Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Market by Communication Type (Cellular V2X, Dedicated Short Range Communication), Component (Onboard Units, Sensors And Antennas, Telematics Control Units), Vehicle Type, Application, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Vehicle-To-Infrastructure Communication Market was valued at USD 4.02 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 4.78 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 19.06%, reaching USD 16.27 billion by 2032.
Setting the stage for Vehicle-to-Infrastructure communication evolution and strategic priorities for stakeholders navigating technical, regulatory, and deployment dynamics
Vehicle-to-Infrastructure communication is rapidly evolving from concept to operational capability as road operators, vehicle manufacturers, and network operators converge on interoperable solutions that enhance safety, mobility, and user experience. At its core, V2I encompasses both short-range dedicated communications and cellular-based paradigms; this analysis explicitly differentiates between Cellular V2X-further broken down into 5G V2X and LTE-V2X modalities-and DSRC to reflect how connectivity choices shape latency, coverage, and backward compatibility considerations. Equally important are the hardware and software building blocks that underpin deployments, including communication modules with 4G and 5G variants, onboard units for commercial and passenger vehicles, and both dedicated and integrated roadside units, as these component distinctions influence installation complexity, maintenance needs, and lifecycle economics.
Beyond technology and components, the practical value of V2I manifests across a spectrum of applications. Autonomous driving support, including cooperative adaptive cruise control and platooning, imposes stringent reliability requirements, while infotainment services such as media streaming and real‑time mapping prioritize bandwidth and session continuity. Safety functions like collision avoidance and emergency vehicle alerts coexist with traffic management systems focused on signal timing and traffic monitoring, each driving different data flows and service level agreements. Finally, deployment choices across highway, rural, suburban, and urban environments interact with end users ranging from automotive OEMs to government agencies, infrastructure providers, and telecommunication companies, demanding flexible strategies that balance technical feasibility with stakeholder incentives.
Identifying transformative shifts reshaping the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure landscape across connectivity standards, infrastructure design, regulatory posture, and cross-industry collaboration
The Vehicle-to-Infrastructure landscape is being reshaped by several convergent shifts that move the industry from isolated pilots to broader-scale programs. First, the maturation of cellular technologies, notably the emergence of 5G V2X alongside continued LTE-V2X deployments, is redefining performance expectations by enabling higher throughput and lower latency for both safety-critical and infotainment use cases. In parallel, DSRC remains relevant in legacy and niche contexts, creating a dual-path connectivity environment that requires careful interoperability planning.
Second, component-level innovation is accelerating; communication modules are now offered with multi-mode capabilities, onboard units are being tailored to the distinct needs of commercial versus passenger vehicles, and roadside units are being specified as either dedicated or integrated solutions to align with infrastructure modernization programs. These design choices are amplifying the need for robust integration services and ongoing maintenance and support to sustain operational readiness.
Third, application demand is diversifying. Safety and autonomous driving support continue to command attention, yet traffic management systems and enhanced infotainment experiences are elevating the role of data orchestration and edge processing. Finally, ecosystem dynamics are shifting as automotive OEMs, government agencies, infrastructure providers, and telecom companies reconfigure partnerships. This shift favors collaborative business models and shared investment frameworks that can accelerate deployment in urban, suburban, rural, and highway environments while managing operational complexity and public accountability.
Assessing the cumulative ramifications of United States tariff measures in 2025 on Vehicle-to-Infrastructure supply chains, component sourcing, and technology adoption pathways
Recent tariff actions in the United States during 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity to Vehicle-to-Infrastructure supply chains, with implications for component sourcing, manufacturing footprints, and procurement strategies. Tariff adjustments affecting semiconductor, module, and communications equipment imports can increase the landed cost of key components, creating incentives for manufacturers and systems integrators to reassess supplier relationships, accelerate localization efforts, or redesign bills of materials to prioritize tariff-resilient alternatives. These shifts are further compounded by global shortages and lead-time variability that persist in certain technology segments, prompting more conservative inventory and contracting approaches.
In response, several pragmatic industry behaviors are emerging. Procurement teams are elevating total cost of ownership assessments that explicitly include tariff exposure, logistics risk, and potential rework costs associated with retrofits when switching between module types such as 4G and 5G variants. Component manufacturers and OEMs are exploring dual-sourcing strategies and nearshoring options to mitigate exposure, while software and service providers emphasize remote update capabilities and modular architectures to reduce field interventions. Moreover, regulatory bodies and public agencies are recalibrating procurement frameworks to favor domestic content or to pre-qualify suppliers that demonstrate continuity plans. Taken together, these developments are shaping how decision-makers prioritize interoperability, maintainability, and contractual flexibility to ensure resilient roll-outs across urban, suburban, rural, and highway deployments.
Deep segmentation-driven insights that illuminate how technology choices, component architectures, applications, offerings, end users, and deployment contexts will influence adoption
Segmentation analysis reveals how distinct technical choices and user contexts will differentially influence adoption paths and investment priorities. From a communications perspective, the dual-track environment of Cellular V2X-organized into 5G V2X and LTE-V2X variants-and DSRC creates a strategic inflection point for network planning: regions prioritizing low-latency cooperative driving functions may accelerate 5G V2X trials, whereas deployments with legacy or limited cellular coverage may retain DSRC or LTE-V2X for continuity. Component segmentation underscores trade-offs between modularity and integration; communication modules that offer both 4G and 5G compatibility reduce obsolescence risk, while onboard units designed for commercial vehicles have different ruggedization and telemetry requirements than those intended for passenger vehicles, affecting cost and lifecycle planning.
Application segmentation drives system architecture and service-level requirements. Autonomous driving support use cases such as cooperative adaptive cruise control and platooning demand deterministic communications and precise synchronization, while infotainment services like media streaming and real-time mapping emphasize throughput and content delivery optimization. Safety functionalities including collision avoidance and emergency vehicle alert necessitate fail-safe pathways and prioritized message handling. Traffic management applications focused on signal timing systems and traffic monitoring systems favor scalable roadside deployments and robust data aggregation. Offering segmentation-hardware versus software and services-highlights the increasing value of integration services and maintenance and support as essential enablers of sustained operational maturity. End-user and deployment-type distinctions, ranging from automotive OEMs to telecommunication companies and from urban to rural settings, further refine procurement criteria and partnership models.
Regional dynamics and strategic priorities across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that will determine Vehicle-to-Infrastructure roll-out pacing and partnerships
Regional dynamics are central to strategy, as the pace and shape of Vehicle-to-Infrastructure adoption vary significantly across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, public-private partnerships and state-level pilots are prominent, driving demand for solutions that can demonstrate measurable safety and congestion-relief benefits while integrating into existing roadside infrastructure. Network operators and automotive manufacturers tend to prioritize modular hardware and scalable software to support phased roll-outs across highways, suburban corridors, and urban cores.
Across Europe Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization, spectrum allocation, and strong urban planning frameworks are key determinants. This region often emphasizes stringent safety standards and interoperability testing, prompting suppliers to demonstrate compliance with regional protocols and to support both DSRC and cellular V2X coexistence where legacy systems persist. Infrastructure providers and government agencies in this region frequently seek turnkey projects that balance innovation with predictable maintenance profiles.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapid deployment ambitions in certain markets, propelled by dense urbanization and aggressive 5G roll-outs. Telecom companies and infrastructure providers in the region are active partners in pilot deployments, and there is pronounced interest in end-to-end solutions that combine high-capacity connectivity with advanced traffic management and real-time mapping services. Rural and highway deployments in less connected areas continue to rely on cost-effective modules and longer-range communication strategies, reinforcing the need for a diverse offering mix across the region.
Company-level perspectives highlighting strategic positioning, technology focus, partnership models, and investment priorities among leading Vehicle-to-Infrastructure stakeholders
Company-level positioning is increasingly defined by specialization, partnership ecosystems, and the ability to offer integrated solutions that span hardware, software, and services. Technology vendors that focus on multi-mode communication modules-supporting both 4G and 5G connectivity-are differentiating on flexibility and future readiness, while providers of onboard units are optimizing for vehicle class-specific requirements to meet the distinct durability and telemetry needs of commercial and passenger segments. Roadside unit suppliers that offer both dedicated and integrated form factors are gaining traction by enabling infrastructure owners to choose deployment approaches that align with urban design constraints and upgrade cycles.
Simultaneously, software and services firms that provide integration services and maintenance and support are becoming essential partners for long-term operational success. These firms often bridge the divide between hardware vendors and system integrators by delivering interoperability testing, remote update frameworks, and managed services that reduce the burden on public agencies. Strategic alliances between automotive OEMs, telecom operators, and infrastructure providers are also emerging as a dominant model; such collaborations facilitate coordinated spectrum planning, shared investment in roadside assets, and aligned roadmaps for autonomous driving support and traffic management systems. Ultimately, companies that combine domain expertise with scalable service delivery models are best positioned to translate pilot learnings into sustained deployments that address regional priorities and deployment types across highway, rural, suburban, and urban contexts.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate secure, interoperable, and scalable Vehicle-to-Infrastructure deployments while managing regulatory and supply risks
To convert technical promise into operational reality, industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic, actionable measures that de-risk deployments while accelerating value realization. First, prioritize interoperability by specifying multi-mode communication strategies that support Cellular V2X-including both 5G V2X and LTE-V2X-and DSRC where necessary, and mandate compatibility testing that mirrors real-world conditions. This approach reduces stranded-asset risk and eases the integration burden across heterogeneous fleets and roadside inventories. Second, embed supply-chain resilience into procurement practices by qualifying alternate suppliers, encouraging modular designs that can tolerate component substitution, and incorporating tariff and logistics considerations into total cost assessments.
Third, invest in software-centric capabilities such as over-the-air updates, edge processing, and integration services to extend hardware lifecycles and enable rapid feature rollouts for applications ranging from cooperative adaptive cruise control to real-time mapping. Fourth, structure partnerships with automotive OEMs, government agencies, infrastructure providers, and telecom companies through clear governance and shared performance metrics to align incentives around safety, congestion reduction, and service availability. Finally, adopt phased deployment strategies tailored to deployment type: pilot and validate in urban or suburban corridors with predictable traffic patterns before scaling to highway and rural contexts, thereby balancing technical validation with stakeholder buy-in and cost control.
Transparent research methodology outlining data collection, primary and secondary validation, expert consultations, and analytical frameworks used to derive insights
The findings presented in this document are built on a structured research approach that blends primary expert interviews, technical standards review, and systematic synthesis of publicly available documentation. Primary inputs included consultations with stakeholders across automotive manufacturing, telecommunications, infrastructure ownership, and systems integration to surface firsthand perspectives on technology readiness, deployment barriers, and operational priorities. Secondary sources comprised technical white papers, regulatory filings, standards organization publications, and vendor product materials to validate feature sets and interoperability claims across communication technologies such as 5G V2X, LTE-V2X, and DSRC.
Analytically, the approach combined component-level technical assessment with application-driven requirements analysis to map how communication modes and hardware configurations align with use-case latency, reliability, and throughput needs. Scenario analysis was employed to evaluate supply-chain sensitivity under varying tariff and logistics conditions, and regional comparative analysis highlighted differences in regulatory posture, spectrum allocations, and public procurement models across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Quality assurance included cross-validation of interview findings against documented deployments and vendor specifications, and peer review by subject-matter experts to ensure conclusions reflect observable trends rather than conjecture.
Concluding synthesis that integrates technological, commercial, regulatory, and regional considerations to inform near-term decision-making in Vehicle-to-Infrastructure initiatives
In conclusion, Vehicle-to-Infrastructure communication stands at a pivotal juncture where technological capability, commercial models, and public policy must align to unlock measurable improvements in safety, mobility, and connectivity. The coexistence of Cellular V2X options-spanning 5G V2X and LTE-V2X-and DSRC requires deliberate interoperability strategies, while component segmentation across communication modules, onboard units, and roadside units highlights the importance of modular design and maintainability. Application priorities will continue to shape architecture decisions, with autonomous driving support and safety functions demanding the most stringent performance characteristics and traffic management and infotainment pushing requirements for scale and throughput.
Regions will progress at different rates depending on regulatory clarity, spectrum availability, and partnership readiness among automotive OEMs, government agencies, infrastructure providers, and telecom companies. Tariff developments and supply-chain pressures observed in 2025 further underscore the need for procurement agility and contingency planning. For stakeholders seeking to move from experimentation to deployed services, the recommended path emphasizes interoperability, software-enabled lifecycle management, resilient sourcing, and collaborative business models that align public value with private investment. Taken together, these elements form a practical blueprint for decision-makers aiming to deliver robust, future-ready V2I services across diverse deployment environments.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Setting the stage for Vehicle-to-Infrastructure communication evolution and strategic priorities for stakeholders navigating technical, regulatory, and deployment dynamics
Vehicle-to-Infrastructure communication is rapidly evolving from concept to operational capability as road operators, vehicle manufacturers, and network operators converge on interoperable solutions that enhance safety, mobility, and user experience. At its core, V2I encompasses both short-range dedicated communications and cellular-based paradigms; this analysis explicitly differentiates between Cellular V2X-further broken down into 5G V2X and LTE-V2X modalities-and DSRC to reflect how connectivity choices shape latency, coverage, and backward compatibility considerations. Equally important are the hardware and software building blocks that underpin deployments, including communication modules with 4G and 5G variants, onboard units for commercial and passenger vehicles, and both dedicated and integrated roadside units, as these component distinctions influence installation complexity, maintenance needs, and lifecycle economics.
Beyond technology and components, the practical value of V2I manifests across a spectrum of applications. Autonomous driving support, including cooperative adaptive cruise control and platooning, imposes stringent reliability requirements, while infotainment services such as media streaming and real‑time mapping prioritize bandwidth and session continuity. Safety functions like collision avoidance and emergency vehicle alerts coexist with traffic management systems focused on signal timing and traffic monitoring, each driving different data flows and service level agreements. Finally, deployment choices across highway, rural, suburban, and urban environments interact with end users ranging from automotive OEMs to government agencies, infrastructure providers, and telecommunication companies, demanding flexible strategies that balance technical feasibility with stakeholder incentives.
Identifying transformative shifts reshaping the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure landscape across connectivity standards, infrastructure design, regulatory posture, and cross-industry collaboration
The Vehicle-to-Infrastructure landscape is being reshaped by several convergent shifts that move the industry from isolated pilots to broader-scale programs. First, the maturation of cellular technologies, notably the emergence of 5G V2X alongside continued LTE-V2X deployments, is redefining performance expectations by enabling higher throughput and lower latency for both safety-critical and infotainment use cases. In parallel, DSRC remains relevant in legacy and niche contexts, creating a dual-path connectivity environment that requires careful interoperability planning.
Second, component-level innovation is accelerating; communication modules are now offered with multi-mode capabilities, onboard units are being tailored to the distinct needs of commercial versus passenger vehicles, and roadside units are being specified as either dedicated or integrated solutions to align with infrastructure modernization programs. These design choices are amplifying the need for robust integration services and ongoing maintenance and support to sustain operational readiness.
Third, application demand is diversifying. Safety and autonomous driving support continue to command attention, yet traffic management systems and enhanced infotainment experiences are elevating the role of data orchestration and edge processing. Finally, ecosystem dynamics are shifting as automotive OEMs, government agencies, infrastructure providers, and telecom companies reconfigure partnerships. This shift favors collaborative business models and shared investment frameworks that can accelerate deployment in urban, suburban, rural, and highway environments while managing operational complexity and public accountability.
Assessing the cumulative ramifications of United States tariff measures in 2025 on Vehicle-to-Infrastructure supply chains, component sourcing, and technology adoption pathways
Recent tariff actions in the United States during 2025 have introduced a new layer of complexity to Vehicle-to-Infrastructure supply chains, with implications for component sourcing, manufacturing footprints, and procurement strategies. Tariff adjustments affecting semiconductor, module, and communications equipment imports can increase the landed cost of key components, creating incentives for manufacturers and systems integrators to reassess supplier relationships, accelerate localization efforts, or redesign bills of materials to prioritize tariff-resilient alternatives. These shifts are further compounded by global shortages and lead-time variability that persist in certain technology segments, prompting more conservative inventory and contracting approaches.
In response, several pragmatic industry behaviors are emerging. Procurement teams are elevating total cost of ownership assessments that explicitly include tariff exposure, logistics risk, and potential rework costs associated with retrofits when switching between module types such as 4G and 5G variants. Component manufacturers and OEMs are exploring dual-sourcing strategies and nearshoring options to mitigate exposure, while software and service providers emphasize remote update capabilities and modular architectures to reduce field interventions. Moreover, regulatory bodies and public agencies are recalibrating procurement frameworks to favor domestic content or to pre-qualify suppliers that demonstrate continuity plans. Taken together, these developments are shaping how decision-makers prioritize interoperability, maintainability, and contractual flexibility to ensure resilient roll-outs across urban, suburban, rural, and highway deployments.
Deep segmentation-driven insights that illuminate how technology choices, component architectures, applications, offerings, end users, and deployment contexts will influence adoption
Segmentation analysis reveals how distinct technical choices and user contexts will differentially influence adoption paths and investment priorities. From a communications perspective, the dual-track environment of Cellular V2X-organized into 5G V2X and LTE-V2X variants-and DSRC creates a strategic inflection point for network planning: regions prioritizing low-latency cooperative driving functions may accelerate 5G V2X trials, whereas deployments with legacy or limited cellular coverage may retain DSRC or LTE-V2X for continuity. Component segmentation underscores trade-offs between modularity and integration; communication modules that offer both 4G and 5G compatibility reduce obsolescence risk, while onboard units designed for commercial vehicles have different ruggedization and telemetry requirements than those intended for passenger vehicles, affecting cost and lifecycle planning.
Application segmentation drives system architecture and service-level requirements. Autonomous driving support use cases such as cooperative adaptive cruise control and platooning demand deterministic communications and precise synchronization, while infotainment services like media streaming and real-time mapping emphasize throughput and content delivery optimization. Safety functionalities including collision avoidance and emergency vehicle alert necessitate fail-safe pathways and prioritized message handling. Traffic management applications focused on signal timing systems and traffic monitoring systems favor scalable roadside deployments and robust data aggregation. Offering segmentation-hardware versus software and services-highlights the increasing value of integration services and maintenance and support as essential enablers of sustained operational maturity. End-user and deployment-type distinctions, ranging from automotive OEMs to telecommunication companies and from urban to rural settings, further refine procurement criteria and partnership models.
Regional dynamics and strategic priorities across Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific that will determine Vehicle-to-Infrastructure roll-out pacing and partnerships
Regional dynamics are central to strategy, as the pace and shape of Vehicle-to-Infrastructure adoption vary significantly across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. In the Americas, public-private partnerships and state-level pilots are prominent, driving demand for solutions that can demonstrate measurable safety and congestion-relief benefits while integrating into existing roadside infrastructure. Network operators and automotive manufacturers tend to prioritize modular hardware and scalable software to support phased roll-outs across highways, suburban corridors, and urban cores.
Across Europe Middle East & Africa, regulatory harmonization, spectrum allocation, and strong urban planning frameworks are key determinants. This region often emphasizes stringent safety standards and interoperability testing, prompting suppliers to demonstrate compliance with regional protocols and to support both DSRC and cellular V2X coexistence where legacy systems persist. Infrastructure providers and government agencies in this region frequently seek turnkey projects that balance innovation with predictable maintenance profiles.
Asia-Pacific is characterized by rapid deployment ambitions in certain markets, propelled by dense urbanization and aggressive 5G roll-outs. Telecom companies and infrastructure providers in the region are active partners in pilot deployments, and there is pronounced interest in end-to-end solutions that combine high-capacity connectivity with advanced traffic management and real-time mapping services. Rural and highway deployments in less connected areas continue to rely on cost-effective modules and longer-range communication strategies, reinforcing the need for a diverse offering mix across the region.
Company-level perspectives highlighting strategic positioning, technology focus, partnership models, and investment priorities among leading Vehicle-to-Infrastructure stakeholders
Company-level positioning is increasingly defined by specialization, partnership ecosystems, and the ability to offer integrated solutions that span hardware, software, and services. Technology vendors that focus on multi-mode communication modules-supporting both 4G and 5G connectivity-are differentiating on flexibility and future readiness, while providers of onboard units are optimizing for vehicle class-specific requirements to meet the distinct durability and telemetry needs of commercial and passenger segments. Roadside unit suppliers that offer both dedicated and integrated form factors are gaining traction by enabling infrastructure owners to choose deployment approaches that align with urban design constraints and upgrade cycles.
Simultaneously, software and services firms that provide integration services and maintenance and support are becoming essential partners for long-term operational success. These firms often bridge the divide between hardware vendors and system integrators by delivering interoperability testing, remote update frameworks, and managed services that reduce the burden on public agencies. Strategic alliances between automotive OEMs, telecom operators, and infrastructure providers are also emerging as a dominant model; such collaborations facilitate coordinated spectrum planning, shared investment in roadside assets, and aligned roadmaps for autonomous driving support and traffic management systems. Ultimately, companies that combine domain expertise with scalable service delivery models are best positioned to translate pilot learnings into sustained deployments that address regional priorities and deployment types across highway, rural, suburban, and urban contexts.
Actionable recommendations for industry leaders to accelerate secure, interoperable, and scalable Vehicle-to-Infrastructure deployments while managing regulatory and supply risks
To convert technical promise into operational reality, industry leaders should adopt a set of pragmatic, actionable measures that de-risk deployments while accelerating value realization. First, prioritize interoperability by specifying multi-mode communication strategies that support Cellular V2X-including both 5G V2X and LTE-V2X-and DSRC where necessary, and mandate compatibility testing that mirrors real-world conditions. This approach reduces stranded-asset risk and eases the integration burden across heterogeneous fleets and roadside inventories. Second, embed supply-chain resilience into procurement practices by qualifying alternate suppliers, encouraging modular designs that can tolerate component substitution, and incorporating tariff and logistics considerations into total cost assessments.
Third, invest in software-centric capabilities such as over-the-air updates, edge processing, and integration services to extend hardware lifecycles and enable rapid feature rollouts for applications ranging from cooperative adaptive cruise control to real-time mapping. Fourth, structure partnerships with automotive OEMs, government agencies, infrastructure providers, and telecom companies through clear governance and shared performance metrics to align incentives around safety, congestion reduction, and service availability. Finally, adopt phased deployment strategies tailored to deployment type: pilot and validate in urban or suburban corridors with predictable traffic patterns before scaling to highway and rural contexts, thereby balancing technical validation with stakeholder buy-in and cost control.
Transparent research methodology outlining data collection, primary and secondary validation, expert consultations, and analytical frameworks used to derive insights
The findings presented in this document are built on a structured research approach that blends primary expert interviews, technical standards review, and systematic synthesis of publicly available documentation. Primary inputs included consultations with stakeholders across automotive manufacturing, telecommunications, infrastructure ownership, and systems integration to surface firsthand perspectives on technology readiness, deployment barriers, and operational priorities. Secondary sources comprised technical white papers, regulatory filings, standards organization publications, and vendor product materials to validate feature sets and interoperability claims across communication technologies such as 5G V2X, LTE-V2X, and DSRC.
Analytically, the approach combined component-level technical assessment with application-driven requirements analysis to map how communication modes and hardware configurations align with use-case latency, reliability, and throughput needs. Scenario analysis was employed to evaluate supply-chain sensitivity under varying tariff and logistics conditions, and regional comparative analysis highlighted differences in regulatory posture, spectrum allocations, and public procurement models across the Americas, Europe Middle East & Africa, and Asia-Pacific. Quality assurance included cross-validation of interview findings against documented deployments and vendor specifications, and peer review by subject-matter experts to ensure conclusions reflect observable trends rather than conjecture.
Concluding synthesis that integrates technological, commercial, regulatory, and regional considerations to inform near-term decision-making in Vehicle-to-Infrastructure initiatives
In conclusion, Vehicle-to-Infrastructure communication stands at a pivotal juncture where technological capability, commercial models, and public policy must align to unlock measurable improvements in safety, mobility, and connectivity. The coexistence of Cellular V2X options-spanning 5G V2X and LTE-V2X-and DSRC requires deliberate interoperability strategies, while component segmentation across communication modules, onboard units, and roadside units highlights the importance of modular design and maintainability. Application priorities will continue to shape architecture decisions, with autonomous driving support and safety functions demanding the most stringent performance characteristics and traffic management and infotainment pushing requirements for scale and throughput.
Regions will progress at different rates depending on regulatory clarity, spectrum availability, and partnership readiness among automotive OEMs, government agencies, infrastructure providers, and telecom companies. Tariff developments and supply-chain pressures observed in 2025 further underscore the need for procurement agility and contingency planning. For stakeholders seeking to move from experimentation to deployed services, the recommended path emphasizes interoperability, software-enabled lifecycle management, resilient sourcing, and collaborative business models that align public value with private investment. Taken together, these elements form a practical blueprint for decision-makers aiming to deliver robust, future-ready V2I services across diverse deployment environments.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
184 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Adoption of dedicated short-range communication (DSRC) standards in mass market vehicles to improve safety and reduce latency
- 5.2. Integration of 5G cellular V2X connectivity with edge computing for real-time hazard detection and collision avoidance
- 5.3. Development of AI-driven predictive analytics combining V2V data streams for dynamic traffic flow optimization
- 5.4. Partnerships between automakers and telecom operators to deploy cross-border interoperable V2V communication networks
- 5.5. Implementation of cybersecurity frameworks and encryption protocols to secure V2V message exchange against spoofing
- 5.6. Emergence of software-defined vehicular networks enabling over-the-air updates and scalable V2V feature enhancements
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Market, by Communication Type
- 8.1. Cellular V2X
- 8.1.1. 5G V2X
- 8.1.2. LTE V2X
- 8.2. Dedicated Short Range Communication
- 9. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Market, by Component
- 9.1. Onboard Units
- 9.2. Sensors And Antennas
- 9.3. Telematics Control Units
- 10. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Market, by Vehicle Type
- 10.1. Commercial Vehicles
- 10.1.1. Heavy Commercial Vehicles
- 10.1.2. Light Commercial Vehicles
- 10.2. Passenger Cars
- 11. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Market, by Application
- 11.1. Autonomous Driving
- 11.1.1. Level 2
- 11.1.2. Level 3
- 11.1.3. Level 4 And Above
- 11.2. Infotainment
- 11.3. Safety
- 11.3.1. Collision Avoidance
- 11.3.2. Emergency Vehicle Alert
- 11.3.3. Platooning
- 11.4. Traffic Management
- 12. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Market, by End User
- 12.1. Aftermarket Suppliers
- 12.2. Original Equipment Manufacturers
- 13. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Audi AG
- 16.3.2. Autotalks Ltd.
- 16.3.3. Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
- 16.3.4. BorgWarner Inc.
- 16.3.5. Cohda Wireless Pty Ltd
- 16.3.6. Continental Aktiengesellschaft
- 16.3.7. Denso Corporation
- 16.3.8. Ford Motor Company
- 16.3.9. General Motors Company
- 16.3.10. Harman International Industries, Inc.
- 16.3.11. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.12. Infineon Technologies AG
- 16.3.13. Intel Corporation
- 16.3.14. Kapsch TrafficCom AG
- 16.3.15. Marvell Technology, Inc.
- 16.3.16. Mercedes-Benz Group AG
- 16.3.17. NXP Semiconductors N.V.
- 16.3.18. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
- 16.3.19. Renesas Electronics Corporation
- 16.3.20. Robert Bosch GmbH
- 16.3.21. Savari, Inc.
- 16.3.22. STMicroelectronics N.V.
- 16.3.23. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
- 16.3.24. Toyota Motor Corporation
- 16.3.25. Volkswagen AG
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
