make. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on grid resilience and distributed energy resources has fostered a range of utility pilots and commercial aggregation models. Market participants in this region tend to prioritize regulatory engagement, utility partnerships, and integration with demand response programs to capture grid service revenue streams.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, regulatory clarity on emissions and ambitious renewable integration targets drive experimentation with bidirectional charging as a tool for system balancing and local energy management. Policymakers in several European markets have moved quickly to define technical standards and compatibility requirements, and this has facilitated multi-stakeholder consortia that align automotive OEMs, utilities, and infrastructure providers around interoperable solutions.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid EV adoption rates combined with diverse grid conditions have created varied pathways for V2G deployment. Some markets emphasize large-scale fleet applications and industrial use cases, while others concentrate on residential resilience and microgrid integration. Across the region, supply chain concentration and manufacturing capabilities influence sourcing strategies and the pace at which local production scales to support national electrification objectives.
These regional profiles inform go-to-market sequencing, local partnerships, and compliance planning for companies seeking to deploy V2G chargers at scale. Understanding the regulatory nuance, utility procurement processes, and customer priorities in each region is essential to tailoring commercial models and technical offerings for success.
Competitive and partnership landscape insights highlighting hardware, software, and service integration dynamics that determine vendor differentiation and procurement decisions
Competitive dynamics in the vehicle-to-grid charger space reflect a mix of established electrification players, specialized power electronics firms, and software-centric aggregators. Technical competence in bidirectional power conversion, controls, and cybersecurity is table stakes, while differentiation increasingly arises from platform capabilities that enable aggregation, energy market participation, and seamless integration with vehicle telematics.
Partnerships between charging hardware vendors and energy service providers are becoming more common as companies seek to bundle hardware with value-added services that monetize grid flexibility. Meanwhile, collaborations with automotive OEMs are essential to ensure compatibility with vehicle powertrains and to enable factory-fitted bidirectional capabilities that simplify field deployments. Firms that can offer end-to-end solutions-combining robust hardware, proven control firmware, and mature cloud-based aggregation platforms-tend to gain broader interest from large fleet and utility buyers.
Intellectual property around converter topologies, thermal management, and secure communications provides another axis of competitive advantage. Companies that can demonstrate compliance with regional regulatory and utility integration requirements while offering adaptable commercial agreements will be best positioned to capture early enterprise deployments. Scalability, serviceability, and a proven track record in joint pilot programs remain critical selection criteria for large procurement decisions.
Practical strategic recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate V2G adoption through regulatory engagement, modular design, resilient sourcing, and aggregation capabilities
For industry leaders seeking to capitalize on vehicle-to-grid opportunities, several actionable recommendations can improve strategic outcomes. First, prioritize early engagement with utilities and regulators to shape interoperability standards, participation rules, and compensation mechanisms that support viable commercial models. Proactive regulatory collaboration reduces implementation risk and opens pathways for pilots to scale.
Next, invest in modular product architectures that allow substitution of tariff-exposed components and rapid adaptation to regional technical requirements. Modular designs lower upgrade costs and facilitate quicker time-to-market across diverse regulatory contexts. Additionally, cultivate strategic supplier relationships and dual-sourcing strategies for critical components to improve resilience against geopolitical and tariff-driven supply disruptions.
Further, focus on building or partnering for aggregation and settlement platforms that can translate technical grid services into transparent revenue streams. Effective aggregation requires sophisticated telemetry, secure communications, and robust billing integrations. Finally, design flexible commercial agreements and incentive structures for fleet operators and site hosts that align incentives for reliability, availability, and grid service performance. These steps will help organizations convert technical capability into repeatable, revenue-generating deployments.
Transparent research methodology describing primary interviews, secondary source integration, engineering assessments, and scenario analysis used to produce actionable V2G insights
This research synthesized primary and secondary inputs to produce a comprehensive view of vehicle-to-grid charger opportunities and challenges. Primary research included structured interviews with stakeholders across the value chain-charging device designers, fleet operators, utility procurement managers, and integration partners-to capture real-world constraints, technical requirements, and commercial priorities. Secondary research incorporated public regulatory filings, utility pilot announcements, standards working group outputs, and patent filings to validate technical trajectories and identify emerging interoperability themes.
Analytical methods combined qualitative scenario development with component-level engineering assessment and supply chain risk mapping. The approach prioritized cross-validation between stakeholder interviews and documented program outcomes to ensure that insights reflected operational realities rather than theoretical constructs. Sensitivity analysis explored how variations in tariff regimes, policy incentives, and technology maturation rates could influence procurement strategies and product design choices.
To ensure transparency, the research documented data sources and interview protocols, applied consistent definitions for bidirectional capability and charger classifications, and flagged areas where further primary testing or pilot data would reduce uncertainty. The result is a structured evidence base designed to support strategic planning, procurement decisions, and technical roadmap development for organizations engaging with V2G technologies.
Concluding synthesis on how technical maturity, regulatory collaboration, and commercial alignment will determine the pace and shape of vehicle-to-grid charger deployment
In conclusion, vehicle-to-grid chargers represent a pivotal intersection of electrified mobility and grid modernization. Technical advances, clearer regulatory pathways, and evolving energy market structures are converging to make bidirectional charging increasingly practical and commercially viable across a growing set of use cases. Stakeholders who align product design, supply chain strategy, and regulatory engagement will unlock new value streams and strengthen operational resilience.
Adoption will not be uniform; regional policy settings, grid characteristics, and fleet concentrations will create differentiated opportunities that favor adaptable product architectures and flexible commercial models. Companies that invest early in standards alignment, robust cybersecurity, and aggregation capabilities will be best positioned to convert pilot successes into scalable deployments. The near-term imperative is to translate technical feasibility into repeatable operational capabilities and sustainable commercial propositions.
The sector’s trajectory will depend on continued collaboration across utilities, automakers, charging providers, and regulators to harmonize standards, clarify participation mechanisms, and ensure that economic incentives align with reliability objectives. With a disciplined approach to design, sourcing, and partnership, vehicle-to-grid chargers can play a meaningful role in decarbonizing transport and stabilizing modern grids.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
181 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Implementation of ultra-low latency 5G networks to support real-time V2I data exchange and safety applications
- 5.2. Integration of edge computing platforms at traffic intersections to optimize vehicular communication and reduce congestion
- 5.3. Standardization of security protocols for V2I to prevent cyberattacks on connected roadside infrastructure
- 5.4. Deployment of AI-driven traffic signal priority systems for emergency vehicles using V2I communication channels
- 5.5. Adoption of multi-access cellular IoT technologies for scalable and energy-efficient V2I sensor networks
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Vehicle-To-Infrastructure Communication Market, by Communication Technology
- 8.1. Cellular V2X
- 8.1.1. 5G V2X
- 8.1.2. Lte-V2X
- 8.2. DSRC
- 9. Vehicle-To-Infrastructure Communication Market, by Component
- 9.1. Communication Modules
- 9.1.1. 4G Modules
- 9.1.2. 5G Modules
- 9.2. Onboard Units
- 9.2.1. Commercial Vehicle Obus
- 9.2.2. Passenger Vehicle Obus
- 9.3. Roadside Units
- 9.3.1. Dedicated Rsus
- 9.3.2. Integrated Rsus
- 10. Vehicle-To-Infrastructure Communication Market, by Offering
- 10.1. Hardware
- 10.2. Software And Services
- 10.2.1. Integration Services
- 10.2.2. Maintenance And Support
- 11. Vehicle-To-Infrastructure Communication Market, by Deployment Type
- 11.1. Highway
- 11.2. Rural
- 11.3. Suburban
- 11.4. Urban
- 12. Vehicle-To-Infrastructure Communication Market, by Application
- 12.1. Autonomous Driving Support
- 12.1.1. Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control
- 12.1.2. Platooning
- 12.2. Infotainment
- 12.2.1. Media Streaming
- 12.2.2. Real-Time Mapping
- 12.3. Safety
- 12.3.1. Collision Avoidance
- 12.3.2. Emergency Vehicle Alert
- 12.4. Traffic Management
- 12.4.1. Signal Timing Systems
- 12.4.2. Traffic Monitoring Systems
- 13. Vehicle-To-Infrastructure Communication Market, by End User
- 13.1. Automotive Oems
- 13.2. Government Agencies
- 13.3. Infrastructure Providers
- 13.4. Telecommunication Companies
- 14. Vehicle-To-Infrastructure Communication Market, by Region
- 14.1. Americas
- 14.1.1. North America
- 14.1.2. Latin America
- 14.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 14.2.1. Europe
- 14.2.2. Middle East
- 14.2.3. Africa
- 14.3. Asia-Pacific
- 15. Vehicle-To-Infrastructure Communication Market, by Group
- 15.1. ASEAN
- 15.2. GCC
- 15.3. European Union
- 15.4. BRICS
- 15.5. G7
- 15.6. NATO
- 16. Vehicle-To-Infrastructure Communication Market, by Country
- 16.1. United States
- 16.2. Canada
- 16.3. Mexico
- 16.4. Brazil
- 16.5. United Kingdom
- 16.6. Germany
- 16.7. France
- 16.8. Russia
- 16.9. Italy
- 16.10. Spain
- 16.11. China
- 16.12. India
- 16.13. Japan
- 16.14. Australia
- 16.15. South Korea
- 17. Competitive Landscape
- 17.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 17.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 17.3. Competitive Analysis
- 17.3.1. Aptiv PLC
- 17.3.2. AT&T Inc.
- 17.3.3. Aud i AG
- 17.3.4. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 17.3.5. Continental AG
- 17.3.6. Daimler AG
- 17.3.7. Delphi Technologies
- 17.3.8. Denso Corporation
- 17.3.9. General Motors Company
- 17.3.10. Huawei Investment & Holding Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.11. Infineon Technologies AG
- 17.3.12. Kapsch TrafficCom AG
- 17.3.13. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
- 17.3.14. Nokia Corporation
- 17.3.15. NXP Semiconductors N.V.
- 17.3.16. Panasonic Corporation
- 17.3.17. Qualcomm Incorporated
- 17.3.18. Renesas Electronics Corporation
- 17.3.19. Robert Bosch GmbH
- 17.3.20. Siemens Mobility GmbH
- 17.3.21. STMicroelectronics NV
- 17.3.22. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- 17.3.23. Volkswagen AG
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
