Urban Mobility Market by Transport Mode (Private Vehicle, Public Transport, Ride Hailing), Powertrain Type (Electric, Hybrid, Internal Combustion Engine), Vehicle Type - Global Forecast 2025-2032
Description
The Urban Mobility Market was valued at USD 14.02 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow to USD 14.93 billion in 2025, with a CAGR of 8.48%, reaching USD 26.89 billion by 2032.
Framing the contemporary urban mobility transformation through technology, policy, and shifting consumer preferences that redefine movement in cities
Urban mobility is undergoing a structural evolution driven by technological innovation, shifting consumer preferences, and intensified regulatory focus on decarbonization and congestion management. This landscape now blends legacy transportation models with emergent solutions ranging from electrified powertrains to digitally enabled shared mobility services. The interplay of infrastructure, policy, and capital allocation is reshaping how people and goods move within metropolitan areas and across regions, producing new entry points for private sector innovation as well as new responsibilities for public planners.
The modern mobility discussion cannot be separated from advances in vehicle electrification, battery chemistry, and software-defined mobility platforms. These technical vectors intersect with demand-side changes such as modal substitution, urban densification, and last-mile logistics growth. Consequently, stakeholders must consider not only vehicle acquisition and operational costs but also lifecycle emissions, interoperability of charging networks, and the resilience of complex supply chains that underpin vehicle production and component availability.
In response, corporate leaders and municipal authorities are recalibrating strategies around fleet electrification, digital ticketing, curb management, and integrated mobility-as-a-service offers. These strategic shifts are prompting new alliances between OEMs, fleet operators, utilities, and technology providers, creating both competitive pressure and collaborative opportunity. As a result, the sector is transitioning from point solutions to system-level thinking that treats mobility as an urban infrastructure service requiring coordinated investment and governance.
Identifying the structural tectonic shifts in urban mobility that reshape strategic priorities across electrification, data, and policy imperatives
Contemporary change in urban mobility is characterized by a handful of transformative shifts that alter competitive dynamics and operational priorities. First, electrification has progressed from niche to mainstream, prompting infrastructure investments and new supply chain dependencies. Improvements in battery energy density and manufacturing processes have heightened focus on materials sourcing, recycling pathways, and second-life applications, thereby expanding the stakeholder set to include raw material suppliers and end-of-life solution providers.
Second, digitalization is converging with mobility operations as telematics, route optimization, and integrated payment systems become core differentiators. Data-driven services enable dynamic pricing, predictive maintenance, and multimodal journey orchestration, which in turn change the nature of customer engagement and revenue models. This digital layer elevates software and data governance to strategic assets, with privacy, interoperability, and cyber resilience emerging as critical management areas.
Third, business models are shifting toward outcomes rather than assets. Mobility-as-a-service propositions, subscription-based access, and shared fleet deployments are changing ownership assumptions and creating opportunities for new value capture across the lifecycle. Finally, policy and regulatory frameworks are accelerating the transition by setting emissions targets, incentivizing low-emission fleets, and enforcing urban access restrictions. Taken together, these shifts require an integrated response from operators, policymakers, and suppliers that balances speed of deployment with long-term system sustainability.
Analyzing the layered and system-level effects of recent tariff measures on supply chains, procurement strategies, and trade governance in mobility
Recent tariff actions originating from the United States have introduced a layer of complexity to global supply chains and procurement strategies in the mobility sector. Trade policy adjustments affect the relative economics of imported components, particularly in segments reliant on cross-border sourcing of batteries, semiconductors, and powertrain subsystems. As a result, procurement teams and supply chain strategists have had to reassess supplier diversification, inventory policies, and nearshoring viability to maintain production continuity.
The cumulative impact extends beyond direct cost implications. Tariffs can catalyze strategic responses such as reshoring of manufacturing capacity, the acceleration of local supplier development programs, and renegotiation of long-term contracts to include tariff-contingent clauses. In addition, they influence the routing of finished vehicles and components through free trade zones and bonded logistics arrangements to mitigate cash flow and duty exposures.
Moreover, tariffs interact with parallel policy instruments such as incentives for electrification and domestic content requirements. This interaction compounds decision complexity for firms that operate across manufacturing footprints and sales territories. Importantly, companies face heightened compliance demands from customs classification, valuation practices, and documentation standards, which necessitate stronger trade governance and tariff engineering capabilities within procurement and legal functions. In sum, the tariff environment has shifted risk management from a primarily operational discipline to a core strategic consideration for mobility stakeholders.
Dissecting mobility segments to reveal how transport modes, nuanced powertrain taxonomies, and vehicle classes shape technology and infrastructure priorities
Segment-level differentiation offers a practical lens to align product development, service offers, and infrastructure investment with user needs and regulatory constraints. Based on transport mode, the market is studied across Private Vehicle, Public Transport, and Ride Hailing, and each mode exhibits distinct adoption pathways for electrification and digital integration. Private vehicles prioritize charging accessibility and total cost of ownership considerations, whereas public transport emphasizes fleet turnover cycles, depot charging logistics, and route-level energy demand. Ride hailing operators focus on utilization rates, rapid vehicle refresh, and interoperability with booking and payment platforms.
Based on powertrain type, the market is studied across Electric, Hybrid, and Internal Combustion Engine, with Electric further studied across Battery Electric Vehicle and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle, and Battery Electric Vehicle further analyzed across Lithium Ion and Solid State chemistries. The Hybrid category is further studied across Full Hybrid, Mild Hybrid, and Plug In Hybrid configurations. These distinctions matter because each powertrain variant imposes different requirements on thermal management, charging or refueling infrastructure, lifecycle maintenance, and regulatory compliance. For example, battery chemistry choices influence vehicle range, charging speed capabilities, and recycling pathways, while fuel cell systems entail hydrogen distribution and safety protocols.
Based on vehicle type, the market is studied across Commercial Vehicle, Passenger Vehicle, and Two Wheeler, each presenting varied duty cycles, payload constraints, and use-case economics. Commercial vehicles demand robust uptime, streamlined depot operations, and integrated telematics for route optimization. Passenger vehicles are sensitive to consumer expectations around convenience, aesthetics, and resale considerations. Two wheelers are often constrained by urban street environments and present unique opportunities to expand electrification quickly through lower-cost battery packs and compact charging solutions. Combined, these segmentation perspectives enable targeted product roadmaps, differentiated financing structures, and prioritized infrastructure investments.
Comparing regional mobility pathways to identify how distinct policy environments, urban forms, and industrial capabilities influence transition strategies
Regional dynamics shape the pace and character of mobility transitions, producing differentiated policy mixes, investment appetites, and infrastructure readiness. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on emissions and incentives for electrification coexist with a sprawling urban form that increases vehicle miles traveled in many metropolitan areas. This combination places a premium on high-capacity charging corridors, grid modernization, and fleet electrification programs that can demonstrate operational resilience in long-haul and regional freight contexts.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, diverse regulatory frameworks and urban densities create a mosaic of mobility outcomes. Western European cities often lead in congestion pricing, low-emission zones, and integrated public transport investments, while parts of the Middle East focus on rapid deployment of high-capacity transit corridors and large-scale mobility projects. Africa presents distinct opportunities for leapfrogging legacy infrastructure constraints through the adoption of compact electric two-wheelers and decentralized charging solutions that suit informal urban economies.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, dense megacities, and strong industrial ecosystems have accelerated adoption of electrified fleets and localized manufacturing. Several jurisdictions are advancing aggressive electrification roadmaps and investing heavily in battery production and charging infrastructure. Across the region, policy harmonization and cross-border logistics corridors are emerging priorities to support scale-up and to ensure interoperability of charging standards and vehicle certification practices. Taken together, these regional patterns highlight the need for tailored strategies that respect local regulatory drivers, infrastructure endowments, and consumer behaviors.
Examining corporate strategies and ecosystem partnerships that determine competitive positioning in an increasingly electrified and software defined mobility sector
Company-level dynamics reflect how incumbents and new entrants allocate resources across technology development, partnerships, and go-to-market models. Legacy OEMs are balancing investment in electrified platforms with the modernization of manufacturing lines and the establishment of battery and component partnerships. Their strategies increasingly involve captive software teams and data analytics capabilities to extract additional value from vehicle lifecycle services, predictive maintenance programs, and connected mobility offerings.
New entrants and technology firms are focusing on modular service propositions, software-defined features, and rapid experimentation with subscription models and fleet operations. These players often emphasize agile product cycles and data monetization opportunities that complement traditional vehicle revenue. Meanwhile, suppliers and Tier 1 producers are evolving to provide integrated solutions-combining hardware, power electronics, and digital services-to remain relevant as vehicles become more electrified and software driven.
Across the competitive landscape, strategic alliances are becoming more common as companies seek to accelerate technology adoption while sharing capital intensity. Joint ventures, strategic equity stakes, and co-development arrangements are frequent mechanisms to align capabilities across battery supply, charging infrastructure, and service ecosystems. At the same time, procurement excellence and supply chain transparency are central to maintaining operational resilience amid trade and policy volatility.
Actionable strategic imperatives for mobility executives to strengthen resiliency, scale digital services, and align infrastructure investments with regulatory realities
Industry leaders must adopt a multi-dimensional approach that addresses technology, operations, and policy engagement simultaneously. First, pursue a pragmatic localization strategy that balances cost, risk, and time-to-market by identifying high-priority components for nearshoring while maintaining global supplier relationships for specialized subsystems. This approach reduces exposure to trade disruptions and supports faster response to regulatory shifts.
Second, invest in interoperable digital platforms that enable modular services across ownership models. By standardizing telematics, billing, and customer interfaces, firms can scale offerings across private, shared, and public mobility channels while preserving opportunities for monetization through data services. Third, prioritize cross-functional capabilities in trade compliance, tariff engineering, and customs optimization to proactively manage the administrative burden of changing trade regimes.
Fourth, accelerate partnerships with utilities and local authorities to co-design charging infrastructure that aligns with grid capacity and urban planning objectives. Coordinated pilots that integrate demand management, vehicle-to-grid trials, and strategic depot electrification will minimize operational disruptions and inform scalable deployment models. Finally, embed sustainability and circularity into product lifecycles through battery recycling programs, second-life use cases, and material traceability initiatives that respond to investor and regulator scrutiny while unlocking new revenue pathways.
Explaining the robust mixed-methods research approach that combined expert interviews, document analysis, and scenario triangulation to ensure credible insights
The research underpinning these insights employed a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative expert consultations, document analysis, and cross-validated secondary sources. Primary interviews included conversations with senior executives across OEMs, fleet operators, component suppliers, utilities, and municipal mobility planners to capture operational perspectives and strategic intent. These interviews were supplemented by technical reviews of policy documents, regulatory filings, and industry standards to ensure alignment with current legislative frameworks and infrastructure commitments.
Data triangulation was used to validate thematic findings by cross-referencing supply chain disclosures, trade and customs reporting, and publicly available technical white papers on battery chemistry and vehicle architectures. Scenario-based analysis helped surface plausible responses to trade policy shifts and technology adoption inflection points without assigning probabilistic forecasts. Methodological rigor was maintained through iterative peer review of findings and anonymized verification of interview summaries with contributing stakeholders.
Ethical research practices guided participant consent and data handling, and sensitivity to commercially confidential information informed the aggregation approach of case examples. Limitations were acknowledged where public data is uneven across regions or where rapid technology change can alter technical assumptions. These constraints were managed by focusing on observable trends, stakeholder intent, and verifiable policy moves.
Concluding reflections on system-level priorities and the integrated governance needed to steer urban mobility toward resilient and equitable outcomes
In conclusion, the urban mobility landscape is being reshaped by an interdependent set of forces that include electrification, digitalization, evolving business models, and trade policy adjustments. These forces interact across segments, regions, and company strategies to create both risk and opportunity for stakeholders across the value chain. Decision-makers who integrate supply chain resilience, interoperable digital platforms, and coordinated infrastructure partnerships into their strategic planning will be better positioned to navigate complexity and capture emerging value pools.
Moving forward, the emphasis will be on pragmatic execution supported by strong governance. Firms must balance rapid deployment with due diligence around grid impacts, material sourcing, and regulatory compliance. Municipal and regional planners will need to foster public-private collaborations that align incentives and distribute investment responsibilities fairly. Above all, viewing mobility as a system service rather than a collection of discrete products will enable more sustainable and scalable outcomes that meet the mobility needs of diverse urban populations.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Framing the contemporary urban mobility transformation through technology, policy, and shifting consumer preferences that redefine movement in cities
Urban mobility is undergoing a structural evolution driven by technological innovation, shifting consumer preferences, and intensified regulatory focus on decarbonization and congestion management. This landscape now blends legacy transportation models with emergent solutions ranging from electrified powertrains to digitally enabled shared mobility services. The interplay of infrastructure, policy, and capital allocation is reshaping how people and goods move within metropolitan areas and across regions, producing new entry points for private sector innovation as well as new responsibilities for public planners.
The modern mobility discussion cannot be separated from advances in vehicle electrification, battery chemistry, and software-defined mobility platforms. These technical vectors intersect with demand-side changes such as modal substitution, urban densification, and last-mile logistics growth. Consequently, stakeholders must consider not only vehicle acquisition and operational costs but also lifecycle emissions, interoperability of charging networks, and the resilience of complex supply chains that underpin vehicle production and component availability.
In response, corporate leaders and municipal authorities are recalibrating strategies around fleet electrification, digital ticketing, curb management, and integrated mobility-as-a-service offers. These strategic shifts are prompting new alliances between OEMs, fleet operators, utilities, and technology providers, creating both competitive pressure and collaborative opportunity. As a result, the sector is transitioning from point solutions to system-level thinking that treats mobility as an urban infrastructure service requiring coordinated investment and governance.
Identifying the structural tectonic shifts in urban mobility that reshape strategic priorities across electrification, data, and policy imperatives
Contemporary change in urban mobility is characterized by a handful of transformative shifts that alter competitive dynamics and operational priorities. First, electrification has progressed from niche to mainstream, prompting infrastructure investments and new supply chain dependencies. Improvements in battery energy density and manufacturing processes have heightened focus on materials sourcing, recycling pathways, and second-life applications, thereby expanding the stakeholder set to include raw material suppliers and end-of-life solution providers.
Second, digitalization is converging with mobility operations as telematics, route optimization, and integrated payment systems become core differentiators. Data-driven services enable dynamic pricing, predictive maintenance, and multimodal journey orchestration, which in turn change the nature of customer engagement and revenue models. This digital layer elevates software and data governance to strategic assets, with privacy, interoperability, and cyber resilience emerging as critical management areas.
Third, business models are shifting toward outcomes rather than assets. Mobility-as-a-service propositions, subscription-based access, and shared fleet deployments are changing ownership assumptions and creating opportunities for new value capture across the lifecycle. Finally, policy and regulatory frameworks are accelerating the transition by setting emissions targets, incentivizing low-emission fleets, and enforcing urban access restrictions. Taken together, these shifts require an integrated response from operators, policymakers, and suppliers that balances speed of deployment with long-term system sustainability.
Analyzing the layered and system-level effects of recent tariff measures on supply chains, procurement strategies, and trade governance in mobility
Recent tariff actions originating from the United States have introduced a layer of complexity to global supply chains and procurement strategies in the mobility sector. Trade policy adjustments affect the relative economics of imported components, particularly in segments reliant on cross-border sourcing of batteries, semiconductors, and powertrain subsystems. As a result, procurement teams and supply chain strategists have had to reassess supplier diversification, inventory policies, and nearshoring viability to maintain production continuity.
The cumulative impact extends beyond direct cost implications. Tariffs can catalyze strategic responses such as reshoring of manufacturing capacity, the acceleration of local supplier development programs, and renegotiation of long-term contracts to include tariff-contingent clauses. In addition, they influence the routing of finished vehicles and components through free trade zones and bonded logistics arrangements to mitigate cash flow and duty exposures.
Moreover, tariffs interact with parallel policy instruments such as incentives for electrification and domestic content requirements. This interaction compounds decision complexity for firms that operate across manufacturing footprints and sales territories. Importantly, companies face heightened compliance demands from customs classification, valuation practices, and documentation standards, which necessitate stronger trade governance and tariff engineering capabilities within procurement and legal functions. In sum, the tariff environment has shifted risk management from a primarily operational discipline to a core strategic consideration for mobility stakeholders.
Dissecting mobility segments to reveal how transport modes, nuanced powertrain taxonomies, and vehicle classes shape technology and infrastructure priorities
Segment-level differentiation offers a practical lens to align product development, service offers, and infrastructure investment with user needs and regulatory constraints. Based on transport mode, the market is studied across Private Vehicle, Public Transport, and Ride Hailing, and each mode exhibits distinct adoption pathways for electrification and digital integration. Private vehicles prioritize charging accessibility and total cost of ownership considerations, whereas public transport emphasizes fleet turnover cycles, depot charging logistics, and route-level energy demand. Ride hailing operators focus on utilization rates, rapid vehicle refresh, and interoperability with booking and payment platforms.
Based on powertrain type, the market is studied across Electric, Hybrid, and Internal Combustion Engine, with Electric further studied across Battery Electric Vehicle and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle, and Battery Electric Vehicle further analyzed across Lithium Ion and Solid State chemistries. The Hybrid category is further studied across Full Hybrid, Mild Hybrid, and Plug In Hybrid configurations. These distinctions matter because each powertrain variant imposes different requirements on thermal management, charging or refueling infrastructure, lifecycle maintenance, and regulatory compliance. For example, battery chemistry choices influence vehicle range, charging speed capabilities, and recycling pathways, while fuel cell systems entail hydrogen distribution and safety protocols.
Based on vehicle type, the market is studied across Commercial Vehicle, Passenger Vehicle, and Two Wheeler, each presenting varied duty cycles, payload constraints, and use-case economics. Commercial vehicles demand robust uptime, streamlined depot operations, and integrated telematics for route optimization. Passenger vehicles are sensitive to consumer expectations around convenience, aesthetics, and resale considerations. Two wheelers are often constrained by urban street environments and present unique opportunities to expand electrification quickly through lower-cost battery packs and compact charging solutions. Combined, these segmentation perspectives enable targeted product roadmaps, differentiated financing structures, and prioritized infrastructure investments.
Comparing regional mobility pathways to identify how distinct policy environments, urban forms, and industrial capabilities influence transition strategies
Regional dynamics shape the pace and character of mobility transitions, producing differentiated policy mixes, investment appetites, and infrastructure readiness. In the Americas, regulatory emphasis on emissions and incentives for electrification coexist with a sprawling urban form that increases vehicle miles traveled in many metropolitan areas. This combination places a premium on high-capacity charging corridors, grid modernization, and fleet electrification programs that can demonstrate operational resilience in long-haul and regional freight contexts.
In Europe, Middle East & Africa, diverse regulatory frameworks and urban densities create a mosaic of mobility outcomes. Western European cities often lead in congestion pricing, low-emission zones, and integrated public transport investments, while parts of the Middle East focus on rapid deployment of high-capacity transit corridors and large-scale mobility projects. Africa presents distinct opportunities for leapfrogging legacy infrastructure constraints through the adoption of compact electric two-wheelers and decentralized charging solutions that suit informal urban economies.
In Asia-Pacific, rapid urbanization, dense megacities, and strong industrial ecosystems have accelerated adoption of electrified fleets and localized manufacturing. Several jurisdictions are advancing aggressive electrification roadmaps and investing heavily in battery production and charging infrastructure. Across the region, policy harmonization and cross-border logistics corridors are emerging priorities to support scale-up and to ensure interoperability of charging standards and vehicle certification practices. Taken together, these regional patterns highlight the need for tailored strategies that respect local regulatory drivers, infrastructure endowments, and consumer behaviors.
Examining corporate strategies and ecosystem partnerships that determine competitive positioning in an increasingly electrified and software defined mobility sector
Company-level dynamics reflect how incumbents and new entrants allocate resources across technology development, partnerships, and go-to-market models. Legacy OEMs are balancing investment in electrified platforms with the modernization of manufacturing lines and the establishment of battery and component partnerships. Their strategies increasingly involve captive software teams and data analytics capabilities to extract additional value from vehicle lifecycle services, predictive maintenance programs, and connected mobility offerings.
New entrants and technology firms are focusing on modular service propositions, software-defined features, and rapid experimentation with subscription models and fleet operations. These players often emphasize agile product cycles and data monetization opportunities that complement traditional vehicle revenue. Meanwhile, suppliers and Tier 1 producers are evolving to provide integrated solutions-combining hardware, power electronics, and digital services-to remain relevant as vehicles become more electrified and software driven.
Across the competitive landscape, strategic alliances are becoming more common as companies seek to accelerate technology adoption while sharing capital intensity. Joint ventures, strategic equity stakes, and co-development arrangements are frequent mechanisms to align capabilities across battery supply, charging infrastructure, and service ecosystems. At the same time, procurement excellence and supply chain transparency are central to maintaining operational resilience amid trade and policy volatility.
Actionable strategic imperatives for mobility executives to strengthen resiliency, scale digital services, and align infrastructure investments with regulatory realities
Industry leaders must adopt a multi-dimensional approach that addresses technology, operations, and policy engagement simultaneously. First, pursue a pragmatic localization strategy that balances cost, risk, and time-to-market by identifying high-priority components for nearshoring while maintaining global supplier relationships for specialized subsystems. This approach reduces exposure to trade disruptions and supports faster response to regulatory shifts.
Second, invest in interoperable digital platforms that enable modular services across ownership models. By standardizing telematics, billing, and customer interfaces, firms can scale offerings across private, shared, and public mobility channels while preserving opportunities for monetization through data services. Third, prioritize cross-functional capabilities in trade compliance, tariff engineering, and customs optimization to proactively manage the administrative burden of changing trade regimes.
Fourth, accelerate partnerships with utilities and local authorities to co-design charging infrastructure that aligns with grid capacity and urban planning objectives. Coordinated pilots that integrate demand management, vehicle-to-grid trials, and strategic depot electrification will minimize operational disruptions and inform scalable deployment models. Finally, embed sustainability and circularity into product lifecycles through battery recycling programs, second-life use cases, and material traceability initiatives that respond to investor and regulator scrutiny while unlocking new revenue pathways.
Explaining the robust mixed-methods research approach that combined expert interviews, document analysis, and scenario triangulation to ensure credible insights
The research underpinning these insights employed a mixed-methods approach combining qualitative expert consultations, document analysis, and cross-validated secondary sources. Primary interviews included conversations with senior executives across OEMs, fleet operators, component suppliers, utilities, and municipal mobility planners to capture operational perspectives and strategic intent. These interviews were supplemented by technical reviews of policy documents, regulatory filings, and industry standards to ensure alignment with current legislative frameworks and infrastructure commitments.
Data triangulation was used to validate thematic findings by cross-referencing supply chain disclosures, trade and customs reporting, and publicly available technical white papers on battery chemistry and vehicle architectures. Scenario-based analysis helped surface plausible responses to trade policy shifts and technology adoption inflection points without assigning probabilistic forecasts. Methodological rigor was maintained through iterative peer review of findings and anonymized verification of interview summaries with contributing stakeholders.
Ethical research practices guided participant consent and data handling, and sensitivity to commercially confidential information informed the aggregation approach of case examples. Limitations were acknowledged where public data is uneven across regions or where rapid technology change can alter technical assumptions. These constraints were managed by focusing on observable trends, stakeholder intent, and verifiable policy moves.
Concluding reflections on system-level priorities and the integrated governance needed to steer urban mobility toward resilient and equitable outcomes
In conclusion, the urban mobility landscape is being reshaped by an interdependent set of forces that include electrification, digitalization, evolving business models, and trade policy adjustments. These forces interact across segments, regions, and company strategies to create both risk and opportunity for stakeholders across the value chain. Decision-makers who integrate supply chain resilience, interoperable digital platforms, and coordinated infrastructure partnerships into their strategic planning will be better positioned to navigate complexity and capture emerging value pools.
Moving forward, the emphasis will be on pragmatic execution supported by strong governance. Firms must balance rapid deployment with due diligence around grid impacts, material sourcing, and regulatory compliance. Municipal and regional planners will need to foster public-private collaborations that align incentives and distribute investment responsibilities fairly. Above all, viewing mobility as a system service rather than a collection of discrete products will enable more sustainable and scalable outcomes that meet the mobility needs of diverse urban populations.
Please Note: PDF & Excel + Online Access - 1 Year
Table of Contents
199 Pages
- 1. Preface
- 1.1. Objectives of the Study
- 1.2. Market Segmentation & Coverage
- 1.3. Years Considered for the Study
- 1.4. Currency
- 1.5. Language
- 1.6. Stakeholders
- 2. Research Methodology
- 3. Executive Summary
- 4. Market Overview
- 5. Market Insights
- 5.1. Integration of micromobility data analytics platforms for real-time urban network optimization
- 5.2. Expansion of electric shared scooter fleets with integrated battery swapping infrastructure
- 5.3. Deployment of AI-driven traffic management systems to reduce urban congestion and emissions
- 5.4. Partnerships between ride-hailing services and public transit agencies for seamless multimodal journeys
- 5.5. Implementation of curbside management solutions to streamline last-mile delivery operations
- 6. Cumulative Impact of United States Tariffs 2025
- 7. Cumulative Impact of Artificial Intelligence 2025
- 8. Urban Mobility Market, by Transport Mode
- 8.1. Private Vehicle
- 8.2. Public Transport
- 8.3. Ride Hailing
- 9. Urban Mobility Market, by Powertrain Type
- 9.1. Electric
- 9.1.1. Battery Electric Vehicle
- 9.1.1.1. Lithium Ion
- 9.1.1.2. Solid State
- 9.1.2. Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle
- 9.2. Hybrid
- 9.2.1. Full Hybrid
- 9.2.2. Mild Hybrid
- 9.2.3. Plug In Hybrid
- 9.3. Internal Combustion Engine
- 10. Urban Mobility Market, by Vehicle Type
- 10.1. Commercial Vehicle
- 10.2. Passenger Vehicle
- 10.3. Two Wheeler
- 11. Urban Mobility Market, by Region
- 11.1. Americas
- 11.1.1. North America
- 11.1.2. Latin America
- 11.2. Europe, Middle East & Africa
- 11.2.1. Europe
- 11.2.2. Middle East
- 11.2.3. Africa
- 11.3. Asia-Pacific
- 12. Urban Mobility Market, by Group
- 12.1. ASEAN
- 12.2. GCC
- 12.3. European Union
- 12.4. BRICS
- 12.5. G7
- 12.6. NATO
- 13. Urban Mobility Market, by Country
- 13.1. United States
- 13.2. Canada
- 13.3. Mexico
- 13.4. Brazil
- 13.5. United Kingdom
- 13.6. Germany
- 13.7. France
- 13.8. Russia
- 13.9. Italy
- 13.10. Spain
- 13.11. China
- 13.12. India
- 13.13. Japan
- 13.14. Australia
- 13.15. South Korea
- 14. Competitive Landscape
- 14.1. Market Share Analysis, 2024
- 14.2. FPNV Positioning Matrix, 2024
- 14.3. Competitive Analysis
- 14.3.1. Uber Technologies, Inc.
- 14.3.2. DiDi Global Inc.
- 14.3.3. Grab Holdings Inc.
- 14.3.4. Lyft, Inc.
- 14.3.5. ANI Technologies Private Limited
- 14.3.6. Bolt Technology OÜ
- 14.3.7. Yandex N.V.
- 14.3.8. Neutron Holdings, Inc.
- 14.3.9. Bird Rides, Inc.
- 14.3.10. Via Transportation, Inc.
- 14.3.11. Toyota Motor Corporation
Pricing
Currency Rates
Questions or Comments?
Our team has the ability to search within reports to verify it suits your needs. We can also help maximize your budget by finding sections of reports you can purchase.
