Utility Communication Market by Communication Technology (Wired Technology, Wireless Technology), Utility Type (Electric Utility, Gas Utility, Water Utility), Application, Deployment Type, End User - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Utility Communication Market was valued at USD 22.45 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 23.44 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 5.14%, reaching USD 33.54 billion by 2032.
A strategic introduction framing the accelerating importance of resilient, interoperable utility communication networks for operations, regulation, and customer service alignment
The utility sector stands at an inflection point where communication networks are no longer ancillary assets but foundational infrastructure that enables operational resilience, customer engagement, and the integration of distributed energy resources. Modern utilities must reconcile legacy systems with emerging technologies to support real-time visibility, automated control, and secure data flows across increasingly heterogeneous environments. In this context, communication architectures that blend wired approaches such as digital subscriber line, fiber optic communication, and power line communication with wireless modalities including cellular networks, radio frequency mesh, and satellite links create both opportunities and management complexity.
Across electric, gas, and water utilities, the demand for reliable telemetry and control amplifies as aging infrastructure, regulatory expectations, and customer service metrics converge. Applications ranging from distribution automation and fault management to metering and supervisory control require connectivity that can be deployed on-premise or delivered through cloud-hosted platforms, and that serves commercial, industrial, and residential end users with differing performance and security needs. Consequently, leaders must prioritize interoperability, cybersecurity, and scalable deployment strategies while cultivating vendor relationships that support long-term integration. By setting these priorities early and aligning investment decisions with operational risk reduction and regulatory compliance, organizations can avoid costly rip-and-replace cycles and enable incremental modernization that yields tangible service improvements.
An incisive analysis of the transformative technological and regulatory shifts reshaping utility communications across reliability, security, and distributed energy integration
The landscape for utility communications is shifting decisively under the combined influence of technology maturation, regulatory pressure, and evolving threat vectors. Fiber optic deployments are expanding to support high-bandwidth grid applications, while cellular technologies, particularly private and mission-critical variants, are maturing to deliver low-latency connectivity for distributed control. Simultaneously, radio frequency mesh and satellite communications provide alternatives for hard-to-reach geographies and redundancy architectures, enabling broader coverage and improved recovery options during extreme events.
Edge computing and fog architectures are emerging to reduce latency and to localize analytics for fault detection and automated response, which in turn demand robust, secure links between field devices and control centers. Cloud adoption is accelerating, yet many operators retain hybrid models to balance latency, regulatory compliance, and data sovereignty. At the same time, cybersecurity has moved from technical afterthought to board-level imperative; utilities increasingly adopt zero trust principles, encryption standards, and coordinated vulnerability disclosure processes. These transformative shifts are compounded by decarbonization goals and distributed energy resources, which require two-way communications and orchestration across previously one-directional networks. As a result, strategic planning must incorporate flexibility to support multiple communication modalities, layered security, and incremental deployment paths that preserve existing investments while enabling future functionality.
A pragmatic evaluation of how recent trade measures and tariff dynamics are altering procurement, supplier strategies, and deployment risk for utility communications programs
The introduction of tariffs and trade measures can reverberate through utility communications supply chains, affecting equipment availability, procurement strategies, and program timelines. Tariff-driven cost increases on specific components or finished goods often prompt procurement teams to reassess sourcing strategies, expand qualification of alternative suppliers, and accelerate inventory hedging where contractual and operational constraints allow. These responses can mitigate near-term disruption but also increase working capital and logistics complexity, which requires careful coordination between procurement, engineering, and project delivery teams.
In parallel, vendors may adjust product roadmaps, prioritize local manufacturing, or consolidate component sourcing to manage margin pressures, creating an environment in which interoperability and standards-based architectures become even more valuable. Utilities that depend on specialized modules or proprietary interfaces may face extended lead times or price volatility, which heightens the importance of flexible network designs that can accommodate substitutions without compromising functionality. Moreover, tariffs tend to incentivize regionalization strategies that emphasize nearshoring and partnership models with domestic assemblers, altering long-term supplier landscapes. From a programmatic perspective, utilities and integrators should emphasize contract agility, scenario planning, and active stakeholder communication to maintain project momentum and to preserve optionality amid evolving trade policies.
Detailed segmentation insights revealing how technology, utility type, application, deployment model, and end user requirements converge to shape communications strategies
Insights derived from segmentation reveal differentiated priorities and technical requirements that should inform solution design and deployment strategies. When communication technology is considered, wired technologies such as digital subscriber line, fiber optic communication, and power line communication continue to provide high-capacity and deterministic links for backbone and distribution use cases, whereas wireless technologies including cellular communication, radio frequency mesh, and satellite communication offer rapid deployment, geographic flexibility, and redundancy-making hybrid architectures increasingly common in field deployments.
Examining utility type uncovers distinct operational drivers: electric utilities often prioritize distribution automation and fault management to improve reliability and integrate distributed resources, gas utilities emphasize pipeline monitoring and leak detection with robust telemetry, and water utilities focus on remote sensing and pressure control to reduce non-revenue water and improve service continuity. Application-focused segmentation highlights that distribution automation and supervisory control and data acquisition systems require deterministic communications and low latency, while metering applications, whether automatic meter reading or advanced smart metering, balance bandwidth efficiency with security and privacy considerations. Deployment type choices between cloud based and on premise systems hinge on latency tolerance, regulatory requirements, and data governance policies, so many organizations adopt hybrid models that place time-critical controls on-premise while leveraging cloud platforms for analytics and long-term data retention. End user segmentation-commercial, industrial, and residential-further shapes service-level expectations, with industrial environments demanding the highest levels of deterministic performance and resilience.
Actionable regional insights explaining how regulatory frameworks, infrastructure maturity, and policy priorities drive divergent communications adoption across major global regions
Regional dynamics influence both technology adoption and regulatory priorities, producing divergent paths that suppliers and operators must navigate. In the Americas, investment in fiber expansion and private cellular solutions is accelerating to support grid modernization and resilience objectives, with regulatory frameworks increasingly focused on data privacy and infrastructure security. This environment favors integrated solutions that combine high-capacity backbones with redundant wireless overlays to maintain service continuity during severe weather and natural hazards.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory heterogeneity drives varied adoption rates; some markets prioritize rapid rollout of smart metering and distribution automation supported by national programs, while others contend with constrained capital and fragmented grids that benefit from low-cost wireless mesh and satellite for remote connectivity. Spectrum allocation policies and public-private partnerships play a decisive role in enabling scalable deployments. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid urbanization, ambitious electrification goals, and strong manufacturing ecosystems support aggressive deployment of fiber and cellular technologies, complemented by satellite and mesh networks in less dense geographies. Policymakers in this region also emphasize local content and industrial participation, which shapes vendor strategies and ecosystem partnerships. Collectively, regional differences underscore the need for adaptive commercial models and configurable technology stacks that align with local priorities and regulatory constraints.
Key company-level observations on how incumbents, new entrants, integrators, and cybersecurity specialists are reshaping competitive advantage through partnerships and services
The competitive landscape for utility communications blends established hardware manufacturers, specialized software vendors, systems integrators, and a growing cohort of cybersecurity and analytics specialists. Incumbent equipment vendors retain strength in fiber, power line, and certain wireless radio platforms due to proven reliability and existing field installed bases, yet newer entrants that deliver cloud-native telemetry, edge orchestration, and managed connectivity services are capturing attention by enabling faster deployment cycles and improved operational visibility. Systems integrators that can bridge legacy SCADA environments with modern IT stacks are particularly valuable because they reduce risk and accelerate time-to-value for operators.
Strategic partnerships and alliances are becoming more central to competitive differentiation. Vendors that adopt open standards, provide clear APIs, and demonstrate successful interoperability tests tend to reduce integration friction and win larger program contracts. Similarly, companies that bundle cybersecurity services with communications solutions are gaining customer trust by offering end-to-end risk mitigation rather than point products. Finally, professional services capabilities around training, change management, and field operations support often determine long-term contract success, as utilities need implementation partners that can translate technical functionality into operational outcomes and workforce readiness.
Practical recommendations for utility and vendor leaders to build resilient, secure, and flexible communications architectures while managing supply chain and workforce risks
Leaders should adopt a pragmatic, phased approach to modernization that balances urgency with operational continuity. Begin by mapping critical assets and communications dependencies to identify high-impact upgrade targets, then prioritize deployments that reduce operational risk and enable key functionality such as automated fault isolation and secure remote access. Where possible, design networks to be technology-agnostic, permitting substitution between wired and wireless modalities to manage cost, availability, and environmental constraints.
Supply chain resilience should be elevated to a program-level objective; diversify suppliers, incorporate local assembly where feasible, and maintain strategic spares for long-lead items. Concurrently, invest in cybersecurity by embedding secure-by-design principles into procurement specifications, enforcing cryptographic standards, and running regular tabletop exercises to validate incident response plans. For deployment models, consider hybrid cloud architectures that place latency-sensitive control loops on-premise while leveraging cloud platforms for analytics and cross-domain orchestration. Finally, foster workforce capability through targeted training and vendor-led certification programs to ensure personnel can operate and maintain increasingly software-defined communication systems. These combined actions will reduce deployment risk, control total cost of ownership, and accelerate the realization of reliability and customer service benefits.
Transparent research methodology explaining interview-driven insights, documentary triangulation, technology maturity assessments, and validation practices used in the analysis
This analysis synthesizes primary and secondary research to present a balanced perspective on trends, risks, and strategic options. The primary research base comprises structured interviews with utility operators, network architects, systems integrators, and procurement specialists to capture real-world constraints and decision drivers. These qualitative insights were triangulated with technical white papers, standards documentation, and public regulatory filings to validate technology trajectories and policy influences. Where appropriate, comparative case studies of recent deployments provided granular lessons on timeline, integration challenges, and performance outcomes.
Analytical methods included technology maturity assessments, scenario analysis to stress-test procurement and supply chain responses, and interoperability reviews to assess integration barriers. The research process emphasized transparency and validation: findings were circulated to a subset of interviewees for fact-checking and to ensure that conclusions reflected operational realities. Limitations include variability in regional regulatory detail and the proprietary nature of some vendor roadmaps, which necessitated anonymizing sensitive input while preserving analytical fidelity. Overall, the methodology balances practitioner insight with documentary evidence to produce actionable guidance for decision-makers.
A concise conclusion emphasizing the imperative to balance rapid communications modernization with supply chain resilience, cybersecurity, and pragmatic deployment strategies
In summary, utility communications are transitioning from siloed assets to integrated platforms that underpin reliability, customer engagement, and energy transition objectives. The convergence of fiber, cellular, mesh, and satellite options, combined with cloud and edge computing paradigms, presents a suite of capabilities that can materially improve fault response, grid observability, and service predictability. However, these opportunities coexist with tangible risks from trade policy shifts, component supply volatility, and evolving cyber threats, which require proactive mitigation and adaptable architectures.
Decision-makers should prioritize interoperability, supply chain diversity, and cybersecurity while adopting phased modernization strategies that preserve existing investments. Regional regulatory conditions and end-user expectations will shape specific technical choices, so vendors and operators must negotiate flexible commercial terms and partnership models. Ultimately, organizations that balance tactical actions-such as strategic spares and hybrid deployments-with longer-term investments in workforce and standards adoption will be best positioned to realize operational improvements and to respond resiliently to future disruptions.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
A strategic introduction framing the accelerating importance of resilient, interoperable utility communication networks for operations, regulation, and customer service alignment
The utility sector stands at an inflection point where communication networks are no longer ancillary assets but foundational infrastructure that enables operational resilience, customer engagement, and the integration of distributed energy resources. Modern utilities must reconcile legacy systems with emerging technologies to support real-time visibility, automated control, and secure data flows across increasingly heterogeneous environments. In this context, communication architectures that blend wired approaches such as digital subscriber line, fiber optic communication, and power line communication with wireless modalities including cellular networks, radio frequency mesh, and satellite links create both opportunities and management complexity.
Across electric, gas, and water utilities, the demand for reliable telemetry and control amplifies as aging infrastructure, regulatory expectations, and customer service metrics converge. Applications ranging from distribution automation and fault management to metering and supervisory control require connectivity that can be deployed on-premise or delivered through cloud-hosted platforms, and that serves commercial, industrial, and residential end users with differing performance and security needs. Consequently, leaders must prioritize interoperability, cybersecurity, and scalable deployment strategies while cultivating vendor relationships that support long-term integration. By setting these priorities early and aligning investment decisions with operational risk reduction and regulatory compliance, organizations can avoid costly rip-and-replace cycles and enable incremental modernization that yields tangible service improvements.
An incisive analysis of the transformative technological and regulatory shifts reshaping utility communications across reliability, security, and distributed energy integration
The landscape for utility communications is shifting decisively under the combined influence of technology maturation, regulatory pressure, and evolving threat vectors. Fiber optic deployments are expanding to support high-bandwidth grid applications, while cellular technologies, particularly private and mission-critical variants, are maturing to deliver low-latency connectivity for distributed control. Simultaneously, radio frequency mesh and satellite communications provide alternatives for hard-to-reach geographies and redundancy architectures, enabling broader coverage and improved recovery options during extreme events.
Edge computing and fog architectures are emerging to reduce latency and to localize analytics for fault detection and automated response, which in turn demand robust, secure links between field devices and control centers. Cloud adoption is accelerating, yet many operators retain hybrid models to balance latency, regulatory compliance, and data sovereignty. At the same time, cybersecurity has moved from technical afterthought to board-level imperative; utilities increasingly adopt zero trust principles, encryption standards, and coordinated vulnerability disclosure processes. These transformative shifts are compounded by decarbonization goals and distributed energy resources, which require two-way communications and orchestration across previously one-directional networks. As a result, strategic planning must incorporate flexibility to support multiple communication modalities, layered security, and incremental deployment paths that preserve existing investments while enabling future functionality.
A pragmatic evaluation of how recent trade measures and tariff dynamics are altering procurement, supplier strategies, and deployment risk for utility communications programs
The introduction of tariffs and trade measures can reverberate through utility communications supply chains, affecting equipment availability, procurement strategies, and program timelines. Tariff-driven cost increases on specific components or finished goods often prompt procurement teams to reassess sourcing strategies, expand qualification of alternative suppliers, and accelerate inventory hedging where contractual and operational constraints allow. These responses can mitigate near-term disruption but also increase working capital and logistics complexity, which requires careful coordination between procurement, engineering, and project delivery teams.
In parallel, vendors may adjust product roadmaps, prioritize local manufacturing, or consolidate component sourcing to manage margin pressures, creating an environment in which interoperability and standards-based architectures become even more valuable. Utilities that depend on specialized modules or proprietary interfaces may face extended lead times or price volatility, which heightens the importance of flexible network designs that can accommodate substitutions without compromising functionality. Moreover, tariffs tend to incentivize regionalization strategies that emphasize nearshoring and partnership models with domestic assemblers, altering long-term supplier landscapes. From a programmatic perspective, utilities and integrators should emphasize contract agility, scenario planning, and active stakeholder communication to maintain project momentum and to preserve optionality amid evolving trade policies.
Detailed segmentation insights revealing how technology, utility type, application, deployment model, and end user requirements converge to shape communications strategies
Insights derived from segmentation reveal differentiated priorities and technical requirements that should inform solution design and deployment strategies. When communication technology is considered, wired technologies such as digital subscriber line, fiber optic communication, and power line communication continue to provide high-capacity and deterministic links for backbone and distribution use cases, whereas wireless technologies including cellular communication, radio frequency mesh, and satellite communication offer rapid deployment, geographic flexibility, and redundancy-making hybrid architectures increasingly common in field deployments.
Examining utility type uncovers distinct operational drivers: electric utilities often prioritize distribution automation and fault management to improve reliability and integrate distributed resources, gas utilities emphasize pipeline monitoring and leak detection with robust telemetry, and water utilities focus on remote sensing and pressure control to reduce non-revenue water and improve service continuity. Application-focused segmentation highlights that distribution automation and supervisory control and data acquisition systems require deterministic communications and low latency, while metering applications, whether automatic meter reading or advanced smart metering, balance bandwidth efficiency with security and privacy considerations. Deployment type choices between cloud based and on premise systems hinge on latency tolerance, regulatory requirements, and data governance policies, so many organizations adopt hybrid models that place time-critical controls on-premise while leveraging cloud platforms for analytics and long-term data retention. End user segmentation-commercial, industrial, and residential-further shapes service-level expectations, with industrial environments demanding the highest levels of deterministic performance and resilience.
Actionable regional insights explaining how regulatory frameworks, infrastructure maturity, and policy priorities drive divergent communications adoption across major global regions
Regional dynamics influence both technology adoption and regulatory priorities, producing divergent paths that suppliers and operators must navigate. In the Americas, investment in fiber expansion and private cellular solutions is accelerating to support grid modernization and resilience objectives, with regulatory frameworks increasingly focused on data privacy and infrastructure security. This environment favors integrated solutions that combine high-capacity backbones with redundant wireless overlays to maintain service continuity during severe weather and natural hazards.
Across Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, regulatory heterogeneity drives varied adoption rates; some markets prioritize rapid rollout of smart metering and distribution automation supported by national programs, while others contend with constrained capital and fragmented grids that benefit from low-cost wireless mesh and satellite for remote connectivity. Spectrum allocation policies and public-private partnerships play a decisive role in enabling scalable deployments. In the Asia-Pacific region, rapid urbanization, ambitious electrification goals, and strong manufacturing ecosystems support aggressive deployment of fiber and cellular technologies, complemented by satellite and mesh networks in less dense geographies. Policymakers in this region also emphasize local content and industrial participation, which shapes vendor strategies and ecosystem partnerships. Collectively, regional differences underscore the need for adaptive commercial models and configurable technology stacks that align with local priorities and regulatory constraints.
Key company-level observations on how incumbents, new entrants, integrators, and cybersecurity specialists are reshaping competitive advantage through partnerships and services
The competitive landscape for utility communications blends established hardware manufacturers, specialized software vendors, systems integrators, and a growing cohort of cybersecurity and analytics specialists. Incumbent equipment vendors retain strength in fiber, power line, and certain wireless radio platforms due to proven reliability and existing field installed bases, yet newer entrants that deliver cloud-native telemetry, edge orchestration, and managed connectivity services are capturing attention by enabling faster deployment cycles and improved operational visibility. Systems integrators that can bridge legacy SCADA environments with modern IT stacks are particularly valuable because they reduce risk and accelerate time-to-value for operators.
Strategic partnerships and alliances are becoming more central to competitive differentiation. Vendors that adopt open standards, provide clear APIs, and demonstrate successful interoperability tests tend to reduce integration friction and win larger program contracts. Similarly, companies that bundle cybersecurity services with communications solutions are gaining customer trust by offering end-to-end risk mitigation rather than point products. Finally, professional services capabilities around training, change management, and field operations support often determine long-term contract success, as utilities need implementation partners that can translate technical functionality into operational outcomes and workforce readiness.
Practical recommendations for utility and vendor leaders to build resilient, secure, and flexible communications architectures while managing supply chain and workforce risks
Leaders should adopt a pragmatic, phased approach to modernization that balances urgency with operational continuity. Begin by mapping critical assets and communications dependencies to identify high-impact upgrade targets, then prioritize deployments that reduce operational risk and enable key functionality such as automated fault isolation and secure remote access. Where possible, design networks to be technology-agnostic, permitting substitution between wired and wireless modalities to manage cost, availability, and environmental constraints.
Supply chain resilience should be elevated to a program-level objective; diversify suppliers, incorporate local assembly where feasible, and maintain strategic spares for long-lead items. Concurrently, invest in cybersecurity by embedding secure-by-design principles into procurement specifications, enforcing cryptographic standards, and running regular tabletop exercises to validate incident response plans. For deployment models, consider hybrid cloud architectures that place latency-sensitive control loops on-premise while leveraging cloud platforms for analytics and cross-domain orchestration. Finally, foster workforce capability through targeted training and vendor-led certification programs to ensure personnel can operate and maintain increasingly software-defined communication systems. These combined actions will reduce deployment risk, control total cost of ownership, and accelerate the realization of reliability and customer service benefits.
Transparent research methodology explaining interview-driven insights, documentary triangulation, technology maturity assessments, and validation practices used in the analysis
This analysis synthesizes primary and secondary research to present a balanced perspective on trends, risks, and strategic options. The primary research base comprises structured interviews with utility operators, network architects, systems integrators, and procurement specialists to capture real-world constraints and decision drivers. These qualitative insights were triangulated with technical white papers, standards documentation, and public regulatory filings to validate technology trajectories and policy influences. Where appropriate, comparative case studies of recent deployments provided granular lessons on timeline, integration challenges, and performance outcomes.
Analytical methods included technology maturity assessments, scenario analysis to stress-test procurement and supply chain responses, and interoperability reviews to assess integration barriers. The research process emphasized transparency and validation: findings were circulated to a subset of interviewees for fact-checking and to ensure that conclusions reflected operational realities. Limitations include variability in regional regulatory detail and the proprietary nature of some vendor roadmaps, which necessitated anonymizing sensitive input while preserving analytical fidelity. Overall, the methodology balances practitioner insight with documentary evidence to produce actionable guidance for decision-makers.
A concise conclusion emphasizing the imperative to balance rapid communications modernization with supply chain resilience, cybersecurity, and pragmatic deployment strategies
In summary, utility communications are transitioning from siloed assets to integrated platforms that underpin reliability, customer engagement, and energy transition objectives. The convergence of fiber, cellular, mesh, and satellite options, combined with cloud and edge computing paradigms, presents a suite of capabilities that can materially improve fault response, grid observability, and service predictability. However, these opportunities coexist with tangible risks from trade policy shifts, component supply volatility, and evolving cyber threats, which require proactive mitigation and adaptable architectures.
Decision-makers should prioritize interoperability, supply chain diversity, and cybersecurity while adopting phased modernization strategies that preserve existing investments. Regional regulatory conditions and end-user expectations will shape specific technical choices, so vendors and operators must negotiate flexible commercial terms and partnership models. Ultimately, organizations that balance tactical actions-such as strategic spares and hybrid deployments-with longer-term investments in workforce and standards adoption will be best positioned to realize operational improvements and to respond resiliently to future disruptions.
Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
184 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of AI-powered chatbots with natural language processing in utility mobile apps for personalized billing support and outage updates
- 5.2. Deployment of 5G-enabled smart meters to support two-way communication and dynamic pricing programs
- 5.3. Implementation of blockchain-based platforms for secure peer-to-peer energy trading and real-time consumption reporting
- 5.4. Adoption of voice assistants and smart speaker integration for hands-free utility account management and proactive outage alerts
- 5.5. Utilization of augmented reality tools for field crew communication on asset maintenance workflows and remote inspections
- 5.6. Leveraging GIS-based mobile communication for real-time outage mapping and hyperlocalized customer notifications
- 5.7. Development of unified customer portals integrating distributed renewable generation data with billing and consumption analytics
- 5.8. Use of predictive analytics and IoT sensor data to proactively inform residential customers about impending service disruptions
- 5.9. Collaboration between utilities and third-party aggregators for automated demand response via personalized customer messaging channels
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Utility Communication Market, by Communication Technology
- 8.1. Wired Technology
- 8.1.1. Digital Subscriber Line
- 8.1.2. Fiber Optic Communication
- 8.1.3. Power Line Communication
- 8.2. Wireless Technology
- 8.2.1. Cellular Communication
- 8.2.2. Radio Frequency Mesh
- 8.2.3. Satellite Communication
- 9. Utility Communication Market, by Utility Type
- 9.1. Electric Utility
- 9.2. Gas Utility
- 9.3. Water Utility
- 10. Utility Communication Market, by Application
- 10.1. Distribution Automation
- 10.2. Fault Management
- 10.3. Metering
- 10.3.1. Automatic Meter Reading
- 10.3.2. Smart Metering
- 10.4. Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition
- 11. Utility Communication Market, by Deployment Type
- 11.1. Cloud Based
- 11.2. On Premise
- 12. Utility Communication Market, by End User
- 12.1. Commercial
- 12.2. Industrial
- 12.3. Residential
- 13. Utility Communication Market, by Region
- 13.1. Americas
- 13.1.1. North America
- 13.1.2. Latin America
- 13.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 13.2.1. Europe
- 13.2.2. Middle East
- 13.2.3. Africa
- 13.3. Asia-Pacific
- 14. Utility Communication Market, by Group
- 14.1. ASEAN
- 14.2. GCC
- 14.3. European Union
- 14.4. BRICS
- 14.5. G7
- 14.6. NATO
- 15. Utility Communication Market, by Country
- 15.1. United States
- 15.2. Canada
- 15.3. Mexico
- 15.4. Brazil
- 15.5. United Kingdom
- 15.6. Germany
- 15.7. France
- 15.8. Russia
- 15.9. Italy
- 15.10. Spain
- 15.11. China
- 15.12. India
- 15.13. Japan
- 15.14. Australia
- 15.15. South Korea
- 16. Competitive Landscape
- 16.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 16.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 16.3. Competitive Analysis
- 16.3.1. Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
- 16.3.2. Schneider Electric SE
- 16.3.3. ABB Ltd
- 16.3.4. Itron, Inc.
- 16.3.5. Landis+Gyr AG
- 16.3.6. Cisco Systems, Inc.
- 16.3.7. General Electric Company
- 16.3.8. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
- 16.3.9. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ)
- 16.3.10. Nokia Corporation
- 16.3.11. Hitachi Energy Ltd.
- 16.3.12. Honeywell International Inc.
- 16.3.13. Xylem Inc.
- 16.3.14. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
- 16.3.15. Fujitsu Limited
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
